exactly-keyboard shortcuts have a steeper learning curve-pianists are pretty
good with them, though :p
2009/6/27 Phil Daley p_da...@tds.net
I expect the users who were tested were not that familiar with the keyboard
shortcuts.
It's obviously faster to make a few keystrokes that navigating a
2009/5/31 John Howell john.how...@vt.edu
At 2:22 PM -0700 5/31/09, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
No, that is NOT Speedy. Speedy allows you to be holding down a chord
and then deciding on the notes value. Sibelius, as far as I know, does
not have this.
I fully realize that different people have
Yeah the 'popular' chord notation (anyone know where this came from
originally?) ignores the key signature. 'm6' is short for minor 3rd, major
6th, probably just because this is far more common (i have a hard time
hearing the minor 6th as a chord note in any context here, actually).
You're
, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Adam Golding adamgold...@gmail.com
wrote:
it's true, it's a lame first step, and probably less functional than
using
MusicXML export in Cubase 4.1, but being that they've gotten started in
this
direction, and the two programs have the same ownership, wouldn't you say
, but
then.it is stuck in Sibelius unless you want to export it
as a Midi
Maybe if PT 8.5 or PT9 gets bi-directional data between PT and
Sibelius I'd be worried...
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Adam Golding adamgold...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just stumbled across the news
Oh, another newsflash, Cubase 4.5 now has MusicXML *import*
2009/1/16 Adam Golding adamgold...@gmail.com
it's true, it's a lame first step, and probably less functional than using
MusicXML export in Cubase 4.1, but being that they've gotten started in this
direction, and the two programs have
I just stumbled across the news that Protools now has a sibelius-powered
score editor--looks like it's still rudimentary, but it LOOKS great compared
to cubase and logic--anyone's thoughts on what this direction spells for the
future of finale in the sibelius/finale war?
interesting, fauxharmonic just calls it 'performance'...
2008/12/8 JERRY BERG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
computer simulated performance
From: Williams, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 5:40:39 AM
Subject: RE: [Finale]
Ground bass?
ostinato?
2008/10/12 Eric Dannewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passcaglia perhaps?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Jane Frasier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't studied music seriously in many many years and my memory is
terrible. I am writing program notes for a piece I wrote
I've always been dismayed by how poorly most attempts at notation capture a
lot of vocal performances (even the Beatles Scores is woefully
straight-jacketed in its notation of the vocal parts, of of many rhythmic
aspects in general.) Are there any treatises on notation or examples of
well done
places, but to leave the
notation lax in other areas where it's not as important.
I'll check out the examples mentioned so far, please keep up the great
reccomendations :-)
2008/10/7 dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Golding wrote:
I've always been dismayed by how poorly most attempts at notation
I have a similar issue. I'm also wondering about the fact that one can
apparently use many HDTVs on a computer as well, and I don't know what the
relevant differences are, at a given screensize/resolution.
2008/8/8 Eric Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
My university is buying me a new
, Adam Golding wrote:
Would the new finalescript features allow anything like generating random
music for sight-reading practice? I'm thinking random pitches/rhythms
with
random enharmonics, including double sharps/flats, and random clef, key,
and
time signatures changes.
Having organized
Would the new finalescript features allow anything like generating random
music for sight-reading practice? I'm thinking random pitches/rhythms with
random enharmonics, including double sharps/flats, and random clef, key, and
time signatures changes.
do the accidental, clef, and key signature changes. That, and it
crashed, left-right-and-center, lol.
2008/8/6 Eric Dannewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably not, but there are plenty of freeware midi things that can do that
for you.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Adam Golding [EMAIL PROTECTED
2008/7/16 Aaron Sherber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 01:39 PM 7/16/2008, Chuck Israels wrote:
I am another committed Speedy Entry user who has attempted using
Simple Entry a few times and quickly abandoned it. Tom Johnson told me
a couple of years ago that the long term plan was to make Simple have
i'm also not up on them, but i'd make sure you choose something that exports
musicXML well, so the scores can be migrated later.
2008/7/6 Paul Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a friend who sings in a non-professional choir and he would like to
buy a Windows platform notation program that is
this is probably overkill, but the newest cubase allows musicxml export, and
a lot of work is speedier in cubase, and could presumably be exported to
finale for final touches. I haven't tried this however.
2008/7/5 João Pais [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
a small question: do you know any converter
the MusicXML people have a handy list of programs:
http://www.recordare.com/xml.html
2008/7/5 João Pais [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm sorry, I forgot to mention: I don't own Finale. Afaik, this feature
isn't available in finale notepad, is it?
Joao
a small question: do you know any converter
How do we know Charpentier didn't accidentally forget the dot on the eight,
and that those two 32nd notes aren't grace notes? Perhaps grace notes were
not written that way at the time, I'm not sure.
On 19/04/2008, dc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dhbailey écrit:
I'm split between notating it
this is a little misleading. I have huge latency issues when trying to use
the built-in garritan sounds with MIDI-Thru. My sound adapter, a TASCAM
US122-L works fine in cubase when i se the asio latency tot he lowest, but
when i set it to lowest in the tascam control panel, I get clicks/pops in
wouldn't have stepped in so quickly if he was asking about that.
Christopher
On Mar 31, 2008, at 7:55 AM, Adam Golding wrote:
this is a little misleading. I have huge latency issues when
trying to use
the built-in garritan sounds with MIDI-Thru. My sound adapter, a
TASCAM
US122
On 31/03/2008, Jari Williamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Golding wrote:
As mentioned, i'm uncertain about this, but i think the bottom line is
that
you need an audio interface with low latency WDM drivers to work well
with
finale's garritan sounds in midi-thru mode.
