On Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 09:04 AM, Javier Ruiz wrote:
> You´ve got to have some kind of compiler, ah?
> I wonder if I could try that myself with the free programming
> tools that
> come with Mac OS X.
For the purposes of learning C/C++ on Macintosh, use Apple's
free MPW/ResEdit combo for
Dear Philip,
You´ve got to have some kind of compiler, ah?
I wonder if I could try that myself with the free programming tools that
come with Mac OS X.
[But, hey, wake up, Javier. I am still fighting with Real Basic...]
Saludos,
Javier Ruiz.
> Actually, it's easier than you might think. There
Mark D. Lew wrote:
> At 7:48 AM 06/23/02, David H. Bailey wrote:
>
>>There is not the ability to hide every element you might want to hide,
>>using a staff style. For instance if you wanted to hide every 8th rest,
>>you would have to do that manually using the speedy entry tool. That is
>>no
At 7:48 AM 06/23/02, David H. Bailey wrote:
>There is not the ability to hide every element you might want to hide,
>using a staff style. For instance if you wanted to hide every 8th rest,
>you would have to do that manually using the speedy entry tool. That is
>not something you can do with a s
>
>I have to admit, it never even occured to me to try doing multiple time
>signatures with asynchronous barlines this way, but I just tried it and it
>works a treat! I set up three staves in 1/4, clicked "independent time
>signatures" on, and changed the the time signature "display as" to 5/4, 6
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 04:48 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> But Finale comes with the ability to use plug-ins, and you can
> learn how to program plug-ins. It is not for the faint of
> heart, though,
Actually, it's easier than you might think. There is a sample
plugin that shows how impl
Michael Edwards wrote:
[snip]
> Do these staff styles allow you to hide particular symbols individually, or
> only allow you to set a general rule which decides automatically what is hidden
> and what is not, and then you can't make exceptions?
>
Staff styles don't have any particular
Concerning using staff styles to hide barlines to achieve non-aligned
barlines, this workaround becomes increasingly unworkable the smaller
the common denominator is. Not only do you have Colin's issue of dotted
notes, you have the issue of beams. If the LCD were eighth or smaller
notes (and even
At 6:10 AM 06/23/02, Michael Edwards wrote:
> It seems that you can hide any element of notation in Finale, so that
>it is
>not visible in a score, but still works in the logic of the program; and that,
>on top of the hidden symbol, you can have something else which is visible but
>has no eff
(Sorry Michael, meant to send this to the list, not to your personal
address. Keep forgetting the system's changed!)
Johannes wrote
> >Can you explain the steps to do this, I never thought of this (but then I
> >haven't come into the situation of needing it, yet, but you never
know...).
I have
[Johannes Gebauer:]
>On 22.06.2002 18:18 Uhr, Robert Patterson wrote
>
>> Finale does not directly support non-aligned barlines. However, Staff
>> Styles provide a fairly simple workaround, as long as the two staves
>> have a reasonable lowest common denominator where the barlines coincide.
...
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
