Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > My suggetion to you bueno is to rewrite your code using the suggestions > provided by this list. Keep all variables different. If your attaching > multiple instances , use the for loop to assign their names. Trace trace > trace. > Thank yo

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:58 AM, beno - wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Thank you. No problem. Any time.. Don't they, though LOL! More often than needed. :P I didn't ask him! He volunteered! If I had asked him, you would be right! Since he volunteered

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Again ??!? Beno, you promised you would buy these books and study. And you promised to build bricks first before trying to build a skyscraper. Cedric I really feel like you are trying to build a ferrari without taking one automotive class. To understand the logic, you need to establish a

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

I know we all love Beno, and we really tried hard to make it work, that's how this list is ;) But, it should end, shouldn't it ? ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Cedric Muller wrote: > Again ??!? > > Beno, you promised you would buy these books and study. And you promised to > build bricks first before trying to build a skyscraper. > I promised I would buy the books around the end of the year. I never promised anything abo

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Merrill, Jason < jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com> wrote: > In my twisted mind, I'm actually kinda enjoying watching this thread > self-destruct under its own weight. > Twisted mind indeed. "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." If you treat me badly

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Beno, > New or used? Take your pick. > Hell what's your address I'll buy you one for Christmas if it means this > thread can end. > Pay it forward I always say.. :) > > http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0596526946/ref=rdr_ext_uan Why

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Steven Sacks wrote: > Dale Carnegie wrote the manifesto on this subject in 1934. Human nature > being what it is, what he wrote then is still true today. I recommend that > you include Dale Carnegie's book when you purchase Colin Moock's Essential > Actionscript 3

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

I did not say you were not honest, pardon me if you felt I was. How would I question honesty in a Flash mailing list ??? I am not saying you are not being honest or anything, but now I am wondering why it took you about 3 weeks to build something a normal coder would have taken 15 minutes ?

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Did you mean: Best Furnature 4200 United Shopping Plaza Christiansted, St. Croix U.S. Virgin Islands 00820 ? and yes I was serious. Karl On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:07 AM, beno - wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Beno, New or used? Take your pick. Hell what's your

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:52 AM, beno - wrote: > I promised I would buy the books around the end of the year. In case you're interested, Safari Books has a free 10 day trial. I haven't tried it myself, but I hear it's good.

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Also, its missing a street name. 4200 (Street name) United Shopping Plaza Christiansted, St. Croix U.S. Virgin Islands 00820 Amazon will not deliver to the address you supplied. I already tried. Karl On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:42 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Did you mean: Best Furnature 4200 Unite

[Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

http://www.stevensacks.net/2009/12/08/flash-socket-class-does-not-wait-for-flush/ The Socket class documentation is incorrect. Calling flush() not only is not necessary, it also has no effect, since all data written to a socket is sent automatically. ___

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Beno, In the spirit of your recommendations and opinions regarding criticism, allow me to be blunt with you in the manner you find most effective. Considering everyone here has expressed a negative reaction to your communication style, it's pretty fucking clear where the problem is. Whether

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Hi, Beno! I'm the list admin for Flashcoders. > The Ch'an masters weren't so subtle. They were famous for beating people > senseless with their staffs and shouting them out the door. You, and almost > everyone else, would demand from them they remove your cancerous tumor but > set down their scalp

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

Steven Sacks wrote: http://www.stevensacks.net/2009/12/08/flash-socket-class-does-not-wait-for-flush/ The Socket class documentation is incorrect. Calling flush() not only is not necessary, it also has no effect, since all data written to a socket is sent automatically.

