Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be
backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why
are you making it needlessly complex?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr.
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
The online defrag runs daily. I see it scheduled for 1:00a.m. to 7:00a.m.
every day. Is this OK? Just wondering if I should change this. What is
the recommended time for Online maintenance to run and for how long? Their
is a radio button for
Casey,
Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to
kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our
secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School,
No, not 'always'. The key thing is to make sure the online maint window
is outside of your backup window, otherwise the backup process will halt
the maintenance. 01:00 - 07:00 is ok. If the window is larger than is
required by the process, multiple runs of the maintenance take place.
Check your
Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to
kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our
secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the
same symptoms - it sits in
Exchange version and SP level?
Windows version and SP level?
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM
To: Exchange
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where
to find out the level!
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
Exchange
I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However...
While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx
error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this
article may shed some light on the issue.
Problem is, I don't get an acutal error, just a delayed delivery report.
I have to delete the message from the queue for the NDR to be spawned
back to me. When I do that, I get the same results I do from the
kpafilms.com domain:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
That article fits perfectly I believe. Thanks for all of your help!
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited.
Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange
server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is
unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are
complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck
of
Sounds like a DNS issue.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
DNS would be my guess too.
The other week we replaced a network card in an Exchange server. During the
course of this it acquired a DHCP address. This DHCP address was retained
in the DNS server records even after the new network card was given the
server's original address. NT4 clients could
Yes, the Exchange Server can be pinged. I haven't been able to find any
problem with the DNS.
- Original Message -
From: Shotton Jolyon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
DNS
Pinging doesn't necessarily mean you have no DNS issue :)
Can you telnet to port 25 of your exchange server from your machine?
Have you run a Traceroute from your machine to see where things might be
going amiss?
Has someone added a device on your network with the same IP address as
your
No recommended time that I know of. The only thing I try to do is make sur
eit runs outside of my daily backups, and before everyone starts logging in
in the morning.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Bridges, Samantha
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday,
Yes, I can telnet to the smtp port on the exchange server.
tracert shows no problems. Its one hop and 10ms
No there are no other devices on the vlan.
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:51
Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from
the desktop?
- Original Message -
From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Just started this
My take on this is that it sounds like the minimum requirement is end to end secure
connection over the Internet (as Andrey pointed out)...which does sound like a TLS
candidate. The problem with using PGP or the like is that you then rely on the
customer (client) to encrypt the email. If the
There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic
logging to maximum.
Yes I can rpcping the server.
- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: Help.
IS Management is one of those things best left alone in MHO. Unless it is
causing an issue with thing such as your backup, just leave it.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Online
Nothing indicating that it is not ok.
I can't believe this is happening today. This sucks
Global Catalog ok ?
- Original Message -
From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: Help.
Your original message indicated that you restarted the servers. Do you have
multiple Exchange servers, all with the same issue?
-Original Message-
From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to
Go into your OUTLOOK client and change the connection from the DNS name
to the IP Address and see if you can make a connection that way.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
I've got a Perl CGI script that allows users to manage distribution
lists they own. Interested?
-Original Message-
From: Phil Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Users managing Distribution
Is NetBIOS still enabled on the LAN connection facing the clients?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 July 2003 15:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Go into your OUTLOOK client and change the connection from
I do have two servers, but all clients are on one. We moved off the other
server about a year ago to this new server.
- Original Message -
From: Lynne July [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect
Holy crap. That script worked great.
Thanks!
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Address Lists
I've got a script that does that: (link might wrap)
Actually, the 4xx error is correct, as this is a recoverable error, and its
being generated by his MTA not the remote one.
He's resolving an MX record but failing to connect to any of the named mail
exchangers at that time. Per RFC2821, 4yz replies are appropriate in cases
where a retry of the
I take my last comment back.
