--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > The sun's position at the time of the vernal equinox
> > can be in Virgo without its being September.
>
> Really? And exa
With all of the traffic on the above topic caused by a simple concept
that was misunderstood I thought the following quote seemed
appropriate. Tom T
Awakening reveals that there is no personal self,
and that everything is myself.
It appears to be a paradox.
We find we are nothing and absolutely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > >
> > > What I'm *very* clear o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:32 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
>
> > That
> > you could create such a fix in the future does not change my basic
> > points.
>
> No, just it does not make sense to refer to something as occurring
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
[...]
> So you agree that in 13000 years, tropical sun is in virgo, aka around
> september?
>
But is Virgo in September by that time?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
On Jan 31, 2006, at 9:32 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:My thesis assumes the modern current calendar. Not that I expect that will be used in 13000 years. But using the current system, sun in tropical virgo will still be in september. And the sun at VE in 15006 will be in tropical virgo.Yes but w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >
> > > The sun's position at the t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Some have made large cogn
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:29 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
>
> > The basic point is understanding what precession of the equinox means.
> > And its impacts long run such as long run weather cycles, human
> > migration and civil
On Jan 31, 2006, at 5:38 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote: The precession of the equinoxes of the Earth is a motion that causes the axis of the Earth's rotation to remain FIXED at an angle of 23.5 degrees, however, it rotates along a great circle with a period of 26,000 years. On average 23.5 degree
On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:29 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:The basic point is understanding what precession of the equinox means. And its impacts long run such as long run weather cycles, human migration and civilization growth/decay impacts, and how correspondence to long-run jyotish cycles may corre
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >
> > > The sun's position at the tim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >
> > > The sun's position at the tim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The sun's position at the time of the vernal equinox
> > can be in Virgo without its being September.
At least its nice you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The sun's position at the time of the vernal equinox
> can be in Virgo without its being September.
Really? And exactly how does that work? Its September when sun is in
(tropical) virgo today. Assuming we don't cha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Some have made large cognitive errors in reading my posts and have
> > interpreted "The VE will be in tropical Virgo in 1300
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some have made large cognitive errors in reading my posts and have
> interpreted "The VE will be in tropical Virgo in 13000 years" to be
> "spring will be in fall". That is muddled reading and thinking, but
> is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > How can vernal equinox possibly be in March when in Virgo?
> >
>
> Have you ever thought your train is moving, when
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> How can vernal equinox possibly be in March when in Virgo?
>
Have you ever thought your train is moving, when
it's actually the train next to yours that's doing that? :)
Yahoo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q1795.html
>
> Will the equinoxes and solstices switch places in
> 13,000 years because of the precession of the Earth's
> rotation axis?
>
> No, there will be no swapping of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You said:
> >
> > "As I suggested earlier, the day-to-day position of
> > the sun in the Zodiac is an entirely different frame
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yah
http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q1795.html
Will the equinoxes and solstices switch places in
13,000 years because of the precession of the Earth's
rotation axis?
No, there will be no swapping of the seasons and the
months of the year.
The precession of the equinoxes of the Earth is a
motio
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What I'm *very* clear on is that spring doesn't end up
> > coming in September 13,000 years hence.
And of course you know
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yah
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > You above clarifi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > You above clarified
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:24 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
>
> > If you agree to the general overall point (regardless of small
> > variations and simplifications) in each of the above 8 points, it
> > logically follows that yo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > You above clarified that in your view that "both" points of
> > reference are tropical. The obsevational reference is
On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:24 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:If you agree to the general overall point (regardless of small variations and simplifications) in each of the above 8 points, it logically follows that you agree that in 13000 years, tropical sun is in virgo, aka around september? All celesti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You appear to think tropically that "the position of the sun from year
> to year at the time of the vernal equinox" is different fro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@ya
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is in two only superfic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is in two only superfic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In tropical right? Western astrologers are the ones tooting "age of
> > acquarius"
> >
> > Thus, in sideral, sun at VE w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 12:22 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Well, it was jumping to another set of questions from the one being
> >> discussed. We can only answer so many questions at a time, but here
> >> goes:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks. I will explore that. Indeed I may be missing something.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dare I mention leap years, leap centuries
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I believe you are using two different calculational reference
> > points, tropical and sideral, in the same single observat
On Jan 31, 2006, at 12:22 PM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote: Well, it was jumping to another set of questions from the one being discussed. We can only answer so many questions at a time, but here goes: 1) vernal equinox occurs once a year when day and night lengths are equal and when the sun rise
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dare I mention leap years, leap centuries
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > > It is in two only superficially. Though in the same
> > > spot, tropical view puts it in Aries, and sideral view puts i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > See Vaj's post about frames of re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > Dare I mention leap years, leap centuries and leap seconds?
>
> The issue is whether the vernal equinox will occur in
> September 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
>
> > Thanks. I will explore that. Indeed I may be missing something. Yet no
> > one has found any factual or logic flaws in the 8 points I listed, or
> > explained th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
>
> > Thanks. I will explore that. Indeed I may be missing something. Yet no
> > one has found any factual or logic flaws in the 8 points I listed, or
> > explained th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > See Vaj's post about frames of reference. Somehow
> > you've managed to confuse at least two different ones.
I believe Vaj is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is in two only superficially. Though in the same
> > spot, tropical view puts it in Aries, and sideral view puts it in
> > Pisces. I think thats where you are confusing your frames.
