Defrag errors

Does anyone know what this defrag error means? And how to fix the problem? Also, anyone have a link to some good online ESEUTIL documentation? Other than the Microsoft website, want to get a good comprehensive manual for ESEUTIL usage. Error :- Operation terminated with error -1603

Re: Defrag errors

Neil, Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:45:11 AM, you typed: Does anyone know what this defrag error means? And how to fix the problem? Also, anyone have a link to some good online ESEUTIL documentation? Other than the Microsoft website, want to get a good comprehensive manual for ESEUTIL

RE: Defrag errors

Already tried that, try adding the 1603 into the equation and there is not listing for that error number. Ive also tried the search term Currency not on a record it lists JetPack errors, which is just a list of possible errors, with no fixes. And then it has something listed about Microsoft

RE: Help with NDR

OL2K is being used for all msgs - fail or not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with NDR What type of client is being used for the just the

RE: Needed: Lab Rats that work for Retail corporations

There are other book store chains than Borders? Who'da thunk? You guys still near the airport in AA? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT)

OWA not working when it redirects to SSL

Hello Guys, We have Exchange OWA on the following address https://lib-mail.wpbpl.com/exchange/logon.asp The web server Lib-Mail is published through ISA. The problem is we get a DNS error host not found when we try to access the site from the outside. It however works fine if

RE: Help with NDR

I would contact the sending email administrator and ask him if sees anything on his end. From: Sean Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with NDR Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:13:16 -0500 OL2K is being

Logic Validation

Can someone double-check me? If I have another server in my ORG but in a different SITE, I should only have to create a SITE connector between it and ONE server in my site (a bridgehead) and NOT every server in my site for users to exchange mail . . .correct? TIA Chris

IMC out bound queue question

I have read about other folks having troubles with thier outbound queue getting hammered, and mine is not exception. My question about this involved the IMC properties tab called Rounting and then under that, the routing restrictions. I have noticed that when I have hosts and clients that

RE: Send Limits fail to trigger NDRs

Thanks for your response. We have our limits in two places, globally (Exchange - Global Settings - Message Delivery) and on the SMTP protocol for each server (Server - Protocols - SMTP - Default SMTP - Virtual Server - Default SMTP Virtual Server) Where did you set the limits? On the org? on

NT Numbers access

On Windows NT platform you can cross reference Lawson Users to NT Numbers by running listusermap | lashow. From there you can save to file. Can this data be accessed directly i.e. a program searches for the cross reference without first exporting the file? Regards, Orin

Re: Logic Validation

You can have mutiple site connectors attaching to other sites. Only one is needed for mail flow. From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Logic Validation Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:23:41 -0400 Can someone

RE: Logic Validation

As long as there is a connector of some sort (it might be X.400 or SMTP as well) you should be okay. You do not need a connector for every server in a site to another site. As long as there is a route to get mail from site A to site B you are good to go. Make sure you stop and start the MTA or

RE: options

Or you could use some form of collaboration software such as Outlook Team Folders (similar to PF's but more versatility)- unsupported by MS at present but it looks good. If u can't find it I can send the pack over -it's only about 1.6mb for both files. Have a look at:

RE: NT Numbers access

I imagine you could stick the listusermap command into a FOR /F statement in a DOS batch file. That will step through output line by line. You could then call that into a batch file and do comparison. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion

Multiple Time Zones (More than 2)

Anyone know of an App that will display more than 2 times zones for Outlook? Searched around with no clues. Nothing on Slipstick. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:

Permissions changing on pickup directory

I have a couple of webpages using CDO to send mail. For them to work, I have to give IWAM_server write access to the pickup directory of my Exch2k-SP3 server. So I give IWAM those rights and the pages work fine. However, we try out the webpage again a few hours later, and we get an access denied

Possible MTA Issue???

Hello again all, In an Ex 2000 SP3 W2K SP4 environment, I am seeing event id: 967 from MSExchangeTransport with the following message: This master server received a one level (Connector) call back. However no DS change has been detected and no major version increase will occur as a result. This

RE: Multiple Time Zones (More than 2)

I don't know of such a beast. You'll probably need to use a third-party time program. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple Time Zones (More than 2) Anyone know of an App

RE: IMC out bound queue question

Have you tried opening some of the message files in \exchsrvr\imcdata\out with a text editor to see what they all are? I would think the messages would just be the usual NDRs, but anything showing an AOL address as the originator would definitely be unnerving, and might point to a spammer who

OWA - NLB

Ive got my OWA-55 on a W2k svr...Id like to bring up second and do NLB between the two svr's... But from what Ive found so far I can only do NLB with W2K Adv svr...Is there a way to load NLB to W2K svr standard? thanks bill _ List

A Challenge responded to - Review of Achieving Process Profitabi lity

I received and read this book (closer to a booklet than a book) Friday. The author does a fairly good job of translating some basic TQM principles as they relate to IT. The book is an easy read but could have used more real world scenarios to emphasize certain points. As far as the philosophy of

RE: IMC out bound queue question

One thought might be to turn diagnostics logging up on the SMTP interface and check for an account that is being used to authenticate. You might want to do this to see if you have an account with a password that might have been compromised. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

Our head office recently laid off a couple of hundred people. I get mail for these people every day and my server is spending a lot of time sending NDR to the senders. Can anyone suggest a good method for handling email coming in to non-existent users? Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

Create an empty DL and add all the non-existent users' SMTP addresses to the DL's e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: users no longer exist - what to do with

