Re: [Flightgear-devel] techtv

2002-03-06 Thread Erik Hofman
Curtis L. Olson wrote: Looks like we are getting a few techtv visitors to the web site this evening: http://seneca.flightgear.org/webalizer/usage_200203.html You can find the text here: http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,24330,3327281,00.html Erik

Re: [Flightgear-devel] view code. was Virtual Cockpit!

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Dressler
That looks good -- a single, configurable view manager would be better than a few ad-hoc, hard-coded ones. You'll need to be able to specify a few more parameters (i.e. draw the 3D model, look towards the plane, reverse view direction [for external], etc.). So i'm trying to reorganize the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Solaris compile error

2002-03-06 Thread Curtis L. Olson
That looks really ugly ... could it be bugs/problems with the sun linker? Have you tried building simple C++ programs with this same version of gcc? Did you biuld plib, simgear, flightgear, etc. all with the same compiler? Curt. Salman Sheikh writes: Got that fixed. Now on file linking I

[Flightgear-devel] Comms

2002-03-06 Thread D Luff
A few quick questions to the pilots about comm radios - do you hear transmissions from both comm1 and comm2 if appropriately tuned in without having to expicitly switch between them. If so, do simultaneous transmissions get overlaid and garbled or does it just play the strongest one. And

Re: [Flightgear-devel] view code. was Virtual Cockpit!

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Dressler
On Wed 6. March 2002 16:09, you wrote: That looks good -- a single, configurable view manager would be better than a few ad-hoc, hard-coded ones. You'll need to be able to specify a few more parameters (i.e. draw the 3D model, look towards the plane, reverse view direction [for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Alex Perry
Redhat 7.2 Sorry, can't help you then. I'll refer you to the RH users on the list. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Comms

2002-03-06 Thread D Luff
Alex Perry writes: Each radio operates independently and will receive whatever is onchannel. However, usually the radios (and other things that make noises) are wired through the so-called audio panel that decides which combination of sounds is sent to the speaker and/or the headset and/or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Solaris compile error

2002-03-06 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Perhaps gcc-2.95.3 for solaris is generating output that the solaris ld can't understand? Curt. Salman Sheikh writes: Yes, all were built with gcc version 2.95.3. Salman On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:29:10 -0600 (CST) Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That looks really ugly ...

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Comms

2002-03-06 Thread Alex Perry
So supposing a pilot is communicating with approach on comm1, but has comm2 monitoring the tower, what happens if a stronger tower transmission is received at the same time as an approach transmission? Will the audio panel loose it, or play them in sequence? And would a pilot actually

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CC compiler problem?

2002-03-06 Thread Andy Ross
Erik Hofman wrote: I have a propblem with a peace of CC code which is pretty standard for common C. When I define a structure and point an array to a pre-defined array; [...] this works for C but not for CC? Am I doing something wrong here, or doesn't CC allow this type of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Comms

2002-03-06 Thread Andy Ross
Dave Luff wrote: So supposing a pilot is communicating with approach on comm1, but has comm2 monitoring the tower, what happens if a stronger tower transmission is received at the same time as an approach transmission? It doesn't have anything to do with signal strength. The two radios

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Andy Ross
Danie Heath wrote: I'm extremely eager to start developing, but I can't because metakit won't compile on my Linux system. This is flatly incorrect. Metakit builds just fine on your Linux system. Hey, if you don't provide any documentation for your problems, then I won't document my

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CC compiler problem?

2002-03-06 Thread Erik Hofman
Andy Ross wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: I have a propblem with a peace of CC code which is pretty standard for common C. When I define a structure and point an array to a pre-defined array; [...] this works for C but not for CC? Am I doing something wrong here, or doesn't CC

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CC compiler problem?

2002-03-06 Thread Erik Hofman
Andy Ross wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: I have a propblem with a peace of CC code which is pretty standard for common C. When I define a structure and point an array to a pre-defined array; [...] this works for C but not for CC? Am I doing something wrong here, or doesn't CC

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Solaris compile error

2002-03-06 Thread Salman Sheikh
Its a Sparc Ultra 60 with Elite3D card. Salman On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 17:46:06 +0100 (MET) Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That looks really ugly ... could it be bugs/problems with the sun linker? Usually the sun assembler and linker - both in /usr/ccs/bin/ - are quite fine with

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Solaris compile error

2002-03-06 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Salman Sheikh writes: Its a Sparc Ultra 60 with Elite3D card. Salman Salman, I'm not sure any one has had flightgear running on a sun box in recent memory. This means that whatever problems you have encountered building on the solaris platform probably have been lurking for years and you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS question

