Re: [Fink-devel] Web site: How to use 'include' correctly

Le 14 juin 2005 à 02:50, BABA Yoshihiko a écrit : 2005/6/13, Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: That works fine as long as the CWD is set to the right location. Often, it isn't, leading to nasty PHP errors messages visible to visitors of our web site. With the PDB, this was very visible, I usua

[Fink-devel] broken-server with libbonobo2

Mac OS X Tiger, fink latest cvs, 10.4-transitional unstable, after a cleanfink (that is there is nothing left in tree except essential packages). libbonobo2 installs a broken-server in /sw/lib/bonobo2/servers which generates warning in system.log. It seems that this server should not be i

[Fink-devel] Compiling X11 from source

Could someone have a look at the instructions for compiling X11 from source on the web site.(Below a copy). Are those instructions still valid? (config and make world for example).3.4 The Official SourceIf you've got the time to spare, you can build XFree86 4.5 from source. You can find the source

Re: [Fink-devel] "fink rebuild" when no binary present

Le 7 juin 2005 à 22:57, Daniel E. Macks a écrit : Fink was recently patched so that any "fink reinstall" of a package whose binary does not exist is automatically upgraded to a "fink rebuild" (a mode that always concludes by reinstalling). Without this, users have observed that fink will crash,

Re: [Fink-devel] Don't we love SF

Le 4 juin 2005 à 09:26, David H. a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hehe :) Generating notification message... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/cvsroot/fink/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 433, in ? main() File "/cvsroot/fink/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 426, in main

[Fink-devel] Problem with an unknown package

Sorry to cross-post but I'm unable to find to which package this problem belongs.After having done a buildfink, cancelled it because it took too many days and followed it by a cleanfink, I got this message:Purge des fichiers de configuration de io-tty-pm581 ...dpkg : avertissement : lors de la supp

Re: [Fink-devel] installer testing again

Le 3 juin 2005 à 02:19, David R. Morrison a écrit : The test versions of the installer have been revised, and I'd appreciate testing reports. http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.7.2-Installer.dmg http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.8.0-Installer.dmg Could you elaborate what do you mean by

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Re: Tiger build report

Hi Jean-François, Le 2 juin 2005 à 23:28, Jean-François Mertens a écrit : You may want to try the new upstream version. They'll be in experimental/michga as soon as it synchronizes, meanwhile they are here. It works for me with 10.4.1 (that is it compiles and it works on a real example), tetex

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Build Status; QA Proposal

Le 1 juin 2005 à 06:52, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit :On May 31, 2005, at 10:55 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:Le 31 mai 2005 à 23:48, Matthew Sachs a écrit :The second build will use 10.4-transitional and not try to force 4.0, and will build the packages as 'nobody' instead of 'root'.That would be good, bec

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Build Status; QA Proposal

Le 31 mai 2005 à 23:48, Matthew Sachs a écrit :[snip]The second build will use 10.4-transitional and not try to force 4.0, and will build the packages as 'nobody' instead of 'root'.That would be good, because I've begun on 27th May and only 1120 packages have been built at the time being mostly bec

[Fink-devel] Hang with fop on Tiger

Maintainer cc'ed. Put here in case the maintainer is not on Tiger yet. fop-0.20.5-6, java version "1.4.2_07" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_07-215) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-50, mixed mode) Tiger 10.4., Build 8B15 Fink version: Package manager version:

Re: [Fink-devel] Conditional and Alternative in Depends/BuildDepends

Le 22 mai 2005 à 08:36, BABA Yoshihiko a écrit : On Sunday, May 22, 2005, at 02:58PM, Michèle Garoche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Disregard above please. Reading more you'll have to make conditional on BuildDepends. At the moment, it is only dependent on postgresql- dev; that's why you ge

