Shemp Mcgurk wrote:
> > And stop calling me a liar, Shirley.
> >
John Manning wrote:
> Then you ARE a liar.
>
Welcome to the John and Judy Show, where everyone else
is a liar, intelectually dishonest, or just plain nuts,
if they don't agree with their liberal political
propaganda.
Let's all p
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"
> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"
wrote:
> > >
> >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > You can't credibly deny that Bush & Che
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
>
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> >
> > You can't credibly deny that Bush & Cheney publicly pushed the idea
> > and claimed a connection between Saddam and Al Qaed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/2/07 11:23:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
>
>
> Nooz I never have doubted that Al Qaeda are nothing more than freedom
> fighters to you.
>
>
You mean Al
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
>
> You can't credibly deny that Bush & Cheney publicly pushed the idea
> and claimed a connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda.
I'm not denying it.
All I'm saying is that it wasn't this massive "over an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 7/2/07 3:52:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> do.rflex:
>
> Whatever you have reproduced here does NOT back up your claim that
> Bush "over and over and over again" tried to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 7/2/07 3:35:51 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Although there was suspicion that there was a link, it wasn't "over
> > and over and over again" as you say. Of course, the real
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 7/2/07 11:41:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, do.rfl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> BushCo didn't hesitate to conflate Saddam with 9/11 over and over
> > and
> > > over and over again.
> >
> >
> >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > do.rflex:
> > >
> > > Whatever you have reproduced here does NOT back up y
In a message dated 7/2/07 3:52:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do.rflex:
Whatever you have reproduced here does NOT back up your claim that
Bush "over and over and over again" tried to tie Saddam to 9/11.
Show us evidence of THAT instead of distracting us with pa
In a message dated 7/2/07 3:35:51 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Although there was suspicion that there was a link, it wasn't "over
> and over and over again" as you say. Of course, the reality is that
> there WAS a link:
>
> _http://www.frontpaghttp://wwhttp://ww
In a message dated 7/2/07 11:41:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, do.rfl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BushCo didn't hesitate to conflate Saddam with 9/11 over and over
> and
> > over and over again.
>
>
>
>
> Actually, he didn't.
>
> Indeed, at the time, he went out of his way to say that t
In a message dated 7/2/07 11:38:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BushCo didn't hesitate to conflate Saddam with 9/11 over and over
and
> over and over again.
Actually, he didn't.
Indeed, at the time, he went out of his way to say that there wasn't
a connection.
In a message dated 7/2/07 11:23:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
Nooz I never have doubted that Al Qaeda are nothing more than freedom
fighters to you.
** See what's free a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 7/2/07 9:23:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> > > do.r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 7/2/07 9:23:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> > do.rflex@ writes:
> >
> > Hermann Göring explains how the Nazis were able to m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 7/2/07 9:23:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hermann Göring explains how the Nazis were able to make use of this
>
>
> Oh Palease! How assinine!
Oh. So you deny the reali
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/2/07 8:10:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> "A few years ago we couldn't have imagined that our government would
> ban public demonstrations by forcing protesters into "Free Speech
> Zones" behind fences, miles aw
In a message dated 7/2/07 9:23:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hermann Göring explains how the Nazis were able to make use of this
Oh Palease! How assinine!
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 7/2/07 8:10:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> "A few years ago we couldn't have imagined that our government would
> ban public demonstrations by forcing protesters into "Free
In a message dated 7/2/07 8:10:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"A few years ago we couldn't have imagined that our government would
ban public demonstrations by forcing protesters into "Free Speech
Zones" behind fences, miles away from other Americans. The
unimagina
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 7/1/07 11:43:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > The point is that he
> >
> >> complained about "too much freedom of speech." I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 7/1/07 11:43:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > The point is that he
> >
> >> complained about "too much freedom of speech." I
In a message dated 7/1/07 2:35:25 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is beside the point. Our discussion was about Republicans calling
for restrictions on free speech.
You never said what restrictions they called for.
** See
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/1/07 11:43:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> The point is that he
>
>> complained about "too much freedom of speech." IOW, he is for
>> restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate.
>>
In a message dated 7/1/07 11:43:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The point is that he
> complained about "too much freedom of speech." IOW, he is for
> restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate.
>
>
>
>
> Fire Fire Fire! There is a Fire i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/30/07 7:06:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> The point is that he
> complained about "too much freedom of speech." IOW, he is for
> restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate.
>
>
>
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/30/07 6:25:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Whether they are or not has no bearing on Trent Lott. Right wingers
> like to play the "somebody else is a scumbag like our guy"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/30/07 7:06:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> The point is that he
> complained about "too much freedom of speech." IOW, he is for
> restraining freedom of speech which is
In a message dated 6/30/07 7:06:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The point is that he
complained about "too much freedom of speech." IOW, he is for
restraining freedom of speech which is something we cannot tolerate.
