Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-08 Thread jfm
would need rethinking..). But please file bug-reports upstream, so we get real corrections ! JFm -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape h

Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-06 Thread jfm
On Jun 6, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/6/12 9:41 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 6/6/12 9:37 AM, jfm wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/5/12 11:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wro

Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-06 Thread jfm
On Jun 6, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/5/12 11:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 6/5/12 11:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Alexander, >>> Do you have a previous build of an earlier altas installed? A google on >>> ATL_FreeAtomicCount undefined >>> produced... >>> >>> htt

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-26 Thread jfm
Hi Benjamin, I still get with mozilla : nsFreeType.cpp g++-3.3 -I/sw/lib/freetype2/include -I/sw/lib/freetype2/include/freetype2 -o nsFreeType.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"Darwin7.8.0\" -DOSARCH=\"Darwin\" -I../.. -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string -I../../../dist/include/pref -I..

Re: [Fink-devel] octave question

2004-12-15 Thread jfm
On Dec 15, 2004, at 5:24 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Koen: Unfortunately, I'm still stuck on the octave package with Xcode 1.5. Even with the Nov gcc update, it still won't build - it dies building libcruft with errors like this: ld: misc/quit.o malformed object (stray relocation PAIR entry (1) in

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo mozilla.info,1.5,1.6

2004-12-06 Thread jfm
On Dec 6, 2004, at 9:37 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: I only hope that the upcoming "official" mozilla/firefox fix will be backward compatible so that it doesn't *require* freetype>=2.1.8. Yes _ their patch goes in that direction... Jean-Francois

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] lynx-ssl-2.8.4-24

2004-11-07 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 11:22 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: On Nov 7, 2004, at 10:22 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: This could also be achieved by "BuildConflicts: gd2". No, I meant it as an alternative to the fix you put in in the meantime. That's why I answered only to the devel list. With sf distributing

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] lynx-ssl-2.8.4-24

2004-11-07 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 10:22 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: jfm wrote: [] fink remove gd2; fink install lynx-ssl; fink install gd2 This could also be achieved by "BuildConflicts: gd2". Martin : this was a fix suggested to the user ; do you really mean better to suggest him to edit the info fil

[Fink-devel] Re: lynx-2.8.4-24

2004-11-07 Thread jfm
Is fixed now in cvs. JF Mertens --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo lynx-ssl.info,1.2,1.3

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:41 AM, jfm wrote: On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:29 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: Is this really correct? - --libdir=%p/etc No idea what it does. From dpkg -L lynx-ssl, I would guess that lynx.cfg goes by default in libdir ... Right _ cf DescDetail ... (and sorry for needing 3 replies

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo lynx-ssl.info,1.2,1.3

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:41 AM, jfm wrote: On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:29 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: Is this really correct? - --libdir=%p/etc No idea what it does. From dpkg -L lynx-ssl, I would guess that lynx.cfg goes by default in libdir ... Right _ cf DescDetail ... (and sorry for needing 3 replies

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo lynx-ssl.info,1.2,1.3

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:37 AM, jfm wrote: On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:29 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: Is this really correct? - --libdir=%p/etc No idea what it does. From dpkg -L lynx-ssl, I would guess that lynx.cfg goes by default in libdir ... JF

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo lynx-ssl.info,1.2,1.3

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:29 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: Is this really correct? - --libdir=%p/etc No idea what it does. But the linking seems correct : /sw/var/logs# grep ' \-L' lynx-ssl.log checking whether the C compiler (gcc -L/sw/lib) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (gcc -L/sw/lib) is

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] lynx-ssl-2.8.4-24

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
Hi Dan, On Nov 7, 2004, at 1:44 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: Should we add -I./chrtrans to lynx Makefile somewhere or add it to CPPFLAGS in the .info? I fixed the info file already. [ +NoSetCPPFLAGS: true +CompileScript: export CPATH=%p/include ; ./configure %c ; make ] Best, JF ---