Successful RPC binding using these parameters:
network address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
endpoint = 2256
UUID =
protocol sequence = mcacn_ip_tcp
Server Statistics:
#Calls Received at Server = 0
#Calls Initiated by Server = 0
#Packets Received at Server = 0
#Packets Initiated
Doesn't seem to work with IP address.
Hmmm
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Go into your OUTLOOK client and change the connection
Can you do telnet to the server's IP address on port 135? (RPC)
How about ports 137 - 139 ? (NetBIOS)
-Original Message-
From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
I do have
Ahh, thus my confusion. I assumed the 4xx error would come from the remote
mail server.
Well, Casey, did SP3 fix your problem?
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL
Holy crap.
I wrote that script while working, well, techically here, but while we were
owned by a larger company, which had a penchant for acquiring other
companies. On the order of at least one a quarter, if not more.
I tend to start with it and modify it as necessary to perform various tasks.
I have to wait until Monday to apply the SP3 - you know, change
management policy
So, Roger, If I experience the same problem when sending to two
different domains that are configured alike. Who's end is the problem
on? Even though I'm getting to their servers, the problem would seem
from a
I can telnet to 135 and 139 on both servers
- Original Message -
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Can you do telnet to the server's IP address on port
Nevermind this. I forgot to run the listener on the server.
- Original Message -
From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
I take my last comment back.
Well that stinks.
What happens if you try to create a new profile on a machine? Can you
resolve the mailbox and server names? If not, can you enter the server's IP
and get resolution?
M
- Original Message -
From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, there are two problems.
First, their primary MX isn't accepting mail. That's their issue.
Your MTA isn't attempting delivery to secondary MX records. That's your
issue.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems
Anybody know where i can download a copy of scancal
thanks for your help
***
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged
Try stopping and restarting the RPC service (although I have some faint
memory that there's a problem and you can't do this for some odd reason.)
If that doesn't help, or you can't do it, I'd uninstall and reinstall TCP/IP
from the server.
- Original Message -
From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL
No, neither work.
- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Well that stinks.
What happens if you try to create a new profile on a
Actually RPCPING was successful. I hadn't started the listener on the other
side. My bad
- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Try
We've recently worked out the what's going on with a problem we're seeing with
outbound SMTP mail flow from E2K.
On our live system (2 back-ends, 2 front-ends and a legacy Ex55 IMS system that we're
in the process of removing) outbound mail normally flows through the FE's, but
sometimes goes
What about hardcoding the Exchange server name and IP address in the
HOSTS file?
-Original Message-
From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Just started this morning. When
Looks like people who had Outlook open before this problem started are still
able to use the exchange server. Those who try to startup Outlook and
connect have the problem.
- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I did try it but it doesn't seem to help. The hostname for the exchange
server is resolving anyway.
- Original Message -
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to
Anything relating to the config of the VLAN and routing rules?
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Todd Boynton wrote:
I did try it but it doesn't seem to help. The hostname for the exchange
server is resolving anyway.
- Original Message -
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Your downstream MTA is supposed to accept all mail from your MTA. That's why
the option says ..forward ALL mail... (emphasis added). To resolve this
issue, mail for domains which this external MTA is authoritative should be
sent through another connector.
On 07/18/03 09:56, Phillips, Alan [EMAIL
Your downstream MTA is supposed to accept all mail from your
MTA. That's why
the option says ..forward ALL mail... (emphasis added). To
resolve this
issue, mail for domains which this external MTA is
authoritative should be
sent through another connector.
Aha. Yes, I see what you mean -
Doesn't seem to be.
FYI:
When I go look at the monitoring on the services in exchange manager the
critical state is stopped, but when I drill down to the listed services,
they are all running.
