From: Bradshaw, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net' fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Fink-devel] Volunteering to maintain some of the orphaned fink
packages
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:53:39 -0600
Hello,
I'd be interested in picking up a handful of
From: Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Fink-devel] sdl
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:23:29 -0800
I moved sdl from 10.3/unstable/main into my local directory, to get
1.2.8 over 1.2.7 but when I install this I get:
From: Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Fink-devel] gtk+2
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 02:46:42 -0800
Ok, now I have a new error. I installed a fresh copy of XDarwin,
figuring that it was something I did to that directory, now the package
builds fine,
Sorry to be so slow to respond here: I've only just begun to track down
what's happening.
When I compile this, I have no problem because the python setup script
does not find a value for DISPLAY in the environment, and so reports
cannot test gtk [no DISPLAY]. My first guess was that this
I've added these to the 10.2-gcc3.3/unstable tree, except for libxml2
and gdbm3, which were already at the versions you requested.
-- Dave
On Feb 19, 2005, at 1:58 PM, Michael wrote:
David R. Morrison wrote:
Mike,
If you will post a list of the precise packages (with version and
revision
On Feb 19, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Michael wrote:
[snip]
Then before that, I get:
/.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libintl.dylib -install_name
/sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib -compatibility_version 601
-current_version 601.2
ld: warning -dylib_install_name /sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib not
Dear Mike,
I think its great that you're interested in getting more modern
versions of the gnome packages working on 10.2. Most of the fink
developers are now working on 10.3 or beyond, but I'm hoping you'll get
some help from the readers of this list in your quest.
Yours,
Dave
On Feb 16,
Hi Chris. You've raised an important issue which I've been meaning to address.
There are a couple of different philosophies about the choice of perl
Types, and I think we need to discuss this and settle on a common policy.
Let me break this into two questions: what Types should be used, and
Also, would such a package (freeware without source code and with
restrictions on redistribution) be allowed in Fink?
Our general policy has been not to allow this -- we insist on source code
which can be compiled by the user (even when there are redistribution
restrictions).
If this
From: Daniel Henninger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci
singular.info,NONE,1.1
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:11:35 -0500 (EST)
Also note that
No, you should make a fink package called date-calc-pm. If you look in
libs/perlmods/ you will see lots of these that you can follow as
examples.
-- Dave
On Jan 19, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Manuel Hendel wrote:
Shell I just add a line to the description which says that you have to
install
One more thing: you are required to document the license arrangement in
the directory %p/share/doc/%n . This could be as simple as
mkdir -p %p/share/doc/%n
cp COPYING %p/share/doc/%n
(assuming that the standard GPL COPYING file is included in your package).
-- Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Kurt Schwehr wrote:
| Looks like my emails are not getting through to the
| fink lists. Maybe these two links will get through.
| I would like to get some discussion going about what
| is the best way to deploy fink to a large number of
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Becky Bendick wrote:
| Thanks for the advice.
You are most welcome.
Please note that -fabi-version=0 is just a shortcut which means select the
latest G++ ABI version that is present. Currently there are ABI version 1 and
ABI version 2. You should
Dear Fink developers,
Several of you have noticed the recent changes which I've made to a number
of packages. Most of these changes ensure that the package in question
compiles using the gcc 3.3 compiler. (The changes involve adding gcc3.3
to BuildDepends, and then either modifying the
Dear Michele,
I can't explain why certain packages aren't compiling with a post gcc-3.3
compiler and other ones are. I'm only adding the flags when my beta
testing reveals a problem.
However, unlike the situation between gcc 3.1 and gcc 3.3, there is NO
binary compatibility issue between gcc
On Jan 9, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
Dear David,
Le 9 janv. 2005, à 18:27, David R. Morrison a écrit :
I can't explain why certain packages aren't compiling with a post
gcc-3.3
compiler and other ones are. I'm only adding the flags when my beta
testing reveals a problem.
