--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > > > The TMO is now publishing "resea
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 6:45 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
>
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
> > shempmcgurk@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Big deal.
> > >
> > > Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a
> > pos
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > Big deal.
> > >
> > > Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
> wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> > Of course, I am a scientific expert on
> > global warming and I should be listened and
> > adhered to by one and all on what I say on
> > that matte
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > I *do* not understand the liar's mentality,
> > especially that of the casual, reflexive liars
> > like Vaj and Barry. Maybe if they never got
> > caught at it and it gave
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
wrote:
> [snip]
> Of course, I am a scientific expert on
> global warming and I should be listened and
> adhered to by one and all on what I say on
> that matter.
Too right!
Saw this in my paper today:
Al Gore, who art in thy fully offse
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
> >
> > Big deal.
> >
> > Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a positive
> > thing to do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36 year
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > Big deal.
> > >
> > > Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
[snip]
Shemp's right. He's not a scientist and neither is Vaj for that matter.
[snip]
Of course, I am a scientific expert on global warming and I should be listened
and adhered to by one and all on what I say on that matter.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > > > The TMO is now publishing "res
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2009, at 9:34 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
> >
> > > > Fortunately no serious person on the planet puts
> > > > your opinion over published scientific research.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > > The TMO is now publishing "research" in UFO journals.
> >
> > No, it isn't. Vaj is lying.
>
> Geez, Judy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 9:34 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
>
> > > Fortunately no serious person on the planet puts
> > > your opinion over published scientific research.
> >
> > Why should they?
> >
> > I'm not a scientist.
>
> One reason they'd hav
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> Typically RD it's the methodology, the lack of appropriate
> controls, inherent bias (research performed by TB's) and
> lack of a serious null hypothesis that dooms TM "research".
However, since the co-director of the study is also the
director
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 9:34 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
>
> > > Fortunately no serious person on the planet puts your opinion over
> > > published scientific research.
> >
> > Why should they?
> >
> > I'm not a scientist.
>
>
> One reason they'd
On Nov 7, 2009, at 10:24 PM, raunchydog wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5"
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
wrote:
> >
> > Big deal.
> >
> > Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a
positive thing to do
On Nov 7, 2009, at 10:24 PM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote:
>
> The NIH funding allocation is part of the Obama Administration's
> American Reinvestment and Recovery Act-or economic stimulus bill.
> Competition for the funding was fierce with more than 20,000
> applications for the Challenge Grants cat
On Nov 7, 2009, at 9:34 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
> Fortunately no serious person on the planet puts your opinion over
> published scientific research.
Why should they?
I'm not a scientist.
One reason they'd have for taking you seriously is because you're both
a TM teacher and an MIU grad,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > Schneider has a history of TM "research" quackery.
>
> No, he doesn't. Vaj is lying.
Fulltime and as usual.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
>
> Big deal.
>
> Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a positive thing
> to do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36 year regular meditator
> and even I don't trust their research...
You don't trust
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
> >
> > Big deal.
> >
> > Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a positive
> > thing to do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36 ye
>
> The NIH funding allocation is part of the Obama Administration's
> American Reinvestment and Recovery Act-or economic stimulus bill.
> Competition for the funding was fierce with more than 20,000
> applications for the Challenge Grants category and only 840 >awarded. "In
> the current climat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
>
> Big deal.
>
> Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a positive thing
> to do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36 year regular meditator
> and even I don't trust their research...
>
>
hum, trust.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > Big deal.
> >
> > Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a positive
> thing to do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36 year
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > The TMO is now publishing "research" in UFO journals.
>
> No, it isn't. Vaj is lying.
>
Geez, Judy you caught Vaj in three whopper in a row. Jackpot!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> The TMO is now publishing "research" in UFO journals.
No, it isn't. Vaj is lying.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2009, at 6:45 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Big deal.
> > > >
> > > > Ev
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 6:45 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Big deal.
> > >
> > > Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes
> > > out as a positive thing to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> Schneider has a history of TM "research" quackery.
No, he doesn't. Vaj is lying.
On Nov 7, 2009, at 6:45 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
wrote:
>
> Big deal.
>
> Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a
positive thing to do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36
year regular meditator and
On Nov 7, 2009, at 6:28 PM, raunchydog wrote:
Well, Mr. Smarty Pant. At least TMO merited a grant for $1 million.
Did the Buddhists get any grant money? Probably not, otherwise you
would be crowing about it.
What makes you think they would need to apply for one in the first
place? They
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk"
wrote:
>
> Big deal.
>
> Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a positive
thing to do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36 year regular
meditator and even I don't trust their research...>>
Fortunately no serious
Well, Mr. Smarty Pant. At least TMO merited a grant for $1 million. Did the
Buddhists get any grant money? Probably not, otherwise you would be crowing
about it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 4:51 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
>
> > Big deal.
> >
> > Even
On Nov 7, 2009, at 4:51 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
Big deal.
Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a
positive thing to do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36
year regular meditator and even I don't trust their research...
Schneider has a history of TM "resea
Big deal.
Even if, as a result of the research study, it comes out as a positive thing to
do TM, who trusts the TMO anymore? Heck, I'm a 36 year regular meditator and
even I don't trust their research...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
> NIH grants $1 million to
36 matches
Mail list logo