- Original Message -
From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello,
I have Exchange 2000, SP3 configured NOT to allow out of office replies. I have a user
who is trying to write a rule in Outlook 2000 to get around this so she can reply to
anyone who makes inquiries from off campus. She did some research and found that this
rule would work if I enable
GFI says their MailSecurity product is Exchange 2003 ready but I have
not personally tried it with Ex2003 yet. It works great with Exchange
2000.
http://www.gfi.com/news/en/miscmsteched03.htm
Greg
-Original Message-
From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July
Get it from PSS; that's where I got mine. It'll be free, too.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Joe Haines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 18 July 2003 15:49
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: corrupted calendar
Subject: corrupted calendar
Anybody know where i can download
Mail loops for sure
-Original Message-
From: Piper, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Enabling Allow Automatic Replies
Hello,
I have Exchange 2000, SP3 configured NOT to allow out of office replies.
I have a user who
On 07/18/03 10:30, Phillips, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your downstream MTA is supposed to accept all mail from your
MTA. That's why
the option says ..forward ALL mail... (emphasis added). To
resolve this
issue, mail for domains which this external MTA is
authoritative should be
sent
Yes,
Domain Prep will change all permissions to default. We did that and it
worked well.
Walt
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:40 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
Conversation: Running DomainPrep in an existing
Hello everyone.
In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy
that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts.
Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked
out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon
Andrey,
I ran into this same issue shortly after we upgraded our domain to
Win2k AD last summer. Funny thing was, all the lockouts were coming from
Windows 98 workstations. I could never put my finger on it, and in
desperation finally disabled account lockouts. However, invalid password
We currently run URL scan as part of the IIS Lockdown tool on our OWA
2000 servers. Users hate that this blocks opening messages with reserved
characters (,%,./,.., etc) in the message subject line. However, after
being hacked (from on campus users) we feel it is necessary.
Question: Does OWA
Does it happen after they change their passwords? Usually that's because
they have multiple machines logged in
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov,
If they are logged into more than one computer with an open profile, and
execute a password change on another computer, something in that other
open profile could be trying to authenticate and is using the old wrong
password.
Walt
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
What OS are you users running? Win 95,98 or ME?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Hello
This happened to us here. We found out that their drive mapping were
still trying to authenticate with the old passwords. So we disconnected
them and then recreated the drive mappings. Problem solved
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Roger and others,
We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile.
Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for
disaster recovery.
If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks)
for
Are the machines that are getting locked out running Windows 98? If so,
checkout:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;278558
The Q article numbers have changed a few times since I first encountered
this error a few years ago, but this link should get you started...
David
Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then...
Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup agent
to delete all VM's older than XX days?
I'd also suggest getting a clarification of longer than needed from the
attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer!
Hi guys,
A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange
server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3,
Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients.
When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including
Exchange, but always have
Does a small to medium sized company with no particular high-sensitivity data
need...encryption, authentication beyond Windows security, VLANs, ACLs on routers, etc?
I agree intrusion detection is likely necessary.
I wonder if the hype of vendors is driving this or actual security issues.
Pls
Why not store the voice mail messages in public folders (each person
gets their own of course) that live on a dedicated pf store for vm and
set a different type of backup schedule for that pf store? You could
also set up the folders so that they delete any messages in the folders
that are over
I believe everyone here is on Win2K Pros
-Original Message-
From: David Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Are the machines that are getting locked out
Roger and others,
We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest. We have a high legal profile.
Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages longer than needed for
disaster recovery.
If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up just enough (say, 1-2 weeks)
for
No, they just log on with a correct password once and bam! - locked out
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
Does it happen
Win2K Pro on desktops
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
What OS are you users running? Win 95,98 or ME?
-Original
Sorry about the double post.
Jesse
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe:
remember it looks at the cached names cache first clear that that may help
From: Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:06:02 -0700
Hi
Could not hurt to verify that RPC is working correctly using something
like rpings. You could also configured a client that is normally having
problems to used IMAP or POP and see if it goes awaycould be the VPN
having problems with RPCs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right - but what Roger is getting at is if these people are possibly
already logged in on another computer. Situation would be: User is
logged on computer. Forgets he/she is logged on. Logs on to main
computer and changes password. Still logged on to other computer with
old password. Can
My Outlook client won't even let me try and send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED],com
and when trying to route the same through Exchange using a POP3 client
(SMTP) the Exchange SMTP refuses to accept it for delivery.