Could you
Presumably you are trying to build postgis using the postgresql74 source tree
as well as the postgis tree. Unfortunately, after postgresql74 was built,
its source tree was erased (unless the user took special action to prevent
this). So what you'll need to do is to have
Version: 0.9.1
Source:
We have a package called hx. It is a restrictive package, so we don't
store the source at distfiles. It no longer has a maintainer, the URL
for the source does not resolve, and the URL for the homepage does not
resolve.
Unless someone has an idea for resurrecting this package, I plan to remove
Well, it shouldn't be! (Unless the label of Restrictive is
incorrect...)
-- Dave
On Dec 31, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
David R. Morrison wrote:
We have a package called hx. It is a restrictive package, so we
don't
store the source at distfiles. It no longer has a maintainer
Thanks, Koen, well-spotted.
I believe that the package was Restrictive because of some patent issue
or something... we'll have to check it out.
-- Dave
On Dec 31, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Dec 31, 2004, at 2:02 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Well, it shouldn't be! (Unless
Thanks for catching this, Martin. Fixed now.
-- Dave
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
1. I've made a modification to the new UseBinaryDist stuff, introducing
a flag --compile-from-source in addition to the flag
--use-binary-dist. My new flag will disable the use of the binary
distribution for that run only.
There have been some objections about the name of my new flag. Some
Josh,
To the best of my knowledge, none of the core fink developers are
running OS X Server. We need your advice about changes or modifications
that might be needed to help fink work better in that environment.
-- Dave
On Dec 16, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Josh wrote:
I'm sending this to both the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David R. Morrison wrote:
| 1. I've made a modification to the new UseBinaryDist stuff, introducing
| a flag --compile-from-source in addition to the flag
| --use-binary-dist. My new flag will disable the use of the binary
| distribution
On Dec 15, 2004, at 6:30 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Dec 15, 2004, at 12:47 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
The current version of octave installs a bunch of files in
directories that are called powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 This makes it
OS X version dependent, and
- --source-run or --binary-off , just because I HATE typing long
command line
switches.
Well, I'm hoping for a one-letter shortcut, whatever we choose.
-- Dave
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews
We introduced that GCC field into fink some time back due to the ABI
incompatibilities between different versions of gcc, when the code in
question was C++ code. The GCC field provided a mechanism for fink
developers to track which packages had compiled code which was
restricted to a
Actually, it would be better to change the manpage. Verbosity=1 is a
much better default for users other than package maintainers (which is
why this change was made a while back).
-- Dave
On Dec 7, 2004, at 10:20 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink
In directory
On Dec 6, 2004, at 5:25 PM, Corey Halpin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm about to package monotone-viz, a tool that draws ancestry graphs
of a monotone repository. (http://oandrieu.nerim.net/monotone-viz/ )
monotone-viz itself contains no crypto code.
however, it
On Dec 4, 2004, at 11:46 PM, Corey Halpin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Using the variants system, is there a succinct way to say This
package conflicts with all other variants of this package?
I'd like to be able to say that, but I can't find in the packaging
manual how
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv24744
Modified Files:
libpng3.info
Log Message:
new upstream version
Index: libpng3.info
===
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv24830
Modified Files:
libpng3.info
Log Message:
new upstream version
Index: libpng3.info
===
RCS
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv27584
Removed Files:
gd209.info gd209.patch
Log Message:
retiring this package, with thanks for a job well-done
--- gd209.patch DELETED ---
--- gd209.info DELETED
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv27728
Removed Files:
gd209-2.0.9-13.info gd209-2.0.9-13.patch
Log Message:
retiring this package, with thanks for a job well-done
--- gd209-2.0.9-13.patch DELETED ---
BSD.
On Nov 22, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
OK, thanks for the clarification. What do you suggest I list it as in
the package description?
Thanks!
On 23 Nov 2004, at 13:35, David R. Morrison wrote:
BSD-type licenses generally don't identify themselves as BSD.