Re: [Fink-devel] Conditional and Alternative in Depends/BuildDepends

Le 22 mai 2005 à 07:26, Michèle Garoche a écrit : Now the problem is more complicated. If I modified the lines like: (%type_raw[-nopgsql] = .) postgresql80-shlibs (>= 8.0.2-13) | (% type_raw[-nopgsql] = .) postgresql80-ssl-shlibs (>= 8.0.2-13), DUMPINFO rightly shows postgresql80-shlibs (>

Re: [Fink-devel] Conditional and Alternative in Depends/BuildDepends

Sorry, forgto to click on reply all. Le 22 mai 2005 à 07:05, BABA Yoshihiko a écrit : On Sunday, May 22, 2005, at 01:48PM, Michèle Garoche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le 22 mai 2005 à 05:03, BABA Yoshihiko a écrit : Hi Daniel, There seems a problem when conditional is used with | (pip

Re: [Fink-devel] Conditional and Alternative in Depends/BuildDepends

Le 22 mai 2005 à 05:03, BABA Yoshihiko a écrit : Hi Daniel, There seems a problem when conditional is used with | (pipe) in Depends/BuildDepends, or I am doing something wrong. Yes, you"ll have to repeat the conditional. The first alternatives (postgresql80-shlibs and grass60-shlibs in t

[Fink-devel] New version of gnucash-docs for Tiger

Already cc'ed the maintainer, but as I'm not sure the mail will not go into junk, forward here too: Le 20 mai 2005 à 15:58, bigl00z3 a écrit : I cannot update gnucash-docs on Tiger in unstable... There is a newer version which works with libxml2. The actual one does not work. So here's

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] Gimp2 compiling on 10.4-transitional unstable

Le 17 mai 2005 à 20:16, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:37:29AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: I thought about hacking the AC_PROG_INTLTOOL macro with something like `which perl` result, would it work? I wrote: OTOH, the AC_PROG_INTLTOOL macro really uses "first 'perl' in PATH". So

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] Gimp2 compiling on 10.4-transitional unstable

Le 17 mai 2005 à 09:42, Daniel Macks a écrit : Taking this to -devel because it's a symtom of a general problem. Consider *not* replying to -gnome-core... On fink-gnome-core, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Compiling gimp2 after using buildfink makes it failed because of an apparently missing dependency on

Re: [Fink-devel] ImageMagick on 10.4 transitional

Le 6 mai 2005 à 18:10, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: In case the maintainer has no access to Tiger, cced here: Hi Jeff, I've just tried to install ImageMagick on 10.4 transitional. Compiling seems to get well, but when using display and clicking on the image to get the menu

[Fink-devel] ImageMagick on 10.4 transitional

In case the maintainer has no access to Tiger, cced here: Hi Jeff, I've just tried to install ImageMagick on 10.4 transitional. Compiling seems to get well, but when using display and clicking on the image to get the menu, the menu pops up but clicking on an item does not trigger anything. An

Re: [Fink-devel] Tiger build report

Le 3 mai 2005 à 15:41, Benjamin Reed a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: People don't mess with other people's experimental, generally. ??? I was told that experimental was precisely here to do that. Provides a location where to put some attempt other people can test or change. So, now what is e

Re: [Fink-devel] Tiger build report

Le 3 mai 2005 à 14:22, Benjamin Reed a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: For doxygen, there had been a newer version in experimental/ michga for 2 months now. People don't mess with other people's experimental, generally. ??? I was told that experimental was precisely here to do that. Provides a l

Re: [Fink-devel] Tiger build report

Le 2 mai 2005 à 22:45, Matthew Sachs a écrit : I've done a build of the entire Fink unstable tree on Tiger with GCC 4 using package descriptions as of 2005-04-30. The report is at: Package maintainers who want to see if their package builds

Re: [Fink-devel] Tiger build report

Le 2 mai 2005 à 22:45, Matthew Sachs a écrit : I've done a build of the entire Fink unstable tree on Tiger with GCC 4 using package descriptions as of 2005-04-30. The report is at: Package maintainers who want to see if their package builds