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] lynx-ssl-2.8.4-24

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 12:36 AM, Ersatz Sophist wrote: I can't compile this package. For the third time, the following error is obtained: LYCharSets.c: In function `HTMLGetEntityUCValue': LYCharSets.c:878: error: `unicode_entities' undeclared (first use in this function) LYCharSets.c:878: error: (Ea

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Unstable Octave compile fails

2004-08-21 Thread jfm
On Aug 22, 2004, at 1:08 AM, jfm wrote: Yes _ I can confirm that (apparently) the same problem arose here, as I already mentioned to you, with the sequence singular-factory singular-libfac macaulay2 (build 1666 of /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.3/cc1plus), and that it disappears with your build

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Unstable Octave compile fails

2004-08-21 Thread jfm
On Aug 22, 2004, at 1:27 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Aug 21, 2004, at 7:08 PM, jfm wrote: Martin, Yes _ I can confirm that (apparently) the same problem arose here, as I already mentioned to you, with the sequence singular-factory singular-libfac macaulay2 (build 1666 of /usr/libexec/gcc

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Unstable Octave compile fails

2004-08-21 Thread jfm
On Aug 21, 2004, at 9:35 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: ããã wrote: [] ld: Undefined symbols: Array::transpose() const [] Failed: compiling octave-2.1.57-3 failed Paul, I think I have narrowed this down to a difference between the compilers from Xcode-1.2 and from Xcode-1.5.

[Fink-devel] percent expansions in Files fields

2004-08-16 Thread jfm
Hi, Trying to update after holidays, libpng3 doesn't build _ with fink HEAD from today : /bin/mv /sw/src/root-libpng3-1.2.6-5/sw/lib/libpng12.0.%vrc5.dylib /sw/src/root-libpng3-shlibs-1.2.6-5/sw/lib/ mv: rename /sw/src/root-libpng3-1.2.6-5/sw/lib/libpng12.0.%vrc5.dylib to /sw/src/root-libpng3-s

Re: [Fink-devel] Implied Perl dependency tree following or what am I missing?

2004-07-24 Thread jfm
On Jul 24, 2004, at 7:04 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Please consult the packaging manual. It is no longer permitted to have a "placeholder" -pm package which depends on versioned packages. The only exception is storable-pm, because of the historical way it is used during bootstrapping. Whoever

Re: [Fink-devel] Implied Perl dependency tree following or what am I missing?

2004-07-24 Thread jfm
On Jul 23, 2004, at 11:57 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: David H. wrote: fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The candidates: (1) io-stringy-pm560: Perl module for advanced I/O with filehandles Since I wish to install soap-lite-ssl for Perl 5.8.1 and it seems to be a ve

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Errors in percent expansions (Modified by jfm)

2004-07-20 Thread jfm
Thanks a lot for %a working again ! On Jul 19, 2004, at 8:20 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: An idea that has been kicked around on #fink and is a Features tracker request is MD5 for patchfiles. This is for end-user convenience (avoid getting .info and .patch out-of-sync if pulling random CVS revisions) an

[Fink-devel] Re: Errors in percent expansions (Modified by jfm)

2004-07-19 Thread jfm
Hi Daniel, I see your log msg 'Restrict use of %a to PatchScript.' from this morning. So the msg below should have gone to you... (Is there a real need for this restriction?) Best, JF On Jul 18, 2004, at 4:27 PM, jfm wrote: Hi, Using fink HEAD : Trying to build postgresql74-ssl-7.4.3-2

Re: [Fink-devel] gabber-ssl/dia scrollkeeper conflict

2004-07-15 Thread jfm
On Jul 15, 2004, at 3:22 PM, jfm wrote: On Jul 14, 2004, at 8:55 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: My suspicion is that neither of these should have that file, but I don't know enough about scrollkeeper to be certain. This is correct : cf `fink dumpinfo -f descpackaging scrollkeeper` [and

Re: [Fink-devel] gabber-ssl/dia scrollkeeper conflict

2004-07-15 Thread jfm
On Jul 14, 2004, at 8:55 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: ---(snip!)--- Preparing to replace dia 0.92-12 (using .../dia_0.93-2_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... Unpacking replacement dia ... dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/graphics/dia_0.93 -2_darwin-powerpc.deb (--inst

