Stopping Spam
by Schwartz Garfinkel
O'Reilly
ISBN: 156592388x
Copyright 1998
It is dated. From the last century.
Jerry W. Hubbard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
NT Server 4, SP 6a
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I have created a new Exchange 5.5 box, transferred
all our users from the old box to the new box, and everyone can send mail no problems.
The old box was then taken away and removed as a server within the exchange
admin screen from the new server.
Stopping Spam
by Schwartz Garfinkel
O'Reilly
ISBN: 156592388x
Copyright 1998
It is dated. From the last century.
Jerry W. Hubbard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Contact me offlist then. They're all written in VB. They don't use the
AcctMgmt component.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Rajalakshmi Iyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 03:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association
I would
Was
the old server the first server in the site? If so, the system folder
housing free/busy info is gone. Check Q152960 about rebuilding the site
folders.
Steve
-Original Message-From: Jason Cordingley
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
3:48 AMTo:
We have a user who likes to print occasionally to a printer different to his
default.
eg User has default of PRINTER1. Has an Outlook message with an attachment
he wishes to print to PRINTER2. Selects PRINTER2 and message comes out of
PRINTER2, but attachment (invoking Word) prints to default
Is he by any chance running a Palm Pilot? I've seen issues where older
versions of Intelli-synch (I think that's what its called) mark all of a
person's contacts as Private and no one else can see them. Check a few of
his contacts for the private checkbox. Its located in the very lower
Trends is always a top product. Here we use Antigen and it's super--it's an
Exchange server only product and it rocks I am not sure there is an
issue using two different virus products. I'd be interested to see what
others have to say.
JRiley
- Original Message -
From: Jesse Rink
Hey,
Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box
yet?
We are actively
running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local
intranet.
Running 5.55, sp4,
NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched.
The program installs
fine, but your web interface thats
Any idea where
I can find Guidgen.exe.
I have MSDN and cant
find it.
Jason Cordingley
-Original
Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 09:03
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
reinstall NAV for MSE.
Cheers,
Marty
-Original Message-
From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE?
Hey,
Anybody have any fun
The virus vendors have mixed success handling the latest virus. By having
multiple vendors, you're hoping at least one of them has the latest def.
The down side of course is having to deal with multiple vendors.
-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I've reinstalled TWICE already???
Same thing,I still go to IIS's default web site? IIS wants and needs control
of that interface I know 192.168.0.1 for our intranet, But so does Nav?
Can't they live together and just PLAY NICE???
Where and how does Nav for EXCH server up it's interface?
Found
So what exactly happens when you type in http://192.168.0.1:8080 ??
-Original Message-
From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas
PLEASE ?
I've
Brings up IIS's default website, our intranet home page.
Howie Pince
Network Administrator
A+, MCSE 2000
Higher Dimension Research Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
651-256-1987
www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine
Thank you, William!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Did we digress again?
No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data,
If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not
work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any
Ideas?
Example:
www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie
www.storms.com/exchange/ Works
It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up
Does your browser have the Do not use Proxy setting unchecked
-Original Message-
From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas
PLEASE ?
Brings up
I forgot to finish the statement . for local addresses oops
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas
PLEASE ?
Does
Will check, going into meeting with message labs?
Any comments on Message Labs service?
Thanks,
Howie
What doesn't kill you, just hurts alot
Howie Pince
Network Administrator
A+, MCSE 2000
Higher Dimension Research Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
651-256-1987
I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should
be..but i'm
Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think?
you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange.
but don't go on to say as to why?...
so, i guess the question I'm asking is ..
why wouldn't you
He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and
evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their
original thinking.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM
To:
Is it Friday, already? Damn, this New Year is certainly zipping[1] along.
Kevin
[1] Copyright PKWare
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 15:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups
I realize it's
Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups
He posted links to all the various vendors so one could
Hello,
Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4, SP6a. Clients = Outlook 2000.
