Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Ya know people, There used to be a time with Linux, that what you get was really bare bones. It was the kernel, some gnu utilities, and a basic installer. Then "we the Linux community" would scurry about, and find the bits that we liked, and wanted, and we spent some time, getting to know them,

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 27 February 2003 03:56 pm, Guy Zelck wrote: > > > >Sounds to me like you are a candidate for Debian stable, slow and steady, > > no real upgrades for years. Of course they are on KDE 2.2.2 still, so > > that won't do. > > You haven't even

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 27 February 2003 04:03 pm, Guy Zelck wrote: > > > >I was going to take a shot at setting up a box and trying to build the > > srpms for KDE3.1 on 8.2, but I see that noone has even voted for this on > > the Club website, so I am going to s

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Greg Meyer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 26 February 2003 04:10 pm, Guy Zelck wrote: Tibbetts, Ric wrote: If you want the newest software, run the new versions, And change every 6 months, no thanks! Now that we finally got all our 3rd party s.w.

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Greg Meyer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 26 February 2003 04:10 pm, Guy Zelck wrote: Hello all, Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? I was going to take a shot at setting up a box and trying to build the srpms for KDE3.1 on 8.2

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 26 February 2003 04:10 pm, Guy Zelck wrote: > Hello all, > > Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? I was going to take a shot at setting up a box and trying to build the srpms for KDE3.1 on 8.2, but I see t

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Greg Meyer wrote: Sounds to me like you are a candidate for Debian stable, slow and steady, no real upgrades for years. Of course they are on KDE 2.2.2 still, so that won't do. Actually on there are kde3.1 packages for debian stable (note that I'm not interest

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 26 February 2003 04:10 pm, Guy Zelck wrote: > Tibbetts, Ric wrote: > > > If you want the newest software, run the new versions, > > And change every 6 months, no thanks! Now that we finally got all our > 3rd party s.w. working like vpn cl

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Tibbetts, Ric wrote: Hello all, Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? Get a grip people! Cool it Ric, slow down. Caught in the race are you? ;-) This is Linux! It's not, it's just one of the many distributions. Linus has nothing to do with Mandrake releases. If you want the

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Hello all, Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? Get a grip people! This is Linux! If you want the newest software, run the new versions, OR: Go get KDE x.xx and install it yourself! How can you people continue to push Mandrake to release the newest software for old releases,

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the exact reason for me trying other distros. Sorce based distros that are not sold are the way to go. (For me). I still use Mandrake at work for servers and workstations but I have been trying others and found "Lunar Linux" "Sorceror" and "Gentoo". With these you

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the exact reason for me trying other distros. Sorce based distros that are not sold are the way to go. (For me). I still use Mandrake at work for servers and workstations but I have been trying others and found "Lunar Linux" "Sorceror" and "Gentoo". With these you

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

So true Lunar Linux took me two days with a P4 1.8. But now that the work is done it should bee smooth sailing for the upgrade path. Ralph > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 19 February 2003 01:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> This is the exact reason for me tryi

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 19 February 2003 01:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This is the exact reason for me trying other distros. Sorce based distros > that are not sold are the way to go. (For me). I still use Mandrake at > work for servers and workstations bu

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

This is the exact reason for me trying other distros. Sorce based distros that are not sold are the way to go. (For me). I still use Mandrake at work for servers and workstations but I have been trying others and found "Lunar Linux" "Sorceror" and "Gentoo". With these you have no need for packages

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Guy Zelck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Simon Ree wrote: > > >Guy Zelck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hello all, > >> > >>Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? > >> > >>I only now can say that I've got my 8.1 system like I want it to be. In > >>the mean time Mandr

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 06:29, Simon Ree wrote: > Guy Zelck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? > > > > I only now can say that I've got my 8.1 system like I want it to be. In > > the mean time Mandrake raced versions, which in my

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

On Sunday 16 February 2003 10:44 am, Guy Zelck wrote: > Hi, > > Simon Ree wrote: > >Guy Zelck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Hello all, > >> > >>Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? > >> > >>I only now can say that I've got my 8.1 system like I want it to be. In > >>the mean time M

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1

Hi, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 09:29:37 -0500 Simon Ree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maybe you could build it? Though it requires some time and effort kde-3.1 will build on 9.0, since 9.0 uses qt3 8.2 uses qt2, so unless you are a programmer and can re-write some of t

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Hi, Simon Ree wrote: Guy Zelck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello all, Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? I only now can say that I've got my 8.1 system like I want it to be. In the mean time Mandrake raced versions, which in my view is crazy . It's becoming more and more d

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 09:29:37 -0500 Simon Ree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe you could build it? Though it requires some time and effort kde-3.1 will build on 9.0, since 9.0 uses qt3 8.2 uses qt2, so unless you are a programmer and can re-write some of the code kde-3.1 can not be built nor w

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Guy Zelck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? > > I only now can say that I've got my 8.1 system like I want it to be. In > the mean time Mandrake raced versions, which in my view is crazy . > It's becoming more and more difficult to h

Re: [expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 16 February 2003 07:00 am, Guy Zelck wrote: > Hello all, > > Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? > You are using an operating sytem that will become unsupported on March31, 2003. About 45 days from now. I don't think you

[expert] KDE3.1 for MD >= 8.1?

Hello all, Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x? I only now can say that I've got my 8.1 system like I want it to be. In the mean time Mandrake raced versions, which in my view is crazy . It's becoming more and more difficult to have recent versions of programs. I find myself more