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-24 Thread jfm
On Jun 24, 2004, at 1:02 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Most of these packages allow the user to override their tests for perl by checking the PERL environment variable first. If we just have fink set PERL to /usr/bin/perl by default (different default for perl modules, I guess), then the problem wil

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-24 Thread jfm
On Jun 24, 2004, at 12:38 AM, David Brown wrote: On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:18:51AM +0200, jfm wrote: More accurately probably, #! `which perl` #! /usr/bin/env perl which will actually work. There are a lot of strange restrictions on that line. This was just symbolic notation, to stress that

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-23 Thread jfm
On Jun 23, 2004, at 10:57 PM, jfm wrote: It is due to the fact that a number of pkgs install scripts beginning with #!/currently/active/perl More accurately probably, #! `which perl` Cf all 'checking for perl... /sw/bin/perl' in lo

[Fink-devel] Re: /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-23 Thread jfm
On Jun 23, 2004, at 10:51 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: you end up with a *real* perl581, but a *virtual* perl581-core, and get this error. Well, that can't be the right explanation, because there isn't a "real" perl581 package at all. Correct . It is due to the fact that a number of pkgs install sc

[Fink-devel] Re: /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-23 Thread jfm
On Jun 23, 2004, at 10:54 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Jean-Francois, I'm not sure if it's the same error you are seeing, but one bug I am aware of is this: there is a place in the fink code where fink tests to see which is the current version of perl installed on the system... unfortnately, fin

[Fink-devel] /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-23 Thread jfm
Hi, The following is the latest example _ but I had this on numerous occasions : ___attempted build of arts-latest /var/tmp/tmp.1.LaILav the following environment is being used: ACLOCALFLAGS: -I libltdl CFLAGS: -Os -fPIC CPPFLAGS: -I/sw/lib/flex/include -fno-common

Re: [Fink-devel] proposed policy on BuildDependsOnly

2004-06-21 Thread jfm
Dear Dave, This proposal looks perfect to me. As to Peter's reservation, couldn't that be met with his suggestion of BuildDependsOnly: false or a variant ? On Jun 21, 2004, at 2:54 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: (It is possible that in future versions of fink, this warning will be expanded to cover t

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging question

2004-06-19 Thread jfm
On Jun 19, 2004, at 1:13 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: CompileScript: << cd src/ make << This gives the following error: cd src/ Can't exec "cd": No such file or directory at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 403. The CompileScript is executed 'line by line'. Thus either use :

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-08 Thread jfm
On May 8, 2004, at 4:57 PM, jfm wrote: The 2 cases were from a local program, that linked both readline and ncurses _ in this order. Clearly the order is important for the trouble _ but you need also that one of the object files does reference one of those 3 symbols... A quick sampling (yes

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-08 Thread jfm
On May 8, 2004, at 3:06 AM, Ben Hines wrote: On May 7, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Ben Hines wrote: That did not happen to me. Perhaps it will only occur with programs which do not use ncurses, but which do use readline? Which programs ? The 2 cases were from a local program, that linked both readline and

[Fink-devel] readline-4.3-26

2004-05-07 Thread jfm
Hi, Today's update was motivated by : > Put an end to: > warning multiple definitions of symbol _BC /sw/lib/libreadline.dylib(terminal.so) > definition of _BC But since then I got with several programs : # Singular dyld: Singular Undefined symbols: Singular undefined reference to _BC expected

Re: [Fink-devel] XCode 1.2 issue with tcltk?

