On 02.08.2008 Matthew Hindson fastmail acct wrote:
Anyway, in the end I just hope that Finale doesn't consider removing or
crippling Speedy. It really is an excellent and easy-to-use tool.
Perhaps eventually they'll just limit it to 4 notes, because publishers
fed up with composers using
David,
Spot on.
This would preserve backward compatibility and meet the objection of it being
too wild for the publishers.
FWIW, I do not write for a publisher. I write for a private group of people. I
haven't taken a survey, but I would venture a guess that many others do not
either. I
Matthew Hindson fastmail acct wrote:
I downloaded the demo and checked it out. But it raised a few
questions/issues which maybe arose during Finale 2008, I'm not sure.
- Does everyone else have the Garamond font for the items in the Setup
Wizard? (Yuk! Great printing font, horrible screen
Rob Deemer wrote:
I agree with the other postings - Kinko's is a ripoff and they'll probably
bind it wrong in any case. My guess is those scores are going to be pretty
thick (as each page would only have 4-6 measures), so they'd have to punch
'em in several passes which only increases the
Kettelhut, Matt wrote:
Bob et al. -
I want to apologize for the miscommunication in our support representative's
response to your concern about the left-channel-only FireWire audio interface
issue.
I'd like to make it clear that MakeMusic is actively pursuing a fix for the
FireWire audio
Tyler Turner wrote:
--- On Fri, 8/1/08, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate that link -- however I still see no reason
that
a publisher has been crippled by the different numbers of
staff lists submission may have.
Scott addressed this. In essence, having the more solid
Allen Fisher wrote:
So I guess these guys don't count:
http://forum.makemusic.com/default.aspx?f=6m=230216
First couple of guys seem to like it just fine.
Actually, only Wiggy seems happy with it, the others seem
more like they're okay with it but haven't really gotten
into it.
The
Don't count on it -- they obviously have put a lot of
thought into this and have put a lot of programming time
into developing that aspect of this upgrade. I don't think
they're likely to change anything unless or until the large
client publishers who apparently demanded this change their
Williams, Jim wrote:
Hi, Craig...
Jim Williams here, the euphonium player...
Garritan Jazz sounds require a fair amount of score-marking. There is a lot of expressivity, hence the need for a lot of controller action. You **ARE** using human playback, aren't you? That makes the task
Jari Williamsson wrote:
Agreed, although I don't understand why everyone seems to focus on staff
lists.
I have actually vowed to stop talking about staff lists. I unsubscribed
from the relevant thread over on the forum.
But the why is this. I cannot remember any feature in the prior 20
Chuck Israels wrote:
[snip]
fluent in data entry in Sibelius, but he is copying existing
manuscripts, so the thought process order doesn't matter. He can
enter the duration first with no hitch in his thinking. For me, as a
composer/arranger, that doesn't work, so I don't get the conventional
From: John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's entirely possible that the chains--especially Kinko's--would
refuse to handle it because it is copyrighted music. You did realize
that it is copyrighted, right? And that your copying it without
permission is an infringement?
Yes, but neither
Craig Parmerlee wrote:
I haven't figured out how to turn down the reverb with F2009. Is it a
setting in the Aria player?
It sounds as if my expectations were too high with the Garritan sounds.
Having listened to the orchestra samples, the Finale website implied
strongly that you enter the
John Howell wrote:
At 5:43 PM -0700 8/1/08, Chuck Israels wrote:
BUT, time value selection precedes pitch (and that's the only way it
can work in Sibelius), and that is a deal breaker for me. When Finale
catches up (as it seems to have done pretty well in Simple Entry) AND
provides the same
Robert Patterson wrote:
Finally, it almost surely *is* an artificial limit. I am virtually
certainly I could write a plugin that allowed you to maintain,
associate, and name as many staff lists as you like. (I never would
write this plugin because those files would not be supported by MM or
dhbailey wrote:
But dumping the midi file into Sonar won't help a person who is using
the Garritan sounds which come with Finale -- he didn't say he had
purchased the JABB set from Garritan. He has simply made use of the
newly included samples from JABB which were incorporated in the
Barbara Touburg wrote:
Then I respectfully and urgently ask you do so, Robert! I can't imagine
working WITTHOUT the staff lists! They are like style sheets to me!
Ha, ha.
This is one of those cases of be careful what you ask for, because I
am half tempted to try. Even though it would
Dear all,
I have to finish a score in MacFin2k5b. On some places is asked for a
Tamtam. Alas, I can't find a playback issue (not in GM for sure).
Is my brain getting older, or am I missing something obvious?
Can/will somebody show me the right way?
TIA
Hans
Perhaps eventually they'll just limit it to 4 notes, because publishers
fed up with composers using all these many notes in their compositions.
I am sure you can see the benefits in the long term. Music with four
notes is just so much easier to learn.
Johannes
Well, in worked so well for
Robert Patterson wrote:
Ha, ha.
This is one of those cases of be careful what you ask for, because I
am half tempted to try. Even though it would probably work, any file you
saved could not be supported by me and would not be supported by MM. And
because Finale's UI is expecting to find
Barbara Touburg wrote:
Why couldn't you support those files?
Because I could not guarantee that MM would upgrade them correctly in
Fin10 (assuming there will be one), or that MM would not deliberately
prevent a plugin from doing what I have in mind. They could do either.