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

I don't know, I think it has more to do with humility and being humble ... are we ? Beno, In the spirit of your recommendations and opinions regarding criticism, allow me to be blunt with you in the manner you find most effective. Considering everyone here has expressed a negative reac

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

thanks - while it works I am having the same issue... by the time I am rolling over - they are all affecting the same mc... so no matter which one you rollover - the same MC is having it's alpha changed - when they should each be changing their own... my thinking is that by the time the event oc

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

ALSO: (and this might be impacting my results... when I used this.nm it did not work at all... so I took this. out and just used nm, while it "works" they are all suing the last array member From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [flashcoder

Re: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

Hmm, Just to be clear. I guess you are creating a number of clips on which you set the alpha. Then you are using an equal number of clips that can be rolled over. When you rollover these clips, you set the alpha on the corresponding "alpha" clip. I can see why it might be using the

Re: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

What kind of method do you use in findValue() to compare the movieclips ? If you are using _name then it might be to short string: var mc = createEmptyMovieClip("aaa",0); trace("mc: "+mc); trace("mc: "+mc._name); trace("mc: "+String(mc)); outputs: mc: _level0.aaa mc: aaa mc: _level0.aaa Maybe y

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

I smell a prank. Does anyone else wonder if Beno really exists, or is just the product of a list regular having a little fun with easily agitated flashers? ;) .m On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:58 AM, beno - > Twisted mind indeed. "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." > If you treat me

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Might be a troll... Matt S. wrote: I smell a prank. Does anyone else wonder if Beno really exists, or is just the product of a list regular having a little fun with easily agitated flashers? ;) .m On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:58 AM, beno - Twisted mind indeed. "Do unto others as you would hav

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Glen Pike wrote: Might be a troll... They live under bridges - never heard of one in the Jungle. Matt S. wrote: I smell a prank. Does anyone else wonder if Beno really exists, or is just the product of a list regular having a little fun with easily agitated flashers? ;) .m ___

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

Yeah - they are created in the IDE... that's what I was afraid of thanks - I will look at the code you included... From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Glen Pike [g...@engineeredarts

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

<> They all trace the same one... the last member of the array not sure I undertstand the last part From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Glen Pike [g...@engineeredarts.co.uk] Se

[Flashcoders] New portfolio site online (and some 10.1 issues with it)

Hey guys, As I recently started freelancing, I updated my portfolio site, it's at: http://www.malatze.com/ Tell me what you think about it and how it works for you(any issues?) One issue I did find(maybe some other people have this same problem) is an issue with the introduction text below the

Re: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

If you gave names to the clips you place on the stage at authortime - in the "instance name" box (Properties panel), then you can access the name with the _name property. If you don't name them, the flash player assigns names like "instance0", etc. It's a bit of work for 50 clips, but you cou

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

OK - I think I MAY have found a way - which leads me to another question: how can I grab the FULL "name" of an object (ie _level0.mc1.mc2.mc3) and substring it - like in the example, I want to extract mc2 from the path. From: flashcoders-boun...@chatt

Re: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

That's the _name parameter Lehr, Theodore wrote: OK - I think I MAY have found a way - which leads me to another question: how can I grab the FULL "name" of an object (ie _level0.mc1.mc2.mc3) and substring it - like in the example, I want to extract mc2 from the path.

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

_name is giving me mc3 - I need mc2. My thought was if I could string the whole thing, I could extract it... From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Glen Pike [g...@engineeredarts.co.uk

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

So are you going to expect your clients to lash out at you if you do not do what you promised them? Would you expect them to act the same way you are about your FREE help? The only difference is, they have a reason to be upset with you. They were going to pay you. Do everyone a favor and outso

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Those are very wise words yet mean nothing coming from you because you do not follow them. Just sayin'. --Original Message-- From: beno - Sender: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com To: Flash Coders List ReplyTo: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still P

Re: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

try using String(this) instead of this._name Lehr, Theodore wrote: _name is giving me mc3 - I need mc2. My thought was if I could string the whole thing, I could extract it... From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [flashcoders-boun...@cha

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

I got it: object._parent._name From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Glen Pike [g...@engineeredarts.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 9:10 AM To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flas

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

i've been following this thread and may have missed a critical detail, but why do you need to check an instances name against an array if all you want to change is its alpha? or if you have extra values you need to check can't you just assign them to each instance when you add the rollover beha

RE: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

Here is the solution I came up with - a mishmosh of a few peoples help: var myStuff:Array = ["a","b","c"]; for (var i:Number=0; ihttp://pastebin.com/m1db46cee hope it helps and i haven't completely missed the point and wasted your time! david > From: ted_l...@federal.dell.com > To: f