Fire Fire Fire! There is a Fire in the Theat
In a message dated 6/30/07 6:25:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whether they are or not has no bearing on Trent Lott. Right wingers
like to play the "somebody else is a scumbag like our guy" card and
try to make it a partisan issue. As if that somehow justifies or
e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/30/07 2:56:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> "Former House Speaker and presumptive 2008 Republican presidential
> candidate Newt Gingrich addressed a freedom-of-speech awards dinner in
> New Hampshire last night
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/30/07 2:16:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> don't know about subsequent elections, but I doubt it improved much.
>
> > Quite high for a Republican. You still haven't said
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/30/07 2:16:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> don't know about subsequent elections, but I doubt it improved much.
>
> > Quite high for a Republican. You still haven't said
In a message dated 6/30/07 2:56:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Former House Speaker and presumptive 2008 Republican presidential
candidate Newt Gingrich addressed a freedom-of-speech awards dinner in
New Hampshire last night and said the problem with the Interne
In a message dated 6/30/07 2:16:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
don't know about subsequent elections, but I doubt it improved much.
> Quite high for a Republican. You still haven't said
> what Lott said that was racist.
What did Lott apologize for?
_Kevin L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/28/07 1:34:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> MDixon wrote:
> >
> >>> IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even
recognize
> >>> it when it is spewed?
> >>>
>
Furthermore on this topic I recalled that Newt Gingrich had said there
is too much freedom of speech on the Internet. Here's the article:
"Former House Speaker and presumptive 2008 Republican presidential
candidate Newt Gingrich addressed a freedom-of-speech awards dinner in
New Hampshire last
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/30/07 11:08:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Call for references for this "high percentage of black votes".
>
> A racist wouldn't have apologized let alone apologized mult
In a message dated 6/30/07 11:08:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Call for references for this "high percentage of black votes".
A racist wouldn't have apologized let alone apologized multiple times
> even on BET for any offense taken.
Sure they would, especially
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/30/07 9:51:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> But it
> doesn't matter that Trent Lott is a racist because Albert Gore Sr. was
> too.
>
>
>
> You really haven't proven Tren
In a message dated 6/30/07 9:51:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But it
doesn't matter that Trent Lott is a racist because Albert Gore Sr. was
too.
You really haven't proven Trent Lott is a Racist. The excuse you use is lame
at best since he was honoring an old,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 6/28/07 7:57:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> > > noo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 6/28/07 7:57:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> > noozguru@ writes:
> >
> > At least it's not
> > > Republicans or conservativ
In a message dated 6/29/07 10:22:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh really? So Trent Lott who recently called for a shutdown of the
> internet and talk radio is not a Republican. What is he then? Have any
> other facts to fabricate for us?
>
>
>
> In fairness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/28/07 7:57:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> At least it's not
> > Republicans or conservatives that want to shut down free
political speech.
> >
> Oh really? So Trent Lo
In a message dated 6/28/07 7:40:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> BTW I gave Sal the
>> example she challenged me for and so did Shemp.
Well, let's see. Bill Maher is a libertarian and has never been any
kind of spokesman for or even identified with the Democrati
In a message dated 6/28/07 7:59:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...as for additional examples, noozguru supplies them himself in this
> very post with references like "Fourth Reich", "this breed of right
> fascism", and "dictator".
>
No, the Bush administration i
In a message dated 6/28/07 7:57:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At least it's not
> Republicans or conservatives that want to shut down free political speech.
>
Oh really? So Trent Lott who recently called for a shutdown of the
internet and talk radio is not a R
Bhairitu writes snipped:
The results are disasterous. Limbaugh was obviously only a "C"
student, but he is absolutely gifted in reducing "gray" issues into
stark black and white. Give him credit for that.
Tom T:
Since our society is solidly running on the basic principles of
addiction, people wa
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:42 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ann Coulter on John Edwards' dead son
--- In HYPERLINK
"mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoo
(snip)
If you've ever read "Mien Kampf" you can see how the first 50 pages
or
> So swayed the simple minded of Germany into being Hitler's
followers
> Just like Fox, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, O'Reilly and their ilk
do to
> The simple minded here. Real thinking conservatives hate those
pe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you've ever read "Mien Kampf" you can see how the first 50 pages
or so swayed the simple minded of Germany into being Hitler's
followers just like Fox, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, O'Reilly and
their ilk do to the sim
Sal Sunshine wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>
>>> BTW I gave Sal the
>>> example she challenged me for and so did Shemp.
>>>
>
> Well, let's see. Bill Maher is a libertarian and has never been any
> kind of spokesman for or even identified with the Democratic
shempmcgurk wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> In a message dated 6/28/07 4:49:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the
>>
> vague
>
>> generaliti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/28/07 4:49:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the vague
> generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's "Outfoxed"
> documentary where the generali
On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>> BTW I gave Sal the
>> example she challenged me for and so did Shemp.
Well, let's see. Bill Maher is a libertarian and has never been any
kind of spokesman for or even identified with the Democratic party, as
far as I know. And the Alec Baldw
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/28/07 4:49:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the
vague
> generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's "Ou
In a message dated 6/28/07 4:49:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just turn on Fox or your local Rush outlet and you can here the vague
generalities all the time. View Robert Greenwald's "Outfoxed"
documentary where the generalities are clearly demonstrated from Fox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/28/07 1:34:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> MDixon wrote:
>
>>
>>
IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize
it when it is spewed?