Nor could I
Robert Patterson wrote:
Barbara Touburg wrote:
Why couldn't you support those files?
Because I could not guarantee that MM would upgrade them correctly in
Fin10 (assuming there will be one), or that MM would not deliberately
prevent a plugin from doing what I have in mind. They could do
I would urge you to put together an even more specific set of
requirements for how you use staff lists and post it to the Finale
support forum. They need to hear from impacted users.
I find particularly compelling your continuo example with the hidden
playback staves. Drag-apply simply does
I had no trouble using the full JABB sounds. You need to use the
Kontakt Player 2 to get them loaded into the file, and that interface
is nowhere near as clear and elegant as the new Aria Player that comes
with Finale, but it works decently. I'm not sure of this, but the
impression I
Please follow this URL to an MP3 of The United States Marine Band playing my
edition of Amilcare's Variations on Carneval of Venice. The original
instrumentation was appropriate for 1860s Cremona, but I had to bring it
forward to the type of band that was established by Sousa.
At 8:54 AM -0400 8/2/08, dhbailey wrote:
But why is this issue being raised now, when these same major
publishers have been using Finale for many years? Why wasn't the
staff-list limit lowered to 4 many years ago? That's the part that
baffles me -- did these publishers simply wake up and
But does it really matter? Why force the program to just have 4 because
a publisher says so? Is make music going to start enforcing fonts as
well? Are we all going to be stuck using Jazz font or something next?
John Howell wrote:
Ummm, did I miss something in all these identically-named posts,
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:32 PM, John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NO PUBLISHER HAS ACTUALLY SAID THAT THIS IS A PROBLEM
FOR THEM?!!! I thought someone just brought the possibility up out of thin
air as an apologia for MakeMusic's ...snip...
I've yet to heard any publishers say this for
On Jul 31, 2008, at 11:56 AM, John Howell wrote:
There were two VERY successful bands in the early '60s that pushed
the limits of jazz/pop/rock'n'roll/classical styles and started a
fusion movement that continued for at least 15 years (and may still be
happening). ...
The two bands I'm
Hi, Prof. Howey--
--I tried twice--got this both times--Bob
Server not found
Firefox can't find the server at www.marineband.usmc.mil.
* Check the address for typing errors such as
ww.example.com instead of
www.example.com
* If you are unable to load any pages,
Works fine for me...
Bob Morabito wrote:
Hi, Prof. Howey--
--I tried twice--got this both times--Bob
Server not found
Firefox can't find the server at www.marineband.usmc.mil.
* Check the address for typing errors such as
ww.example.com instead of
From: John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:49:10 -0400
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Score Binding Question
Are we really talking about donation here, or plain and simple
deposit with LC as part of the copyright process? And are the
At 8:26 AM -0500 8/2/08, Robert Patterson wrote:
Jari Williamsson wrote:
Agreed, although I don't understand why everyone seems to focus on
staff lists.
I have actually vowed to stop talking about staff lists. I
unsubscribed from the relevant thread over on the forum.
But the why is
Robert Patterson wrote:
Jari Williamsson wrote:
Agreed, although I don't understand why everyone seems to focus on
staff lists.
I have actually vowed to stop talking about staff lists. I unsubscribed
from the relevant thread over on the forum.
But the why is this. I cannot remember any
At 2:30 PM -0400 8/2/08, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On Jul 31, 2008, at 11:56 AM, John Howell wrote:
There were two VERY successful bands in the early '60s that pushed
the limits of jazz/pop/rock'n'roll/classical styles and started a
fusion movement that continued for at least 15 years (and may
At 5:25 PM -0400 8/2/08, Blake Richardson wrote:
From: John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:49:10 -0400
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Score Binding Question
Are we really talking about donation here, or plain and simple
deposit with LC
A little follow-up question for Chuck or anybody else who knows the answer.
If I purchase the full JABB package and set my instruments under
Kontact, are those settings saved with my Finale score? In other words
the next time I open that score, it will have the same instruments I
assigned
On 2 Aug 2008, at 8:41 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
If I purchase the full JABB package and set my instruments under
Kontact, are those settings saved with my Finale score?
Yes.
In other words the next time I open that score, it will have the
same instruments I assigned through Kontact?
On Aug 2, 2008, at 5:41 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
A little follow-up question for Chuck or anybody else who knows the
answer.
If I purchase the full JABB package and set my instruments under
Kontact, are those settings saved with my Finale score? In other
words the next time I open
Er um, my noisy posts both on this list and on the public forums
included direct quotes of MM folks that I believed said it (by
circumlocution of course). I'll let you check your own deleted folder.
I'm too tired of the subject to check mine. ;-)
RP
John Howell wrote:
Has MakeMusic actually
COOL!!! Thanks
OK. One more nit-picky question. I am confused about the pricing.
This page says it is $249.
http://www.garritan.com/jazz.html
This page says it is $199.
https://www.garritan.com/order.php
Anybody know what's up with that? I don't suppose they offer an upgrade
price for
In the plug-ins menu, there is a plug-in for MiBAC Rhythm Section
Generator. This could be very useful for maying down a quick bed, even
if it isn't the sort of track you would want in the final version. But
there are only 4 styles presently. I'm working on a chart that needs a
funky groove
42 matches
Mail list logo