The MIT X-license also
BSD-type licenses generally don't identify themselves as BSD.
The MIT X-license also counts as a BSD-type license, for example.
-- Dave
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:57 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
On 22 Nov 2004, at 2:03, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Redistribution and use in source and binary
On Nov 16, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
Uhm... I see, so I'm supposed to have been very very lucky... Anyway,
could you explain this a little further? You say according to its
database, but which database? Do you mean the .deb file or dpkg keeps
track of all the files it has
On Nov 9, 2004, at 3:18 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
perl5.8.4-core does not install /sw/bin/perl, but its Config.pm has:
startperl='#!/sw/bin/perl'. This messes up my help2man package. I tell
it PERL is /sw/bin/perl5.8.4 but then it asks for $Config{startperl}
and perl says /sw/bin/perl. So it no
Charles Lepple wrote:
David Smiley wrote:
I'll have to assume by this point that I'm not going to reach Matt
Stephenson.
Can someone please describe to me (and/or point me to documentation)
so that I can tinker with the build process of openldap as provided
with fink? I'd like to do things
On Nov 3, 2004, at 5:58 AM, D. Höhn wrote:
I think that this is the way to go. However, to handle this gracefully
and to make sure that the users are notified of what is going on I
would
like to porpose the following steps.
a) Notify the common user base that we are planning to make significant
Dear Fink developers,
In the course of working to update several of fink's essential
packages, some of us have come to realize that we need a policy change:
we need packages to explicitly declare their dependencies on essential
packages.
The contrary policy -- that packages should *not*
William Scott wrote:
The following construct prepends the 38 function directories and
subdirectories revision 13 creates to the $fpath array without
clobbering what the user might already have:
fpath=( $(print /sw/share/zsh/**/*(/) ) $fpath )
but if you configure it the default way, it only needs
and
dpkg so I don't know how to solve this one through fink.
I've attempted to send this problem to the maintainer of openldap-ssl,
Matt Stephenson, however both his email addresses I've found aren't
working: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can
someone tell me how to reach him?
~ David
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:23:47PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
A package I am working on uses /usr/bin/test during compiling. I don't
have that on my Mac (10.3.5). Anyone have a suggestion what I should do
in this case? Is there maybe a fink package that installs /sw/bin/test?
It's in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello.
As I am currently being asked to do two different things and I have not
fully decided yet how to set the paths, the fink supplied zsh package
will be broken until Monday most likely. Please do accept my apologies
for this.
Thanks
- -d
On Oct 20, 2004, at 9:28 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome
In directory
sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv28500/unstable/main/finkinfo/
gnome
Modified Files:
gnucash.info
Added Files:
gnucash-1.8.9-14.info
On Oct 18, 2004, at 6:38 PM, Richard Rudolph wrote:
fink info gcc3.1 fails with an error message stating
it can't find the package for the specification gcc3.1
I'm on the current version of OS X. I thought this
version of OS X upgraded GCC to a newer version. To
resolve this dependency, do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Blair Zajac wrote:
| Apache 2.0.50 is still in Fink and there have been a number of security
| issues fixed in 2.0.51 and 2.0.52.
|snip
|
| So I'm thinking we should update Apache and then get Subversion up to
| 1.1.0.
|
Even though I might be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Daniel Macks wrote:
| On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:09:05AM +0200, David H. wrote:
|
|Christian Schaffner wrote:
||
|| Thanks to the help of bbraun and dmacks i just committed a new feature
|| for fink. You can now tell fink to try to download pre
On Oct 13, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote:
Hi
Since a couple of days i often get the following warning on
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/index.php?phpLang=en :
Warning: Failed opening 'hostlogo.inc' for inclusion (include_path='')
in /home/groups/f/fi/fink/htdocs/header.inc on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Christian Schaffner wrote:
| Dear Fink Users and Developers
|
|
| Thanks to the help of bbraun and dmacks i just committed a new feature
| for fink. You can now tell fink to try to download pre-compiled binary
| packages from the binary
As we all know, g++-3.3 in XCode 1.5 is broken. I had expected a fix
by now, but since it hasn't shown up, I believe we should warn users
about this while they are running fink itself.
