Re: [expert] Virus?

2003-10-22 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 22:17, HaywireMac wrote: > Motion carried! We nuke Redmond! Yeah, I second that!! E, what's Redmond?;) Good luck, HarM -- Registered Linux User #197998 FSF Associate Member #901 ICQ #146191606 Mandrake HowTo's & more: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org Want to buy y

Re: [expert] Install issues with 9.2

2003-10-22 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 23:15, Greg Meyer wrote: > On Wednesday 22 October 2003 04:58 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I downloaded the 9.2 Powerpack CD's, and went on an adventure. > > > > Well, 9.2 has several annoying install issues especially with a broken > > KDE install

Re: [expert] RANT: vicious viruses

2003-10-20 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 20 October 2003 10:09, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Sunday 19 Oct 2003 10:34 pm, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > On Sunday 19 October 2003 23:28, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > That's one I hadn't thought of. Thanks > > > > Here's another one: Calypso, it ha

Re: [expert] Virus?

2003-10-20 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 20 October 2003 22:54, HaywireMac wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:39:44 +0100 > > Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > > You may find this interesting: > > > > http://www.virusbtn.com/news/latest_news/granneman.xml > > > > Anne > > Here we go again. > > As has happened many times b

Re: [expert] Running X across a network?

2003-10-19 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 19 October 2003 23:05, Kwan Lowe wrote: > 2. Run X over SSH. ssh into the server and run the client X11 application. > a. ssh -X w.x.y.z > b. On remote, launch X11 application. Even easier: On Mandrake -X is applied by default (or alias)...you actually have to use option -x to disab

Re: [expert] RANT: vicious viruses

2003-10-19 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 19 October 2003 23:28, Anne Wilson wrote: > That's one I hadn't thought of. Thanks Here's another one: Calypso, it has some very nice features in it including filtering on the server. And it has good looks;) The only mailer I advise to Win sufferers. Good luck, HarM -- Registered Lin

Re: [expert] Missing kernel source from 9.2 isos...

2003-10-19 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 19 October 2003 17:23, Olaf Marzocchi wrote: > At 00.02 19/10/2003, you wrote: > >On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:27, Olaf Marzocchi wrote: > > > Ok, but I have to wait until 9.2 will be available for everyone. > > > > > > Olaf > > > >It already is and has been all along..check the mir

Re: [expert] Missing kernel source from 9.2 isos...

2003-10-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:27, Olaf Marzocchi wrote: > Ok, but I have to wait until 9.2 will be available for everyone. > > Olaf It already is and has been all along..check the mirrors. It's only the 9.2 iso's that aren't available allover (yet). Good luck, HarM -- Registered Linux User

Re: [expert] Missing kernel source from 9.2 isos...

2003-10-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 18 October 2003 23:35, James Sparenberg wrote: > On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 13:30, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote: > > > Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add > > > cd as urpmi source

Re: [expert] Missing kernel source from 9.2 isos...

2003-10-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:46, Charlie M. wrote: > Are you sure about that HarM? If you don't download all the rpm's in that directory, then the hdlist.cz will not be valid anymoreyou'll have to generate a new one with the right packages using the -f option. If the gui does that by defau

Re: [expert] Missing kernel source from 9.2 isos...

2003-10-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote: > Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add cd > as urpmi source. Which still calls for a hdlist.cz describing the packages on that CD. It will not be accepted without! Good luck, HarM -- Registered Linux User #19

[expert] remotekeyboard in ssh

2003-10-15 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
Hello all, Here's a strange problem I've encountered: I've got a small spec laptop running applications on a ssh-server with Xforwarding. These machines have Belgian keyboards and special characters like ô or è. Locally I get these by first hitting the ^ key and then the letter that goes undern

Re: [expert] libgal

2003-10-14 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 13:56, HaywireMac wrote: > Look out world, I be buildin' RPM's! > > -- Starting to dig trenches here:) HarM -- Mandrake HowTo's & more: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-11 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 11 October 2003 06:01, James Sparenberg wrote: I> Ah but it can be removed! check out > > http://www.litepc.com/ I know that, you know thatthey don't! They just acquire an unbootable Winders and have it re-installed, with the local M$ wizard telling 'em: "Yeah that's wh

Re: [expert] This Host Wont Die/Shutdown!!