Re: [Fink-devel] Tiger build report

Le 2 mai 2005 à 22:45, Matthew Sachs a écrit : I've done a build of the entire Fink unstable tree on Tiger with GCC 4 using package descriptions as of 2005-04-30. The report is at: Package maintainers who want to see if their package builds

[Fink-devel] epiphany 1.4.8 for 10.3 needs tester

I've put in http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/michga/ an info file for epiphany. It is for 10.3 tree crypto branch, and does not required the current patch file in the tree. Could somebody test it please? Michèle PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-bundle-4.1.2-3

Le 14 avr. 2005, à 17:50, Rob Saecker a écrit : I recieved the following (three different mirrors and the original source URL): The checksum of the file is incorrect. The most likely cause for this is a corrupted or incomplete download Expected: 0d5a4a999a2d7b2e77a46bd069301caf Actual: 900d7609f

[Fink-devel] Could scrollkeeper be moved to stable?

Could version 0.3.14-5 of scrollkeeper in 10.3 unstable be moved to 10.3 stable. It is from July 2004 and works fine, has same dependencies and build dependencies and respects the split-offs of libxslt and libxml2, which is not exactly the case of the version in 10.3 stable. I need it for one

[Fink-devel] autoconf2.5 in 10.3 stable vs. autoconf2.5 in 10.3 unstable

Could the info file for autoconf2.5 in 10.3 unstable be put in 10.3 stable, so that they would be exactly the same? At the moment the checksum are different due to a -f option to rm lines: in unstable: rm -f %i/share/emacs/site-lisp/autoconf-mode.elc rm -f %i/share/emacs/site-lisp/autotest-mode.

[Fink-devel] Could exuberant-ctags be moved to stable?

Could exuberant-ctags 5.5.4-1 in 10.3 unstable be moved to 10.3 stable? It is about one year old and seems to work, as far as I can judge. I need it for one of my package to be moved to 10.3 stable. Thanks in advance. Michèle PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci

[Fink-devel] Question about vte on 10.3 stable versus vte on 10.3 unstable

While checking if and how I can move some of my packages from 10.3 unstable to 10.3 stable now that gnome 2.6 in 10.3 stable, I've noticed this about vte: Same version 0.11.10 on both trees. 1 - Depends on popt on stable, not on unstable. Why? 2 - Depends on gcc3.3 on stable, not on unstable. W

[Fink-devel] Could expat 1.95.8-1 be moved to 10.3 stable

The version in stable has more than one year and the one in unstable already six months. I need it for a package I maintain. Michèle PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=

[Fink-devel] Could readline 4.3-28 be moved to 10.3 stable?

Could it be possible to move readline 4.3-28 to 10.3 stable? At the moment the revision number is 27 in stable, though all ncurses and libncursesw5 are the same in both trees. This way I can have the same info file in both trees for a package I maintain. Michèle

Re: [Fink-devel] Bazaar files in crypto directory

Le 18 mars 2005, à 9:37, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:26:18AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Well if it should be anywhere under finkinfo recursively, the files precisely were not under finkinfo, but above it My bad reading of the original situation:( Sorry... Not a problem, Dan

Re: [Fink-devel] Bazaar files in crypto directory

Le 18 mars 2005, à 9:08, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:09:17AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Le 18 mars 2005, ? 0:02, Lars Rosengreen a ?crit : On Mar 17, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Does somebody notice that bazaar-ssl.info and patch files are at the top level of t

Re: [Fink-devel] Bazaar files in crypto directory

Le 18 mars 2005, à 0:02, Lars Rosengreen a écrit : On Mar 17, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Does somebody notice that bazaar-ssl.info and patch files are at the top level of the crypto directory in 10.3 unstable, and not in finkinfo subdirectory? that was my fault. it should be fixed