2004-05-05 Thread jfm
I don't think this is due to XCode1.2 : my tcltk was re-built here with XCode1.2 (apr. 26), and I got there : ../macosx/tclMacOSXBundle.c: In function `Tcl_MacOSXOpenVersionedBundleResources': ../macosx/tclMacOSXBundle.c:152: warning: passing arg 4 of `CFURLCreateCopyAppendingPathComponent' with

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-devel] SGMLSpm-1.03ii.tar.gz failed to compile (Modifié par Michèle Garoche)

2004-04-12 Thread jfm
On Apr 12, 2004, at 6:01 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Sorry, redirected from fink-users (sent on fink-users by error). Michele _ you can pick up a fixed file on cvs. Hopefully it works now on HFS+ _ please test ! Jean-Francois --- This SF.Net

[Fink-devel] bluefish

2004-04-08 Thread jfm
Hi Michele, In the Source field, 'downloads' should be replaced by 'snapshots' (wondering how Martin managed to build it already w/o hitting this.. did you already have the src ?) The build went well, except for the overwrite of the the prev version at the end. Jean-Francois ---

[Fink-devel] Re: Incorrect ConfigureParams in zsh-4.2.0

2004-03-27 Thread jfm
David H. users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > jfm wrote: > > > Or "Suggest" or "Recommend" ? _ no need to Depend it would seem to me > > > Suggest and Recommend does not work for source installs, fink ignores > those fields. If those scripts r

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Incorrect ConfigureParams in zsh-4.2.0

2004-03-27 Thread jfm
On Mar 27, 2004, at 10:39 PM, David H. wrote: Gary Kerbaugh wrote: As far as whether or not to include it with zsh, I have to defer to your experience. As I think about it, it does seem easier to make it a separate package. The zsh-script.info should be pretty easy and I could alter the scr

[Fink-devel] ccrypt

2004-03-26 Thread jfm
Hi David _ Changing mandir > -ConfigureParams: --prefix=%p --mandir=%p/share/man > +ConfigureParams: --prefix=%p --mandir=%i/share/man will not change : mkdir /sw/src/root-ccrypt-1.6-12/sw/doc mkdir /sw/src/root-ccrypt-1.6-12/sw/doc/ccrypt /sw/bin/install -c -m 644 ./ccrypt.html /sw/src/root-c

Re: [Fink-devel] /sw/man and dante

2004-03-26 Thread jfm
On Mar 26, 2004, at 6:28 PM, David H. wrote: jfm wrote: I don't know to which of your above pkgs you're referring here : ccrypt or xmlsec ? (apparently not sudo since that's not yet in 10.3). But for both I was referring to the 10.3 version. ccrypt is fine, just checked it. I a

Re: [Fink-devel] /sw/man and dante

2004-03-26 Thread jfm
Hi Justin, On Mar 26, 2004, at 4:20 PM, TheSin wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]$ dpkg -S /sw/man dante: /sw/man A couple of other cases: rig, xmlsec, jove, sudo, gdm And ccrypt and hdf5 install /sw/doc And lclint: /sw/imports (direct install). Jean-Francois

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-cvs

2004-03-18 Thread jfm
Hi Dan, Trying a bit more : fink list -o Information about 3532 packages read in 15 seconds. Use of uninitialized value in exists at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Status.pm line 153. Use of uninitialized value in exists at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/VirtPackage.pm line 472. ... repeats I omit the non-interesting

[Fink-devel] fink-cvs

2004-03-18 Thread jfm
Hi Dan, Since today's update to fink, I also get msgs : Failed: Can't resolve dependency "libsoup-ssl-shlibs (= 1.99.28-3)" for package "libsoup-ssl-1.99.28-3" (no matching packages/versions found) Failed: Can't resolve dependency "gal199-shlibs (= 1.99.11-6)" for package "gal199-1.99.11-6" (no

Re: [Fink-devel] failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-18 Thread jfm
On Mar 18, 2004, at 10:53 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: Alright, in fink cvs, du_sk now counts the same as 'du -sk' on both filesystems. I had to remove the test for du_sk(empty directory) = 0, since apparently it's not on UFS. jfm, could you please test it? Thanks. Dave I did t

Re: [Fink-devel] failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
On Mar 17, 2004, at 6:36 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: It seems this answers part of the mystery: [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t] vasi$ du -sk . 94 . [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t] vasi$ perl -MFink::Command=du_sk -e 'print(du_sk($_),"\n") for @ARGV' . 73 [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t]

[Fink-devel] Re: failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
Probably incorrect : with '-sk' both give the same output. JF On Mar 17, 2004, at 6:02 PM, jfm wrote: Here is the explanation I guess : /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /usr/bin/du . 10 ./CVS 38 . /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /sw/bin/du . 5

