..members of Congress who identify as Christian – in the 115th Congress, 91%
of members were Christian,
Christians are overrepresented, according to Pew, given that just 71 percent
of all U.S. adults describe themselves as Christians.
But by far the largest difference between the U.S.
Wisdom v Creed..
The New Congress: One notable finding is that members of Congress are more
likely to claim a religious affiliation than is the public at large.
CQ Roll Call finds that more than 99 percent of the Republican members
identify as Christian, as opposed to 78 percent of the
Wisdom v Creed..
For instance,
Xian Wisdom Spirituality..
Xian (Chinese: 仙/仚/僊; pinyin: xiān; Wade–Giles: hsien) is a Chinese word for
an enlightened person, translatable in English as: "spiritually immortal;
transcendent; super-human; celestial being" (in Daoist philosophy and
Actually Maharishi was a Transcendentalist, spiritually by experience. I knew
him. The religion was culturally something else. Some Buddhist are
transcendentalists by spirituality too.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You have included a number of
You have included a number of things here as examples of how you are defining
"spiritual."
MMY was Hindu. In Hinduism as in Christianity, the existence of a personal
"soul" is assumed. So, are you saying that all persons are spiritual because
they have a "soul" and a "birthright" to
emily.mae50 writes:
The word "spiritual" always amuses me. Re: "for spiritual people." How do
you define "spiritual?"
In 1957, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi said of Spirituality that: 'Spiritual
development is the birthright of everyone, for it is the unfoldment of the
essential nature of
The Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.. -Thomas Jefferson
Yes, of the Unified Field the laws of Nature yet work in mysterious ways.
-JaiGuruYou
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
"Dear God, may Trump fall flat on his ugly mug."
Scientifically, stopping to pray may not be as effective as taking a
'quiet-time' or 'quiet-in' meditation, according to the Bible..
Matthew Ch:6 6 But thou, when thou
"Dear God, may Trump fall flat on his ugly mug."
Scientifically, stopping to pray may not be as effective as taking a
'quiet-time' or 'quiet-in' meditation, according to the Bible..
Matthew Ch:6 6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when
thou hast shut thy
door, pray to
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
FairfieldLife,
“Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but a conversation
about spiritual questions. What did it mean for our spiritual lives?”
Back_formore writes:
Dear God, may Trump fall flat on
FairfieldLife,
“Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but a conversation
about spiritual questions. What did it mean for our spiritual lives?”
Back_formore writes:
Dear God, may Trump fall flat on his ugly mug. Is there a God? (See Doug, we
are a spiritual group.)
Atma is Universal Self. ‘There is no miracle. There is nothing from outside
that comes to make the mind open to its own reality, which is the Atman, which
is his Self, Unified Field of Natural Law—by nature, by nature, by nature.
There is no miracle; it’s by nature. Transcendental Meditation
#
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The all-pervading Soul
15. As oil in sesame seeds, as butter in cream,
As water in River-beds, and as fire in the friction-sticks
So is the Soul (Atman) apprehended in one's own soul,
If one looks for Him with true
The all-pervading Soul
15. As oil in sesame seeds, as butter in cream,
As water in River-beds, and as fire in the friction-sticks
So is the Soul (Atman) apprehended in one's own soul,
If one looks for Him with true austerity (tapas).
-Svetasvatarea Upanishad
First Adhyaya
#
16. The Soul (Atman) which pervades all things
As butter is contained in cream,
Which is rooted in self-knowledge and austerity-
This is Brahma, the highest mystic teaching (upanishad)
This is Brahma, the highest mystic teaching.
-Svetasvatarea Upanishad
First Adhyaya
---In
What does mysticism really mean?
It means the way to attain knowledge.
It's close to philosophy,
except in philosophy you go horizontally
while in mysticism you go vertically.
-Elie Wiesel
“If therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light”
(Matthew 6:22).
If you do not make an effort to know truth, to perceive it beneath the veils
that hide it, you will not discover your own real nature and will therefore
remain at the mercy of outside forces of “circumstances.” In Meditation behold
the start of divine wisdom, that its rays disclose the truth
Cultivating Spirituality in Collective Meditation..