>
> No, I'm just assumin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yah
On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:Thanks. I will explore that. Indeed I may be missing something. Yet no one has found any factual or logic flaws in the 8 points I listed, or explained the cites I provided that report the slow retreat of the date of the vernal equinox -- and t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dare I mention leap years, leap centuries and leap seconds?
The issue is whether the vernal equinox will occur in
September 13,000 years from now (or whether it *was*
in September 13,000 years ago).
> --- In Fairfie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yah
Dare I mention leap years, leap centuries and leap seconds?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[E
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The vernal equinox is in "September" in 13000 years. Its not that
> > complex. If you are struggling with the September ver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would recommend you get a copy of "Practical Astronomy with your
> Pocket Calculator" which you can get used real cheap. One of the
> important concepts to grok in celestial mechanics is *frames of
> reference*. For ex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Just take it as a given that
> >
I would recommend you get a copy of "Practical Astronomy with your
Pocket Calculator" which you can get used real cheap. One of the
important concepts to grok in celestial mechanics is *frames of
reference*. For example, there are horizon coordinates, equatorial
coordinates, ecliptic coordi
The graph on this link I beleive shows a long term
(1800-2200)declining trend of the date of the vernal equinox --
consistent with the explanation for such I provided earlier.
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/VernalEquinox.html
Some other links that touch on and are consistent with a l
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > If you have a cogent a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > it's always around
> > > March 20
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > it's always around
> > > March 20
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > it's always around
> > March 20--and then work backward, and you yourself will
> > be able to discover whatever it is that isn'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been an astronomy buff for 38 years and am not
> confused easily. I leave it to those who know little
> about the subject to be confused.
>
Ok good. Glad to have your experience available.
So with your knowl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > If you have a cogent argument as to why you believe it is not,
> > please post. (Just saying it is eternally in March is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The vernal equinox is in "September" in 13000 years. Its not that
> > complex. If you are struggling with the September verna
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The vernal equinox is in "September" in 13000 years. Its not that
> > complex. If you are struggling with the September vern
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The vernal equinox is in "September" in 13000 years. Its not that
> complex. If you are struggling with the September vernal equinox, I
> speculate that you have not groked what "precession of the equinox"
> mea
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > It will be for quite some time. It won't be in 13000
> > years.
>
> How's 8000 years? Is that enough proof? Link to here
> and change "maximum year" to and "yearly
> increment" to 100 and you will find tha
> It will be for quite some time. It won't be in 13000
> years.
How's 8000 years? Is that enough proof? Link to here
and change "maximum year" to and "yearly
increment" to 100 and you will find that the vernal
equinox in 9900 will be on March 21st.
http://aom.giss.nasa.gov/srvernal.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Well I will bet you a quart of soma that in 13000
> > years the vernal
> > equinox will be in "September". Lets meet then and
> > see.
>
> No. The sun moves from its lowest point in the sky
> relative to the
> Well I will bet you a quart of soma that in 13000
> years the vernal
> equinox will be in "September". Lets meet then and
> see.
No. The sun moves from its lowest point in the sky
relative to the earth to its highest point in the sky
relative to the earth in six months, from the winter
solsti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What will change are the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Jan 30, 2006, at 3:52 PM, authfriend wrote:
> >
snip.
+++ The problems that one would notice in one lifetime that were
caused by th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > What will change are the time of year the vernal equinox will occur
> > and the position of the sun relative to constellatio
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2006, at 3:52 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:50 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
> >>
> >>> My main question st
On Jan 30, 2006, at 3:52 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:50 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote: My main question still holds. Does the orientation of a building to the sun really change at that rate? Like pyramids, 4000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What will change are the time of year the vernal equinox will occur
> and the position of the sun relative to constellations. Vernal
> equinox is now in March, and the sun is in Pisces when this
> occurs. In 13
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > ...but what happens when the universe implodes back into a point
> > singularity?
>
> Didn't that already happen this morn
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ...but what happens when the universe implodes back into a point
> singularity?
Didn't that already happen this morning?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:50 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
>
> > My main question still holds. Does the orientation of a building
to
> > the sun really change at that rate? Like pyramids, 4000 yrs /
500 is
> > about 8 degre
Eureka once more!
--- anonyff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "authfr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I was not making that assumption. But I was making a
> different false assumption based on my trying to piece things together
> from different posts. I finally did some reading. I think I got now.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:50 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:
>
> > My main question still holds. Does the orientation of a building to
> > the sun really change at that rate? Like pyramids, 4000 yrs / 500 is
> > about 8 degrees
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> > doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> > bhagwan_goose <[EMAIL PRO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:50 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:My main question still holds. Does the orientation of a building to the sun really change at that rate? Like pyramids, 4000 yrs / 500 is about 8 degrees. Has the orientation of the pyramids to the sun changed 8 degrees? A recent poster says n
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> > > doctor_gabby_savy
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
>
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> doctor_gabby_savy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> doctor_gabby_savy
>
On Jan 30, 2006, at 10:37 AM, doctor_gabby_savy wrote:Perhaps you can shed some light on the following: Peter claims that this precession changes the orientation of buildings over long of time -- that a building facing due east will be facing due west in 13,000 years due to precession (assuming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I just went back and looked, and Peter did *not* claim
> > a building facing due east will be facing due west in
> > 13,000 yea
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctor_gabby_savy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yah
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