I propose adding a check for the bad build, checking only the file
/usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.3/cc1plus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Kevin Horton wrote:
snip
|
| It certainly would be nice to have fink automatically deal with this
| situation. I have seen discussions before about various ways to do
| this, but no one was ever able to come up with a perfect solution, so
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Kevin Walzer wrote:
| I've been away from Fink for awhile, but after downloading the latest
| upgrade I noticed that TexShop is now a Fink package. Does this mean
| that there is now a process for packaging app bundles? When Dave
| Morrison asked
On Sep 24, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Hi,
I'm packing a small utility for checking symlinks. The only
information concerning copyright is '(c) Mark Lord, freely
distributable'. I'm not sure on which license type this maps best.
I think I would put OSI approved (which really means:
On Sep 22, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to update some of my packages to use variants, and one of
these is pygtk. As it exists now, there is a -py22 version and a -py23
version, for the respective versions of Python. There's also a
placeholder pygtk package that
On Sep 19, 2004, at 5:57 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Lars Rosengreen wrote:
Maybe I'm missing the obvious, but shouldn't this depend on
tetex-base or something similar?
I don't think so. Neither for building nor for running does it need
any TeX package. It should probably have Recommends or
Please be sure to validate before you commit. This one gives an ERROR,
due to missing Info2 declaration.
(I'll fix it.)
-- Dave
On Sep 18, 2004, at 5:43 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods
In directory
On Sep 9, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
It appears that the cyrus-sasl2 maintainer has been missing for some
time.
Yes, indeed.
I want an updated version because I'm building a Postfix package that
uses it, and was wondering if it would be OK to take it over. I have
an updated package
On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:48 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv26193
Added Files:
test-simple-pm.info
Log Message:
thesin said it was OK ;)
--- NEW FILE: test-simple-pm.info ---
On Sep 7, 2004, at 3:49 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I didn't see any reply on this... no comment?
Randal == Randal L Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Randal The most recent ettercap seems to be broken. Is it just me?
Randal Trying even the first example of the manpage:
Randal localhost:~
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Benjamin Reed wrote:
| Darian Lanx wrote:
|
| More of a philosophical question. Should the code not try to pick the
| _latest_ JVM that is present,. Thus most likely the one with the most
| features and the one a common user would be using?
|
|
|
Dear Fink developers,
A few of us were discussing the possibility of switching a number of
fink packages from the fink-provided openssl to the built-in openssl.
This would allow us to include ssl functionality even in the non-crypto
tree, and could cut down on potential errors from mixing and
On Sep 2, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Am 30.08.2004 um 20:04 schrieb David R. Morrison:
On Aug 29, 2004, at 12:59 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Aug 29, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I wanted to check that I'm not the only one seeing this. Under
MacOS X 10.3.5, I find that Safari
On Aug 29, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I wanted to check that I'm not the only one seeing this. Under
MacOS X 10.3.5, I find that Safari crashes whenever I try to login
to the secure web pages. For example if I click on the hyperlink for
Request a feature that's not in fink (the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Martin Costabel wrote:
| Do we really have a developer planetmirror? There is a stale cvs lock
| by this user in
/cvsroot/fink/dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/text
|
Yes we do. It should be read only account for the Australian Master
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jim White wrote:
| Martin Costabel wrote:
|
| David R. Morrison wrote:
|
| []
|
| (3) The problems with octave, singular-libfac and others that cannot
| be built with Apple's latest g++-3.3 are too fresh in the discussion
| to have to be recalled
On Aug 27, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
It appears to screw up colors on some types of PNG images.
