2012 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question about SSL certificates on Exchange 2007
Me too John. It is a tossup what I hate more...certs or IE group policies.
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]<mailto:[mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01
I hate the meme but...
This.
:)
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question about SSL certificates on Exchange 2007
If you don't do it often, it can certainly be confusing.
From: John
If you don't do it often, it can certainly be confusing.
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question about SSL certificates on Exchange 2007
I don't have a wildcard cert. Just going by what MS
Me too John. It is a tossup what I hate more...certs or IE group policies.
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question about SSL certificates on Exchange 2007
I don't have a wildcard cert. Just goi
(352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question about SSL certificates on Exchange 2007
Ohh thhh.
It requires one extra configur
Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: Kennedy, Jim
[mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]<mailto:[mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: qui
Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 2:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
Apparently Microsoft's bureaucracy gives them the ability to update guidance
just about as fast as, oh say, Congress?
J
TVK
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[
Ahh ok, then that makes more sense
- Original Message -
From: Michael B. Smith
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: Quick Question
Not..the "allocation" comments are for memory on the mailbox server. Sorry.
Apparently Microsoft's bureaucracy gives them the ability to update guidance
just about as fast as, oh say, Congress?
:)
TVK
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
I agree with you
/theessentialexchange
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
Wow. Those numbers seem to be circa 2000. We have a bunch of users here who
swear that email is the debil and refuse to give up
rr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 9:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Quick Question
Those are very small mailboxes. That wouldn't work here. 25MB minimum for
light users. Staff love to keep email around here and really cant handle
managing their mailbox
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 8:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
I use the Microsoft definitions:
For light users (which are defined as 5 sent messages/20 received messages per
day), allocate 2.0 MB per mailbox
oying.
- Original Message -
From: Michael B. Smith
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 9:18 AM
Subject: RE: Quick Question
I use the Microsoft definitions:
For light users (which are defined as 5 sent messages/20 received messages
per day), allocate 2.0 M
/michael
Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Quick Question
Can you define heavy use?
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Michael B. Smith
ds,
>
> Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
> My blog:
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael<http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael>
> Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M
essentialexchange
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
Those 1 TB drive are SATA I'm sure so they may be overkill size wise, they
are not performance wise.
Those 1 TB drive are SATA I'm sure so they may be overkill size wise, they
are not performance wise.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 6:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
I would just throw
t;
Best Place to Work, Alliance for Workplace Excellence – 2006, 2007, 2008
...ask me how to better manage your IT costs with PROSuite
From: Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Quick Question
Thanks
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Quick Question
You have four disks for a total of 1TB...I would buy one more, then have
logs and OS on a RAID 1, and data on a
> that's not enough info., then have at it. Thanks, I think.
>
> --
> *From:* David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:52 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Quick Question
>
eim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:37 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Quick Question
>
> As Martin mentioned in a previous post we would need to know how many
> disks to answer any RAID questions.
>
>
>
> *From:* Theoch
(4) 1tb
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
As Martin mentioned in a previous post we would need to know how many
disks to answer any RAID
As Martin mentioned in a previous post we would need to know how many
disks to answer any RAID questions.
From: Theochares, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
Nobody will ever accuse me of
s, I think.
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
That is where I was going
Minimal question = Minimal answer
From: Michael B. Smith [mai
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
That is where I was going
Minimal question = Minimal answer
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:50 AM
That is where I was going
Minimal question = Minimal answer
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
P3 133 with 256 MB RAM is the minimum
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
I say he should get a server with a Pentium IV processor of 800 Mhz, and 2
GB of RAM, with at least 4GB of Hard Drive space.
That ought to have him up and running in no
, 2008 10:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Question
Quick answer: 42
Seriously, this is anything but a quick question. Without knowing
anything about your environment we can't begin to help you.
We don't know if you have 10 or 10,000 users, 1 or 100 disks, 1 GB
Quick answer: 42
Seriously, this is anything but a quick question. Without knowing anything
about your environment we can't begin to help you.
We don't know if you have 10 or 10,000 users, 1 or 100 disks, 1 GB or 1 TB
of mail, are you running Exchange on a desktop PC or Cray?
From: Theocha
1. The article you quoted talks about Exchange 5.5
2. Exchange 2000 doesn't provide LDAP access. It uses it to access a
DC/GC with the respective ports (389/3268).
3. Exchange 2000 runs quite nice on a Windows 2000 DC/GC.
I've been using Exchange 2000 for about a year on a DC/GC as production
ma
Title: Message
1) I
don't know anything about your WAN links, but you might consider obtaining
better links to allow for some consolidation. E2K can handle more users
per server than 5.5 did.
2) I
have a couple clients that run E2K on a DC/GC. The issues are similar as
with 5.5 - both p
in exchange admin create a new custom recipient, on the mailbox you want
forwarding done on go to the delivery options tab and under Alternate
recipient click on modify, find and insert the custom recipient that you
just created and click on the check box in the bottom portion of the Alt
rcpt opti
Title: RE: quick question...
Not a great idea..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 16:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: quick question...
Can someone refresh my memory on how to set Exchange 5.5 to forward all
t: AW: quick question...
No answer before you tell us your age!!! ;-)
Ricki
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2002 22:59
An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Betreff: RE: quick question...
Ahh...its all coming back
Subject: RE: quick question...
Alternate recipient
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: quick question...
