Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

2005-08-19 Thread Clemence Magnien
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Please report your experiences (good and bad) with 0.24.9. We'd like to move this one over to stable as soon as possible. Hi, following this message I went and updated fink and ran 'fink update-all', which I had not

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

2005-08-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Garrett Cooper wrote: [] This may not be good news for all you guys that tweaked your fink installations already, but I just reinstalled fink and redid everything from scratch and not only did all of the mono stuff compile and install Including mono-tools? correctly this time around (devoid

Firefox problem (was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9)

2005-08-19 Thread Clemence Magnien
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:06:19AM +0400, Clemence Magnien wrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Please report your experiences (good and bad) with 0.24.9. We'd like to move this one over to stable as soon as possible. Hi, following this

Re: [Fink-users] [OT] imagemagick malfunctions on Tiger

2005-08-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Mark J. Reed wrote: For what it's worth, I'm seeing the same behavior as Jens. 10.4.2, installed over clean-from-the-Apple-Store 10.3, Apple's X11 from the This over makes me suspicious. We have seen problems with this on other occasions. The Apple installer could very well have decided that

Re: [Fink-users] Unison 2.10.2 on 10.3 broken?

2005-08-19 Thread Bruno Martin
Hello, I was the writer of the original thread concerning unison problem and, for me, there was no improvement. Of course I do have some ISO 8859-1 characters in my filenames. And yes, it seems that the Glib (even the newest one) has problems with this, since unison works fine in text-only

Re: Firefox problem (was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9)

2005-08-19 Thread Clemence Magnien
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:04:49PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Clemence Magnien wrote: [] I know there's a fix proposing to remove the ~/.mozilla/firefox/randomstring.default/xpti.dat file, but I do not have a randomstring.default directory in my firefox directory. Here is its content:

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

2005-08-19 Thread Benjamin Reed
Travis Smith wrote: + export DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/sw/src/fink.build/root-mono-tools-1.0-1/sw/lib:/usr/lib + DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/sw/src/fink.build/root-mono-tools-1.0-1/sw/lib:/usr/lib + make install DESTDIR=/sw/src/fink.build/root-mono-tools-1.0-1 Making install in po

Re: [Fink-users] How to find all packages dependent on glib2?

2005-08-19 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:52 AM, Samuel Herschbein wrote: This algorithm worked to get pango1-xft past the __cg_jpeg_resync_to_restart issue: apt-get install pango1-xft2 apt-get install glib2 fink install pango1-xft2 What versions of pango1-xft2 and glib2 do you have now? One of your

esound problem was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

2005-08-19 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Aug 19, 2005, at 3:06 AM, Clemence Magnien wrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Please report your experiences (good and bad) with 0.24.9. We'd like to move this one over to stable as soon as possible. Hi, following this message I went and

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

2005-08-19 Thread Benjamin Reed
Travis Smith wrote: checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c aha! I've got fileutils installed, that was the difference. checked in the fix, should be on the mirrors shortly --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better

Re: [Fink-users] How to find all packages dependent on glib2?

2005-08-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: [] 2) How can I get a list off all packages which are dependent on glib2? (a reverse lookup of fink show-deps) fink remove glib2 is an easy way--every package that depends on glib2 will complain about your attempt to remove it. There is also apt-cache showpkg

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

2005-08-19 Thread Travis Smith
I installed fileutils and tried. Still no go with monodoc. $ fink install fileutils mono-tools [...] Setting up mono-tools (1.0-1) ... $ monodoc The monodoc GUI component is not installed. Install it from the mono-tools package. Is there something else I need to do? Thanks. On 8/19/05,

Re: esound problem was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

2005-08-19 Thread Clemence Magnien
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:15:53AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Aug 19, 2005, at 3:06 AM, Clemence Magnien wrote: After a couple of hours the compilation stopped on the e-sound package with the following error: snip beginning where all seemed to happen normally checking for

Re: [Fink-users] [OT] imagemagick malfunctions on Tiger

2005-08-19 Thread Jens Nockel
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Martin Costabel wrote: Mark J. Reed wrote: For what it's worth, I'm seeing the same behavior as Jens. 10.4.2, installed over clean-from-the-Apple-Store 10.3, Apple's X11 from the This over makes me suspicious. We have seen problems with this on other occasions. The

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

2005-08-19 Thread Benjamin Reed
Travis Smith wrote: $ fink install fileutils mono-tools [...] Setting up mono-tools (1.0-1) ... $ monodoc The monodoc GUI component is not installed. Install it from the mono-tools package. Is there something else I need to do? Thanks. Ah, no, this is a different issue. I'd disabled the

Re: [Fink-users] [OT] imagemagick malfunctions on Tiger: Solved

2005-08-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Jens Nöckel wrote: [] It made no difference whether or not X11 had click-through enabled or not. Really? I can now reliably switch this behavior on or off by dis/enabling wm_click_through. If I do defaults write com.apple.x11 wm_click_through -bool Yes then restarting X11 gives me correct