Before (libpng-1.2.5-4):
http://ranger.befunk.com/misc/libpng-1.2.5-4.jpg
After (libpng-1.2.6-6):
http://ranger.befunk.com/misc/libpng-1.2.6-6.jpg
Can I get you to report this directly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Enigmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBLlUuPMoaMn4kKR4RA176AJ4peREbbO6QwDd74eHcUEasLgMFGACbBbSz
pWBvBJKWyCzeGPOjSDRdPW4=
=BqKp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---BeginMessage---
Hi Again (this is LasVegas off
On Aug 26, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
[snip]
This is not a discussion about philosophy or policy, but about how to
deal with buggy software.
Absolutely correct. Thanks for the detailed response.
3. The recent versions of gcc seem to be sufficiently binary
compatible so that you
The troubles with g++ under XCode 1.5 and the lack of any quick
response from Apple, combined with earlier incidents of an analogous
nature, lead me to ask: would we be better off with a fink gcc package
in place of the Developer Tools? As I understand it, the Apple
compiler team has been
On Aug 24, 2004, at 10:14 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel,
You might want to take a look at how fink currently handles
Provides.
As I mentioned before, I had to create a new revision of fftw (2.1.5-6)
because the addition of Provides: fftw to both the fftw and fftw-mpi
as
well as Provides:
On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
I see several packages have constructs like:
Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs
BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev
This is not correct--if, for example, one has openssl097-dev installed
at build-time, then one *must* have
On Aug 23, 2004, at 6:21 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
I see several packages have constructs like:
Depends: openssl-shlibs | openssl097-shlibs
BuildDepends: openssl-dev | openssl097-dev
I apologize; I completely misread this message the first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Kevin Horton wrote:
snip
|
| There must be many other unstable users who have Fink 0.22.0, and they
| need to be told what to do to restore selfupdate functionality. I
| hesitate to post something myself, as I'm not a core developer, and I
| don't
The fink-0.22.0 package manager, which was available briefly in the
unstable tree this past week, had a bug which prevents further updating
via rsync. If you installed this version of fink, you can recover by
running the command
fink install fink-0.21.2-1
which will downgrade fink to the
On Aug 21, 2004, at 12:15 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
and then from within the fink-0.22.1 directory, run the command
./inject.pl/code
Sorry, typo, this should just be
./inject.pl
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price
On Aug 21, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev,
because it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those
packages are marked
(B (BOn Aug 21, 2004, at 7:08 PM, jfm wrote: (B (B (B(B (BOn Aug 21, 2004, at 9:35 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: (B (B (BMartin Costabel wrote: (B (B (B$B%]!%k(b$B%U%)%s%9(B (Bwrote: (B (B[] (B (Bld: Undefined symbols: (B (BArraydouble>::transpose() const (B (B[] (B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michèle Garoche wrote:
snip
| Then I'm not sure colors may be suitable for color-blind people, though
| I'm in this category and have no problem with them, but there are many
| different way of being color-blind.
|
maybe it is a good idea to
On Aug 19, 2004, at 8:12 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:55:02AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Yes, I think it is a bug in the new fink.
In SelfUpdate.pm, the line
next unless ($tree =~ /stable/);
was changed to
next unless ($tree eq stable or $tree eq
On Aug 14, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
Does anyone have any objections to moving gperf to 10.3/stable? I have
been using version 2.7.2-12 for a while to build iverilog packages,
and it
doesn't have any dependencies that would prevent it from building in a
stable-only setup.
Moved to
On Aug 13, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/sci
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv9005
Modified Files:
roofitcore.info roofitcore.patch roofitmodels.info
roofitmodels.patch
Log Message:
Promote to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Daniel Macks wrote:
| The 'fink checksums' mode was added two years ago when we first
| started requiring MD5 for source tarballs. The code implementing it is
| marked:
|
| # HACK HACK HACK
| # This is to be removed soon again, only a
I plan to start building the 0.7.1 bindist in about one week. If you
have packages which should be moved to stable before the bindist,
please move them this week.