2003-10-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 10 October 2003 22:05, Ricardo (Tru64 User) wrote: > Greetings, > > shutdown -h now, halt, reboot, shutdown -r now, kill > -9 1, kill -KILL 1, init 6, system still going > strong!!! > Finally, pulled out power plug!! > > Anyway to troubleshoot this further...?? > Second shutdown in 6month

Re: [expert] Wireless - shutting down pcmica locks system

2003-10-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 10 October 2003 22:15, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > Does anyone have any idea about what the problem is here with linux and > wireless such that simply trying to remove the card, one way or another, > nicely or not, it totally wrecks the system? Anyone else run into this? > > My laptop is

Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 10 October 2003 18:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > this would allow even the > newbie-est to find and install whatever flavor tickles their > tastebuds with a minimum of effort or understnding on their part. Right up to the point where they uninstall explorer, thinking they won't be need

Re: [expert] i18n and language switching.

2003-10-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 10 October 2003 07:42, James Sparenberg wrote: > All, > >In that other OS my wife would be able to hit one key (the right > "windows" button) and switch the language she is typing in between > Korean and English. Is there any way to enable this kind of feature > within Linux? > > Jam

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 09:21, Anne Wilson wrote: > Finally, I would like to remind users that this is not a closed > 'club'. We welcome material from any user, particularly if they are > able to add to the hardware compatibility pages, or able to write a > mini HOW-TO on any of the frequen

[expert] Python2.3 in MDK9.2

2003-09-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
Hello all, I'm having some problems due to Python2.3 (I think) that gets installed with MDK9.2. Prog's like "sketch" and "blender" rely heavily on python and I can't get either to run. Blender segfaults without any comments whereas sketch can't load the SKetch module...that's definitely to do w

Re: [expert] mandrake distro on linux world magazine resource DVD dosn't inst...

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 18 September 2003 00:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 9/17/2003 5:42:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > On Wednesday 17 September 2003 23:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Any solutions? > > > > Try burning a CD and use that. > > > > Good luc

Re: [expert] mandrake distro on linux world magazine resource DVD dosn't install

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 23:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any solutions? Try burning a CD and use that. Good luck, HarM -- Mandrake HowTo's & more: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [expert] testing

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 20:55, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > I need a test...why aren't my messages appearing in the list? Hijack a thread, that way you'll be sure the "list-Nazi" gets you;o) Good luck, HarM -- Mandrake HowTo's & more: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org Want to buy your Pack

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 20:34, John Wilson wrote: > It all comes down to a chicken and egg argument. People who try Linux will > opt for RedHat or SuSE because it's on the shelves. Mandrake barely even > comes into it until some poor soul who bought RedHat suddenly realizes what > a pain

Re: [expert] Very sorry for the hijacked threads

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 19:55, James Sparenberg wrote: > Well given the appropriate nature of the name, I vote for BASH *grin*. Yes, well that would be the last straw, wouldn't it. Oops! I forgot about Rubynever tried that one myself tho. They say it's good. Good Luck, HarM -- Mandra

Re: [expert] Very sorry for the hijacked threads

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 19:37, James Sparenberg wrote: > The only problem now is that for the life of me I can't find your > original post again. *grin*. Doing a search on the "srabclmed" words > ain't easy *grin*. Oh and thanks for taking the time to learn what > happened. So what do w

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 14:18, ed tharp wrote: > yes,,, but it still seems to me a gold mine for some entrepreneur who > can put it together to be a "hands off distribution contractor" where > the distribution and printing of the product are taken off MDKsofts > hands, and done by someone wi

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:02, Anne Wilson wrote: > Write to our favourite mags, > regularly, quoting Mandrake as often as possible. Not a bad idea (I'm a LXF subscriber too), could be worth our while to make our preferences known. I bet there's quite a few of us here. Ann you are priceless

Re: [expert] Re: Mandrake's visibility

2003-09-16 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 10:33, T. Ribbrock wrote: > Admittedly, I've been wondering about this as well. In the > Netherlands, *if* I see a distro in the shops, it's SuSE or Red Hat > and that's it. > > Cheerio, > > Thomas I've noticed the same and also noticed that what is on offer, is usuall

Re: [expert] (OT)Mandrake and Advertising.