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc issues

2005-08-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: [] This may not be good news for all you guys that tweaked your fink installations already, but I just reinstalled fink and redid everything from scratch and not only did all of the mono stuff compile and

Re: [Fink-users] [OT] imagemagick malfunctions on Tiger: Solved

2005-08-19 Thread Jens Nöckel
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:45 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Jens Nöckel wrote: [] It made no difference whether or not X11 had click-through enabled or not. Really? I can now reliably switch this behavior on or off by dis/enabling wm_click_through. If I do Wow - it works! That was one of the

Re: [Fink-users] [OT] imagemagick malfunctions on Tiger: Solved

2005-08-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Jens Nöckel wrote: [] Wow - it works! Good that we know now how to deal with it. But that this is necessary is still a weird behavior and could be called a bug. ImageMagick should probably at least contain a warning in its usage notes. And Apple's X11 needs some fixing anyway. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc issues

2005-08-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Garrett Cooper wrote: On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: [] Including mono-tools? Will try in a minute. Actually, Ben R updated it in the meantime, so it will now probably compile. -- Martin --- SF.Net email is

Re: [Fink-users] [OT] imagemagick malfunctions on Tiger

2005-08-19 Thread Mark J. Reed
For what it's worth, I'm seeing the same behavior as Jens. 10.4.2, installed over clean-from-the-Apple-Store 10.3, Apple's X11 from the Tiger CD. None of the buttons in the window that pops up when I click on a display(1)ed image are responsive. But display itself is not hung; it's still

Re: [Fink-users] [OT] imagemagick malfunctions on Tiger

2005-08-19 Thread Mark J. Reed
Oh, also, the three dots in the upper-left-hand corner of that window aren't colored in, so it makes sense if it's a window manager thing. I also have exactly the same issue with a remote instance of ImageMagick running on a Linux box displaying back to my Mac. On 8/18/05, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL

Re: [Fink-users] Error 572 in ATLAS build

2005-08-19 Thread Jens Nöckel
On Aug 17, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Jens Nöckel wrote: [] ATL_cger1.c:3:5: error: #error This kernel requires gas x86-32 assembler! In file included from ATL_cger1.c:42: /sw/src/fink.build/atlas-3.7.10-1/ATLAS/include/contrib/ ATL_gemv_ger_SSE.h:12:2: error: #error This

Re: [Fink-users] Error 572 in ATLAS build

2005-08-19 Thread Jens Nöckel
On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Jens Nöckel wrote: numbers like 6 Gigaflops in some of the tests scrolled across the screen... Ha - that was Teraflops. Not that anybody cares... But while I'm at it, I wonder why there needs to be a separate libgslcblas.a for GSL. Can't it use either the

Re: [Fink-users] Error 572 in ATLAS build

2005-08-19 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Jens Nöckel wrote: On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Jens Nöckel wrote: numbers like 6 Gigaflops in some of the tests scrolled across the screen... Ha - that was Teraflops. Not that anybody cares... But while I'm at it, I wonder why there needs to be a separate libgslcblas.a for GSL. Can't

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc issues

2005-08-19 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:55 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: This may not be good news for all you guys that tweaked your fink installations already, but I just reinstalled fink and redid everything from scratch and not

[Fink-users] Re: How to find all packages dependent on glib2?

2005-08-19 Thread Samuel Herschbein
Conclusion question before details: To avoid the __cg_jpeg_resync_to_restart error, it looks like packages that depends on glib2 must be installed BEFORE glib2. Right? * Is there a way to ensure that glib2 is the LAST thing installed? Or, * Is there a way to remove glib2 without removing

RE: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

2005-08-19 Thread Kevin T. Broderick
Title: RE: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9 I just did a complete reinstall of my system (replaced my PowerBook's hard drive due to a failure, and decided to do a clean install of Tiger and apps with only importing the user settings, rather than importing everything from the old

Re: [Fink-users] Re: How to find all packages dependent on glib2?

2005-08-19 Thread Samuel Herschbein
Alexander- I put all the answers to your questions on my web site since the transcript is about 1MB... http://www.oz.net/~samh/transcript.html TIA, Sam Below is the message I'm responding to- On Aug 19, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Samuel Herschbein wrote: Conclusion question before details:

Re: [Fink-users] Re: How to find all packages dependent on glib2?

2005-08-19 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Aug 19, 2005, at 7:25 PM, Samuel Herschbein wrote: Alexander- I put all the answers to your questions on my web site since the transcript is about 1MB... http://www.oz.net/~samh/transcript.html TIA, Sam OK--I tried a rebuild of gtk+2 here and didn't have the same problem. Quoting

Re: [Fink-users] Re: How to find all packages dependent on glib2?

2005-08-19 Thread Samuel Herschbein
I'll need to think about this. That's how I usually get in trouble... Let me know if I can help in anyway. I know *nix (bit rusty), but haven't taken the time to master fink. If access to my Mac will help, let me know. Sam -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Samuel Herschbein