Thanks,
Dave
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed
On Aug 9, 2004, at 12:15 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
[snip]
So we could either have enable_bootstrap() and
disable_bootstrap() clear the cache, or have get_env() only cache if
the _bootstrap flag is not set.
Either one sounds good to me: why don't you do it in the way you think
would be easiest to
On Aug 9, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/base-files
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv26056
Modified Files:
ChangeLog init.csh.in init.sh.in
Log Message:
Include . (default when unset) when explicitly setting CLASSPATH
(Bugs #1005793)
Should I
On Aug 9, 2004, at 2:45 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv29963
Modified Files:
ChangeLog PkgVersion.pm
Log Message:
Disable caching for get_env if in bootstrapping mode.
With this change, bootstrapping
Thanks, John. I have reproduced the bug and am trying to figure out
which change in Fink's code is responsible for it.
In the meantime, if you want an up-to-the-minute fink installation, you
can download and unpack any recent fink tarball, run ./bootstrap.sh
from within in, and after the
On Aug 9, 2004, at 12:14 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv16066
Modified Files:
PkgVersion.pm Engine.pm ChangeLog
Log Message:
Recompute %c value every time get_*script() is called.
Rename
On Aug 7, 2004, at 10:13 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
David R. Morrison wrote:
[snip]
CustomMirror:
- Primary: http://telia.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/
+Primary: http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/
David,
Is this the wrong URL? I was able to download the new Fink release
from http
This fails validation:
Validating package file ccp4.info...
Warning: Field patchscript appears to contain %p/src. (ccp4.info)
Warning: Field installscript appears to contain %p/src. (ccp4.info)
Warning: Patch file appears to contain a hardcoded /sw. (ccp4.patch)
On Aug 7, 2004, at 10:39 PM,
Thanks a lot!
-- Dave
On Aug 4, 2004, at 6:56 AM, BABA Yoshihiko wrote:
The simplest (yet ugly) solution is probably like this:
#for docs and faq
$text =~ s|/head.*body(¥n)*(!--¥?)|¥';¥n¥n|s;
$text =~ s|/body.*/html(¥n)*(!--¥?)|¥';¥n¥n|s;
$text =~ s|!--¥?|?|g;
$text =~ s|¥?--|?|g;
$text =~
Baba,
This change has broken compilation in the news directory. (I had to
fix index.php by hand to add back the header and footer lines.)
I don't understand well enough what you were doing, to see how I should
modify news.xml to cope with this change.
-- Dave
On Jul 10, 2004, at 8:34 AM, BABA
Sorry, I should have edited that better. The problem is caused by the
changes to postprocess.pl, not to finkdoc-website.i18n.xsl.
-- Dave
On Aug 2, 2004, at 10:34 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Baba,
This change has broken compilation in the news directory. (I had to
fix index.php by hand
On Aug 1, 2004, at 8:51 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
OK, no news is good news, I guess :-)
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
Such a CLI version of pathsetup.sh is now in my exp directory. Please
test.
Dave has now put this version into the latest fink from cvs, so I hope
it will get some testing
On Jul 31, 2004, at 3:01 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
I am confused about the naming of shlibs. The docs say to use oTool -L
to make sure the numbering is up-to-date. I checked some base packages
shlibs to see where the numbers go, and this is the output:
koen$ oTool -L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Blair Zajac wrote:
| Daniel Macks wrote:
|
| On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 04:13:17PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
|
| Daniel Macks wrote:
|
| On my 10.3.4 machine, I have /usr/lib/libz.1.1.3.dylib
|
|
| Funny, I was looking at the header files to see
On Jul 29, 2004, at 8:24 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
[snip]
Some questions to base this work off of:
1) I'm looking at dbi-pm*.info and wondering why there's a dbi-pm.info
(with Info2 format) and the dbi-pm5??.info files. Isn't just one
needed?
2) Why does this module have these lines, particularly
701 - 800 of 1724 matches
Mail list logo