2002-03-06 Thread Jim Wilson
Hi Mark, What I do is update occaisonally (once or twice a week sometimes more) and keep an eye on the logs (the web based ViewCVS is handy too) in order to know what others are working on. Before sending in code I'll update to current CVS again and make sure things still work. It is much

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS question

2002-03-06 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Boslough, Mark B writes: Now that I am modifying code, I have the need to keep it updated. I am a beginner at CVS, so I'm not sure I am doing things properly. Should I be doing CVS updates every day? That requires that I completely recompile and relink every day, is that correct? I want

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Solaris compile error

2002-03-06 Thread Salman Sheikh
Yes, all were built with gcc version 2.95.3. Salman On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:29:10 -0600 (CST) Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That looks really ugly ... could it be bugs/problems with the sun linker? Have you tried building simple C++ programs with this same version of gcc? Did

[Flightgear-devel] Ground Vehicles

2002-03-06 Thread Sam Varner
Hi folks, I got in touch with Curt a few days ago to try to get some help on making Windows binaries for my project (Vamos Automotive Simulator http://vamos.sourceforge.net). He invited me to join the list to try to recruit some help. So drop me a line if FlightGear isn't keeping you busy

RE: [Flightgear-devel] CVS question

2002-03-06 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Paul Deppe writes: A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is there a way to make install only the files which have changed? For example, suppose there is only a change to a .cxx file in plib/ssg. I do a make, which rebuilds only libplibssg.a. But when I do a make

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS question

2002-03-06 Thread Andy Ross
Paul Deppe wrote: A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is there a way to make install only the files which have changed? For example, suppose there is only a change to a .cxx file in plib/ssg. I do a make, which rebuilds only libplibssg.a. But when I do a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS question

2002-03-06 Thread Tony Peden
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 05:17:42PM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Paul Deppe writes: A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is there a way to make install only the files which have changed? For example, suppose there is only a change to a .cxx file in plib/ssg. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS question

2002-03-06 Thread John Check
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 07:17 pm, you wrote: snip quite the way you want them. One of the central characteristics of being a geeky hacker type is a strongly held conviction that the rest of the world are idiots and are doing things all wrong. :) Andy Hahahah! Quick somebody notify

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Jonathan Polley
I build using RH 7.1, among others, and had no problem building Metakit. I unpacked the archive to my home directory and did the standard make and make install. What kind of errors are you seeing? Jonathan On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 10:09 AM, Martin Dressler wrote: I'm not RH user,

RE: [Flightgear-devel] CVS question

2002-03-06 Thread Paul Deppe
A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is there a way to make install only the files which have changed? For example, suppose there is only a change to a .cxx file in plib/ssg. I do a make, which rebuilds only libplibssg.a. But when I do a make install,

[Flightgear-devel] Runway plow

2002-03-06 Thread Jim Wilson
Noticed that the c310 has its wheels below pavement. Is it ok to readjust the models for a recent change or is this a temporary? Or am I the only one :-)? Best, Jim ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ground Vehicles

2002-03-06 Thread Alex Perry
I got in touch with Curt a few days ago to try to get some help on making Windows binaries for my project (Vamos Automotive Simulator I'm a non-windows developer, so I can't help. Also, Curt suggested turning my ground vehicle model into a module for FlightGear. The FAA has a real training

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS question

2002-03-06 Thread Alex Perry
Now that I am modifying code, I have the need to keep it updated. I am a beginner at CVS, so I'm not sure I am doing things properly. Should I be doing CVS updates every day? That requires that I completely recompile and relink every day, is that correct? I want to make sure that I am

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Comms

2002-03-06 Thread Alex Perry
Dave Luff wrote: So supposing a pilot is communicating with approach on comm1, but has comm2 monitoring the tower, what happens if a stronger tower transmission is received at the same time as an approach transmission? It doesn't have anything to do with signal strength. The two

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Metakit

2002-03-06 Thread Alex Perry
My computer crashed totally yesterday, and I sent it to be replaced (luckily it was still under warranty). I either think it's RAM or the slot on the motherboard for the RAM. Go find the MEMCHK project and download the floppy disk image. Copy it to a floppy and leave it running overnight (or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Runway plow

2002-03-06 Thread Wolfram Kuss
Andy wrote: Jim Wilson wrote: Noticed that the c310 has its wheels below pavement. Is it ok to readjust the models for a recent change or is this a temporary? Or am I the only one Which FDM? There are three (count 'em) descriptions of where the Cessna 310 wheels are relative to the