So, I think[1]
the risk is relatively low.
[1] Not much thought
I've got a Cisco tool that can go in and scrub out the VM's. That isn't an issue. Or
as you said, I could script ExMerge.
The problem is, if the VM's make it to a store which has regular email, then they'll
get backed up that night with the regular email, and then they're on that tape
That makes sense
But the problem reports that we are receiving indicate that the users
were not trying to change the password. They were just logging in and
trying to do work as usual.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:39 PM
To:
Cisco won't authenticate to a PF. It requires a mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco
Uni fied Messaging
Why not
If you wanted to get all convoluted and all you could make hidden
mailboxes that forward to the pfs. Its a lot of work and it would not
be pretty..but I bet it would work.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendel, Jesse
Sent: Friday, July
Nope. Not DNS.
MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor
if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to
1500 (we use 1400).
Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on
communications, and sends it at the existing
Yeah, and it took 5-6 calls to me to unlock that account, if I remember
correctly!
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have more than one IP address on your Exchange server?
Or if your server is behind NAT, then it would have an internal address
and external address...
Here is what I am getting at. Maybe under some circumstances Outlook is
trying to get to the wrong IP address.
Try the HOSTS file in this
I guess I'm not being clear.
The problem is, to make Cisco's UM work properly, the user MUST be logged in with the
user account/mailbox that the voice mail is going to. Lets call that: juser-v (John
User - Voice)
As a consequence, if the user then composes an email, because they're primarily
Hello again. Sorry for asking too many questions today.
Our Exchange 2000 OWA is set up to use windows integrated
authentication.
Some users are reporting that when they go to OWA from their PC at work,
they get prompted to enter their logon credentials.
We have checked to make sure that their
Um...
The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM
doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally
planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have
people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are
logged in as,
No Gary, we are not talking about Bahama Breeze.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni
fied Messaging
Um...
The problem
See? That's why I don't try and be helpful very often any more! g
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 14:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni
fied Messaging
Yes. Unity Messaging.
What we've been told by Cisco and by the integration consultants, is that with
secondary authentication as you just described it, and as we want to do, the Cisco
Softphone won't a) turn on the light on the phone for voice mail's waiting, and b)
Unity won't let you click
What desktop operating system are your users on? That could be your
clue.
Walt
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:15 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
Conversation: weird logon issue with OWA
Subject: weird logon
Give them permission on the security tab.
Walt
-Original Message-
From: Phil Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Sunday, July 13, 2003 5:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
Conversation: Users managing Distribution List membership
Subject: Users managing Distribution List
I tested from my Win2K Pro desktop. Logged onto windows as the user.
Started OWA - got prompted.
-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA
What desktop operating
It's a feature
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: weird logon issue with OWA
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:45:24 -0400
I tested from my Win2K Pro desktop. Logged onto windows as the user.
Unclear. But a security audit from a trusted firm with an understanding that
any implementations of recommendations would be done by another firm might
serve to provide a more unbiased answer than what one might get from a
vendor directly.
On 07/18/03 12:26, Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, that's a slightly different set of perspectives. It doesn't work is
different to certain aspects operate differently or not at all.
Redlight - works fine; I use the softphone as a secondary phone, when I'm
elsewhere in the building or travelling; if I get a message, my deskphone
light still
Gary,
k.
Thanks very much for your report on how it works for you.
I think I'm going to implement it like you have it, which is with the secondary
account for voice.
If people want to listen through the phone, they can dial into the voice mail through
the phone.
Thanks everyone for your
Chris,
How were you able to determine that the drive mapping was causing the
problem? We have a similar problem here, and can't find anything in the
event logs that pinpoints the problem. It would be easy enough to test by
disconnecting drive mappings, but I'd be happier if there was something
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
