PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 backup/restore
I have Exchange 2000 SP2 and have done Win2000 backup of mailboxes. Now
I wants to restore the backup file to a test E2K machine. I am having
hard time to restore to a test machine which
Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 backup/restore
I have Exchange 2000 SP2 and have done Win2000 backup of mailboxes. Now
I wants to restore the backup file to a test E2K machine. I am having
hard time to restore to a test machine which has a different machine
name but I kept org name as same. After
(609) 597-2860
www.tbopayroll.com
-Original Message-
From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Exchange 2000 backup/restore
Importance: Low
I have Exchange 2000 SP2 and have done Win2000
Systems Manager
IEA - San Francisco
~~
-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 backup/restore
I hope you first restored from a full store backup
We're using Exchange 2000 with Outlook 2000 and would like to implement
some kind of corporate in/out board that our receptionist can monitor.
Currently we have the white board solution, where some people actually
take the time to write out to lunch, out til' 3PM...
Anyone use anything like
Currently we have the white board solution
A virtual whiteboard solution?
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 In / Out Board
We're using Exchange 2000 with Outlook
: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 In / Out Board
We're using Exchange 2000 with Outlook 2000 and would like to implement
some kind of corporate in/out board that our receptionist can monitor.
Currently we have the white board solution, where some
]
--
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 02:02 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 In / Out Board
We're using Exchange 2000 with Outlook 2000 and would like to implement
some kind of corporate in/out
Hello all,
i've had a test exchange 2000 server running live
in my network for 6 months now. it was set up for 7 people to play with
and evaluate and is just running on a PIII workstation. everything has
worked out great and we are now putting in a full-flege install of exchange
2000.
i
;q252486
W
-Original Message-From: Bob Chyka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 6:57
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: New Exchange 2000
install replacing old Questions
Hello all,
i've had a test exchange 2000 server running live
in my
.
- Original Message -
From:
William Lefkovics
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:31
AM
Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 install
replacing old Questions
Your
test server was in production. In essence, it wasn't as much a test
server
-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: New Exchange
2000 install replacing old Questions
yes you are correct, it was in
production i think i will go with the 1st option because i want the
1st server totally gone first so i can install into a clean environment.
do i have to rerun forest
Anyone know what the best settings are for managing memory usage for Exchange?
I have 1GB of RAM in my Exchange Server and it's going beyond the allotted amount.
The store.exe just keeps growing. Is there special performance settings I need to set?
Current Virtual Memory settings are as
I forgot to mention it's running on Win2k sp2 and Exch2k sp2.
-Original Message-
From: Ren Johnson
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 and Memory
Anyone know what the best settings are for managing memory usage for Exchange?
I have
The recommended memory management technique for Exchange 5.5 or 2000 is to
let Exchange's Dynamic Memory Allocation handle it.
If you have 1 GB or RAM, running Exchange and it's using 850MB, the OS is
using the rest, then you're getting your money's worth. Exchange is
programmed to use every
Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 and Memory
The recommended memory management technique for Exchange 5.5 or 2000 is to
let Exchange's Dynamic Memory Allocation handle it.
If you have 1 GB or RAM, running Exchange and it's using 850MB, the OS is
using the rest, then you're getting your money's
haven't had
a problem since deploying Exchange 2000 last July.
Maybe William has a take on this, but I don't think it's anything to lose
sleep over, unless you're running other services that are suffering due to
Exchange.
Does it make a difference that it is using 1.24 GB of RAM?
Maybe it's
Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 6:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 Org\Site
ADC seems to be working fine, I do not have in errors in the event logs. The ADC is
set up with one-way CA's, From
Someone was using the SMTP Relay service to spam on our exchange 2000
server. To stop the Relay we disabled the SMTP Virtual server and created
a new SMTP Virtual server. The new one is working fine. The problem is
with the disabled virtual server. There are 15K plus messages in it. How
do
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Virtual SMTP Server
Someone was using the SMTP Relay service to spam on our exchange 2000
server. To stop the Relay we disabled the SMTP Virtual server and
created
a new SMTP Virtual server. The new one is working fine. The problem
It seems when I enable it so that I can start to delete the messages,
there are too many messages trying to be sent and that slows the entire
system down to where it is difficult to get anything done...CPU
utilization jumps to 100%.
List Charter and FAQ at:
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Virtual SMTP Server
It seems when I enable it so that I can start to delete the messages,
there are too many messages trying to be sent and that slows the entire
system down to where it is difficult to get anything done...CPU
utilization
/12/2002 9:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc:
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 Org\Site
Ew.