I want to set up a Public Folder for a user, give it an SMTP address, and
have the user who has permissions to that Public Folder reply to messages
sent to that PF with the reply address being [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust
such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on
Windows2000 backs up to disk.
He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a
trusted setup. Those links give various options I
I have MS Exchange 5.5 Server installed in multiple sites. I am
attempting to create a new Public Folder under All Public Folders. When
doing this from MS Outlook, I get an error indicating that I do not have
sufficient permissions to perform this operation. I am currently logged
onto the
Use send as from the O2K client.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to
Again, that's his opinion. The question was why he has that opinion. It
wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup isn't an answer, it's an opinion.
It's not based any technical or factual information.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11,
Title: Message
do you
have the q# off the top of your head?
dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:47
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Event ID 1160
in
-V mode
Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming.
but:
Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most
reliable manner.
that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to
become comfortable/complacent.
I respect Don's and William's opinions',
Go to properties on Information Store Site Configuration and choose the
Top Level Folder Creation.
Andrew Toon
Trace Group plc
andrewtracegroup.com
-Original Message-
From: Marc Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 16:11
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public
I am running Exchange 5.5 spk4 on an NT 4.0 Server. I keep receiving
these conflict messages in my Inbox. Where are these settings and how
can I change them?
M
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
What type of conflict messages? Public folder? Synchronisation
conflicts? Are you modifying messages offline in an OST then
synchronising later? Need more info...
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 11 January 2002 17:02
Posted To: Sunbelt
I have exchange 2K installed with 2 DNS servers all included in Active
Directory + NT2K SP2 + EXCH-SP1
Ther is only one Domain working : abc.net and email are of the type
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to install other domains like new.com to have other mail adresses of
the type [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder conflict messages?
What sort of conflict message?
Misdirected mail from someone in the USMC?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men
Make sure the second domain new.com has MX records pointing to your
Exchange 2000 server, and then create a recipient policy in Exchange
System Manager for new.com. This new recipient policy should be
configured to give your users the new.com SMTP address. Make sure you
create a new recipient
They are multiple edits in a public folder.
I just want to find the section that allows me to change who receives the
email/notification.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Here is our validation... In the event something goes wrong and either of
us were to call PSS (god forbid), they would most likely tell us DUDE, You
are so NOT supported.
The DR Whitepapers are pretty specific. There are many ways to backup an
Exchange server. There are right ways and there
TTT...
Anyone got any ideas?
Here is the actual page... Look at what it does
www.legislature.state.tn.us/exchange
with the / at the end everything is okie dokie
-Original Message-
From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange
I agree. It's a good thing that developers are always pushing the envelope,
trying to find better solutions. More data is being collected, priv.edb's
aren't getting smaller, disks are getting larger/faster, networks are
getting faster, and disaster recovery will need to become faster and, better
It looks like the page thinks it is loading from the wwwroot dir and not
the proper Exchange Dir. Just reinstall OWA that should fix that page
work.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
You like my phrase ?
- Original Message -
From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:09
Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Here is our validation... In the event something goes wrong and either of
us were to call
The notification in this case is sent to Owners of the public folder.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 11 January 2002 17:15
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Conflict Messages
Subject: RE: Conflict Messages
They are multiple
Love it! ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Evault vs. tape backups
You like my phrase ?
- Original Message -
From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Title: Message
actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control
thru exchange what attachments to open.
Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted
to
-Original Message-From: Scott Erwin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
What do you have a for a firewall? I am having a very hard time getting
a proper scan of your network.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Is the error not able to login or that you can't see your images?
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
TTT...
Anyone got any ideas?
Here is
Any event log details?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:01
Subject: Conflict Messages
I am running Exchange 5.5 spk4 on an NT 4.0 Server. I keep receiving
these conflict messages
Still doesn't answer the original question. Arcserve is a running joke on
this list, and yet it follows the DR Whitepapers requirements. I used BE,
with a Travan Tape drive, which sucks, but it also follows the DR Whitepaper
requirements.
Hopefully the DR Whitepaper will continue to be a living
Title: Message
Anybody knows how?