2003-09-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 13 September 2003 21:54, Bill Mullen wrote: > Yes, it never ceases to amaze me how many people (newbies especially, but > even some old hands who really should know better) consistently think that > AOLM is some sort of forum Please just excuse me..but what on earth is AOLM???

Re: [expert] (OT)Mandrake and Advertising.

2003-09-12 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 12 September 2003 23:07, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > I've nothing against this way of making some extra revenue. OK, so let's start a new thread on Mandrake undercutting ad-prices and selling itself (and thus us) too cheap;o) ..ducking and running ... Good luck, HarM BTW Charlie, when d

Re: [expert] Re: (OT)Mandrake and Advertising.

2003-09-12 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 12 September 2003 17:59, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > Is it really a good idea to deny Mandrake the same type of revenue > source because of an incorrect impression of advertising? I have my doubts whether it's only that. I think a lot of people actually like the stigma of Linux being dif

Re: [expert] (OT)Mandrake and Advertising.

2003-09-12 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 12 September 2003 11:33, Lee Wiggers wrote: > Let's see if I understand this. Mdk sells advertising for megabucks > to companies who want to reach mdk users. > > Mdk users simply avoid gui install and avoid adverts. > > What a nice day. > > Lee I wouldn't call these prices megabucks, ce

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-11 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 18:10, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > If you tried it you would know whether or not it's working in a few > seconds. If it's not working just hit "Ctrl+c" to kill it. I just tried it, renaming the rc1 iso to rc2. Here's the command (I left '--progress' in just to be saf

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 12:31, James Sparenberg wrote: > Of course you can always just set the new main contrib etc etc urpmi > "points" for your install and just run urpmi --auto --auto-select No > need to re-install .. you'll have final. (no disks but final) I did > that from 9.0 to 9.1

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 09:55, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > > You need to get familiar with rsync. Navigate to the directory with > > the partial downloads and run this from the command line: > > > > rsync -Pv --stats --progress > > ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.2rc2-CD* > >

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 08:32, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > I thought you have cafés in NL, too? And morning papers? Yeah, but the bread is usually horrible if you've gotten used to the German choices. Good luck, HarM Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-09 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:16, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > I'm just d'ling CD1+2 from the NL mirror which Thorsten reported to be > ok (nluug). My personal experience is that the surfnet one is more reliable but that might have changed in time. > Both downloads are running at 90.1kB/s right

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-09 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 02:56, Tom Brinkman wrote: >HarM, post the link you posted to the 'other' list ;) Here it is: http://people.zeelandnet.nl/triade/grounding.html have fun:o) > >No damn boat, pretty good size ship! Maybe you could contract > some dredging as an affiliate vent

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-09 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 23:10, Charlie M. wrote: > Gotta hurry away again so I can get close enough to started so that I'll > feel I'm making at least _some_ headway. Some *hobby* I picked. > > Peace; > Charlie Heheheh, Charlie buy yourself a boat, get grounded (accidentally) at high tide a

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-09 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 20:48, Charlie M. wrote: > Howdy; > > Have you a set of ISOs from the last release still? If so you can rename > them and rsync them with the mirror of your choice to save at least > some bandwidth. > > Greg Meyer did a "mini tutorial" on doing that. A link can be found

Re: [expert] Failed downloads of RC2

2003-09-09 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 20:00, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried 3 times to d'l the first ISO of RC2. First I used the > browser (Mozilla) with a German mirror (ftp.vat.tu-dresden.de). The > download stopped at 50KB left(!) and tiemd out. Trying to resume failed > because the brow

Re: [expert] realtek rtl8180 wlan card -- drivers/modules.

2003-09-05 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 05 September 2003 01:07, James Sparenberg wrote: > If the card was inserted when you loaded the module this could be the > explination. It would do that on mine until I stumbled (yes stumbled) > upon a set of lines in my /etc/pcmcia/config file that actually were > correct for my card.

Re: [expert] realtek rtl8180 wlan card -- drivers/modules.

2003-09-04 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:11, James Sparenberg wrote: > One thing to note is that they mention a point about removing // on line > 128 to correct a compile error. (just in case) > > James Noted that...haven't made a home brewed yet. FWIW I loaded the Suse module directly using "insmod -f

Re: [expert] forgotten knowledge...