ADC is ok?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto
Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA on Exchange 2000
I've had OWA (on Exchange 5.5) running successfully on my network for
quite some time. It connected to my only Exchange 5.5 server. Both my
OWA box and Exchange box
You will need Exchange Enterprise version if you want a separate OWA boxen.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA on Exchange 2000
I've had OWA (on Exchange 5.5) running
Ah.. well, see how you find these things out after-the-fact if you don't
research it ahead of time? haha.. Doh! Ok.. well, I'm already running
Exchange 2000 Standard Edition. Not the enterprise version... So, my
previous configuration of a seperate OWA box is not an option right?
Unless I just
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange 2000
Ah.. well, see how you find these things out after-the-fact if you don't
research it ahead of time? haha.. Doh! Ok.. well, I'm
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange 2000
OWA installs by default with Exchange 2000 when installed 'fresh'. OWA relies on IIS to function.
As a side note, the latest version of OWA is very good - the interface is much more intuitive. However it isn't compatible with all versions of IE. I had to do
to convert the UDGs to USGs, but this will fail since USGs can
only exist in native mode domains.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 11 July 2002 13:17
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade to Exchange 2000 from 5.5.. Native Mode
Damn! Must read the rest of the thread... :-(
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 11 July 2002 19:14
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade to Exchange 2000 from 5.5.. Native Mode?
Subject: RE: Upgrade to Exchange 2000 from 5.5
Yeah, you'd never catch me doing that!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 July 2002 09:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Upgrade to Exchange 2000 from 5.5.. Native Mode?
Damn! Must read the rest of the thread... :-(
-Original
Don't feel bad, I've been caught not reading the entire thread a few times
this week. :o)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Upgrade to Exchange 2000 from 5.5.. Native Mode
Hello All,
I just recently upgraded a clients NT Domain to Windows 2K AD. I have since
installed the ADC and created ADC CA's to replicate recipients, contacts, public
folders to AD. I then install Exchange 2000 on the new server, updated to SP2, then
created a test user, mailbox-enabled
Ew.
ADC is ok?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 Org\Site
Just connected to the E2k server via telnet and sent a message to a mailbox
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
2000 schedule backup
Hi:
I'm trying to backup Exchange 2000 by the
Windows 2000 build-in backup program. (save the backup at a NAS)
The Exchange 2000 server link to a NAS
and make a Network Drive of the NAS.
1. When perform the backup task by select
backup "NOW"
Title: Message
Hi
William:
The Exchange
2000 server with Exchange 2000 SP2 is running on Windows 2000
SP2.
And I use
Hard disk (Network Drive of a NAS or other member server's Hard disk) to store
the backup data.
The first
line of Exchange 2000 backup is backup by a HP Tape library
Title: Message
Thank
you for the blank message ;)
-Original Message-From: Richard
Frankhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July
11, 2002 03:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re:
Upgrade to Exchange 2000 from 5.5.. Native Mode?
Send
Title: Message
And
thank YOU for the USELESS response!
-Original Message-From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11,
2002 7:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Upgrade to Exchange 2000 from 5.5.. Native Mode?
Thank you
6:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
2000 schedule backup
Hi
William:
The
Exchange 2000 server with Exchange 2000 SP2 is running on Windows 2000
SP2.
And I use
Hard disk (Network Drive of a NAS or other member server's Hard disk) to store
No, Jesse you are not required to be running Native mode. Mixed will be
fine.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Upgrade to Exchange 2000 from 5.5.. Native Mode?
When I upgrade my
Ok, Hope this one goes better!
You will need to switch your W2K domain to Native mode so that your Exchange
5.5 distribution lists can be properly converted into the correct type of
W2K groups. If any of your current DL's is used in conjunction with Public
Folders, your DL will be converted
Title: Message
Hi
Ely:
Both Exchange
2000 server and NAS are connected to the same L3 core switch in the same
subnet.
Using
interactive backup (by click backup "Now") it's no problem. But when running at
schedule backup, it fails.
The schedule
backup to the hard disk seams
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 schedule backup
Hi Ely:
Both Exchange 2000 server and NAS are connected to the same L3 core switch
in the same subnet.
Using interactive backup (by click backup Now) it's no problem. But when
running at schedule backup, it fails.
The schedule backup to the hard disk
Ely like an Eagle.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 schedule backup
Hi Ely?
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching
: Exchange 2000 schedule backup
Ely like an Eagle.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 schedule backup
Hi Ely?
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN
Hi All,
I recall seeing a document talking about the problems associated with
merging the public folder server and mailbox server onto one server.