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
12:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: wow
actually, if youre running
Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru
Thanks for the insight. Unfortunately he is a laptop user - not running a
Palm Pilot. I'll check for the Private listing. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Contact
Gotcha.How about other notifications? I remember a screen in the
Exchange Administrator possibly, that lists a bunch of
alerts/notifications that you can set up to email the admin.
Does this ring a bell?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Ok, answered my own question...
-Original Message-
From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
TTT...
Anyone got any ideas?
Here is the actual page... Look at what it does
While ArcCrap might follow the DR whitepapers, it has the problem of say...
NOT WORKING ever.
D
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Still doesn't answer
Laura,
I presume that if you're doing BLBs with the ArcServe Exchange agent you are
also doing on-line Exchange backups through the same agent? If not, the
first thing I would do (like now, while planning any other changes) is stop
doing the BLBs and start doing the on-line backups of the
Title: Message
I
do
thats
how i run our setup
look
thru microsoft.com or slipstick for adminpack.exe the readme shows
how
-Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:35
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Title: Message
No, he is wrong.
You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or
Outlook.
You need a 3rd
party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block
attachments at the Exchange server.
-Original Message-From:
Title: Message
Damn, I have not
seen that program in YEARS. I didn't know it was still around.In the first
versions of OL, there was no preview pane and you needed this to do
preview.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,
You are doing the right thing. You should question. If somebody didn't, we
wouldn't have choices.
-Original Message-
From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups
WOW! Didn't
Title: Message
I am
right in this.
You
can use the service pack2 for outlook 2000 to lock down the
client,
add a
registry key to enable security,
use a
public folder called "outlook security settings"
and
use an outlook form in that folder to specify who can open what
attachments
trust
Hey all,
I have a simple question: Does anyone know if running without the '/3GB'
switch in the boot.ini on an Exchange 2000 server with 2GB of RAM could
cause message delivery problems? The Virtual memory error is showing up
every hour in the event log. The Server is E2k SP1, with about 800
Title: Message
also
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q263297
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q290499
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
January 11, 2002 11:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange
We are also using Antigen and it DEFINITELY ROCKS!!! We previously had
McAfee installed on the Exchange box. Before removing McAfee we ran a
complete scan and had it clean the server. We installed Antigen, ran the
scan, and found 800 viruses that McAfee had missed. I think you'll be very
If you are just an OWNER, you won't get the conflict messages. You get the
if you are a Folder Contact for the folder.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because
Title: Message
we use
NAVSME to strip the same stuff, but my point is that you can use this method as
well.
-Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002
12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
wow
Yep...we do
Title: Message
Actually Michaelis correct, we have this solution already in place,
no third party products.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
January 11, 2002 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: wow
No, he
apply sp2
-Mensaje original-
De: Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Enero de 2002 03:07 p.m.
Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Asunto: /3GB switch
Hey all,
I have a simple question: Does anyone know if running without the '/3GB'
switch in the boot.ini
Believe your Netscape messaging server with Netscape (or possibly other)
LDAP directory should be able to do so.
Llanos Carlos wrote:
Greetings,Here is my situation:We have a single domain xxx.edu. We
have Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6a (MAIL). All the staff and faculty
are in this host. We
doesn't really understand why all the anti-ArcServe feeling: I've not
had major problems with it and get consistently good backups from which I
can restore files, Exchange servers, SQL databases, PDCs etc
It's their support, IMHO. ARCserve worked fine for me, too, as recently as
6.61. Back when
From Vulnwatch.org:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VulnWatch] 8 NGSSoftware security advisories
NGSSoftware has listed some security advisories. There are no
details
behind these descriptive names but given the past history of the
author,
David Litchfield, this should be taken as a heads up
I have attempted a reinstall. It seems like it is caused by the fact that
it is running on Windows 2000/IIS5.0 as I cannot replicate the problem on a
nt 4.0 box.
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange
But, but, it is unbreakable?? And there email product can do 1,000,000
users with out problem? We all need 1,000,000 user email solutions???