[Fink-devel] New docbook-xsl release

I've put in experimental/michga the new 1.67-2 release for docbook-xsl, as it solves some issues with fop. Could you test it please, so that it may be put in unstable as soon as possible? Michèle PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectr

[Fink-devel] New info files for docbook-dsssl-dlp and docbook-bundle

I've put in experimental/michga new info files for docbook-dsssl-dlp, since the file was changed on 2003-03-19. Then on the same file I've removed the version number in name and changed the version number scheme so that it matches the version number inside the installed file. As a consequence I

[Fink-devel] Another docbook-dsssl-nwalsh.info

Thanks to jfm who adviced me to put the collateindex.pl script where it belongs and ChangeLog, I got a deeper look at the installation. It seems that till the beginning, all was installed in /sw/share/sgml/dsssl/docbook-dsssl-nwalsh/docbook-dsssl-nwalsh- versionnumber, but the catalog points

[Fink-devel] docbook-dssl-nwalsh releases

I've put in experimental/michga the new 1.79 release for docbook-dssl-nwalsh, since older releases are no more on sf. Maybe it should be changed in all trees, all branches. Michèle PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=

[Fink-devel] Re: Multilingualize News Section of Fink Website

Michèle Garoche wrote: that it does work as is Sorry, read it does not work as is. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.

[Fink-devel] Re: Multilingualize News Section of Fink Website

Michèle Garoche wrote: that it does work as is Sorry, read it does not work as is. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.

[Fink-devel] Update of glade2 in bindist

Hi David, I've modified glade2 in 10.3 stable. It's a new version, but just some minor bug fixes. So, now if you want to put it in the bindist, it will be better than the one which is in it, since it's likely not to work correctly, as discussed on the fink channel. Michèle

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: web/xml/doc doc.en.xml,1.11,1.12 doc.es.xml,1.7,1.8 doc.fr.xml,1.10,1.11 doc.ja.xml,1.13,1.14 doc.zh.xml,1.8,1.9

Le 21 oct. 2004, à 1:16, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 03:06:50PM +0200, Darian Lanx wrote: Daniel Macks wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/web/xml/doc In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv17373 Modified Files: doc.en.xml doc.es.xml doc.fr.xml doc.ja.xml doc.zh

Re: [Fink-devel] Something wrong etc... And the saga goes on

Le 16 oct. 2004, à 11:31, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: [] 100 71340 71340 0 7385 0 --:--:-- 0:00:00 --:--:-- 2923 Have you looked at the file? Most likely it's a text file saying something like This domain has expired. Click below to renew! It i

[Fink-devel] Re: Something wrong in US mirror

Le 16 oct. 2004, à 6:58, Trevor Harmon a écrit : Dave wrote: > Michèle, > > If you examine this file, I think you'll find that it is pure html, > reporting that the requested file is not available. If that is the > case, it's a problem with sourceforge.net, and I suggest that you file > a

Re: [Fink-devel] Something wrong etc... And the saga goes on

Le 16 oct. 2004, à 11:07, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 11:03:21AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Already reported on October 14th, but does not seem to have motivated anyone The package 'uri-pm581' will be built and installed. The following package will be installed or updated:

[Fink-devel] Something wrong etc... And the saga goes on

Already reported on October 14th, but does not seem to have motivated anyone Samedi 16/10/2004 10:58:45 CEST +0200 [toto]% fink update-all Information about 3976 packages read in 9 seconds. The package 'uri-pm581' will be built and installed. The following package will be installed or updated

[Fink-devel] kinput2 and canna movable to stable (10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3)?