>> Bhairitu
In a message dated 6/28/07 1:34:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MDixon wrote:
>
>>> IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize
>>> it when it is spewed?
>>>
>>>
> Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> You are the pot calling the kettle black.
>>
>>
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> MDixon wrote:
>
>>> IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize
>>> it when it is spewed?
>>>
>>>
> Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> You are the pot calling the kettle black.
>>
>>
> Yes, the venom is so natural that Bharat2 didn't
In a message dated 6/27/07 10:14:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My recommendation: work with energy fields and attach a prayer to
the energy, saying something like "Cheney, may your bad karma return
3-fold, and soon!". That way, the exact manner of the karmic ret
MDixon wrote:
> > IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don't even recognize
> > it when it is spewed?
> >
Bhairitu wrote:
> You are the pot calling the kettle black.
>
Yes, the venom is so natural that Bharat2 didn't even mention Bill Maher's
hate speech, or even acknowledge it,
Dangerous to you perhaps - except that you are saved through the
weakness of wishful thinking from your own malice.
See message 142401 for a dharani mantra and a better way.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tertonzeno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>My recommendation: work with energy fiel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 2007, at 7:16 PM, do.rflex wrote:
>
> >>> Give us an example of someone on the left who is comparable to
Ann
> >> Coulter.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Have you ever read the huffingtonpost.com? They have dozens
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" wrote:
> > >
> > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/27/07 7:52:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Let's see you provide an example.
>
> Notice that they never do--they just speak in vague generalities.
>
> They can't, which is why they don't.
>
> Sal
>
>
>
> IS the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tertonzeno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---Cheney sold his soul to the Haliburton devil for money, at the
> expense of numerous lives. Very bad karma. However, it's speculative
> and dangerous perhaps to preordain the manner of his karmic
> retribution (
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/27/07 9:33:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Correction: Mahr said it was a pity Cheney Wasn't killed.
>
> Maher was being kind. Cheney is a war criminal of the worst kind.
---Cheney sold his soul to the Haliburton devil for money, at the
expense of numerous lives. Very bad karma. However, it's speculative
and dangerous perhaps to preordain the manner of his karmic
retribution (hanging, being eaten alive by parasites, killer bee
attack, whatever...).
My recommend
In a message dated 6/27/07 9:33:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Correction: Mahr said it was a pity Cheney Wasn't killed.
Maher was being kind. Cheney is a war criminal of the worst kind. Hanging
would be more
appropriate. But I'll live with impeachment.appropriat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/27/07 9:23:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 6/27/07 6:29:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a messag
>
> I challenge yo
In a message dated 6/27/07 7:52:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let's see you provide an example.
Notice that they never do--they just speak in vague generalities.
They can't, which is why they don't.
Sal
IS the venom of the left so natural to you that you don
In a message dated 6/27/07 7:52:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let's see you provide an example.
Notice that they never do--they just speak in vague generalities.
They can't, which is why they don't.
Sal
I did in my last post.
*
In a message dated 6/27/07 9:23:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 6/27/07 6:29:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a messag
I challenge you to come up with anything comparable to this from
someone of prominence on the left:
V
In a message dated 6/27/07 6:29:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I challenge you to come up with anything comparable to this from
someone of prominence on the left:
Video: Ann Coulter wants John Edwards killed
_http://www.youtube.http://wwwhttp://www.yo&;_
(http://
On Jun 27, 2007, at 7:16 PM, do.rflex wrote:
Give us an example of someone on the left who is comparable to Ann
Coulter.
Have you ever read the huffingtonpost.com? They have dozens of
columnists -- all on the left -- and the vitriole and insults they
spew out make Ann Coulter look like an a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:13 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Ann Coulter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/27/07 5:14:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Give us an example of someone on the left who is comparable to Ann
Coulter.
>
>
> Do you really want to go there? Think of som
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/27/07 2:06:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>
>
> Is it ever appropriate to invoke a candidate's dead son in
political
> commentary?
>
> _http://youtube.http://youh
In a message dated 6/27/2007 3:27:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I remember seeing Ann for the first time on TV about five years ago. Since
then I have seen her several times on talk shows on every major network. To
me she has always been very heartless. Most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Is it ever appropriate to invoke a candidate's dead son in political
> commentary?
>
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=6otjSCjgm48
>
When you're possessed with evil, as Ann Coulter is, anything goes...
She's getting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Is it ever appropriate to invoke a candidate's dead son in political
> commentary?
>
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=6otjSCjgm48
>
When you're possessed with evil, as Ann Coulter is, anything goes...
She's getting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Is it ever appropriate to invoke a candidate's dead son in political
> commentary?
>
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=6otjSCjgm48
>
When you're possessed with evil, as Ann Coulter is, anything goes...
She's getting
91 matches
Mail list logo