2003-09-03 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 05:15, Mark wrote: > > Anne Wilson wrote: > > >Hi, Mark. I've been following this, and it doesn't look promising, so > > >I wonder if it's time for a dirty solution. Could you not pdf2ps all > > >the files, open them in SOWriter, then cut and paste into one file, >

Re: [expert] realtek rtl8180 wlan card -- drivers/modules.

2003-09-03 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 01:05, James Sparenberg wrote: >Seems that there is a known bug in the sourcecode (why it doesn't > want to build.) Someone clued me into a howto that might get you going > and get the modules to build. > > http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/Wireless-Link-sys-W

Re: [expert] realtek rtl8180 wlan card -- drivers/modules.

2003-09-02 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:12, James Sparenberg wrote: > > 2 questions > > 1. Do you know what the driver should be. No not really, I'm supposing (going by the readme that comes with the realtek download) the module is rtl8180_24x.o which is part of the download. if it doesn't work as del

[expert] realtek rtl8180 wlan card -- drivers/modules.

2003-09-01 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
Hello all, I'm trying to get my wlan card to work in my laptop. It's a "sweex pcmcia card" with rtl8180 chip. Now realtek offers download for drivers but not specifically for the mdk kernel (I'm using the stock 2.4.21-0.13mdk with 9.1). The closest are IMO the redhat9.0 and/or suse8.2 Anybody al

Re: [expert] forgotten knowledge...

2003-09-01 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 01 September 2003 21:00, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > "pdf2pdf ?.pdf" that obviously should've been "pdf2ps" on the first line, sorry! -- Good luck, HarM Mandrake HowTo's & More:-) http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org Want to buy your Pack or Se

Re: [expert] forgotten knowledge...

2003-09-01 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 01 September 2003 20:03, Bill Mullen wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Björn Olsson wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've forgotten how to do something that I used to know how to do. That > > > is, using cat to combine a list of files into one single file. >

Re: [expert] Making space

2003-07-29 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 16:39, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Tuesday 29 Jul 2003 3:09 pm, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 July 2003 14:13, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > What is the easiest and safest way of making more space here? > > > > > > Anne > > >

Re: [expert] Making space

2003-07-29 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 14:13, Anne Wilson wrote: > What is the easiest and safest way of making more space here? > > Anne If you've got enough spare space on your HD: make a nice big (5gb or more) new partition, format it ext3 and call it /usr (yeah that's the big one).diskdrake will ask yo

Re: [expert] followup to boot failure message

2003-07-27 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 27 July 2003 04:45, Todd Lyons wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David E Fox wanted us to know: > >installing a new DVD/CDRW combo drive last weekend. I rebooted the > >system (which had been rebooted before, successfully) and the system > >hung completely at "f

Re: [expert] Connection sharing and 2 Nics ?

2003-07-19 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 19 July 2003 20:01, |nSaNe wrote: > Hiya, > > I have Internet connection sharing set up for my windows PC's and have > recently brought Xbox live, now if i use a dediacated cat5 lead to the > mandrake box it works fine (after editing shorewall rules to allow ports) > however as I am che

Re: [expert] Draksync...how

2003-07-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 10 July 2003 16:06, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thunderstorms have conspired to wreck my HDD. I bought a new one and now > wish to bring my desktop fully current with my laptop. It is simply > unreasonably slow to do it via MandrakeUp

Re: [expert] boa-constructor - solved

2003-06-20 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 19 June 2003 21:46, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there anybody on this list that plays around with boa-constructor i.e. > has it gotten it working on Mdk9.1? > > Tia, > HarM requires wxPython2.4-2.4.0.6-2 nothing lower! HarM Want to buy your

[expert] boa-constructor

2003-06-19 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
Hello all, Is there anybody on this list that plays around with boa-constructor i.e. has it gotten it working on Mdk9.1? Tia, HarM Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [expert] 9.0 to 9.1

2003-06-03 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 02 June 2003 21:56, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 02 June 2003 02:30 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 13:32, Brian V Bonini wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 12:52, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > > > Also, before you mo

Re: [expert] Lockups in LM91

2003-05-31 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 23:43, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > On Wednesday 28 May 2003 22:07, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > Peeps, > > > > There have been an alarming number of system freezes here recently, and > My gui works a little more stable since I use the non-fb boot option so &

Re: [expert] Lockups in LM91

2003-05-29 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 22:07, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > Peeps, > > There have been an alarming number of system freezes here recently, and > I guess I'm not so much looking for a solution as I am for other LM91 > users that have been experiencing similar things. > > There have been other system locku

Re: [expert] Mandrake Out of Control?/Is Windows faster on same machine?