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

We've gone from rudimentary Flash to jungle exile to treatises on human behavior bouncing off the Illuminati on the way to betrayal and disillusionment. Pretty impressive work, list; someone should convert this thread into an opera. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Cedric Muller wrote: > I don't

Re: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

I haven't really followed this thread that closely, but I do see a lot of complication about naming a lot of clips and later trying to access them by reconstructing the correct name. I generally try and avoid doing this kind of "name reconstruction" where a lot of clips are involved in some ki

Re: [Flashcoders] Minimizing Code: Logic Issue

On reflection some of the ideas I had are a bit messy - this has probably come from mixing stuff in with legacy code for a year - but Ted's solution looks quite nice and elegant without attaching extra properties to the clips :) Paul Andrews wrote: I haven't really followed this thread that

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

dammit - i missed the beginning of this thread - where's the archives please classic ax On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Matt Gitchell wrote: > We've gone from rudimentary Flash to jungle exile to treatises on human > behavior bouncing off the Illuminati on the way to betrayal and > disillusionm

[Flashcoders] AS3 Draggable sliding MC with infinite looping? Tutorial?

Hello again, All- I've got a project (the same one) in which I have a horizontal, draggable container populated with MC's by an XML file. http://www.steveklein.cc/images/dragloop.jpg There are actually two, one horizontal that when it snaps to a resting point then populates a ve

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Mark Winterhalder wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:52 AM, beno - wrote: > > I promised I would buy the books around the end of the year. > > In case you're interested, Safari Books has a free 10 day trial. I > haven't tried it myself, but I hear it's good. > On

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Did you mean: > > Best Furnature > 4200 United Shopping Plaza > Christiansted, St. Croix > U.S. Virgin Islands 00820 > beno C/o Best Furniture etc. > > ? > and yes I was serious. > Cool! Thank you. BTW, you should probably buy a new one,

Re: [Flashcoders] New portfolio site online (and some 10.1 issues withit)

Hey Gregory, Thanks! The insects are basically 2 concepts combined: One where the particles are gravitated towards a center point(street light) and the other where they have their own random 'wandering' force. Check out this excellent resource: http://www.shiffman.net/teaching/nature/

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

> We've gone from rudimentary Flash to jungle exile to treatises on human > behavior bouncing off the Illuminati on the way to betrayal and > disillusionment. > Pretty impressive work, list; someone should convert this thread into an > opera. Let's go ahead and end this thread now. I prefer to do

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > 4200 United Shopping Plaza >> Christiansted, St. Croix >> U.S. Virgin Islands 00820 >> > beno c/o Best Furniture etc. Addresses are strange down here in the Virgin Islands. Everything is by estate, not street. Take my word for it ;) beno _

RE: [Flashcoders] New portfolio site online (and some 10.1 issues withit)

Looks good. How did you do the insects around the street light? gregb -Original Message- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Meinte van't Kruis Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:38 AM To: Flash Coders List Subje

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:58 AM, beno - wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > >> My suggetion to you bueno is to rewrite your code using the suggestions >> provided by this list. Keep all variables different. If your attaching >> multiple instances , use the for loop t

RE: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

What is setting "e" in your code? -Original Message- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of beno - Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:38 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Pro

[Flashcoders] Passing a Variable to Adobe Acrobat

Hello, I am attempting to pass a variable to adobe acrobat (a pdf file) using a URL string (certificate.pdf?name). For some reason the pdf file is not receiving the variable. Do any of you have any experience with this? I am not sure if the problem is flash or the pdf. The pdf has a field withi

Re: [Flashcoders] Passing a Variable to Adobe Acrobat

If it did not work with HTML I would check the PDF. Doesn't seem to be a flash issue then. --Original Message-- From: Lord, Susan, CTR, DSS Sender: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com To: Flash Coders List ReplyTo: Flash Coders List Subject: [Flashcoders] Passing a Variable to Adob

RE: [Flashcoders] New portfolio site online (and some 10.1 issues withit)

Thanks for the site reference! I could get lost in that stuff. gregb -Original Message- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Meinte van't Kruis Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:35 PM To: Flash Coders List Subje

