Andy wrote:
>Jim Wilson wrote:
> > Noticed that the c310 has its wheels below pavement. Is it ok to
> > readjust the models for a recent change or is this a temporary? Or am
> > I the only one
>
>Which FDM? There are three (count 'em) descriptions of where the
>Cessna 310 wheels are relative t
> My computer crashed totally yesterday, and I sent it to be replaced (luckily
> it was still under warranty). I either think it's RAM or the slot on the
> motherboard for the RAM.
Go find the MEMCHK project and download the floppy disk image.
Copy it to a floppy and leave it running overnight (
Sorry Guys,
The problem isn't with Metakit
My computer crashed totally yesterday, and I sent it to be replaced (luckily
it was still under warranty). I either think it's RAM or the slot on the
motherboard for the RAM.
Sorry to have taken your time.
Danie Heath
I build using RH 7.1, among oth
> Dave Luff wrote:
> > So supposing a pilot is communicating with approach on comm1, but has
> > comm2 monitoring the tower, what happens if a stronger tower
> > transmission is received at the same time as an approach transmission?
> It doesn't have anything to do with signal strength. The tw
> I'm not sure any one has had flightgear running on a sun box in recent
> memory. This means that whatever problems you have encountered
> building on the solaris platform probably have been lurking for years
[...]
I _had_ a Solaris binary sometime summer 2000 using recent GCC and Solaris
'ld'.
> Now that I am modifying code, I have the need to keep it updated.
> I am a beginner at CVS, so I'm not sure I am doing things properly.
> Should I be doing CVS updates every day? That requires that I
> completely recompile and relink every day, is that correct? I want
> to make sure that I am
> I got in touch with Curt a few days ago to try to get some help on
> making Windows binaries for my project (Vamos Automotive Simulator
I'm a non-windows developer, so I can't help.
> Also, Curt suggested turning my ground vehicle model into a module for
> FlightGear.
The FAA has a real train
Jim Wilson wrote:
> Noticed that the c310 has its wheels below pavement. Is it ok to
> readjust the models for a recent change or is this a temporary? Or am
> I the only one
Which FDM? There are three (count 'em) descriptions of where the
Cessna 310 wheels are relative to the aircraft coord
Noticed that the c310 has its wheels below pavement. Is it ok to readjust the
models for a recent change or is this a temporary? Or am I the only one :-)?
Best,
Jim
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailm
> > A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is
> > there a way to "make install" only the files which have changed? For
> > example, suppose there is only a change to a .cxx file in plib/ssg. I
> > do a "make", which rebuilds only libplibssg.a. But when I do a "make
I build using RH 7.1, among others, and had no problem building Metakit.
I unpacked the archive to my home directory and did the standard make and
make install. What kind of errors are you seeing?
Jonathan
On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 10:09 AM, Martin Dressler wrote:
> I'm not RH user,
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 07:17 pm, you wrote:
> quite the way you want them. One of the central characteristics of
> being a geeky hacker type is a strongly held conviction that the rest
> of the world are idiots and are doing things all wrong. :)
>
> Andy
Hahahah! Quick somebody notify Bartl
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 05:17:42PM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Paul Deppe writes:
> > A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is there a
> > way to "make install" only the files which have changed? For example,
> > suppose there is only a change to a .cxx file in plib/
Paul Deppe wrote:
> A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is
> there a way to "make install" only the files which have changed? For
> example, suppose there is only a change to a .cxx file in plib/ssg. I
> do a "make", which rebuilds only libplibssg.a. But when I d
Paul Deppe writes:
> A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is there a
> way to "make install" only the files which have changed? For example,
> suppose there is only a change to a .cxx file in plib/ssg. I do a "make",
> which rebuilds only libplibssg.a. But when I do a
Hi folks,
I got in touch with Curt a few days ago to try to get some help on
making Windows binaries for my project (Vamos Automotive Simulator
http://vamos.sourceforge.net). He invited me to join the list to try to
recruit some help. So drop me a line if FlightGear isn't keeping you
busy enoug
> If you are using our unix style makefile system (automake/autoconf)
> then it should track all the code dependencies and only rebuild code
> that changes (or depends on something that has changed.)