Long before the TM movement ever came to Iowa there came a preceding movement
of transcendentalism.
This was a recognized and practiced group by its own long line in history,
practiced in the cultivation of transcendent spirituality by
Long before Swami Vivkananda, Yogananda and Maharishi Mahesh Yogi came along to
the West came others as teaching transcendentalists, preceding them in a
sequence. In Europe there was a long lineage of the equivalent in European
transcendentalist spiritual satsanga and ashram-like spiritual
On December 31, 1957, celebrating the Conference of Spiritual Luminaries of
India, Maharishi inaugurated the Spiritual Regeneration Movement in Madras,
India, to spiritually regenerate the world.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yep, in a line of
Long before the TM movement came along to Iowa, like a manifesting destiny
transcendentalism as a movement in its own long line was recognized and
practiced as a cultivation of spirituality by group meditation.
At the time of Iowa pioneer settlement of the 1830's and 1840's the old
Quakers
Yep, in a line of transcendentalists Elias Hicks carried the banner in satsang
a generation before Emerson. In their day actually they were widely heard and
followed penetrating the contemporary thought. Considering the size and
population of America then they were in about as far as
Well, in a line Maharishi's transcendentalism message a hundred years before
was carried forward as American Transcendentalism by Emerson and the American
transcendentalist satsanga at the time. Same message of populist
transcendentalism was carried then as seems always has been carried in
I wonder if little Mahesh ever got the inkling as he was sitting in school, for
example, that he would one day grow up to become a famous spiritual teacher?
The times have definitely favored his message, and so many of us have been
influenced by this one man. It could have been anybody (though
Thanks - I like this broader context of the transcendental wave running through
time and consciousness, with some of us picking it up (again and again) as it
comes by. Perhaps the efficiency of the TM technique (diving deeply, precisely,
and quickly, 2 x 20) speaks to this age, where we don't
I have no problem with differing meditation systems having a consistent EEG
pattern, and that very likely each system will have a different pattern. The
question is what does that pattern mean in terms of experience and knowledge
and living life. I like research, it can tell us a lot, but in
A few studies on Ch'an and Zen seen to show the same general pattern.
On the other hand, other studies on CH'an and Zen don't.
This goes along with the idea that teaching meditation is generally an art,
and Maharishi's greatest accomplishment was to create technicians who could
produce
On 8/11/2014 8:27 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
I have no problem with differing meditation systems having a
consistent EEG pattern, and that very likely each system will have a
different pattern. The question is what does that pattern mean in
terms of experience and
TM is different from most other forms of meditation in how the brain reacts to
the practice.
You can pontificate all you want, but measurable physical activity trumps
philosophy every time, or so I believe.
Here's a fine example of how far apart two practices can be, both of which are
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
Meditation-Related Psychosis
Almost all of us posting to Fairfield Life are practising TM or at some point
practised TM. So we can conclude that the way we are now is in some way related
to TM practice. We are the poster-child
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
Meditation-Related Psychosis
Almost all of us posting to Fairfield Life are practising TM or at some point
practised TM. So we can conclude that the way we are now is in some way related
to TM practice. We are the poster-child
scientific research has now shown that despite using this common term
meditation in english, TM has little or nothing in common with the other
technique which are widely used and studied today
Comparison of Techniques - David W. Orme-Johnson, Ph.D.
On 08/10/2014 08:39 AM, lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
TM is different from most other forms of meditation in how the brain
reacts to the practice.
Saying this over and over again, Lawson, isn't going to make it true.
/“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people
to ignore reality and claim that negative is positive
that makes the TM world such a unique place for sure.
From: sri...@ymail.com sri...@ymail.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 12:41 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re
On 08/10/2014 08:39 AM, lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
TM is different from most other forms of meditation in how the brain
reacts to the practice.
Saying this over and over again, Lawson, isn't going to make it true.