[Fink-devel] Re: failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
Hi, Here is the explanation I guess : /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /usr/bin/du . 10 ./CVS 38 . /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /sw/bin/du . 5 ./CVS 19 . Jean-Francois --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorial

[Fink-devel] failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
Hi, I have no idea what causes this _ UFS shouldn't matter here, no ? ./Command/du_sk..NOK 5# Failed test (./Command/du_sk.t at line 30) # got: '83' # expected: '103' ./Command/du_sk..NOK 6# Failed test (./Command/du_sk.t at line 31) # got:

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-13 Thread jfm
On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:19 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: I thought that Dan had fixed all those by changing the .info files to use here-doc format? Perhaps he only did the 10.3 tree? On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:29 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: I'm pretty sure that's been fixed in all of 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3 for

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-12 Thread jfm
On Mar 12, 2004, at 10:44 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Following a suggestion on the fink-users list, the CVS version of fink will now only display the warnings about BuildDependsOnly if you set the verbosity level of fink to be higher than the default. All fink developers should do this, to a

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-1

2004-03-09 Thread jfm
On Mar 8, 2004, at 9:32 PM, Michael Kluskens wrote: fink install octave-forge gives: ld: can't locate file for: -lqhull Thanks for the reminder _ the issue came up already before. Fixed in cvs. (if you can't wait, just add in the info file a line SetLIBRARY_PATH: %p/lib ) JF Mertens --

Re: [Fink-devel] pango and freetype question

2004-02-26 Thread jfm
On Feb 26, 2004, at 2:02 AM, James Gibbs wrote: Could someone look at the following snippet from the compilation of pango1-xft2 and tell me if it looks wrong to them, too. Specifically, in the last call to gcc, -L/sw/lib comes before -L/usr/X11R6/lib and there is also a -lfreetype. Wouldn't thi

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: problem with octave-forge 2004.02.12-1

2004-02-20 Thread jfm
On Feb 20, 2004, at 6:23 PM, Christian Schaffner wrote: g++ -bundle -bundle_loader /sw/bin/octave-2.1.53 -o tsearch.oct tsearch.o -lqhull -L/sw/lib/octave-2.1.53 -loctave -lcruft -loctinterp -framework vecLib ld: warning -prebind has no effect with -bundle ld: can't locate file for: -lqhull I w

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging policy

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 13, 2004, at 8:48 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: On Feb 13, 2004, at 9:15 AM, jfm wrote: Similarly, to get the set of pkgs that eg still depend on gd a simple egrep -rI '[, ]gd([, ]|$)' /sw/fink/dists/unstable|grep 'Depends:' suffices with the 1 line convention. (And as long

Re: [Fink-devel] date-manip-pm error

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 17, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Trees line. 'fink info'. Huh? We're talking about http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/index.php Very sorry _ I thought of fink's package db... JF --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux

Re: [Fink-devel] date-manip-pm error

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 16, 2004, at 3:19 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:40:24AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: One (minor) question in this context is how the package database determines the maintainer when different versions of a package have different maintainers. From looking at examples it

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging policy

2004-02-13 Thread jfm
On Feb 13, 2004, at 9:39 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: I prefer the here-doc structure for Depends and BuildDepends in fink packages, where each dependency (with possible alternatives) is on a separate line. For example Depends: << x11, giflib-shlibs | libungif-shlibs << IMO this is much more rea

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods getopt-long-pm.info,1.1,1.2 getopt-long-pm581.info,1.1,1.2

2004-02-03 Thread jfm
On Feb 3, 2004, at 5:44 PM, TheSin wrote: the point is still why? it's not hurting fink or dpkg for our usage. Even if it doesn't hurt fink's or dpkg's current usage (no guarantee about future versions of dpkg), users must be able to rely on the specs for whatever scripts they need. Jean-Francois

Re: .app's in Fink (was Re: [Fink-devel] CFD: Installing Frameworks from fink packages)