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

Doesn't Exchange bounce back any type of message to the originator of the message that the account no longer exists, though? Or really, maybe I should say shouldn't it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Monday,

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

I guess he doesn't want to see their NDRs in the outgoing queue, especially when the bounces are trying to go to bogus addresses. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Public folder replication problem while moving to new server

I'm pretty sure I have shot myself in the foot and so first up let me acknowledge my stupidity. I'm hoping that someone can suggest the best way to recover... I am moving our single Exchange server to a new machine using the ECMSM[1]. I am moving from Exchange 5.5 on NT4 to Exchange 5.5 on

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

Those ndrs are filling up my queues and I think substantially slowing down my server. Plus most of the addresses on the ndrs are invalid and so can't be sent to them anyway. Louanne Fournier, CCNA, MCSE Technical Analyst (905) 319-8378 Ext. 240 FAX (905) 319-8397 www.nexterna.com NEXTERNA

RE: OWA - NLB

Only supported on Win2k advanced server: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/windows2000serv/Default.asp It's listed under Increased Scalability -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003

RE: OWA - NLB

You could do it if you use Cisco and or Alteon Load balancing switches to do Harware balanacing but costs may be the same as upgrading to enterprise version of Exchange. Soemthing to consider. From: Bolser, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

RE: OWA - NLB

Thanks..actually I am about to replace my main switches... Might you have an Idea which cisco units could do this PS to All...Actually you can add NLB to W2K stantard..BUT you must purchase Application Center 2000..which has NLB as one of it's components..and well then you have to purchase

RE: OWA - NLB

You would have to contact the vendor and explain what your trying to accomplish and get the latest info. Hardware -vs- Network load balancing both have their place. From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA - NLB

This isn't a standard Cisco switch thing. You would need a Cisco load balancer. Though I would probably look at F5 first. BTW, these kinds of things are $$$ -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange

RE: OWA - NLB

thanks..already did so..just wondering if you had any more input on model's thanks all bill -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - NLB You would have to contact the vendor and

RE: OWA - NLB

Yeh Im finding thatI was just maybe thinking since I was going to get the new switches maybe I could also get some small NLB for not too many more kinda throw into the cisco switch..etc... Really all I want to do it NLB 2 - WWW and 2 - TS thanks bill -Original Message- From:

RE: OWA - NLB

Nope; that is not possible. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - NLB Ive got my OWA-55 on a W2k svr...Id like to bring up second and do NLB between the two svr's... But from

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

If they're substantially slowing down your server, you have really large problems, as the processing of NDRs doesn't exactly put a heavy load on the server. That said, you can either add the users' old smtp addresses to an empty DL (as someone else mentioned) so the messages will essentially go

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

Disable copying NDRs to the admin account. I only get the true error ones rather than all the crap stuff. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Louanne

Re: A Challenge responded to - Review of Achieving Process Profitabi lity

Mr. Schwartz, Thank-you for reading Achieving Process Profitability and giving it a fair and honest review both here and on Amazon.com. I hope that you enjoyed it. I agree that Achieving Process Profitability does not touch on information or infrastructure. I intentionally left these out in

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

Thanks everyone for the ideas and assistance. Will I have to clean up \dev\null in the same way you have to manually clean the badmail directory? Louanne Fournier, CCNA, MCSE Technical Analyst (905) 319-8378 Ext. 240 FAX (905) 319-8397 www.nexterna.com NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

no -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail? Thanks everyone for the ideas and assistance. Will I have to clean up \dev\null in

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

No. Saying \dev\null is another way to say that the message simply disappears into the ether. It vanishes. No admin intervention required. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted

RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail?

Ummm... \dev\null is nowhere. It's an eternally empty bit bucket. -Original Message- From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: users no longer exist - what to do with their mail? Thanks everyone for

FW: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials

-Original Message- From: Ed Carrano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:06 PM To: Fyodorov, Andrey Subject: RE: continuous prompt for NT domain credentials I was able to get around this symptom by creating host files on the workstation pointing to the exchange

RE: Permissions changing on pickup directory

Well, I kinda hacked a solution into place... Just running a cacls against it every few hours with scheduled tasks... Not the nicest way to do it... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions changing

RE: Permissions changing on pickup directory

What if you turn on security event logging? Maybe that will log the change in permissions and tell you when and what user account did it? Tom -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

ADC Connector issue

We have installed AD on a W2k3 box and have it running in the mixed mode. We are now trying to install E2k3 and the ADC wizard gets to step 3 and advises that ir needs to modify the attributes of the mailboxes that we have IMS and directory replication with, but are in other Exchange sites and

Delegate Sent on behalf of is not being displaying

Has anyone ever seen an instance when a delegate sends an email and it displays as From: Delegate and not the standard Sent on behalf of Delegate? This was working fine now all of a sudden it displays the messages as if the Delegate sent the email form their own account. Environment is a primary

Re: ADC Connector issue

I thought I read where you must run Forest and Domain prep prior to installing ADC. From: Milt Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ADC Connector issue Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:57:08 -0500 We have

Re: ADC Connector issue

Already way past that point ... it completed without any errors ... From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ADC Connector issue Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:23:19 -0400 I thought I read where you

RE: Delegate Sent on behalf of is not being displaying

Are you sure that they are filling in the From field, or still have it displayed? That's usually the culprit in cases like this. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Steve I [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September

RE: Delegate Sent on behalf of is not being displaying

Not sure. I will check with them in the morning. Thanks, Steve Iadarola -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delegate Sent on behalf of is not being displaying Are you sure