/“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it,
/meditation/art-20045858
*From:* sri...@ymail.com sri...@ymail.com
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 10, 2014 12:41 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Spirituality and Psychosis
scientific research has now
On 8/10/2014 10:39 AM, lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
TM is different from most other forms of meditation in how the brain
reacts to the practice.
You can pontificate all you want, but measurable physical activity
trumps philosophy every time, or so I believe.
It's almost like
: Sunday, August 10, 2014 12:41 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Spirituality and Psychosis
scientific research has now shown that despite using this common term
meditation in english, TM has little or nothing in common with the other
technique which are widely used and studied today
Comparison
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Spirituality and Psychosis
scientific research has now shown that despite using this common term
meditation in english, TM has little or nothing in common with the
other technique which are widely used and studied today
Comparison of Techniques - David W. Orme-Johnson
On 08/10/2014 10:03 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 08/10/2014 08:39 AM, lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
TM is different from most other forms of meditation in how the brain
reacts to the practice.
Saying this over and over again,
On 8/10/2014 2:02 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 08/10/2014 10:03 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 08/10/2014 08:39 AM, lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
TM is different from most other forms of meditation in
On 8/10/2014 2:02 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
As for my reply to Lawson, he's been droning this for years. I'm not
saying there's anything wrong with TM just that one shoe size does not
fit all. I think Maharishi knew that and figured if it didn't work
for
On 08/10/2014 12:11 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 8/10/2014 2:02 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
On 08/10/2014 10:03 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 08/10/2014 08:39 AM,
On 8/10/2014 2:52 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 08/10/2014 12:11 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 8/10/2014 2:02 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
On 08/10/2014 10:03 AM, 'Richard J. Williams'
Saying that I'm wrong doesn't make me wrong.
I can cite study after study showing a consistent EEG pattern for TM.
I can cite study after study showing a consistent, but different-than-TM, EEG
pattern for mindfulness.
I can cite study after study showing a consistent, but
-procedures/meditation/in-depth/meditation/art-20045858
From: srijau@... mailto:srijau@... srijau@... mailto:srijau@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 12:41 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Spirituality and Psychosis
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 12:41 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Spirituality and Psychosis
scientific research has now shown that despite using this common term
meditation in english, TM has little or nothing in common with the other
technique which are widely used and studied today
On 08/10/2014 05:00 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 8/10/2014 2:52 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
On 08/10/2014 12:11 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 8/10/2014 2:02 PM, Bhairitu
-20045858
*From:* srijau@... mailto:srijau@... srijau@... mailto:srijau@...
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 10, 2014 12:41 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re
On 8/10/2014 9:12 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 08/10/2014 05:00 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
On 8/10/2014 2:52 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
On 08/10/2014 12:11 PM, 'Richard J. Williams'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Did Danial Boone have a family? You know, was he also a family man?
Did he get along with people in some form or was it all 'rip-off or be
ripped-off' on the frontier?
Are you implying that ole Dan'l wore a con-skin cap? :-)
Axe-holes and con-skins. We certainly are creating our own culture here at FFL.
What next, intellectual
vibe-wation if Share is to be believed.
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
wrote:
I think Religion is a bi-product of spirituality, as opposed to sprituality
being a bi-product of religion.
First you have spirituality. Someone achieves great spiritual development and
achieves a great deal of admiration. So a bunch of people follow that person,
record his thoughts and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seekliberation seekliberation@...
wrote:
I think Religion is a bi-product of spirituality, as opposed to sprituality
being a bi-product of religion.
It is very difficult to gain *proficiency* in Religion without spirituality,
this is true, that is
And how does that person 'achieve' great spiritual development?, through a
Religion developed by someone who achieved great spiritual development, and
on and on it goes, religion leads to spirituality which is the substance of
religion. FWIW. :-)
Not necessarily. Eckhart Tolle, from what
Additionally, the suggestion that one is 'spiritual' and not Religious,
generally means one does not follow any 'sectarian' Religion, but some take it
a step further and suggest that Religion itself doesn't even lead to
spirituality which is ridiculous.