2004-01-27 Thread jfm
On Jan 27, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Darian Lanx wrote: What happens to the maitainer precedence then? Will the "native" app always be preffered? Why would anyone want to use KDE/X11 when they can have native KDE? To me, the crucial point is that all X11 based stuff, as well as the command line stuff,

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 6:27 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: libs/ggz-client-libs.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) games/ggz-server.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) (what a strange construct _ again a pkg that BuildDepends on self ?) I guess that -dev could be in a different .info or something so it's n

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 6:10 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Remi adjusted all of 10.2-gcc3.3 and most of 10.2 yesterday, and I did the remainder of 10.2 this morning. Thanks for fixing ivtools in 10.2 _ that did it. For those playing along at home: ... Thanks also for the nice explanation. Best, Jean-Fra

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 5:17 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: adjusted those .info in 10.3 in CVS Wednesday night. For me: % grep -lr /sw/fink/10.3 '%n-dev' Even in 10.3 I still find , in unstable: libs/ggz-client-libs.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) games/ggz-server.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) (

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 5:17 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:47:34PM +0100, jfm wrote: When updating fink from cvs an hour ago, I got : ln -s 10.3 /sw/fink/dists Reading package info... Error performing percent expansion: unknown % expansion or nesting too deep: "%n-dev&quo

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
When updating fink from cvs an hour ago, I got : ln -s 10.3 /sw/fink/dists Reading package info... Error performing percent expansion: unknown % expansion or nesting too deep: "%n-dev". at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 549. And any command like 'fink rebuild foo' yields the same msg. Anyt

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/rubymods imlib2-rb.info,NONE,1.1 imlib2-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.patch,NONE,1.1

2004-01-15 Thread jfm
Sorry _ had not yet looked at fink-commits, and my PkgVersion.pm wasn't updated as of today... Jean-Francois --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanc

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/rubymods imlib2-rb.info,NONE,1.1 imlib2-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.patch,NONE,1.1

2004-01-15 Thread jfm
On Jan 15, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Or just hard-code the CompileScript? Might be a better idea, because this way I get for both packages: gzip -dc /sw/src/imlib2-ruby-0.4.2.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf - ./configure --prefix=/sw Can't exec "./configure": No such file or directory at /s

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] librsvg2-2.4.0-3

2004-01-14 Thread jfm
On Jan 14, 2004, at 6:31 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: The real fix would be to lean on the freetype2 guys to make them fix the upstream sources. Why for god's sake did they have to put a "freetype" directory inside include/freetype2? This header file should be named . Hi Martin, Why do you alway

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods compress-zlib-pm.info,NONE,1.1 compress-zlib-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm-2.21-6.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm581-2.21-1.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm560.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-09 Thread jfm
Hi Dave, But Dan's excerpts showed --- NEW FILE: template-notex-pm581.info --- Package: template-notex-pm581 Depends: appconfig-pm, perl580-core BuildDepends: fink (>= 0.13.0-1), perl580-core those '580' should presumably be 581 ... (Also the Suggests line has a couple of stray 580's) And the sam

Re: [Fink-devel] fink builds twice

2004-01-06 Thread jfm
gain _ what is "the first problem" _ and the other(s) ? and not fink it's self, I disagree about ffmpeg, I think it is right. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 6-Jan-04, at 8:04 AM, jfm wrote: "Don't worry _ it&#

Re: [Fink-devel] fink builds twice

2004-01-06 Thread jfm
On Jan 6, 2004, at 12:05 PM, Max Horn wrote: After all, relatives of a package can't (and mustn't) be build dependencies of the package, since they are built at *exactly the same time*. So it wouldn't even make sense to have such a dependency (I can imagine some situations where people would *w

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Ruby test failed

2003-12-23 Thread jfm
On Dec 23, 2003, at 8:19 PM, jfm wrote: This looks like you're running the test without having installed the ruby-support patch itself, I just ran inject.pl ... But I see the cvs update command had the '-f' option (together with -

