I have a problem with my Exchange 2000 server, receiving messages
from Exim mail servers. I can't receive messages from Exim 3.32 and
3.35 servers (maybe other versions, but Exim is the only one for which
this has occurred). The NDR received by the sender contains a 500
5.3.3
Title: Unusual Public Folder issue
Hello list,
Using Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows 2000 Server SP2
We have set up a group calander in a public folder which all users have perrmission to create items, but only to modify there own and not delete anything.
There are 2 owners defined on the
Exchange2000 implements pipelining as per RFC2197. It actually improves
performance.
I do not know how to disable it, but perhaps using an SMTP relay of a
different species afront of your Exchange Server, like Postfix or
Sendmail perhaps?
William
-Original Message-
From: JAC Software
Title: Message
What
happens when you try? What error does it give?
W
-Original Message-From: Graeme Carstairs
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:03
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Unusual Public
Folder issue
Hello list,
Using Exchange
Title: Message
William,
Whenthe ownerstrys to move or delete the items created by
someone else, they get "Your changes could not be saved because you do not have
permission to modify some or all of the items in this folder." which is exactly
the same error as I get under my own user name
Title: Phantom email address
Outlook has a local
"autocomplete" feature. Outlook 2002 in the Office XP suite is
particularly bad about this. This is coming from the desktop, not an address
list.
Walt
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Title: Message
Thanks, I'll be taking a look at this too.
Sherry
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24,
2002 6:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Looking for More Advice
That's certainly one way.
Title: Message
Good
guess, almost exactly right, a couple of the were for the dir.edb. Q186291
answered my questions. Filtering only for 1221's just didn't give me
enough information, just confused me ;)
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Actually I have the 4x700 servers freeing up; will E2k
make better use of the 4 processors vs. the 2 faster Cpus?
-Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:59
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Sizing once
more?
Go
Title: Message
Sherry,
Ihad the samedilemma a few months ago when I moved to a new
Exchange server. Don't sweat keeping the same server name, use the "Ed
Crowley Method" that William's link points to. I can certainly testify
that it is indeed "a beautiful thing".
YourPOP users may
Title: Message
POP
users experience discomfort on a daily basis anyway. Their used to
it.
-Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002
6:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking
for More Advice
Sherry,
Title: Message
Oops... Les isn't on this list.
I mean
they're used to it.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
25, 2002 6:28 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Looking for More Advice
POP
users
Title: Message
Who?
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
25, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Looking for More Advice
Oops... Les isn't on this list.
I
mean they're used to it.
Title: Message
Your
[sic] lucky he isn't.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
25, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Looking for More Advice
Oops... Les isn't on this list.
I
mean
Title: Message
The
Bessant filter has detected the following errors in your
message:
"Their
used to it" possesses an incorrect syntax and grammatical
error(s).
This
could be because:
1)
Title: Message
Defintely 3) times 2.
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
25, 2002 7:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Looking for More Advice
Title: Message
You have way too much time Kevin ;-)
- Original Message -
From:
Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:25
AM
Subject: RE: Looking for More
Advice
Title: Message
The
POP users. They're used to discomfort.
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:40
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for
More Advice
Who?
-Original
Title: Message
Are you surprised? He's working in a government
establishment...
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 June 2002
14:55Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: Looking
for More AdviceSubject: Re: Looking for More
Title: Message
I
get a list of all the Rob. entries in the GAL and her local contacts.
But this buy in not in either one.
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates
Do not follow where the path may
lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
- Muriel Strode
Title: Message
Get
your English contractions right William, heh.
I have
no POP users so that isn't even a consideration in this scenario
:)
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
25, 2002 8:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
I
spend it sending utilities to people with full mailboxes. Don't I, Matthew?
Matthew? ;-)
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 June 2002 14:55To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Looking for More
Advice
You have
Title: Message
If
it's not in the GAL, hidden or otherwise, then it has to be on her local
machine. Contacts, PAB (bad bad bad), private distribution list, somewhere
it's in there.
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25,
Title: Message
Your
write. Sorry.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:55
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for
More Advice
Get
your English contractions right William, heh.
I
Title: Message
Is this Outlook 2002? If so, it may be that (sometimes) annoying
automatic completion feature.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q287623
Neil
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 June 2002
Title: Message
I'm
write, what am I writing? Oh, I'm righting an email message.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
25, 2002 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Looking for More Advice
Your
write.
