Re: [Fink-users] feedback wanted: dbus

On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > Yup, gnome-session was doing bad things. Update to gnome-session > 2.24.3-3 and it should work again. It is working again, and my Gramps database is up and running. Thanks for the quick fix! Stan --

Re: [Fink-users] feedback wanted: dbus

Your fix to gnome-session worked. Good job and thank you. On Feb 17, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Benjamin Reed wrote: >> Stan Sanderson wrote: >> >>> I had a working Gnome install, just updated yesterday. >> >> I'm doing some diggin

Re: [Fink-users] feedback wanted: dbus

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benjamin Reed wrote: > Stan Sanderson wrote: > >> I had a working Gnome install, just updated yesterday. > > I'm doing some digging, and it looks like, in fact, gnome-session does > some things it shouldn't regarding assuming the way dbus is implemen

Re: [Fink-users] feedback wanted: dbus

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stan Sanderson wrote: > I had a working Gnome install, just updated yesterday. I'm doing some digging, and it looks like, in fact, gnome-session does some things it shouldn't regarding assuming the way dbus is implemented (which was true, for the lin

Re: [Fink-users] feedback wanted: dbus

On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I've committed an update to dbus that includes the new launchd support > instead of using X11's session tracking. > > I'd love some feedback from folks, especially GNOME users, to > confirm

Re: [Fink-users] feedback wanted: dbus

On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I've committed an update to dbus that includes the new launchd support > instead of using X11's session tracking. > > I'd love some feedback from folks, especially GNOME users, to > confirm

Re: [Fink-users] feedback wanted: dbus

Gnome will no longer start. Here is the startup messages: Macintosh-3:lib rmiles$ gnome & [1] 11728 Macintosh-3:lib rmiles$ X11.app: main(): argc=1 argv[0] = ./X11.bin Waiting for startup parameters via Mach IPC. X11.app: Could not connect to server (DISPLAY is not set). Starting X serve

[Fink-users] feedback wanted: dbus

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've committed an update to dbus that includes the new launchd support instead of using X11's session tracking. I'd love some feedback from folks, especially GNOME users, to confirm it doesn't cause any issues for them. I tested it with a few apps th

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback needed for emacs22

At 10:18 AM -0400 6/7/07, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: >Sebastien Maret wrote: >> Emacs 22.1 was released a few days ago, and I have updated the >> emacs22, emacs22-gtk and emacs22-nox to this new version. >> >> I'd like to move these pacakages to the stable branch soon, so I would >> appreciate

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback needed for emacs22

Sebastien Maret wrote: > Emacs 22.1 was released a few days ago, and I have updated the > emacs22, emacs22-gtk and emacs22-nox to this new version. > > I'd like to move these pacakages to the stable branch soon, so I would > appreciate if poeple could provide feedback on these. > > Sébastien > >

[Fink-users] Feedback needed for emacs22

Emacs 22.1 was released a few days ago, and I have updated the emacs22, emacs22-gtk and emacs22-nox to this new version. I'd like to move these pacakages to the stable branch soon, so I would appreciate if poeple could provide feedback on these. Sébastien ---

Re: [Fink-users] feedback for cvs in unstable tree

Alexander, At my office, I'm running 1.12.13-3 from 10.4-transitional/unstable on 2 clients and we're using 1.12.12-4 from 10.3/unstable on our XServe for the server. We've had no problems. I've been using Fink CVS on the client side since 10.2 (because Apple's CVS didn't support non-sta

Re: [Fink-users] feedback for cvs in unstable tree

On 1/14/06, Sven de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm looking for feedback for cvs-1.12.13 (10.3/unstable and > > 10.4-transitional/unstable) > > > > If you've been using it, let me know how it's been working, because > > I'd like to migrate it to stable. > > I tried it: > i c