Life itself leads to spirituality, true
(Generally, you don't BECOME spiritual without
practicing some form of Religion, today, most
people who claim to be 'spiritual' (as opposed
to Religious) *ARE* practicing some from of
discipline i.e. RELIGION).
Bhairitu:
Religion is for sheeple...
Religion is for the 99%;
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana. The misery in the
world is because we throw away the banana and are holding on to the skin.
I had not really thought about this. I found an article on about.com
(http://atheism.about.com/od/religionnonreligion/a/spirituality.htm) that
discusses this point - it implies this distinction between spirituality and
religion is mainly an American (US) phenomenon.
My question here is, if an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@... wrote:
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana.
The misery in the world is because we throw away the banana
and are holding on to the skin.
Hear hear. Either that or religion is the
Dude, is that coffee shop a little smokey this morning?
Are you saying that religious people are usually dicks?
Hear hear. Either that or religion is the condom and
spirituality is the dick.
Religions that involve a lot of costumes and dress-up
are like French ticklers.
:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
I had not really thought about this. I found an article on about.com
(http://atheism.about.com/od/religionnonreligion/a/spirituality.htm) that
discusses this point - it implies this distinction between
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@... wrote:
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana. The
misery in the world is because we throw away the banana and are
holding on to the skin.
Or, fixating on the finger pointing at the
I think what Turq is trying to say is that ALL of life itself, is Religion,
either it is poorly practiced Religion or Wisely practiced Religion.
Because life itself is a form of school and learning (through the experience of
opposites) whose purpose is to bring all human Beings to the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@ wrote:
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana.
The misery in the world is because we throw away the banana
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi martyboi@ wrote:
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar:
Religion is the banana skin and spirituality is the banana. The
misery in the world is because we throw away
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u anitaoaks4u@... wrote:
I think what Turq is trying to say is that ALL of life
itself, is Religion, either it is poorly practiced Religion
or Wisely practiced Religion.
Au contraire, Pierre. What Turq is trying to say is
that in his opinion religion
'wgm4u' I am quoting from two different posts here (Turq Xeno). I think you
are missing something here. I cannot really speak for Turq, but to take a shot,
what he says is often a lot less than what he has been assumed to have said,
that is, you have over-interpreted whatever his intent might
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
'wgm4u' I am quoting from two different posts here (Turq Xeno). I think you
are missing something here. I cannot really speak for Turq, but to take a
shot, what he says is often a lot less than what he
Fair enough. Regards Krishnamurti and Tolle. I think Krishnamurti's style of
communicating his experience to others was largely confusing, though now I get
what he was saying much better than in years past. Tolle does fare better, and
is rather charming to listen to, so you get a sense of what
Q: Dear Guruji, I have never been a spiritual or a true religious person. How
can I learn to let go and believe?
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar: You don't have to label yourself- I am spiritual,
religious person etc. No need for it. Just be natural, beautiful, good human
being. That's it!
If someone is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
pirituality once and for all.
Is it possible to have a spiritual experience without
the presence of and outside of the confines of a
religion? Of course it is. Many of the founders of
what later became religions did
http://www.fantasygallery.net/fishel/art_6_ENCHANTED-ENCOUNTER.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
Right on, Buck. Incredibly simple isn't it?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:
When the mind stops talking, one is aware that one is life. One is immersed
in it rather than being on the surface, talking about it.
Paradoxically this enables full participation. With diminution of
egocentricity, the joy of freedom and
Right on, Buck. Incredibly simple isn't it?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
When the mind stops talking, one is aware that one is life. One is immersed
in it rather than being on the surface, talking about it.
Paradoxically this enables full participation.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
Right on, Buck. Incredibly simple isn't it?
Yep, take the time.
The true path is meeting our eyes even now. Just attend to what is actually
going on -but keep it simple and keep it clear. Just open your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
Right on, Buck. Incredibly simple isn't it?
Yep, take the time.
The true path is meeting our eyes even now. Just attend to what is actually
going on -but keep it simple and keep it clear.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
Right on, Buck. Incredibly simple isn't it?
Yep, take the time.