2003-02-27 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 27 February 2003 21:45, logic7 wrote: > I hold mdk7.2 as my personal benchmark for speed > and stability and, IMO, no other version after that can stand up to it. I > have noticed, tho, that this is not limited to just Mandrake. RedHat has > the same problem, each successive version is

Re: [expert] Mandrake Out of Control?/Is Windows faster on same machine?

2003-02-27 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 27 February 2003 20:40, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > WineX goes a long way to getting us users completely under Linux, and in > the process saving the developers thousands of dollars of development time. > It helps bridge the chasm between the win world and us, giving us even > more opportuni

Re: [expert] MDK 9.1 rc1 install failure

2003-02-23 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 23 February 2003 07:19, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 21:03, David McGlone wrote: > > On Saturday 22 February 2003 08:48 pm, Joeb wrote: > > > I believe there is already an errata on 9.1 RC1 that states printer > > > installation during the install is broke and. If I recall

Re: [expert] Houston Stands up to M$

2003-01-22 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 22:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 January 2003 21:06, Tibbetts, Ric wrote: > > > Check out this link, detailing why Houston, TX sh*tcanned Microsoft. > > > > > > http://w

Re: [expert] Houston Stands up to M$

2003-01-22 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 21:06, Tibbetts, Ric wrote: > Check out this link, detailing why Houston, TX sh*tcanned Microsoft. > > http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2003-01-21-simdesk-cover_x.htm Hey, didn't any of you yanks tell 'm about linux and openoffice.org? What a mess, sounds more like a

Re: [expert] Is it meant to be hard or easy to change network settings?

2003-01-22 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 14:39, David Robertson wrote: > > I have to admit that I have always had problems with this. At home I > have adsl and at work a small, fixed-IP mixed lan, with dial-up internet > connection.Every time I move my laptop from one location to the other, I > have to set up

Re: [expert] Is it meant to be hard or easy to change network settings?

2003-01-22 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 01:19, Damon Lynch wrote: > On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 14:20, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > As to the gui tool; guuhhh!! I hate it and never use it nor the > > profiles. Much too slow to startup and clunky=:o( > > I agree that once you have learned a

Re: [expert] Is it meant to be hard or easy to change network settings?

2003-01-21 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 22:47, Damon Lynch wrote: > > Are you using DHCP for both networks, or does one of them have a static > IP? On my (old) cable connection, I had a static IP address (with fixed > gateway and DNS too of course). > > Do you use the profiles in the network GUI tool? > > tha

Re: [expert] Is it meant to be hard or easy to change network settings?

2003-01-21 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 21:44, Damon Lynch wrote: > Hi, > > Are the GUI network tools supposed to take care of all changes needed to > connect through KPPP instead of through an already configured ethernet > adapter? That is, change the default gateway, change shorewall > configuration, and mak

Re: [expert] O Yyyyyyyyyyummy!!

2003-01-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 18 January 2003 14:19, Mark Weaver wrote: > H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > On Saturday 18 January 2003 12:38, Tibbetts, Ric wrote: > >>Mark Weaver wrote: > >>>Mandrake 9.1beta2 is out...Just in case no one else knew. Just found it > >>>on one of the

Re: [expert] O Yyyyyyyyyyummy!!

2003-01-18 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 18 January 2003 12:38, Tibbetts, Ric wrote: > Mark Weaver wrote: > > Mandrake 9.1beta2 is out...Just in case no one else knew. Just found it > > on one of the french servers. Ooo! I feel like a little kid at > > Christmas. :) This'll help me feel better after taking that beating

Re: [expert] RPM screwed and worthless

2003-01-17 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 17 January 2003 16:05, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I don't know what happened or when but I cannot do anything with rpm except > make simple queries. VERY simple queries. And I cannot do a database > rebuild either. I have been

Re: [expert] Something that just might work for Mandrake...