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Gregory Boudreaux wrote: > What is setting "e" in your code? > I have no idea. This is what was suggested to me on this list once upon a time. I presume that's the problem. The idea was to make the mc run when the code entered a certain frame, as you can see by the

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Maybe you should be a preacher, rather than a programmer? The only thing you are doing with the stumbling-blocks, is dropping them on the very toes of the people that are trying to help you. You truly lack manners and do not understand proper etiquette/common courtesy. Just my 2 cents and obser

RE: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Without knowing what else you have going on... remove all references to e in your current code to see if you get an error. public function myLeftHand():void { var mcHandInstance2A:mcHand = new mcHand(); addChild(mcHandInstance2A); mcHandInstance2A.x = 800; mcHandInstance2A.y =

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

beno - wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Gregory Boudreaux wrote: What is setting "e" in your code? It the remnants of a solution using an event handler - hence the "e:Event". You can also see the remnants of code for controlling MovieClips using enterframe (a pointless exercise

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Gregory Boudreaux wrote: > Without knowing what else you have going on... remove all references to > e in your current code to see if you get an error. > Well, that works, because it's a copy of what I have for mcRightHand except for the trace: public function m

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Shouldn't "e" be the object that is calling the event for the method? Nathan Mynarcik Interactive Web Developer nat...@mynarcik.com 254.749.2525 www.mynarcik.com -Original Message- From: "Gregory Boudreaux" Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:34:18 To: Flash Coders List Subject: RE: [Flashcoders]

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Paul Andrews wrote: > beno - wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Gregory Boudreaux > >wrote: >> >> >> >>> What is setting "e" in your code? >>> >>> >>> >> It the remnants of a solution using an event handler - hence the > "e:Event". You can also see the rem

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

The reason why it isn't tracing is because you are not telling the function what mc to check if its current frame is at 10. I believe that is what the "e" was for. mcToCheck.addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, myLeftHand); public function myLeftHand(e:Event):void { if (e.target.currentFra

RE: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

He does have the makings of a best-selling novel. >Beno, have you ever considered that programming is not for you? So far >you have had a ton of help on a very simple example and very little of >that assistance seems to have stuck. >What you have now is a real hotpotch of the "solutions" provi

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

> Maybe you should be a preacher, rather than a programmer? That's how I feel today. I've been preaching all day to everyone to STOP THE OT STUFF, INCLUDING OT RESPONSES TO OTHER PEOPLE'S OT STUFF. Not to pick on you specifically, let's just all let it drop. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software htt

[Flashcoders] prevent superclass from being instanced directly

Hi list... I have a superclass, let's say it's Dog. Then, I have some extensions of Dog, like so: Schnauzer extends Dog Poodle extends Dog In the Dog constructor, I want to prevent a Dog from being instanced directly, but when I include this line in the superclass constructor: throw new Illeg

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Nathan Mynarcik wrote: > The reason why it isn't tracing is because you are not telling the function > what mc to check if its current frame is at 10. I believe that is what the > "e" was for. > > mcToCheck.addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, myLeftHand); > > publi

Re: [Flashcoders] prevent superclass from being instanced directly

> I have a superclass, let's say it's Dog.  Then, I have some extensions of > Dog, like so: > Schnauzer extends Dog > Poodle extends Dog > > In the Dog constructor, I want to prevent a Dog from being instanced > directly, but when I include this line in the > superclass constructor: > throw new I

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Yeah sorry. That address will not work. It says it's not valid. Karl Sent from losPhone On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:14 PM, beno - wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Did you mean: Best Furnature 4200 United Shopping Plaza Christiansted, St. Croix U.S. Virgin Islands

RE: [Flashcoders] prevent superclass from being instanced directly

Great link, Dave. I am doing that with a singleton anyway and I'm sure your link will confirm what I did there is OK. Much appreciated, - MM > http://joshblog.net/2007/08/19/enforcing-abstract-classes-at-runtime-in-actionscript-3/ ___ Flashcoders mai

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

I do. But amazons shipping doesn't Karl Sent from losPhone On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:15 PM, beno - wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: 4200 United Shopping Plaza Christiansted, St. Croix U.S. Virgin Islands 00820 beno c/o Best Furniture etc. Addresses are str