The true path is meeting our eyes even now. Just attend to what is
actually going on -but keep it simple and
All I can say Rav, is that given a choice, I going to come down on I
might call the Believer side of the equation. Higher Power is mystery
to me, and one that I am no hurry to solve. But I am not going to deny
my own experience. You are ruthless, though oftentimes funny in your
pointed
Thank you Steveji. Like I said I wouldn't use the words believers and
non-believers since even the so called Skeptics have some kind of belief
in their lives. Belief in themselves, may be their spouse, kids and
family, belief that the plane they boarded in Fairfield will land in
Amsterdam. In fact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
snip
David's publishing record has taken a kind of downward turn
of late. Last article I heard of was in a pseudoscience/
paranormal/UFO journal IIRC.
In
Vaj:
Here's a good article on TM research you may have
missed, by award-winning writer Andrew Skolnick:
Is this the same Andrew Skolnick that got fired from
one of the scientific research journals recently for
publishing untruths and getting sued by Deepak Chopra?
So, a 'lucid dream' is a
If I might ask, Buck, who do you think you are talking to?
Could one of the people possibly be the person who asked
some pointed questions to the person who keeps trotting
out the phrase, They just lack spiritual experience
about his *own* personal spiritual experience?
If so, I'll answer after
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
wrote:
You are trying to make a case that you can make a low
level vetting decision and I am not buying it.
Yes, I know. You're using your
On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Ahem. If this were true, wouldn't YOU be using
your epistemic hubris to claim that something
*you know nothing about* is *not* a scam?
Ignorance and deception will always find a breeding ground in hidden
areas of science. Nowhere are such
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
You are trying to make a case that you can make a low
level
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Ahem. If this were true, wouldn't YOU be using
your epistemic hubris to claim that something
*you know nothing about* is *not* a scam?
Ignorance and deception will always
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
wrote:
Judy: And now we've reached the point in the exchange where
Curtis realizes he has no legitimate ammunition, so
he starts to make shit
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:23 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
See above where I said make shit up and try to stuff it
in my mouth?
Where exactly did I tout, or even hint at, my credentials
or training in this field?
Nowhere. You are trying to make a case that you can make a low
level vetting
You are trying to make a case that you can make a low
level vetting decision and I am not buying it. So we
are just arguing about where your lack of knowledge
comes to play here.
Vaj:
One thing you can count on David O-J for is a good
chuckle. As usual: he delivers...
Maybe you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
snip
If these allegedly advanced TMers aren't also lucid dreaming, it
doesn't sound like they've actually developed a real witness-
consciousness.
Vaj might want to read a paper by Gackenbach, a leading
lucidity researcher
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
[Curtis wrote:]
I am so impressed with your credentials in this field.
You are just another person who mistakes intelligence
for
Judy: And now we've reached the point in the exchange where
Curtis realizes he has no legitimate ammunition, so
he starts to make shit up and try to stuff it in my
mouth, his standard tactic when up against the wall.
Such integrity.
(Doesn't it ever occur to him that the shit is going
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@...
wrote:
Judy: And now we've reached the point in the exchange where
Curtis realizes he has no legitimate ammunition, so
he starts to make shit up and try to stuff it in my
mouth, his standard tactic when up against
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
I have no way to evaluate the two German editor's
background
Yes, you do. You could look them up on the Web, as I did.
. . .
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
I have no way to evaluate the two German editor's
background
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
snip
I don't share your confidence in my ability to
On Apr 25, 2010, at 11:17 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony...@...
wrote:
What say the doubters, quitters and poor in spiritual experience
here to this?
Is this research no good too? Just wondering.
First of all what part of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
snip
David's publishing record has taken a kind of downward turn
of late. Last article I heard of was in a pseudoscience/
paranormal/UFO journal IIRC.
In fact, what O-J published in the Journal of Scientific
Exploration was not a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony...@... wrote:
What say the doubters, quitters and poor in spiritual experience
here to this?
What say they TO WHOM?
Possibly to insufferably elitist assholes who
consider themselves better than those who moved
on past the spiritual
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo