David Guntner wrote:
> Charlie grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
>>Please have a look at the relevant manufacturer's site for revisions before
>>you have any more trouble. The updated firmware for my burner was
>>specifically for newer media. As in larger. Under Windows of course.
>
>
> Just to
On Friday 04 October 2002 12:28 pm, David Guntner wrote:
>
> It's over a year old, though I can't say exactly *how* old - a HP CD-Witer
> Plus 8100i. The thing burns CD-RWs at 2X speed and CD-Rs at 4X.
>
> That's a good suggestion and I'm glad you made it. It never occurred to me
> that this mi
On Friday 04 October 2002 02:28 pm, David Guntner wrote:
>
> It's over a year old, though I can't say exactly *how* old - a HP CD-Witer
> Plus 8100i. The thing burns CD-RWs at 2X speed and CD-Rs at 4X.
This is a rather old burner. I think I may have had this same model several
years ago.
>
Charlie grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> Please have a look at the relevant manufacturer's site for revisions before
> you have any more trouble. The updated firmware for my burner was
> specifically for newer media. As in larger. Under Windows of course.
Just to follow up: I did some Google
Charlie grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> How old is that burner? Mine is a circa 1998 Mitsumi CR-4804 TE; and
> it not only will burn 700 MB disks, but the download edition of 9.0
> I'm using now was burned on 90 minute disks. cdrecord sees it as
> "apparently a Phillips..." Installed easily wit
On Thursday 03 October 2002 01:19 pm, David Guntner wrote:
> I've got a good .iso download of all three disk (md5sum says that they're
> all fine, according to the md5sums.90 file that is provided). However,
> disk 2 appears to have a bit too much information on it. My CD burner is
> an older on
021003 David Guntner wrote:
> Philip Webb grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>> mount the ISO -- 'mount -t iso9660 -o loop name.iso /mnt/cdrom' -- ,
>> copy the whole thing to some empty space on your disk,
>> remove some stuff you don't need -- i removed some i18n RPMs -- ,
>> then remake the now-smal
Todd Lyons grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> Damian G wrote on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:03:22PM + :
> >
> > [I said...]
> > > Needless to say, I end up with an unusable disk 2 as a result of this. Any
> > > chance that Mandrake can issue new versions of those ISO files, distributed
> > > a b
Damian G wrote on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:03:22PM + :
>
> > Needless to say, I end up with an unusable disk 2 as a result of this. Any
> > chance that Mandrake can issue new versions of those ISO files, distributed
> > a bit differently? Disk 3 only has about a bit more than 400M of data
On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 12:19:01 -0700
"David Guntner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a good .iso download of all three disk (md5sum says that they're
> all fine, according to the md5sums.90 file that is provided). However,
> disk 2 appears to have a bit too much information on it. My CD b
021003 David Guntner wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
> I've got a good .iso download of all three disk (md5sum says
> they're all fine, according to the md5sums.90 file that is provided).
> However, disk 2 appears to have a bit too much information on it.
> My CD burner is an older
I've got a good .iso download of all three disk (md5sum says that they're
all fine, according to the md5sums.90 file that is provided). However,
disk 2 appears to have a bit too much information on it. My CD burner is
an older one that won't burn 700M disks - only the older 650M disks. And
12 matches
Mail list logo