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Ruby test failed

2003-12-23 Thread jfm
On Dec 23, 2003, at 6:24 PM, Matthias Neeracher wrote: Interesting, and thank you so much for testing this! This looks like you're running the test without having installed the ruby-support patch itself, I just ran inject.pl ... which applies to the perlmods (Fink::PkgVersion, to be more spec

[Fink-devel] Ruby test failed

2003-12-23 Thread jfm
Hi, The following test failed : ./PkgVersion/get_rubyok 2/0Can't locate object method "get_ruby_dir_arch" via package "Fink::PkgVersion" at ./PkgVersion/get_ruby.t line 25. # Looks like your test died just after 2. ./PkgVersion/get_rubydubious Test returned status 255 (w

Re: [Fink-devel] The perl modules situation

2003-12-15 Thread jfm
On Dec 15, 2003, at 8:39 AM, Patrick Näf wrote: jfm said: Typically perl580 (eg) will install the same man pages, at the same place. So in order for the user not to have to force-overwrites , yes, you need such a Replaces (and perl580 too) _ if this is the case with your package. Ah, I see, the

Re: [Fink-devel] new fink commands

2003-12-15 Thread jfm
Opinions seems to me to go a bit too much in one single direction on this _ so let me try to play the devil's advocate.. On Dec 9, 2003, at 11:44 PM, Max Horn wrote: Am Dienstag, 09.12.03 um 21:56 Uhr schrieb TheSin: netpbm10 has 2 children: -> netpbm10-shlibs -> netpbm-bin so net

Re: [Fink-devel] The perl modules situation

2003-12-14 Thread jfm
On Dec 14, 2003, at 12:38 AM, Patrick Näf wrote: I'm the owner of one of the modules which is provided by perl580 (text-tabs-wrap-pm). When JFM brought this up back in August he suggested that, "appropriate 'Replaces' fields be put in those packages, and in perl580.&quo

Re: [Fink-devel] "Trees" not searched in order?

2003-12-09 Thread jfm
On Dec 9, 2003, at 5:25 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Why isn't the order of Trees important? This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is now, since one of the recent shakeups, Not that recent : the introduction of 'fink index' the *reverse* orde

Re: [Fink-devel] new fink commands

2003-12-09 Thread jfm
On Dec 9, 2003, at 7:45 AM, D. Höhn wrote: There can be many children but only _one_ parent. Is that correct? netpbm-bin has as parents both netpbm and netpbm10 _ and there may be a couple more such examples. Jean-Francois --- This SF.net ema

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.3 gtk+2 2.2.4-2 not building

2003-12-05 Thread jfm
On Dec 5, 2003, at 1:12 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: jfm wrote: [] Both freetype and freetype2 have headers that answer to the name , and they are, of course, totally incompatible. Which one of the two is chosen depends on your good or bad luck. Rather _ it exposes errors in the ordering of the

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.3 gtk+2 2.2.4-2 not building

2003-12-05 Thread jfm
that answer to the name , and they are, of course, totally incompatible. Which one of the two is chosen depends on your good or bad luck. Rather _ it exposes errors in the ordering of the flags : -I/sw/include should always come last. JF On Dec 4, 2003, at 7:35 PM, jfm wrote: Hi Masanori

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
On Dec 4, 2003, at 6:47 PM, jfm wrote: Trying ; fink gets rebuild twice : PS: I read : "But I think this is the end of the road for my changes, as I'm upsetting ppl now" I'd be sorry about that. My msgs didn't imply at all I was upset _ on the contrary. "On ne fa

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
On Dec 4, 2003, at 5:54 PM, TheSin wrote: try current HEAD now. Also if you know of a build that needs to switch db3 and db4 a few times or something like that could you test it or tell me :P Trying ; fink gets rebuild twice : ... All tests successful. Files=21, Tests=492, 56 wallclock secs

[Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
Hi, Just updated fink, and now : ... dpkg-deb: building package `cups-dev' in `/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/cups- dev_1.1.20-0.rc1.1_darwin-powerpc.deb'. /bin/ln -sf /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/cups- dev_1.1.20-0.rc1.1_darwin-powerpc.de