Re: [Fink-users] feedback for cvs in unstable tree

Hi, I'm looking for feedback for cvs-1.12.13 (10.3/unstable and 10.4-transitional/unstable) If you've been using it, let me know how it's been working, because I'd like to migrate it to stable. I tried it: i cvs 1.12.13-3Version control system a bit, but when i check o

Re: [Fink-users] feedback for cvs in unstable tree

I've been using cvs-1.12.13 (10.4-transitional/unstable) since it was in the tree, and I've never experienced any problem. However, I've been using it with a local repository only. HTH, Andrea. On Jan 14, 2006, at 03:00 , Alexander K. Hansen wrote: I'm looking for feedback for cvs-1.12.13

[Fink-users] feedback for cvs in unstable tree

I'm looking for feedback for cvs-1.12.13 (10.3/unstable and 10.4-transitional/unstable) If you've been using it, let me know how it's been working, because I'd like to migrate it to stable. -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/l

[Fink-users] Feedback for xcircuit-3.3.38

If anybody's been using the xcircuit-3.3.38 package from unstable, I'd like to get feedback on it. This is apparently the last of the 3.3.x series, and I'd love to have it in stable when we produce the next 10.3 and 10.4 binary distributions. -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter [Day Job] Levit

Re: [Fink-users] FEEDBACK REQUEST: cvs-1.12.12 from unstable trees

I've been running it for a month (only with a local repository though) without any problem. Andrea. On Sep 29, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: I'd like anybody who has been using cvs-1.12.12 to send me any positive or negative feedback. I've been using it myself with no inc

[Fink-users] FEEDBACK REQUEST: cvs-1.12.12 from unstable trees

I'd like anybody who has been using cvs-1.12.12 to send me any positive or negative feedback. I've been using it myself with no incidents, but I'd like to get some more data points before I consider moving this to stable. -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia Univer

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > Please report your experiences (good and bad) with 0.24.9. We'd like > to move this one over to stable as soon as possible. Hi, all went fine here. fink update-all failed two times due to packages problem (e-sound and d

RE: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

Title: RE: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9 I just did a complete reinstall of my system (replaced my PowerBook's hard drive due to a failure, and decided to do a clean install of Tiger and apps with only importing the user settings, rather than importing everything from the old in

Re: esound problem was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:15:53AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2005, at 3:06 AM, Clemence Magnien wrote: > > > >After a couple of hours the compilation stopped on the e-sound package > >with the following error: > > > > > >checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes > >

esound problem was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

On Aug 19, 2005, at 3:06 AM, Clemence Magnien wrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Please report your experiences (good and bad) with 0.24.9. We'd like to move this one over to stable as soon as possible. Hi, following this message I went and up

Re: Firefox problem (was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9)

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:04:49PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > Clemence Magnien wrote: > [] > >I know there's a fix proposing to remove the > >"~/.mozilla/firefox/randomstring.default/xpti.dat" > >file, but I do not have a randomstring.default directory in my > >firefox directory. Here is its

Re: Firefox problem (was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9)

Clemence Magnien wrote: [] I know there's a fix proposing to remove the "~/.mozilla/firefox/randomstring.default/xpti.dat" file, but I do not have a randomstring.default directory in my firefox directory. Here is its content: [Berlin ~]$ ls .mozilla/firefox/ profiles.iniqgpbr3bq.def

Firefox problem (was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9)

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:06:19AM +0400, Clemence Magnien wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > > > Please report your experiences (good and bad) with 0.24.9. We'd like > > to move this one over to stable as soon as possible. > > Hi, > > following

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:24:35AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > Please report your experiences (good and bad) with 0.24.9. We'd like > to move this one over to stable as soon as possible. Hi, following this message I went and updated fink and ran 'fink update-all', which I had not d

Re: pango1 troubles (was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9)

Yes, glib2, glib2-dev, and glib2-shlibs are all at 2.8.0-122. pango1-xft2 1.10.0-1 still dies with: dyld: Symbol not found: __cg_jpeg_resync_to_restart --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2

pango1 troubles (was Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9)