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

It's all player 10, but varying versions of it. Glen Pike wrote: Steven Sacks wrote: http://www.stevensacks.net/2009/12/08/flash-socket-class-does-not-wait-for-flush/ The Socket class documentation is incorrect. Calling flush() not only is not necessary, it also has no effect, since all da

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

The player team has confirmed the documentation is wrong. Data gets sent the instant you write it to the socket. flush() has no purpose. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashc

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Well I know why this code was not working. if (e.target.currentFrame == 40) TweenMax.to(mcHandInstance2, 2, {x:200, startAt:{totalProgress:1}}).reverse(); } Because it should read. if (e.target.currentFrame == 40) { TweenMax.to(mcHandInstance2, 2, {x:200, startAt:{totalProgress:1}})

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

Steven Sacks wrote: The player team has confirmed the documentation is wrong. Data gets sent the instant you write it to the socket. flush() has no purpose. Then why was it added in the first place? ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.f

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

Henrik Andersson wrote: > Then why was it added in the first place? Great question. Ask Adobe. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

Steven Sacks wrote: Henrik Andersson wrote: > Then why was it added in the first place? Great question. Ask Adobe. You are the one who said that it was confirmed pointless. You know better how to ask the question. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flas

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

So we'd all feel better activating the toilet handle I guess. I always feel better after a flush(). On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Steven Sacks wrote: > Henrik Andersson wrote: > > Then why was it added in the first place? > > Great question. Ask Adobe. >

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

> Then why was it added in the first place? My guess is that behavior changed between FP versions, and that it was left there for code compatibility reasons. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

I don't think, because braces are not required when the there is only one statement ended with semicolor: //code if(something) doSomething(); // semicolon ends the scope here... //code ... the second brace was ending the myLeftHand() method. I think that that the problem with this line was that

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

> So we'd all feel better activating the toilet handle I guess. I always feel > better after a flush(). If you're a ColdFusion programmer, in addition to CFFLUSH you also have the additional commands CFDUMP and CFLOG. I apologize in advance for bringing this up. I guess I'm never too old for toil

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

Eric E. Dolecki wrote: So we'd all feel better activating the toilet handle I guess. I always feel better after a flush(). I am more of the opinion that it is an accident that no data is buffered. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.fi

Re: [Flashcoders] Flash Socket Class Does Not Wait For Flush

Word is that the writer tasked with updating the documentation is asking the same thing. Henrik Andersson wrote: Steven Sacks wrote: Henrik Andersson wrote: > Then why was it added in the first place? Great question. Ask Adobe. You are the one who said that it was confirmed pointless. You

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Greg, I see your point. I am more familiar with AS2, so oops. I will be migrating soon. I promise. Karl On Dec 8, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Greg Ligierko wrote: I don't think, because braces are not required when the there is only one statement ended with semicolor: //code if(something) doSomething(

Re[2]: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Karl, That is perfectly valid for AS2, for example: for(var k in myArray) trace("val: " + myArray[k]); ...works both AS2 and AS3. Even a combo... if(someBoolean) for(var k in myArray) myClass(myArray[k]).doSomething(); Just one line and the semicolon ";" (required). Man can save a pair of br

Re: [Flashcoders] Re:Trying to set multiple images to 'export for AS' with JSFL

Thanks guys. I found a partial solution, which is changing all bitmap names with JSFL and then clicking 600 times to assign a class name which by default is the symbol name. Easier than setting the name by hand for each symbol, but still a bit dumb. 2009/12/2 Cedric Muller > but it isn't a Movi

Re: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Beno buy a book and start where we all started: learning on your own or in a class. Now go in peace. Thanks Paul Andrews wrote: beno - wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Gregory Boudreaux wrote: What is setting "e" in your code? It the remnants of a solution using an event handl

Re: Re[2]: [Flashcoders] Back On Course, Still Problems

Yes, your correct. I always use braces. It looks aesthetically pleasing to me and helps me separate things. BTW, what is the point of braces if you dont need them, except the separation of your code part. Are they needed in some situations over others? Karl On Dec 8, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Greg