[Fink-devel] Re: bladeenc

2003-11-29 Thread jfm
Hi, I get in my logs : The following package will be rebuilt: bladeenc Failed: Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 271. I guess it is the * in the "TarFilesRename: BladeEnc.*" The use of wildcards is explicitly allowed in the docs though. JF

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Installing librep-dev-0.16.2-11 failed

2003-11-27 Thread jfm
On Nov 27, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: David Orlovich wrote: - Trying to install rep.m4 in /sw/src/root-librep-0.16.2-11/usr/share/aclocal; if this fails, install it manually in a suitable location

Re: [Fink-devel] current fink HEAD

2003-11-26 Thread jfm
On Nov 26, 2003, at 5:47 PM, TheSin wrote: HEAD is currently broke because of Michael's changes again, @BASEPATH@ needs to be set someplace to find $config_file, I fixed my local Engine.pm with this sub initialize { my $self = shift; my $config = Fink::Config->new_with_path('/sw

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 7:39 PM, TheSin wrote: the fix is now in fink cvs...thanks And works perfectly. How efficient, Justin ! Thanks a lot JF --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more p

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 6:26 PM, TheSin wrote: hmmm how odd, so the error is in the conffiles file, and you say any pkg with a conffile line will produce this? Right (tested just one other, plus variations on this one) Didn't check pkgs with multiline ConfFiles fields. JF -

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 6:01 PM, TheSin wrote: can you paste the /sw/src/root-leafnode-1.9.46-1/DEBIAN/CONTROL file please. The 'control' file is perfect (cf below if you want). But the 'conffiles' file has indeed no final newline. Best, JF Package: leafnode Source: leafnode Version: 1.9.46-1 Secti

[Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
Hi, Since today I get errors of the style : dpkg-deb -b root-leafnode-1.9.46-1 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/net warning, conffile name `/sw/etc/leafnode/config...' is too long, or missing final newline dpkg-deb: ignoring 1 warnings about the control file(s) ... dpkg: err

[Fink-devel] -fast flag ?

2003-11-20 Thread jfm
Hi, I see packages coming up in 10.3 that set the '-fast' flag _ eg, agrep, in the patch (after correcting 644 to 755 in the first install command and fixing the second...) My understanding is that some mechanism would then be needed in fink to automatically add the appropriate -mcpu and -mtune fl

Re: [Fink-devel] About perl modules (was: Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.405,1.406 PkgVersion.pm,1.169,1.170)

2003-11-14 Thread jfm
Things seem to work perfectly now. Thanks a lot Dave for this very clarifying msg. On Nov 14, 2003, at 2:30 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: ... The scheme was disrupted somewhat when Apple compiled perl 5.8.1 for 10.3 with a different architecture flag. So for "Type: perl 5.8.1" we now need /sw/

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 7:21 PM, jfm wrote: Rebuilding it now _ but the error msg basically tells it: dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/33/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/rec- descent-pm_1.80-5_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/sw/lib/perl5/darwin/perllocal.pod

[Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 7:18 PM, TheSin wrote: ahh the arch dir is killing it, do you still have the build dir...or main root dir if so can you tell me where the perllocal.pod file resides in a 581 pkg pleasE? On 13-Nov-03, at 10:56 AM, jfm wrote: /bin/cat /sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5

[Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 6:47 PM, TheSin wrote: I'll look at the code. but it might expect perllocal.pod to be at a certain location and it might not be there? Yes _ eg in the log of rec-descent-pm : /bin/cat /sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5/sw/lib/perl5/5.8.1/darwin-thread- multi-2level/perllo

Fwd: [Fink-devel] package manager release

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
Sorry _ bounced. Retrying .. JF Begin forwarded message: Resent-From: jfm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: jfm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: November 13, 2003 6:12:10 PM CET Resent-To: David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Justin Hallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fink devel <[E

Re: [Fink-devel] package manager release

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 12, 2003, at 10:05 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to release version 0.17.0 of the package manager from CVS HEAD around 24 hours from now. Also, if anyone is aware of things in HEAD which are inappropriate for the next release, please let me know ASAP. Since before ~nov 5, the UpdateP

  1   2   >