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:46:09AM -0700, Samuel Herschbein wrote: > (until I got to the pango1-xft2 error which is still a show stopper > for me...). Did you upgrade to the latest glib2 packages? dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ---

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

After a clean install of Fink, adding unstable trees, and selfupdating, a fink install bundle-gnome ran without interruption (until I got to the pango1-xft2 error which is still a show stopper for me...). It had previously stopped a few times for the gettext- dev/libgettext3-dev issue. -

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

No problems here either. Updated fink, updated-all, no hangs & it went quick too. Brandon Potter On Aug 17, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Travis Smith wrote: I've rebuild my fink tree with it from the start and getting over that libgettext3/gettext problem was great. I haven't noticed any other difference

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

I've rebuild my fink tree with it from the start and getting over that libgettext3/gettext problem was great. I haven't noticed any other differences in it, but there has been no more stoppages with the before mentioned problem. Thanks. On 8/17/05, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[Fink-users] Feedback for fink-0.24.9

If you've been using the unstable tree and have now installed fink-0.24.9, we would like your feedback on it. In particular, this version of fink allows build dependencies to be swapped in the meddle of a multi-package build--this should get rid of the ubiquitous gettext-dev/libgettext3-de

[Fink-users] feedback (Koffice, emacs21, Xtool 1.5)

Just a quick feedback about the latest problems: (1) the latest available versions of KDE and Koffice installed without further problem. (2) the latest version of emacs21-xaw3d also installed (to be sure I just removed nxml-mode before the install and reinstalled it after). (3) Apple has posted

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback needed: Yorick

Well, I can help with the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree anyway: Setting up yorick (1.5.12-1) ... * Yorick: (yorick). Yorick interpreted language. bash-2.05b# fink --version Package manager version: 0.22.2 Distribution version: 0.6.3.rsync Compiles and installs fine for me. On Friday, September 10, 2004, at 08:5

[Fink-users] Feedback needed: Yorick

I would need some feedback from people who use yorick.1.14-2, in order to move it in the stable branch. Thanks in advance, Sébastien --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod

[Fink-users] Feedback needed: Yorick

Hi, I would need some feedback from people who use yorick.1.14-2, in order to move it in the stable branch. Thanks in advance, Sébastien --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple i

[Fink-users] Feedback wanted

I have several packages in unstable, that I'd like to get moved to stable before the upcoming binary release. findbugs-0.7.1-1 jdepend-2.6-2 jing-20030619-2 nxml-mode-20031018-1 python-mode-4.35-11 trang-20030619-1 If you're using any of these with no problems, can you send me a quick

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Well you were right of course! I use PsynX for backing up my hard disk to a firewire external disk, and sure enough it has installed rsync-hfs in both /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin! Hopefully I had the genuine Apple version on an other machine. It is a 1/3 in size and now all is fine with selfupd

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Costabel wrote: | Is it really the same binary? It rather looks like it is rsync-hfs, AKA | rsyncX. I wouldn't it put past the authors of that package that they | didn't change the version information. In the older days they even | replaced /usr/

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Paul INDELICATO wrote: [] finkinfo/w3m-ssl-0.4.1-11.info /bin/cp: finkinfo/w3m-ssl-0.4.1-11.info/rsrc: No such file or directory fopen: No such file or directory stat finkinfo/w3m-ssl-0.4.1-11.info : No such file or directory [] Could it be that rsync is the problem: rsync version 2.5.5 protocol

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

I have no idea how this mess came upon! I use finkcommander to enable or disable the unstable tree (I have not enabled the unstable crypto). I never touced the fink.conf file by hand. Right now unstable is enabled. Except for the root3.patch I never changed anything myself in the 10.2-gcc3.3 di

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi Paul, Somehow you have a great mix up between stable and unstable packages on your disk (see below). Did you copy the root3.info and roofitcore.info file to the local directory or do you have the full unstable tree enabled? On Nov 29, 2003, at 10:08 PM, Paul INDELICATO wrote: Well root3 is

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Well root3 is installed: fink list root3 Information about 1925 packages read in 2 seconds. i root3 3.10.01-11Object-oriented data analysis framework i root3-shlibs3.10.01-11Object-oriented data analysis framework root3-threaded 3.05.