Title: Message
What
if I don't want to 'reset' it, but rather terminate it?
-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002
7:02 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Phantom
email address
Is this Outlook 2002? If so,
Title: Message
Yeah,
and it's the only place I work where they let me use listservers! Are the girls
out playing hockey yet??
-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 June 2002
14:51To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking
for More
Title: Message
::perk::
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
25, 2002 7:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Looking for More Advice
Yeah, and it's the only place I work where they let me use listservers!
Title: Message
Listservers? Or girls playing hockey?
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 June 2002
15:17To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking
for More Advice
::perk::
-Original Message-From: Snook,
Title: Message
Thattook care of the problem at hand thanks. I would just
kill off this little "feature" but some of my users really like
it.
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates
Do not follow where the path may
lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
- Muriel Strode
Title: Message
I'm getting worried about you.I'd betterlock up my two
daughters. :-)
Anyway, no they're not. Sports day was yesterday,
though.
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 June
2002 15:56Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange
Title: Message
Ummm...dunno! Error...stack overflow...process
terminated.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 June
2002 15:11Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation:
Phantom email addressSubject: RE: Phantom email
Title: Message
POP
causes me less discomfort[1] than you might think.[3]
[1] I
use it for personal mail[2] at home
[2]
Tiggercam correspondence, mostly.
[3]
I'd get some help with your homophone confusion issues ;-)
Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]IT Manager,
Sanderson Townend
Title: Message
No
need to worry - I'm perfectly safe - the guys at the hospital told me that.
-Original
Message-From: Neil Hobson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 June 2002
15:23To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for
More Advice
I'm getting worried about
Title: Message
Dastard! Dastard! ;-)
- Original Message -
From:
Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:34
AM
Subject: RE: Looking for More
Advice
I
spend it sending utilities to people with full mailboxes. Don't I,
Per prior thread (see messages below) you all mentioned that there is MS
docs that recommend not running Exchange on the DC. Our consultants
recommended to us that we should use exchange on the DC because it was
recommended by MS. Can you point me in the direction of the Docs you
referenced?
Can anyone advise as to the purpose of the messageobject.txt, file, and
can it safely be edited to delete file size ? as ours is currently about
79mb and growing
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
I read the same Q that you should not run Exchange on a DC I thought I book marked it
but I guess not. I would hire a new consultant. In fact if I remember the article
correctly ms advises not running anything on the DC
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL
The DR white paper does not like it on the only DC you have. I dont
seen anything wrong with it.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, I have a user who is sending out meeting request, but when he receives a
confirmation from the parties he sent the request to, he receives an error
stating that the request doesn't exist in his calender, also he is receiving
the unable to update free/busy schedule information and I checked
Title: Message
Ahem
-Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002
14:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking
for More Advice
Your
[sic] lucky he isn't.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics
Title: Message
Dunno
-Original Message-From: Erik Sojka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:40To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More
Advice
Who?
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
You
forgot 4) It's the Les-baiting season
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002
14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking
for More Advice
Defintely 3) times 2.
-Original
Try starting Outlook using the command line switch to clean free busy
information.
Here is the link to the article describing this command for Outlook XP.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q296192
Peter Dahl.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
Just
when you thought it was safe to post on a list without checking your grammar and
spelling.
Queue the music
-Original Message-From: Les Bessant
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:01
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Title: Message
Doesn't that start on the Glorious 12th?
-Original Message-From: Les Bessant
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 June 2002 16:02To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More
Advice
You
forgot 4) It's the Les-baiting season
Title: Message
Are you going to use Exmerge or the move
mailbox wizard?
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:57
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for More
Advice
Thanks Don. This
Is the request being sent from inside or outside of the Exchange
environment ?
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Two Issues
Ok, I have a user who is sending out meeting request,
And that has what to do with his own calendar? Would my calendar work any
better if I sent messages to the external world?
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
Can you reject the receiving or sending from/to specific internet email addresses and
or email domains in Exchange 5.5?
The delivery restrictions in Internet Mail Service just apply to users with Exchange
accounts.
Joe Friess
List Charter and FAQ at:
Inside the environment. Also it is Outlook 2000 running on Win2k. Exchange
5.5 Service Pack 4
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
Is the request being sent from
Start with the Clean Free/Busy Switch that Peter mentioned. Is it one user
or a bunch of them?