The OP
I'm relatively new to finale here--simple actions such as pressing the
left/right arrows to change which note is selected exhibit a major delay
(1-2 seconds). So, if i press 'right' five times to move five notes over i
then sit and wait for awhile while the selection makes the journey... Are
is there a way to view two pages at once in page view, or to have a single
page have two columns of music? (i'm using page view with forced system
breaks every 4 measures to help me think about the phrase structure of a
melody i'm writing, but i'd like to see 2 pages of it at once on my
I've never written music for solo percussionist before--do you guys do
percussion diagrams in Finale? is there a resource i can look to for advice
on how to do this?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Can anyone fluent in both Finale 2008 and Sibelius 5 comment on which is
actually faster to work in? If one isn't trying to create publishable
scores, but merely trying to get scores and parts that an orchestral
librarian would accept for rehearsal, I get the impression that sibelius 5
is much
pretty sure the user interface of each program imposes some
upper bound.
On 18/02/2008, Eric Dannewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't being fluent in one or the other or both really make it a moot
point?
On 2/18/08, Adam Golding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone fluent in both Finale
with Sibelius. You really don't need to use TWO different
programs to do notation. It would be like learning Logic and Cubase.
On 2/18/08, Adam Golding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric,
I have used both Sibelius and Finale. Sibelius is currently faster for
me,
but I know it somewhat better than
them out.
Then YOU can figure out what works best for YOU.
On 2/18/08, Adam Golding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not in the slightest. Suppose that someone is maximally fluent in both
programs--that is to say, they use each program as fast as humanly
possible. It doesn't follow that they use
Working on a harp piece in finale, two questions:
1. I can't get the G# at the top of the instrument's range to sound--i guess
this is just an error? is there a way around it?
2. while improvising using MIDI thru, working on ideas, is there a way to
trigger harmonics? what midi message should
how do i combine these shapes in the shape designer?? i can't see how to
import font characters...
On 26/11/2007, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Adam Golding wrote:
On 26/11/2007, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 26-Nov-07, at 2
i can't find any non-expired download links :-(
i'm also looking for the Text Editor one...
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
ok so i'm going about setting up combined articulations (not to mention some
handy macros for applying them from the selection tool) but i've realize i
don't have symbols for:
mezzo-staccato accent
mezzo-staccato strong accent
stacatissimo accent
stacatissimo strong accent
i have no idea what
by mouse selection
is always retained--if only arrow left and arrow right would actually move
the selection region...
On 24/11/2007, Jari Williamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Golding wrote:
been playing with finalescript and autohotkey but still can't find a way
to
do these without
On 26/11/2007, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26-Nov-07, at 2:27 PM, Adam Golding wrote:
ok so i'm going about setting up combined articulations (not to
mention some
handy macros for applying them from the selection tool) but i've
realize i
don't have symbols
playback is enabled.. eep!
On 24/11/2007, Jari Williamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Golding wrote:
does anyone know where i can take a look at hp's exact policies for
interpeting notation? I often can't tell when it's changing based on
context or applying some generic rule. (It becomes
perhaps there should be a user-maintained FAQ for this sort of thing--is
there? i never did find one..
On 25/11/2007, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
Could you give me a clue? As far as I can see,
On 25/11/2007, Jari Williamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Golding wrote:
well he's what i found in the manual:
Human Playback interprets and performs articulations during playback
automatically. See Human
Playbackfile:///H:/Program%20Files/Finale%202008/Help%20Files/Content/Finale
/2007, Jari Williamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Golding wrote:
does anyone know of
a way to affect the duration of umarked notes? in some performance
styles
they should be detached or 'at the performer's discretion' most likley
1. MIDI Tool
2. Check Edit Note Durations in the MIDI
been playing with finalescript and autohotkey but still can't find a way to
do these without taking my hands off of the keyboard to use the mouse:
1. adding a slur or other smart shape (in sibelius this is actually quite
simple to do from the keyboard)
2. removing articulations
any
what's the fastest way to stop articulations from colliding? i.e. if I have
both accents and staccati on some notes. dragging them all manually is
clearly not the way! :p
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
on and on, lol
On 24/11/2007, Chuck Israels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are pretty well defined in Human Playback.
Chuck
On Nov 24, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Adam Golding wrote:
thanks for your helpful responses everyone--chris, by any others
you need?
do you mean other combined articulation? yeah
On 24/11/2007, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Adam Golding wrote:
thanks for your helpful responses everyone--chris, by any others
you need?
do you mean other combined articulation? yeah, well on a first
glace it
doesn't have stacatissimo
On 24/11/2007, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Adam Golding wrote:
On 24/11/2007, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Playback is part of the articulation definition, so there is no
problem with most situations.
hrm perhaps i'm
harmony and voice leading by aldwell and schacter.
On 21/11/2007, Lawrence David Eden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings Listers,
I need an (elementary) book that explains how to make smooth key
changes in compositions.
I hope that some of you can recommend a title or two.
Thanks
ah, it's true that there's a bit too much style-specific beethoven
discussion in these books.
peronally i just don't think in terms of keys. i mean, i can step back and
analyze what i've done and realize where the key changes are, and in fact
one often ends up with long ambiguous regions which
47 matches
Mail list logo