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi Paul, Great you solved your first problem, though I have no idea what really went wrong. Concerning roofitcore: you are definitely missing the root3 install. What gives 'fink list root3'? I guess that somehow your package database thinks, that root3 is installed, but it isn't (anymore).

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Finally I ran once more sudo find /sw/ -user 2011 -exec chown root:admin {} \; and did AGAIN a selfupdate and now I can compile pine-ssl 4.58. From the web page I thought that this problem happened only on 10.3, and I had run the command at some point already. Go figure! The roofitcore problem

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi, actually my package description does not update correctly: I had indeed an old patch, but the only way I could get the right one was getting it "by hand" from the web site. When I do a rsynk update I get very often errors: Updating stable/main rsync -az --delete-after -v 'rsync://master.us

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi, On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, at 11:34 AM, Paul INDELICATO wrote: Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, The packages sci/cernlib and sci/root3 (version 3.10/01) are in the unstable trees since quite some time. I'd like to move them to the stable trees. Therefore I would be interested to hear some f

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, The packages sci/cernlib and sci/root3 (version 3.10/01) are in the unstable trees since quite some time. I'd like to move them to the stable trees. Therefore I would be interested to hear some feedback about those packages. Do you have any problems using them? Would yo

[Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi, The packages sci/cernlib and sci/root3 (version 3.10/01) are in the unstable trees since quite some time. I'd like to move them to the stable trees. Therefore I would be interested to hear some feedback about those packages. Do you have any problems using them? Would you please indicate th

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Wanted on XFree86 Packages

D. E. Kiefer wrote: It conflicts with Eudora 6. The cursor hangs while Eudora checks mail. It's usable if you limit the checkmail time to 1 hour. I'm running the latest KDE with xfree86 4.3.0. I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What conflicts with Eudora? XDarwin is just an application li

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Wanted on XFree86 Packages

4.3.0-16 seems to be OK for me--I didn't notice any odd behavior, anyway. On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 11:27 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: The XFree86 4.3.0-16 package in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and 4.3.99.16 package both contain important bugfixes that need to be released. If you've had success

[Fink-users] Feedback Wanted on XFree86 Packages

The XFree86 4.3.0-16 package in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and 4.3.99.16 package both contain important bugfixes that need to be released. If you've had success (or failure) with either of these, could you please let me know or post to the list? I'd like to fasttrack them to stable if possible. --

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback wanted

>> python-mode 4.35-1 Emacs - python edit mode Jason> I'd like to test out python-mode. Note that as of earlier today, the current version is 4.40. (4.38 is available from Python CVS or the latest - 2.3.2 - release.) A release separate from Python hasn't yet bee

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback wanted

On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:31 PM, Jason Clark wrote: On Nov 6, 2003, at 7:16 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote: I've got quite a few packages that I'd like to get moved to stable. So can anyone successfully using any of the following, give me some feedback. eieio 0.17-

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback wanted

On Nov 6, 2003, at 7:16 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote: I've got quite a few packages that I'd like to get moved to stable. So can anyone successfully using any of the following, give me some feedback. eieio 0.17-1 Enhanced Integration of Emacs Interpreted

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback wanted

yd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:16:21 +1100 Subject: [Fink-users] Feedback wanted I've got quite a few packages that I'd like to get moved to stable. So can anyone successfully using any of the following, give me some feedback. eieio 0.17