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
Inside the environment. Also it
It is just one user that is experiencing the problem
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
Start with the Clean Free/Busy Switch that Peter mentioned. Is it one user
or a
Title: Message
It
did. And it's never ended...
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002
16:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking
for More Advice
Doesn't that start on the Glorious 12th?
-Original
Title: Message
http://www.messagelabs.com
Klez
generated messages never even reach your network.
-Original Message-From: Paul Green
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 June 2002 19:44To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for Klez Horror
Stories
Yea
I
Title: Exchange 5.5 on W2K
No
problems out of the ordinary
-Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002
12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 on W2K
Quite a happy combo. I have 2 servers running this
Okay, I ran the command on his machine, and it gave me an error stating that
the Free/Busy Data couldn't be cleaned. So I exited out and ran it a second
time, and I didn't receive the error. So I am going to assume it was
successful. Is there anywhere I could check to see what it actually did?
Title: Message
Gee
Jerome, I'm like really glad to get this input from you for the 20th
time.
-Original Message-From: Green, Jerome
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:23
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
on W2K
No
Title: Message
Can
you hear me now?
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:35
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
on W2K
Gee
Jerome, I'm like really glad to get this input from you
Title: OWA SSL problem
Try
inside the domain first. And start with straight IP. https://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/exchange
You
SHOULD get a message regarding the validity of your cert, depending on how it
got setup.
If
this works, you at least know it is working internally to the collision
domain.
Title: Message
Dang,
just when I was going to Precht you for the dictionary you got that spelling
from too...
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002
06:35To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking
for More
Hello everyone,
ive had a exchange 2000 server running for the past
6 months on a workstation while 7 people here evaluated exchange. we are
looking to dump our unix sendmail piece of junk and have decided on
exchange.
my question is, how do i go about removing the old
exchange server out
It would affect the free/busy.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
And that has what to do with his own calendar? Would my calendar work
any better if I sent messages to
Ooo... How so? Please explain!
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
It would affect the free/busy.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
And
who are you?
-Original Message-From: Les Bessant
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:24
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for
More Advice
POP
causes me less discomfort[1] than you might think.[3]
[1]
In order to consolidate many rules to economize space (users were getting the unable
to store rules on server message), I am trying to merge rules by modifying an
existing rule to check for more than one internet recipient or sender. How can I add a
new e-mail address to the list without
Q307917
-Original Message-
From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:04
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ADC Keep or Remove
Hello everyone,
ive had a exchange 2000 server
running for the past 6 months on a workstation
Is the user using Outlook on more than one machine at the same time? There
is a problem with copies of the calendar cached in OST's.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two
other than the IS what should be excluded from real-time scanning? I'm in
the process of battling Nimda.E and want to get this installed on our
exchange server ASAP. Somehow it has managed to avoid infection unlike most
other systems, does Norton's for Exchange also guard the filesystem, I
Every time someone sends a message that exceeds our user's mailbox limits,
postmaster returns an undeliverable reply to the sender, including the
attachment. Does anyone know how to have postmaster reply as undeliverable
without the attachment on Exchange 5.5? TIA
Wade Walters
[EMAIL
The disaster recovery doc on MS' website
(http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Krecovery.asp)
recommends not.
I think it's mostly a performance issue. I've got it running both ways at
different sites; some clients have limited resources and no choice. I
haven't done any
Title: Message
Sure I
can hear youI just don't want to hear from Jerome on this subject
anymore
-Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:38
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
on W2K
Start here:
Q245822
-Original Message-
From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Norton's AV, File exclusion for Exchange
other than the IS what should be excluded from real-time scanning? I'm in
ok, i found the Norton's article about what to exclude, are there any other
files that cause problems?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Norton's AV, File exclusion for
thank you sir...
- Original Message -
From:
Garland
Mac Neill
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:18
PM
Subject: RE: ADC Keep or Remove
Q307917
-Original
Message-From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Do not let it scan the transaction log files or the checkpoint file.
-Original Message-
From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Norton's AV, File exclusion for Exchange
other than the IS
Joe,
You will probably need some sort of content filtering solution on your smtpo
gateway(s) to and from the Internet to do what you need, although what is odd is
those restrictions on the ims SHOULD apply to anyone pointing to that IMS as an
smto gateway. Unix folk will do that if that IMS is
Try reinstalling the client software and make sure all of his time settings are
correct on the OS and via outlook.
If that doesn't work, try exmerging all of his data out of his box, delete the
box, and then rebuild the box then exmerge all of his data back in.
Sometimes simply cycling the
Sorry for the long delay, but I did mean Q313932. In your reply, you
quoted 313_392_. 932 does deal with E2K and some IS fixes/public folder
issues.
--Jon
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Sorry for the long delay, but I did mean Q313932. In your reply, you
quoted 313_392_. 932 does deal with E2K and some IS fixes/public folder
issues.
--Jon
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Why? When we deployed Exchange 5.5 on Win2K, Microsoft asked us if we wanted
to deploy Exchange 2000 beta and they would support it. I said no because I
wasn't sure the A/V or backup would work. Note howver I had near zero
testing/evaluation time; nice huh? I shoulda went Exchange 2000. The
I've got a couple boxes doing this well. The only thing I've noticed is
that Win2K sometimes gets impatient waiting for the Information Store to
shutdown. If it doesn't shutdown pretty quickly, it will complain that it
didn't respond in a timely manner. When that happens, the service shows a
He is using Outlook on only one machine. I did the /CleanFreeBusy on his
machine, and he told me he is still receiving the problem.
cc
-Original Message-
From: Schutte, Keith [EPT/FLO] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Title: Message
I
would export to pst, then import into the new server
Thanks,
-Chris-
IT Director
Sundowner
Interiors
-Original Message-From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:04
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: ADC Keep or
Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 Server
I've not played much with the Alternate Recipient option in Exchange. I
normally use it for people that leave, use an alternate recipient but I've
never tried sending to both recipient and alternate recipient. I am trying
to get messages sent to two recipients, and
Try:
XADM: Set Alternate Delivery Location for Recipient Through Exchange
Administrator Program (Q246284)
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: alternate recipient
Exchange 5.5
Title: Message
One of
these covers that.. I dont remember which one.
Exchange uninstallhttp://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q260378http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q273478Q252486:
Removing First E2K Server from the SiteQ284148: Removing Last E5.5
In exchange admin, in the recipients container, open up the mailbox
properties in question. Go to the delivery options tab, and on the bottom
of the window, where the alternate recipient box is, hit the radio button,
specify the alternate recipient, then click the check box to deliver to both
The few times I have used it I just checked the Send to both... check box and it
worked.
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: alternate recipient
Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 Server
h oooh! pick me! Can we discuss gateways to dissimilar systems now?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 09:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
Ooo... How so? Please explain!
-Original Message-
Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a.
Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User
2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put
EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they
would prefer not to have other people trying to make an
Title: Message
Exchange 2000 SP2
Outlook 98, 2000, and a few
XP users. Mostly Outlook 2000.
Is there an automated way
to increase the free/busy client publish setting from 2 months to 12 months in
an automated way for 4000 users?
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics
Decision Systems
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - EC
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Appointments.
Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a.
Is it
Rules Wizard(in OL2000, mind... may also be in OL98):
When messages arrive from _User1_ using the _Appointment_ Form, perform
action on message (delet, auto-deny, etc.)
HOWEVER, this doesn't address how the system is supposed to recognize if it
is or is not a valid appointment request.
A MUCH
We can discuss whatever tickles your fancy...
-Original Message-
From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
h oooh! pick me! Can we discuss gateways to dissimilar systems now?
And I most certainly look forward to Mr. Precht's insightful dribble on
these topics...
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Two Issues
We can discuss whatever tickles your fancy...
-Original Message-
They don't want the system to make the judgement calls, they just want it
blocked completely. Absurd? Yes. Possible? I don't know.
-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
I have used it quite a bit to send to both and only ran in to a problem when
the alternate recipient was at a hotmail account...never really pursued that
one problem, as hotmail is weird anyway
Jay Personette
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mavtech.com/
(281) 455-3993
-Original Message-
Document actions for Senior Management.
Implement Auto-Delete rule as described below, IF the options are available
in OL98. Make sure to tie it to the Appointment Form only. Wait for them
to complain when actual meeting requests don't come through.
-Original Message-
From: McCready,
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
