First, this is not a bug.
Optimization only should be done when you're essentially through with the
layout, including which measures will be on which systems. (If you're
expanding staves, you're not through with layout.) In other words, lay it
out just as if the empty staves will be part of the fi
On 14 Dec 2003, at 02:03 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Darcy:
(Have you even tried Fin 3.2 in Panther's Classic?)
I haven't done *anything* in Panther Classic, because every time the
OS wants to go there, I get alerts to the effect that various of my
utilities need to be changed to some other vers
Piano piece, all systems had been previously optimzied: Mass select all of
top staff (page or scroll view), '2' meta-key to expand. (Settings for
expand: to 2 staves, 1 note each staff, extra notes in bottom, new staves
created below existing ones). Do expansion. Instead of now having 4
staves,
For disk and volume problems, there's a bunch of programs you can't
depend on, and there is Disk Warrior. Disk Warrior will solve your disk
problems or else tell you why it can't. (I've never seen it fail to fix
these kinds of problems, and I've seen plenty of them.)
For Classic, I highly recom
On Sunday, December 14, 2003, at 11:03 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
After installing Panther, System 9 started alerting me that my catalog
file was busted. I "fixed" it with Disc Doctor (which found and
corrected a number of things, but I'm still getting the busted-catalog
alert), whereupon OSX st
On 14 Dec 2003 at 10:43, Brad Nelson wrote:
> I am seeking confirmation that the problem may have been directly
> related to installing 2004 (which requires 128MB ram) on a computer
> with only 64MB ram.
I can't conceive of a reason why your described problems would be
caused by low RAM. Either
On 14 Dec 2003 at 9:50, Philip Aker wrote:
> On Sunday, December 14, 2003, at 08:47 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>
> > With Panther I can now see that I actually get a lot more from OS X
> > than I would ever have got from an updated OS 9.
>
> That was always the goal of OS X. It was perhaps diff
On 14 Dec 2003 at 6:30, Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
> At 4:40 pm -0500 12/13/03, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> >Basically, Microsoft has backwards compatibility down.
>
> Yeah.
>
> Right.
>
> Much of the rest of your message either apologizes for Microsoft's
> ineptitude at providing adequate backwa
On 14.12.2003 20:03 Uhr, Andrew Stiller wrote
> I haven't done *anything* in Panther Classic, because every time the
> OS wants to go there, I get alerts to the effect that various of my
> utilities need to be changed to some other version in order to work
> well in the Classic environment. I am p
Tobias,
Thanks for responding so quickly.
I have replaced the printer cable, tried the printer on another computer
system (worked fine), reformatted the hard drive and did a clean install
of Win98se, tried different printer drivers, etc. I have not yet
tried b) below, and will try to see if that
> Without thinking, I installed Finale 2004 on an older computer
> with only 64 MB of ram. Is this what's causing my printer
> to print intermittent gibberish on word-processed documents
> as well as Finale scores?
No. 64 MB RAM is plenty. It also has hardly anything to do with printing.
I wo
Darcy:
(Have you even tried Fin 3.2 in Panther's Classic?)
I haven't done *anything* in Panther Classic, because every time the
OS wants to go there, I get alerts to the effect that various of my
utilities need to be changed to some other version in order to work
well in the Classic environmen
Without thinking, I installed Finale 2004 on an older
computer with only 64 MB of ram. Is this what's causing my printer
to print intermittent gibberish on word-processed documents as well as
Finale scores?
Also, I can't seem to uninstall Finale 2004 with either the Finale
uninstall utility or i
On Sunday, December 14, 2003, at 08:47 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
With Panther I can now see that I actually get a lot more from OS X
than I would ever have got from an updated OS 9.
That was always the goal of OS X. It was perhaps difficult to see how
the merging of OS 9, NeXT, and Unix would
Until about three weeks ago I felt pretty similar to you about OS X.
However, Panther has changed this, and for that very reason I am actually
glad that the release date was not before but after the Panther release
date. It would have been absolute desaster if Finale had come out Jaguar
compatible
At 09:07 AM 12/14/03 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>WinFin2004
>Windows 98SE
>Since upgrading to WinFin2004 I have had several lockups associated with
>the following dialogue:
>Cannot Create Font DC
>Has anyone else seen this? The dialogue box has an OK button but usually
>the result is a restart
I'm using Win98se and have not seen that error message.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WinFin2004
Windows 98SE
Since upgrading to WinFin2004 I have had several lockups associated with
the following dialogue:
Cannot Create Font DC
Has anyone else seen this? The dialogue box has an OK button but usual
At 4:40 pm -0500 12/13/03, David W. Fenton wrote:
Basically, Microsoft has backwards compatibility down.
Yeah.
Right.
Much of the rest of your message either apologizes for Microsoft's
ineptitude at providing adequate backwards-compatibility or blames
the creators of 'incompatible' software.
WinFin2004
Windows 98SE
Since upgrading to WinFin2004 I have had several lockups associated with
the following dialogue:
Cannot Create Font DC
Has anyone else seen this? The dialogue box has an OK button but usually
the result is a restart.
--
Malcolm Miles
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Does ex
19 matches
Mail list logo