Would it be possible to move kinput2 and canna to stable? I post here since I don't know if the maintainer (Masanori Sekino) is still listening. Michèle PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

Le 19 août 2004, à 21:12, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: Apart the maintainer problem, the layout makes a presupposition that all the other fields are identical for all versions, which is not always the case: - Description may vary - Section may vary - License may vary Taking

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

Le 19 août 2004, à 17:42, Martin Costabel a écrit : The first option uses the screen real estate better. The column headers that are somewhat too heavy could be made lighter by replacing the two-liners "stableversion" and "unstableversion" by just "stable" and "unstable". It is clear at this

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

Le 19 août 2004, à 17:42, Martin Costabel a écrit : The first option uses the screen real estate better. The column headers that are somewhat too heavy could be made lighter by replacing the two-liners "stableversion" and "unstableversion" by just "stable" and "unstable". It is clear at this

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

Le 19 août 2004, à 5:39, Hanspeter Niederstrasser a écrit : On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Daniel E. Macks wrote: Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users) terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just improvements to the visual layout and headings: http://fink.so

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

Le 19 août 2004, à 5:33, TheSin a écrit : Both look good to me, I like the second best, the only thing is that it doesn't take in consideration multi maintainers in multi trees. Maybe move maintainer to the table too, with ditto if it is the same. It is not a bad idea anyway, since when there are

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

Le 19 août 2004, à 4:34, Daniel E. Macks a écrit : Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users) terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just improvements to the visual layout and headings: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html Looks a bit too busy p

Re: [Fink-devel] Package database webpage layout

Le 17 août 2004, à 10:42, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:15:36AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Daniel Macks wrote: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html Thoughts on concept? Improvements on details of the new layout? The concept is good, but I find the optical layout confu

[Fink-devel] Possible addition in gconf2

Could the way to install/uninstall schemas with gconftool-2 be added gconf2 as it has be done for scrollkeeper? It is unclear from actual practice if the right way is: InstallScript: << #/bin/sh -ev GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1 make install DESTDIR=%d << PostInstScript: << if [ conf

[Fink-devel] Updating of glade2 in cvs

While I'm happy that a new upstream version of glade be put on cvs, I was astonished that I was not told before it was done. Should not the maintainer advised beforehand? Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv9313 Mod

Re: [Fink-devel] Virtual package handling

Le 6 juil. 2004, à 18:46, Alexander K. Hansen a écrit : And it shouldn't--I've swapped XFree86 for Apples's X11 on a system after Fink was installed, and have also performed a complete Fink reinstall with an XFree86-4.4 installation in place. In both cases the virtual packages got generated wit

Re: [Fink-devel] Virtual package handling

Le 6 juil. 2004, à 18:27, Martin Costabel a écrit : On 6 juil. 2004, at 17:50, Michèle Garoche wrote: I've never had success in getting Apple X11 recognized when the installation of Apple X11 and its SDK was made after installing fink, be it on 10.2.8 or 10.3. A contrario, I've never had issue wh

Re: [Fink-devel] Virtual package handling

Le 5 juil. 2004, à 19:33, Daniel Macks a écrit : Okay, I'm getting mighty tired of "I can't find system-java14-dev" questions, and wondered how we could better handle these virtual packages. Currently, when VirtPackage does not find the requisite files for a given system-foo, the system-foo virtual

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: proj update to 4.4.8 / grass 5.7.0

Blair, Matt is no more reachable since August 2003. Michèle PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: BuildDependsOnly

Le 18 juin 2004, à 16:20, Benjamin Reed a écrit : Well, it implies that they're reachable by other packages trying to build things from source; I would say that as long as they're in a "public" place that other packages can end up linking against, they should be BuildDependsOnly. If you *also* nee

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: BuildDependsOnly

Le 18 juin 2004, à 15:48, Benjamin Reed a écrit : I agree that anything that's got headers for development in it should be BuildDependsOnly. As I understand it, there are some packages that use headers at runtime, but, IMHO, the headers should be duplicated in /sw/share as data in that particular

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: BuildDependsOnly

Le 18 juin 2004, à 13:14, David R. Morrison a écrit : As announced on Tuesday, I've started to enforce the new validation check related to BuildDependsOnly. I've gotten some complaints about it, so perhaps we need to discuss the situation. As Dan Macks has pointed out to me, our shared libraries