2003-01-16 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 16 January 2003 16:17, Jonathan I. Nori wrote: >snip< > What do the rest of you think? > > Jon 8^) I think the idea is interesting, but personally I wouldn't toddle along with Mandrake in a construction like that. I think we have to get some things in perspective her IMHO: Mandrak

Re: [expert] "Removable Media" icon

2003-01-16 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 16 January 2003 01:04, James Sparenberg wrote: > HarM, > > edit the .icewm/toolbar file and you can put the icons on the > taskbar. Easy format for example > > prog Evolution jmail.png evolution > > added Evo to the bar. The icon has to be in /usr/share/icons/mini to > get grabbed

Re: [expert] "Removable Media" icon

2003-01-15 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 23:31, Tom Brinkman wrote: > On Wednesday January 15 2003 03:30 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: > > Still like my two methods. > > > > If I use KDE in control center -> Look n Feel -> Desktop. Uncheck > > enable desktop Icons. > > > > otherwise ... I use iceWM. *grin*. > >

Re: [expert] Mandrake 9.1beta1 screen shots

2003-01-15 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 21:34, James Sparenberg wrote: > Yep did forget that step... xfs needs to be restarted AND you need > to change fonts. To either xft or TTF fonts The ugly old ones still > look ugly in many cases. > > James True, but now that I've reset my fonts-->I have to do

Re: [expert] Recognition of Todd Lyons

2003-01-15 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 16:49, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > I want to make an official appeal to the Mandrake management to keep > Todd Lyons securely in the company, in the recent light of current > events regarding the Chapter 11. > > Todd Lyons has been an incredible asset to the Expert list, help

Re: [expert] 9.1 beta - More 1st impressions

2003-01-15 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:16, Robert Goshko wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:19, Charles A Edwards wrote: > > > On 14 Jan 2003 13:47:44 -0700 > > Robert Goshko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I did , and I get the graphical installation? > > > > > > You need to use > > > I person

Re: [expert] Mandrake 9.1beta1 screen shots

2003-01-15 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
Thanks, will do! HarM On Wednesday 15 January 2003 10:49, James Sparenberg wrote: > All,,, Sorry for the last one being incomplete... never sneeze with your > Hands on the mouse button... weird things happen...*cringe* > > Ok, The following is on my box. > > For freetype I've installed > > freet

Re: [expert] Mandrake 9.1beta1 screen shots

2003-01-15 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 08:14, James Sparenberg wrote: > On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 16:15, Mark Weaver wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Here's a URL with some screen shots. One Gnome and three Kde. Rather > > generic, but it's a start. I'm still making adjustments to the whole > > thing cause there are thi

Re: [expert] SSH

2003-01-15 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 04:31, Ron Stodden wrote: > H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 January 2003 13:12, Ron Stodden wrote: > >>It is kernel that assigns eth numbers at boot time, I suspect based on > >>the (remembered) MAC at the other end of the link, using

Re: [expert] 9.1 beta - More 1st impressions

2003-01-14 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 20:47, Robert Goshko wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:33, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 January 2003 19:50, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:20 -0700, Robert Goshko wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [expert] 9.1 beta - More 1st impressions

2003-01-14 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 19:50, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:20 -0700, Robert Goshko wrote: > > - On the individual package selection and configuration of services > > screen the "work box" on the screen is smaller than the content > > displayed, obscuring the buttons. Th

Re: [expert] SSH

2003-01-14 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 13:12, Ron Stodden wrote: > H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > Take care to know which Nic is going to be eth0 or eth1 i.e. which Nic is > > which. > > Smoothwall recognizes them alphabetically on vendor. > > What makes you think that? > > It is k

Re: [Future] [triade@zeelandnet.nl: Re: [expert] 9.1 beta 1 first impressions]

2003-01-14 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 12:25, you wrote: > "H.J.Bathoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > First there's the original lilo.conf here with all the entries. > > The second is what it looked like after upgrading the 9.0 on /dev/hdd1. > > > > Note

Re: [expert] Mandrake 9.1beta1 screen shots

2003-01-14 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 01:15, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hi All, > > Here's a URL with some screen shots. One Gnome and three Kde. Rather > generic, but it's a start. I'm still making adjustments to the whole > thing cause there are things that I want that aren't on the download > yet. All in all tho

Re: [Future] [triade@zeelandnet.nl: Re: [expert] 9.1 beta 1 first impressions]