Can anyone point me to that?
We are in the process of consolidating our NT/Exchange 5.5 servers into a
windows 2000/Exchange 2000 environment. My
of it comes down to the size of your org...?
Thanks
Rob Wilcox
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2002 19:27
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Sizing
Hi All,
I recall seeing a document talking about the problems associated
When I upgrade my Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000... Am I required to
have my domain running in Native Mode? Microsoft's white paper states
this to be the case but I haven't heard this anywhere else. My domain is
still running in Mixed Mode.
Thanks.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http
Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange 2000 SP1 Antigen dual 700MHz 1 Gb memory no
other applications
Lately we have been seeing a problem where Exchange memory usage grows to
100%, mail slows to a crawl then the system either hangs or reboots
itself.
Would appreciate any help. Thanks
List Charter and FAQ
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 out of memory
Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange 2000 SP1 Antigen dual 700MHz 1 Gb memory no
other applications
Lately we have been seeing a problem where Exchange memory usage grows
to 100%, mail slows to a crawl then the system either hangs
Beware of mailbox move wizard.
Unless you have to use the wizard, use exmerge.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Libove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: First Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 environment (on 2K
Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs. We did add a storage array about a
month before the problem started.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out
Is that your real name?
-Original Message-
From: David Duke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory
Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs. We did add a storage array
about a month
Also I miss typed - we are on SP2.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory
Give SP2 for Exchange a try. Any thing in the event logs? Change
anything
: Exchange 2000 out of memory
Also I miss typed - we are on SP2.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 out of memory
Give SP2 for Exchange a try. Any thing in the event
Why is that?
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 environment (on
2K domain)?
Beware of mailbox move wizard.
Unless you have
as an old
NT 4.0 domain Backup Domain Controller.
I intend to add my first Exchange 2000 (Enterprise) server to this
environment.
At first, I want to test it by adding an Exchange 2000 server on to
another Windows 2000 Advanced Server, so that I can create a test mailbox
on the new Exchange 2000
26, 2002 9:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: First Exchange 2000 server in Exchange 5.5 environment (on 2K
domain)?
Hello -
I have an Exchange 5.5 environment currently, with one Exchange 5.5
server on an NT 4.0 server, and another Exchange 5.5 server on a Windows
2000 Advanced Server
or firewall?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Issue
I please one more time for help on the below.
Yes, we are seeing the warning in the event logs
Title: Message
Support WebCast: Microsoft Exchange 2000
Server Connectivity Through a Firewall Tuesday, July 9, 2002: 8:00 A.M.
Pacific time (Greenwich mean time - 7 hours)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/servicedesks/webcasts/wc070902/wcblurb070902.asp
William Lefkovics
;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Issue
Mixed-mode Exchange environment? So these servers were upgraded to E2K?
Or you migrated to E2K?
Are you seeing the Event from the KB article in the event log?
William
-Original Message-
From: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh
So does anyone here have any thoughts on this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:18 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Issue
Yes, we are seeing the warning in the event
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Issue
Here is a challenge to all of the E2k experts out there.
The symptoms we are having here is in Q288175 - basically e2k servers in
the same admin/routing group are having troubles sending mail to one
another. Mail refuses to go
Hello,
I know this thread comes and goes, but our main reseller for the past 6
years sold his business and I don't trust the new owner, also we are an HP
shop and now I guess we will be buying compaq servers.
We will be deploying Exc2000 standard later this summer,
+/- 100 users
we have about
RAID5 is very beneficial for the databases. I would sacrifice RAID1 for
the OS/logs to get that.
-Original Message-
From: David Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Sizing
Hello,
I know
Before you make any choices, read ASB's text on server configs:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=/raid.txt
Rick
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 5:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Hi,
Does the Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition media actually say Enterprise
Edition on it? We ordered Enterprise but I'm unsure as to the media
that was received.
Thanks,
Darrin
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Mine does.
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Media
Hi,
Does the Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition media actually say Enterprise
Edition on it? We ordered
Mine does also
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Media
Mine does.
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
IIS to give me a fresh metabase, and am going
to try installing everything again.
Walt
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:03
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 2000
Front-end/Back-end Setup for OWA
Title: Message
Thanks
William, that's exactly what I was looking for.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June
05, 2002 7:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange 2000 migration issues
There is a specific
Greetings,
I need some help. Is anyone using an Exchange 2000 Server in a
front-end/back-end setup for OWA.
I am trying to set one up and can't get it working. Does anyone have a link to good
documentation?