A related question - after rebuilding with the makefile system, is there a
way to "make install"
Yes, all were built with gcc version 2.95.3.
Salman
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:29:10 -0600 (CST)
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That looks really ugly ... could it be bugs/problems with the sun
> linker? Have you tried building simple C++ programs with this same
> version of gcc?
Boslough, Mark B writes:
> Now that I am modifying code, I have the need to keep it updated.
> I am a beginner at CVS, so I'm not sure I am doing things properly.
> Should I be doing CVS updates every day? That requires that I
> completely recompile and relink every day, is that correct? I want
Hi Mark,
What I do is update occaisonally (once or twice a week sometimes more) and
keep an eye on the logs (the web based ViewCVS is handy too) in order to know
what others are working on. Before sending in code I'll update to current CVS
again and make sure things still work. It is much easie
Now that I am modifying code, I have the need to keep it updated.
I am a beginner at CVS, so I'm not sure I am doing things properly.
Should I be doing CVS updates every day? That requires that I
completely recompile and relink every day, is that correct? I want
to make sure that I am organizi
Andy Ross wrote:
> Erik Hofman wrote:
> > Andy Ross wrote:
> > > This is perfectly legal C++; I tried it with gcc (full program
> > > attached) and it works fine. What errors are you seeing?
> >
> > This program gives me a core dump, because __fg_snd_[0].fn == NULL.
>
> Not in the code snip
Salman Sheikh writes:
> Its a Sparc Ultra 60 with Elite3D card.
>
> Salman
Salman,
I'm not sure any one has had flightgear running on a sun box in recent
memory. This means that whatever problems you have encountered
building on the solaris platform probably have been lurking for years
and you
Its a Sparc Ultra 60 with Elite3D card.
Salman
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 17:46:06 +0100 (MET)
Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That looks really ugly ... could it be bugs/problems with the sun
> > linker?
>
> Usually the sun assembler and linker - both in /usr/ccs/bin/ - are quite
>
Erik Hofman wrote:
> Andy Ross wrote:
> > This is perfectly legal C++; I tried it with gcc (full program
> > attached) and it works fine. What errors are you seeing?
>
> This program gives me a core dump, because __fg_snd_[0].fn == NULL.
Not in the code snippet you sent. The value of __fg_
Andy Ross wrote:
> Erik Hofman wrote:
> > I have a propblem with a peace of CC code which is pretty standard for
> > common C. When I define a structure and point an array to a
> > pre-defined array;
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > this works for C but not for CC? Am I doing something wrong here, or
Andy Ross wrote:
> Erik Hofman wrote:
> > I have a propblem with a peace of CC code which is pretty standard for
> > common C. When I define a structure and point an array to a
> > pre-defined array;
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > this works for C but not for CC? Am I doing something wrong here, or
Danie Heath wrote:
> I'm extremely eager to start developing, but I can't because metakit
> won't compile on my Linux system.
This is flatly incorrect. Metakit builds just fine on your Linux
system.
Hey, if you don't provide any documentation for your problems, then I
won't document my soluti
Dave Luff wrote:
> So supposing a pilot is communicating with approach on comm1, but has
> comm2 monitoring the tower, what happens if a stronger tower
> transmission is received at the same time as an approach transmission?
It doesn't have anything to do with signal strength. The two radios
Erik Hofman wrote:
> I have a propblem with a peace of CC code which is pretty standard for
> common C. When I define a structure and point an array to a
> pre-defined array;
>
> [...]
>
> this works for C but not for CC? Am I doing something wrong here, or
> doesn't CC allow this type of
> So supposing a pilot is communicating with approach on comm1,
> but has comm2 monitoring the tower, what happens if a stronger
> tower transmission is received at the same time as an approach
> transmission? Will the audio panel loose it, or play them in
> sequence? And would a pilot actua
> That looks really ugly ... could it be bugs/problems with the sun
> linker?