Can someone refresh my memory on how to set Exchange 5.5 to forward all mail
to
Title: RE: quick question...
Create a custom recipient and set it as the alternate recipient
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: quick question...
Can someone refresh my
Alternate recipient
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: quick question...
Can someone refresh my memory on how to set Exchange 5.5 to forward all mail
to a specific recipient to a
Can someone please tell me the procedure for doing this with Exchange2k?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Hi all,
As Jim
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Ditto!
-- Jeff Eggleston
"Jim Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:208767@exchangelist...
No
problem at all...I can't imagine how much I've learned from this list over the
last 3+ years!
Its
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
No
problem at all...I can't imagine how much I've learned from this list over the
last 3+ years!
Its
good to be able to help sometimes, instead of receiving help all the
time!
-Jim
-Original Message-From: Khoi Nguyen
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Hi all,
As Jim, Jeff and other has pointed out. I did not turn on those extra tabs so I did not see them when first get in. They are turning on now and test out; It works like a charm. I can not express how much I appreciate the help that I
RE: quick question on multiple mail box
What if you don't see the permissions tab? I've seen this on a couple of
Ex55 servers, the tab is missing...is this a logon issue?
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 12/6/01 9:11 AM
Subject: R
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Hi
Jeff,
I've got
it.
Thanks for all
your help.
--
Khoi
-Original Message-From: Jeffegg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001
12:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: quick
questi
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Hi
all,
OK now it is
clear to me on this. Sorry for the confusion.
Will do as you
suggested (BTW - I did not change the primary account).
Thanks again for
all of your help
--
KHoi
-Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Khoi -
Please note:
4. In the "Windows NT accounts with Permissions" Box ADD the person who will
be getting the Send as Permission --
Jeff Eggleston
--"Khoi Nguyen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wr
, December 06, 2001 9:31
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: quick
question on multiple mail boxSensitivity:
Private
This
is really an Outlook issue, not Exchange. From my limited experience I
don't think it can be done. You could set up a profile for her to open
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Khoi,
You
should be able to add the secretary/assistant in addition to your boss. On
the Permissions tab for the mailbox properties (can't see the Permissions
tab? In Exchange Admin go to Tools, Options, Permissions tab and add a
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
no..no.no...don't change the Primary account.
There
should be a permissions tab in his mailbox properties...if not you'll need to
add it by going to tools, Options...click Permissions and check the boxes marked
"Show permis
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
That's
not what Jeff wrote. You should re-read his suggestion.
-Original Message-From: Khoi Nguyen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06,
2001 12:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
quick questi
]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001
11:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: quick
question on multiple mail boxSensitivity:
Private
Nope...it wouldn't prevent him from accessing his mailbox. She
would not even need to have his mailbox open in her Outlook profile to
s
Title: RE: quick question on multiple mail box
Thanks Jeff & Jim
I looked at his mailbox properties from within Ex 5.5 admin and see that the primary windows NT account with his account on it. If I correctly understand your suggestions that I need to change this account to his assistan
Title: quick question on multiple mail box
If you
set it up correctly (i.e. allocate the right Permissions from Exchange Admin
(Send As), you should be able to use the From Field directly in the email.
(View-From Field when creating a message)
Kevin
-Original Message-From: Khoi N
rsday, December 06,
2001 11:39 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
quick question on multiple mail boxSensitivity:
Private
Thank Jim for a
quick response,
I do, however,
have another question on this. He would like also be able to access his
mailbox on his stati
IssuesSubject: RE: quick
question on multiple mail boxSensitivity:
Private
1) Give her access as "owner" to his mailbox in Exchange Admin
(assuming Exchange 5.5).
2) If using Outlook, Click on View...From
Field.
3) After permissions replicate (up to two hours by de
Title: quick question on multiple mail box
This
is really an Outlook issue, not Exchange. From my limited experience I
don't think it can be done. You could set up a profile for her to open his
mailbox but she'd have to close Outlook, re-open under the other profile, etc.,
etc. It gets bo
quick question on multiple mail boxSend as needs to have permission assigned
from within Exchange
Administrator.
Here's the breakdown:
1. Log into Exchange Administrator
2. Open the properties box of the originating mailbox (In my case the
General Manager)
3. Click on the permissions tab.
4. In
Title: quick question on multiple mail box
1) Give her access as "owner" to his mailbox in Exchange Admin
(assuming Exchange 5.5).
2) If using Outlook, Click on View...From
Field.
3) After permissions replicate (up to two hours by default) she
should be able to send as him by putting his
your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.
-Original Message-
From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question
Thanks everyone for the feedback. I want to move the users emails
I on the right track or any better suggestions.
Anwar
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: quick question
If they have a PST then they have outlook or an exchange client?? I am
If they have a PST then they have outlook or an exchange client?? I am
really missing something here?? All clients can access exchange it is
just a matter how they do it. Outlook is currently about the one out
there that does it with MAPI [1] other ways of connection would be POP3
or IMAP
[1] the
Do you have too? No. Should you, Yes.
What the heck, you got Outlook licenses when you bought Exch. You may as
well use what you paid for. Right?
-Original Message-
From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subje
Exchange clients can be MAPI, IMAP4, or POP3 compatible.
MAPI - Outlook
IMAP4 - lots!
POP3 - more than lots!
MAPI gives you the greatest functionality.
William
-Original Message-
From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Ad
62 matches
Mail list logo