George Morse
Nordson Corporation
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List
2000
Front-end/Back-end Setup for OWA
Greetings,
I need some
help. Is anyone using an Exchange
2000 Server in a front-end/back-end setup for OWA. I am trying to set one up and can't
get it working. Does anyone have
a link to good documentation?
George Morse
OVER EX2K Exchange 2000... To
fix some right problem on the AD Schema.
During that process the installation block when tryning to modify the AD
schema...
Anyone encoutered that problem ?
JF
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
What
issues are you experiencing George?
You
have followed the whitepaper?
William
-Original Message-From: Morse, George
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 2000
Front-end/Back
Just make sure to turn off 8bitmine.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTP relay - Windows/Exchange 2000 upgrade
If you are going to maintain the IIS relay in the DMZ
Title: Exchange 2000 migration issues
We are in the middle of migrating our single site, single server organization over to Exchange 2000. We have setup the ADC and run ForestPrep. Everything seems cool so far. All accounts seem to be syncing in AD. We are at the point now where we are going
Title: Exchange 2000 migration issues
www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxa.htm
-Original Message-From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002
11:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 2000
migration issues
We
.
-Original Message-From: Crosby, Tim
(Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June
05, 2002 8:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Exchange 2000 migration issues
We are in the middle of migrating our single site,
single server organization over to Exchange 2000. We have
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002
6:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
migration issues
The requirement of
patience can not be underestimated.
Use the E2K tools to
admin E2K and the 5.5 tools to admin 5.5.
If it's single server,
s
Title: Message
Patience
A room to cuss
And an emergency sledgehammer
-Original Message-
From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002
5:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
migration issues
Thanks William
=/technet/itcommunity/chats/default.asp
William
-Original Message-From: Crosby, Tim
(Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June
05, 2002 4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange 2000 migration issues
Thanks William, we
are planning to get
.
Knowing that I'm eventually going to upgrade my Exchange 5.5 box to 2000
(WIndows 2000 and Exchange 2000) in the near future, is there anything I
need to be aware of before upgrading my SMTP relay from IIS4 to IIS5? Or
should I just go ahead and get it upgraded... I guess my concern is from
not knowing
Title: Message
or
lusers
DUDE, you are
SO NOT SUPPORTED !
-Original Message-From:
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31,
2002 14:07To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Corrupt
Email in Exchange 2000
We call them HMU's. High Maintenance Users
Hello All,
I am having an interesting problem with Exchange 2000 BackupExec 8.6. Over the past
few weeks, I have been getting errors within BackupExec8.6 when it backs up indivdual
mailboxes in Exchange 2000. There are two mailboxes where it finds messages that it
can't access so
Title: installing first exchange 2000 server in Active Directory
Hi All,
I am trying to install the initial exchange 2000 server. It will be joining an existing org and site. The existing org/site and exchange servers are in 5.5 and NT4 domain.
I have two-way trust between the NT4 domain
This isn't corrupt information. It's crappy backup methodology.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Hello All,
I am having an interesting
Please keep conversations on-list.
I take it you're unfamiliar with the Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com?
- Original Message -
From: Paul Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
What do you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
now there's an intelligent, well-thought out response.
It sounds to me like you might want to call Veritas and see if they can
help with the source
-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc:
Subject: Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Please keep conversations on-list.
I take it you're unfamiliar with the Exchange FAQ at
http://www.swinc.com?
- Original
) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860
www.tbopayroll.com
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Importance: Low
This isn't corrupt information. It's
Title: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
I've seen the same thing with Backup Exec 8.6 on an Exchange 5.5 server doing mailbox backups. Personally I think it's just one of those features of BE 8.6. On regular data backups, even with Remote Agent Open Files Options Agent installed I've seen
for you to do a restore from tape...
-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Yeah, I am familiar with the list and it basically says
all of the time!
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 5/31/2002 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc:
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
I've
less heartache.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Personally, I dont care about using Brick Level Backup and I know what you
mean about BE being
: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Yeah, I am familiar with the list and it basically says that Brick Level= BAD. The
reasoning behind this is because it takes up more space on the backup tape and makes
your backup window larger.But if it doesn't matter that the brick level backup is
taking up
: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Personally, I dont care about using Brick Level Backup and I know what you
mean about BE being extremely sensitive. BackupExec can skip a file and it
will say your backup failed. Unless you look
How many times have you needed to restore a mailbox using this system?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
Yeah, I am familiar with the list
Title: RE: Corrupt Email in Exchange 2000
We call them HMU's. High Maintenance Users. Of course, that's when we're in a good mood, if we're not, then they might be called ID10T's.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:04
101 - 200 of 642 matches
Mail list logo