Usually the sun assembler and linker - both in /usr/ccs/bin/ - are quite
fine with GCC. I've compiled more than 200 OpenSource packages using these
tools, so I believe you have to look somwhere else for this bug.
Afte
Perhaps gcc-2.95.3 for solaris is generating output that the solaris
ld can't understand?
Curt.
Salman Sheikh writes:
> Yes, all were built with gcc version 2.95.3.
>
> Salman
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:29:10 -0600 (CST)
> "Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That looks re
Alex Perry writes:
> Each radio operates independently and will receive whatever is onchannel.
> However, usually the radios (and other things that make noises) are
> wired through the so-called audio panel that decides which combination
> of sounds is sent to the speaker and/or the headset and/o
Yes, all were built with gcc version 2.95.3.
Salman
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:29:10 -0600 (CST)
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That looks really ugly ... could it be bugs/problems with the sun
> linker? Have you tried building simple C++ programs with this same
> version of gcc?
I'm not RH user, but why you don't try to install metakit from
distribution's rpm. In debian it work without problem.
--
Martin Dressler
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.musicabona.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
> Redhat 7.2
Sorry, can't help you then. I'll refer you to the RH users on the list.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
> A few quick questions to the pilots about comm radios - do you
> hear transmissions from both comm1 and comm2 if appropriately
> tuned in without having to expicitly switch between them. If so, do
> simultaneous transmissions get overlaid and garbled or does it just
> play the strongest one
On Wed 6. March 2002 16:09, you wrote:
> > That looks good -- a single, configurable view manager would be better
> > than a few ad-hoc, hard-coded ones. You'll need to be able to specify
> > a few more parameters (i.e. draw the 3D model, look towards the plane,
> > reverse view direction [for ex
A few quick questions to the pilots about comm radios - do you
hear transmissions from both comm1 and comm2 if appropriately
tuned in without having to expicitly switch between them. If so, do
simultaneous transmissions get overlaid and garbled or does it just
play the strongest one. And can
That looks really ugly ... could it be bugs/problems with the sun
linker? Have you tried building simple C++ programs with this same
version of gcc? Did you biuld plib, simgear, flightgear, etc. all
with the same compiler?
Curt.
Salman Sheikh writes:
> Got that fixed. Now on file linking I ge
>
> That looks good -- a single, configurable view manager would be better
> than a few ad-hoc, hard-coded ones. You'll need to be able to specify
> a few more parameters (i.e. draw the 3D model, look towards the plane,
> reverse view direction [for external], etc.).
>
So i'm trying to reorganize
Got that fixed. Now on file linking I get the following error:
c++ -DPKGLIBDIR=\"/folks/salman/bin/lib/FlightGear\" -g -O2 -L/folks/salman/bin/lib
-o fgfs main.o fg_commands.o fg_init.o fg_io.o fg_props.o fgfs.o globals.o options.o
splash.o viewer.o viewer_lookat.o viewer_rph.o viewmgr.o
..
> Which leads me to a random digression: does anyone have a good
> reference on historic HUD symbology? Not MIL-STD documents about
> current fighters, nor research papers on what would be cool, but
> actual photos and descriptions of the HUDs installed on (just for the
> sake of argument) the Ha
Hi,
I have a propblem with a peace of CC code which is pretty standard for
common C. When I define a structure and point an array to a pre-defined
array;
struct {
string name;
double (*fn)(double);
} __fg_snd_[] =
{
{"lin", _fg_lin},
{"log", _fg_log10},
{"", NULL}
};
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Looks like we are getting a few techtv visitors to the web site this
> evening:
>
> http://seneca.flightgear.org/webalizer/usage_200203.html
You can find the text here:
http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,24330,3327281,00.html
Erik
46 matches
Mail list logo