[Fink-users] Feedback wanted

I've got quite a few packages that I'd like to get moved to stable. So can anyone successfully using any of the following, give me some feedback. eieio 0.17-1 Enhanced Integration of Emacs Interpreted Objects elib 1.0-1

[Fink-users] feedback needed

Dear fink users, As we approach the next major Fink release, the fink developers need your feedback about packages from the unstable tree which you have used successfully. You can find the developer's email address by running "fink describe packagename". I need feedback myself on the following

[Fink-users] feedback needed

Dear Fink users, If you are using the 10.2/unstable tree (for example, because you upgraded from 10.1 following the jaguar upgrade instructions), please help the Fink developer team prepare for the upcoming 0.5.0 distribution by letting us know which packages are working for you, so that they can

[Fink-users] Feedback

After upgrading to Jaguar a month ago, some feedback: Here are some fink installed programs for which I can give positive feedback - i.e. they definitely work for me: i apache 1.3.23-1Flexible and extensible web server i gv 3.5.8-4 X11 interface for ghostscript interpre

[Fink-users] Feedback for evolution-1.0.7-2

I've been using evolution-1.0.7-2 for a while and in my experience it's been fairly stable--I've had Entourage crash more often (though that's not saying much). -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole E

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

At 11:11 PM +0200 10/6/02, Michael Loose wrote: >As there is no possibility to sent feedback directly to someone who >feels responsible >for the latest distribution i use this way to let out these things >(adressed to whom ever it may concern). > <- snip -> >It simply takes more time to use Fi

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

> Ponder #1. I wonder how many people with limited to some *nix > experience have installed scores of open source programs with fink? > Ponder #2. I wonder out of the people found in #1 how many could have > done it without fink? > Ponder#3. If "And... there is especially no use for the average

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

On 10/6/02 5:11 PM, "Michael Loose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After having read all that stuff i assume the thought of fink was to > make life easier for people who are not that common w. UNIX and the > commandline - which is quite a nice idea. Why do you assume that? As a satisfied fink user,

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

If fink is not for you, that's all well and good. Please e-mail fink customer service and ask for a refund of every penny you paid for it. Ponder #1. I wonder how many people with limited to some *nix experience have installed scores of open source programs with fink? Ponder #2. I wonder out of

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

After reading your whole e-mail, I'm still not clear on what your actual problem with Fink is... On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 05:11 PM, Michael Loose wrote: > As there is no possibility to sent feedback directly to someone who > feels responsible > for the latest distribution i use this way

[Fink-users] feedback

As there is no possibility to sent feedback directly to someone who feels responsible for the latest distribution i use this way to let out these things (adressed to whom ever it may concern). After having read all that stuff i assume the thought of fink was to make life easier for people who

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback on Gramps

On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 08:16 AM, Ben Hines wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 07:43 AM, Timothy Gregg wrote: >> >> from intl22 import * >> ImportError: Inappropriate file type for dynamic loading >> > > Yes, i noticed that as well and I'll look into it. > Ok, i fixed th

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback on Gramps

On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 07:43 AM, Timothy Gregg wrote: > > from intl22 import * > ImportError: Inappropriate file type for dynamic loading > Yes, i noticed that as well and I'll look into it. > File "/sw/share/gramps/gramps_main.py", line 819, in save_file > self.db.save(fi

[Fink-users] Feedback on Gramps

I'm trying the newly added gramps 0.8.0-1. Thanks for the work on this package. I'm seeing a number of problems. As I don't know much about this yet, I will post some of these issues here before trying the upstream discussion lists. Executing from the command line gives a warning: Traceback

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

> hey, I am looking for some feedback on these packages that are in > unstable: > autoconf25-2.53 Seems okay. > m4 Works fine for me. HTH, Dan -- This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery. --

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 14:33, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > hey, I am looking for some feedback on these packages that are in > unstable: > > autoconf25-2.53 no problems that I know about > m4 ditto ... > di looks fine ... > userutils Seems