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:48 AM
I have it running all over, on this same platform? Do you have any other
odd things on the server? could you uninstall IIS, rip out the Dirs and
start from a Virgin state, per say? It feels like something is wrong in
the redirection of the folders to me.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
Only if you spec it right. G
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited
But, but, it is unbreakable?? And there email product can do
Title: Message
I just
reread this posting and I now see the confusion. The original post
referred to a 3rd party solution for disabling the Outlook security "Feature"
that blocks user's from accessing certain types of attachments. There is a
MS supported solution for disabling this
Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking
software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous?
Thanks, Cris
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
That is not controlled through Exchange.
It is controlled via a registry setting on every client. The Public folder is
merely used to contain the form that every client must download. Trust me. I
have done that as well.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
You should be fine without them. They wanted their Visio docs huh?
-Original Message-
From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
Mgmt just
That's a good one as well!
So, was it Visio?
-Original Message-
From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
I took the philosophy block
http://www.ifla.org/I/training/listserv/lists.htm
- Original Message -
From: Brenda Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 17:26
Subject: Setting up a ListServer
Hello:
Can anyone tell me how to setup a ListServer
www.lyris.com
-Original Message-
From: Brenda Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Setting up a ListServer
Hello:
Can anyone tell me how to setup a ListServer or where I could go to find
some information on
All I need is a system and I mean any system that will not break with 40
users.
ellery july
phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ellison's
www.lyris.com.
-Original Message-
From: Brenda Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Setting up a ListServer
Hello:
Can anyone tell me how to setup a ListServer or where I could go to find
some information on
Any system could do that. As long as it was setup correctly. I Still get
calls to work on a Msmail with SMTP gateway server. That thing has been
running now for since 95?, When ever I built it? Same hardware, same
software. Keeps on chugging with out any problems. Has about 150+ users.
Milton R
Did
you always listen to what your Dad told you ;-).
You
could re-eng Exchange (actually not much of it) but you would have to face the
following questions:
1)
Would MS support your version of Exchange.
2)
Would you not be likely to blame any problems on your updated
version.
3) Is
it
Wow, that is a big generalization. You can also say any system can support
1,000,000 users if set up properly.
ellery july
phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
If you Qualify that with something like the 1,000,000 users were only
going to access the server once in the life time of the server. =]
I like you, You are always picking on everyone, but you do it and make
such great points. Thanks for always being here and being you.
Milton R Dogg
Of The
imho, the /3GB switch causes problems on standard Win2000 servers. Someone
sent me a MS doc talking about why you wouldn't want to run this switch on a
production box - I could probably find it if anyone is interested.
/3Gb seems to be much happier on Win2000 Advanced server though, it actually
It not the /3GB switch meant for advanced servers. I do not know anyone
using a standard serving but runs OK on AdvServer and E2KE.
ellery july
phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-
From: Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:07 PM
To:
So how do you get email?
ellery july
phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-
From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
I took the
Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions and vs is
not normally executable??
ellery july
phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-
From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Spy vs Spy???
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions
OK Martin what is spy vs spy mean?
ellery july
phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
cartoon, from MAD, right ?
- Original Message -
From: Ellery July [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 18:29
Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
OK Martin what is spy vs spy mean?
ellery
I understand that - just not the context.
ellery july
phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
Yes!
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
cartoon, from MAD, right ?
- Original Message -
From: Ellery July
I'm tired...
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
I understand that - just not the context.
ellery july
phone -
We've had problems with our Exchange store dismounting unexpectedly.
This happens quite often - sometimes two or three times a week. We are
using GroupShield anti-virus software. Other than that, we have nothing
else running on that server. Has anyone experienced this problem?
Would appreciate
What do you mean Dismount?
What version and SP of Exchange?
Any event log errors?
-Original Message-
From: Sonny Meza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: Michael Hoelscher; Dan Reed; John Moreland; Bill Brown
Subject:
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
