On Saturday 28 February 2004 22:00, Gunnstein Lye wrote:
> On Saturday 28 February 2004 21:49, Gunnstein Lye wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 February 2004 00:16, David Culp wrote:
> > > --aircraft=paraglider-jsbsim
> > >
> > > Just remember to change the paths of course.
> > > I have no experience in par
> I'm a bit concerned about the physics model of flightgear. Are there
certain
> physical limitations built into the sim, that makes paraglider physics
> impossible to model? I'm thinking particularly about the pendulum effect.
Of
> course, everything is possible when you have access to the source
Jon Berndt wrote:
If neither of the two (YASim and JSBSim) are appropriate for your
expectations, you can code a special flight model in C within LaRCSim or
perhaps set up a special model in UIUC-LaRCSim, although I am not very
familiar with that.
Right, but that's roughly equivalent to writing yo
On 2/28/04 at 5:50 PM Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
>Default : 120.5/118.85, 118.3/133.77, but I was at LFMI, not KSFO... I
>did have a message saying
>
>ERROR - can't get a tower pointer from tower control for LFMY in
>FGAILocalTraffic::GetAirportDetails() :-(
>
>just before the segfault, but I ha
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 07:46:16 -0500
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon Berndt wrote:
If neither of the two (YASim and JSBSim) are appropriate for your
expectations, you can code a special flight model in C within LaRCSim
or perhaps set up a special model in UIUC-LaRCSim, although I am
On Monday 01 March 2004 13:28, Jon Berndt wrote:
> > I'm a bit concerned about the physics model of flightgear. Are there
> > certain
> > physical limitations built into the sim, that makes paraglider physics
> > impossible to model? I'm thinking particularly about the pendulum effect.
> > Of cours
Jon S Berndt wrote:
Good point. I was just pointing out that sometimes code changes are
required for special needs, such as in the icing studies done using
UIUC-Larcsim. I would think we ought to be able to model a paraglider
within JSBSim as it is, currently, but I haven't had time to think a
David Megginson wrote:
> Jon Berndt wrote:
> > If neither of the two (YASim and JSBSim) are appropriate for your
> > expectations, you can code a special flight model in C within LaRCSim or
> > perhaps set up a special model in UIUC-LaRCSim, although I am not very
> > familiar with that.
>
> Right,
On Monday 01 March 2004 18:19, Andy Ross wrote:
> There shouldn't be anything really weird about a paraglider. The big
> differences from airplane behavior are due to funny mass distribution:
> the engine acts near the c.g., but the lift and drag are rather high
> above it. My guess this is the s
David Megginson wrote:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..ahem, _not_; wave lift sometimes cause static clouds over and
> > downwind of mountain ridges, in some cases you can fly backwards
> > thru these clouds. ;-)
>
> I'm trying to think this one through.
It's a condensation effect. The air gets carr
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..ahem, _not_; wave lift sometimes cause static clouds over
> and downwind of mountain ridges, in some cases you can fly
> backwards thru these clouds. ;-)
This is true enough. But I don't think the cloud motion code is
trying to model this particular behavior. :)
Andy
_
Lee Elliott wrote:
> What I'd like to do is to be able to switch the AP mode from
> Glide-slope hold to this new Touch-down mode automatically at a
> specified agl-ft.
>
> Any ideas how I can do this in xml?
Probably the best thing to do is write a little nasal code to poll the
property at maybe 5
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:55:43 +
David Luff wrote:
> This should now be fixed. The cause of the problem was that LFMI and LFMY
> have a common tower frequency (122.1), but the commlist code was returning
> the first in-range match rather the closest match when initialising the
> tower, resultin
Gunnstein Lye said:
> On Monday 01 March 2004 18:19, Andy Ross wrote:
> > There shouldn't be anything really weird about a paraglider. The big
> > differences from airplane behavior are due to funny mass distribution:
> > the engine acts near the c.g., but the lift and drag are rather high
> > ab
Jorge Van Hemelryck writes:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:55:43 +
> David Luff wrote:
>
> > This should now be fixed. The cause of the problem was that LFMI and LFMY
> > have a common tower frequency (122.1), but the commlist code was returning
> > the first in-range match rather the closest matc
marco.gugel wrote:
> Hi Fred,
> I include in attachments a file (buildlog.zip) containing two log files
> (BuildLog_FlightGear.htm and BuildLog_simgear.htm) with the build errors.
I don't have this version of MSVC, so as you are in an adventurous
mood, you should try to experiment by yourself.
1
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:11:59 +
David Luff wrote:
> I generated them from the DAFIF data, you (and others) can send
> corrections, additions and clarifications to me and I'll store them
> and apply them each time the files are regenerated. So far I've only
> generated tower and ATIS frequencies
17 matches
Mail list logo