[Fink-users] feedback

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hey, I am looking for some feedback on these packages that are in unstable: autoconf25-2.53 m4 libmusicbrainz bitchx bitchx-ssl ckermit gkermit gtkhx gtkhx-ssl minicom bchunk di slay uptimed userutils thanks, - -chris zubrzycki - - -- PGP public ke

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback needed for packages

On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 05:32 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: > ettercap-ssl 0.6.5-1 crypto Works on 10.2 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback needed for packages

> nmap-nox3.00-1netNetwork exploration utility Works fine > tcptraceroute1.2-2netAlternative to traceroute, using TCP packets Works fine Guillaume --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job b

[Fink-users] Feedback needed for packages

Hi everyone, In order to get some of my packages into stable (hopefully) before the next Fink release, I need feedback on the following packages which are in unstable (and are not in stable), or have updated versions in unstable: nameunstablecategorysummary ettercap

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback needed..

Ben Hines wrote: [] > xaos graphics Fractal explorer Works for me. -- Martin --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! ht

[Fink-users] Feedback needed..

Feedback is needed on the following packages so they can be moved to stable for the upcoming release. Thanks! lifelines database Scriptable Genealogy program. help2man devel Generates man pages from program output. treecc devel Tree Compiler-Compil

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Request

On Monday, August 12, 2002, at 06:08 PM, Olaf Foellinger wrote: > fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. > The > candidates: > > (1) giflib-bin: GIF image format handling library, LZW-enabled version > (2) libungif-bin: GIF image format handling library, LZW-fr

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Request

Hi, * Matt Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12.08.02 08:30]wrote: > I'm after some feedback on the following packages: > > freeciv-1.13.0-1 freeciv gives the following error: $ sudo fink install freeciv Information about 1316 packages read in 0 seconds. pkg freeciv version ### pkg freeciv v

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Request

On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 06:39 PM, Matt Stephenson wrote: > aalib-1.4rc5-1 > qtella-0.5.3-1 I know these work. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Request

On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 06:39 , Matt Stephenson wrote: > I'm after some feedback on the following packages: > diffutils-2.8.1-1 AFAICT, this is working fine. HTH, Dan -- This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery. -

[Fink-users] Feedback Request

I'm after some feedback on the following packages: aalib-1.4rc5-1 aftp-1.0-1 asp2php-0.76.13-1 calcoo-1.3.12-1 diffutils-2.8.1-1 freeciv-1.13.0-1 gnuboy-1.0.3-1 gnut-0.4.28-2 hfsutils-3.2.6-1 jags-0.20.2-1 joe-2.9.8-pre1-1 mtools-3.9.8-3 mtoolsfm-1.9-3-1 mutella-0.4.1-1 peacock-0.5-2 pong-1.0.2-2

Re: [Fink-users] feedback needed

> I am also looking for feedback on the newest versions of the following > packages, with the hope that I can update the version in "stable" prior > to the release: [ ... ] > fvwm2-2.4.8-2 > fvwm2-no-gnome-2.4.8-2 fvwm2 is my everyday window manager, and version 2.4.8 seems to work just fine,

Re: [Fink-users] feedback needed

David R. Morrison wrote: [] > fvwm2-2.4.8-2 Works for me. > pari-gp-xemacs-2.1.4-1 Works. And finally doesn't require me to install some emacs package that I don't need otherwise. Why can't pari-gp even use OSX's built-in /usr/bin/emacs while building? As an interface to run pari-gp, texmacs i

[Fink-users] feedback needed

Hello, Fink users. I am looking for feedback on the following packages, with the hope of moving them to "stable" prior to the next release: gd2-2.0.1-4 gtranslator-0.43-1 latex2rtf-1.9.13-1 libpng3-1.2.1-2 rpl-1.4.0-1 surf-1.0.3-1 I am also looking for feedback on the newest versions of the fol