2003-01-14 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 01:00, you wrote: > "H.J.Bathoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > What happened was that lilo installation couldn't be stopped/skipped > > ...well no big deal so I installed it in the mbr as I usually do. >

Re: [expert] Baffled on permissions

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Saturday 23 November 2002 14:43, Norman wrote: > Help please before I finally go completely mad!!! Ummm, maybe some of the students got wise on you and 'rootkit'ted the squid box? I would certainly do my best if I were there=:o) Good Luck, HarM Want to buy your Pack or Services from Mandra

Re: [expert] YaBir (Yet another Beta install report)

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 21:35, Charles A Edwards wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:09:02 +0100 > > "H.J.Bathoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Strange I had no mishaps like that whatso-ever not on the upgrade nor > > on the clean install. I got mine off th

Re: [expert] YaBir (Yet another Beta install report)

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 20:54, Charles A Edwards wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:42:11 +0100 > > Wolfgang Bornath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You don't happen to recall which magic spell you were muttering just > > when you succeeded? > > I'll tell you one thing, it was not the same damn one I

Re: [expert] SSH

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 19:56, James Sparenberg wrote: > Harm, > >Thanks on one thing... I never noticed before but you are right a > number of "firewalls" do recognize the cards alphabetically instead of > asking... Wondered about this before myself... SNF does it by going > numbers first...

Re: [expert] SSH

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 17:36, Mark Weaver wrote: > >> > >>I'm getting jazzed about this. As soon as the new Nic's I ordered get > >>here I'll be setting this up on a box here at the house. I tested the > >>boot disk last night after it was made and it works good. even managed > >>to remember ho

Re: [expert] SSH

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 13:51, Mark Weaver wrote: > H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > On Monday 13 January 2003 02:20, Ken Thompson wrote: > >>On Friday 10 January 2003 08:30 am, Mark Weaver wrote: > >>>Ken Thompson wrote: > >>>>On Thursday 09 January 2003 08:1

Re: [expert] Nvidia Drivers + 9.1beta = excellent

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 03:13, Chuck Burns wrote: > After all my reported problems with 4191 NV drivers, and Mdk 9.0, under > both KDE and Gnome, I can now happily report a significant 2D speed > improvement, and don't need to run glxinfo continuously. KDE3.1 is > super-quick using the nvidia dr

Re: [expert] More 9.1 b1 opinions

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 03:23, Azrael wrote: > I have just installed 9.1 beta 1 and I must agree with wow that it looks > better. >snip< > > xine - ever a thorn in my side, gives me trouble. It appears I have no > audio or video drivers installed. Any ideas? Make sure you've got all the requier

Re: [expert] question about 9.1beta1

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 03:05, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hi list, > > I was wondering if any of you that have been test driving 9.1beta1 have > been able to get a display res larger then 1024x768 at all. I can't get > anything bigger then this for love or money. I did, I'm using 1280x1024 with 24 dep

Re: [expert] SSH

2003-01-13 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Monday 13 January 2003 02:20, Ken Thompson wrote: > On Friday 10 January 2003 08:30 am, Mark Weaver wrote: > > Ken Thompson wrote: > > > On Thursday 09 January 2003 08:14 pm, Mark Weaver wrote: > > >>Pierre Fortin wrote: > > >>>Stop or remove "shorewall" -- sure wish Mdk would have made it more

Re: [expert] 9.1 beta screenshots please?

2003-01-12 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 12 January 2003 22:23, Azrael wrote: > You can send me 'big massive ultra fat yummy-licious oh my god that > image won't even fit onto a DVD.. and I haven't even got a dvd-burner' > sized pics ;) OK, gimme some time to take a few:o) Good Luck, HarM Want to buy your Pack or Services fr

Re: [expert] 9.1 beta screenshots please?

2003-01-12 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:48, mycal62 wrote: > Hi all, > > any of you with a running 9.1 beta willing to send some screenshots? > > I would like to see what it looks like before I attempt a test on a > spare drive. > > Thanks in advance. I don't mind sending some screenshots but what kind of c

Re: [expert] 9.1 beta 1 first impressions

2003-01-12 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Sunday 12 January 2003 19:49, Charles A Edwards wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:56:09 -0500 > > Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hey Harm! at least you got buttons to click on at that point! :) No > > buttons showed up on that panel during the intall, which necessitated > > me starti

  1   2   >