[Fink-users] feedback request

I am looking for feedback on the following packages scribus 0.7.7-1 Layout program and lcms 1.09-1 Free color management engine in 100K siag 3.5.2-1 Ulric Eriksson's Office Suite and mowitz 0.2.0-2 Library of widgets for X applicati

Re: [Fink-users] feedback requested on maxima, ntl and w3-emacs

William McCallum wrote: > If anybody has been using these packages, please let me know whether > they have been working for you, and what has been going wrong if they > haven't. I have played with maxima and saw some bugs: Some built-in paths are not right, for example (C1) example(laplace); C

[Fink-users] feedback requested on maxima, ntl and w3-emacs

If anybody has been using these packages, please let me know whether they have been working for you, and what has been going wrong if they haven't. Thanks, Bill McCallum --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

At 11:41 AM -0400 7/24/02, Alexander Strange wrote: >Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: > >gimp-1.2.3-9 >gtk-perl-pm-0.7008-5 >gimp-perl-1.211-2 >xscorch-0.1.15-1 >tads-2.5.5-3 > gimp you said you were moving to stable...good don't do perl don't do tads xscorch compil

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 12:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 11:41 , Alexander Strange wrote: > >> Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: >> >> gimp-1.2.3-9 >> gtk-perl-pm-0.7008-5 >> gimp-perl-1.211-2 >> xscorch-0.1.15-1 >> ta

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 11:41 , Alexander Strange wrote: > Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: > > gimp-1.2.3-9 I just updated to the above; the process went without a hitch. gimp was able to start, load pics,

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 11:41 , Alexander Strange wrote: > Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: > > gimp-1.2.3-9 > gtk-perl-pm-0.7008-5 > gimp-perl-1.211-2 > xscorch-0.1.15-1 > tads-2.5.5-3 gimp-1.2.3-9 compiled fine (takes a while, though ), I've looked at s

[Fink-users] Feedback request

Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: gimp-1.2.3-9 gtk-perl-pm-0.7008-5 gimp-perl-1.211-2 xscorch-0.1.15-1 tads-2.5.5-3 -- Alexander Strange iThink Software -- http://www.ithinksw.com --- This sf.net email is spons

[Fink-users] Feedback esound-0.2.27-1

This is no bueno. When I launch gnome or play xmms the terminal reflects: Audio device open for 44.1Khz, stereo, 16bit failed Trying 44.1Khz, 8bit stereo. Audio device open for 44.1Khz, stereo, 8bit failed Trying 48Khz, 16bit stereo. Audio device open for 44.1Khz, stereo, 8bit failed Trying 22.05

Re: [Fink-users] feedback needed

I want give qualified feedback...there's no criteria to use...no 1,2,3 questions (if you ever decide to do that...no essay questions, o.k.?). As far as these packages downloading and compiling ok these are alright.. they run fine, especially the gimp and xmms. I like xmms in that it has the echo..

Re: [Fink-users] feedback needed

On Thursday, May 16, 2002, at 01:17 , David R. Morrison wrote: > I am looking for feedback on the following fink packages in the unstable > tree (with the precise version number as stated). If you have tested > these, please let me know. If you are willing to test them, you can > copy the .inf

Re: [Fink-users] feedback needed

"David R. Morrison" wrote: I guess somebody needs to spoil the fun :-) I am no longer able to compile qt2, neither this one > x11/qt2-2.3.2-1 nor the older qt-2.3.1. It crashes with the message c++ -c -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/Volumes/Hrot/sw/src/qt2-2.3.2-1/qt-2.3.2/include -I/usr/X11R6/

Re: [Fink-users] feedback needed

On Thursday, May 16, 2002, at 11:17 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: > graphics/gimp-1.2.3-8 I've used it to color correct photos and it works for me. > libs/readline-4.2a-5 I have it installed, and I guess it's what's doing command completion for me? Anyway, not problems. > x11/qt2-2.3.2-

  1   2   >