Le 23/11/2012 22:54, Alexis Bory a écrit :
> Here, core i7-3Ghz-16 MB RAM, GTX 680-2MB VRAM, 1920*1200px,
BTW:
- Linux 3.2.0-33 64 bits
- NVidia driver: 304.64
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cl
Le 23/11/2012 20:03, Renk Thorsten a écrit :
>
> I guess I need some help here... I've finally managed to compile FG
> on the new computer, then copy my FGData here, and... it works. But
> the framerate is abysmally bad.
Hi Thorsten,
Just to say that if you have a serious cloud coverage (with
Hi,
While trying to help an user on the forum I just tried to downlod a .tgz
snapshot of the f-14b from mapserver.
The path inside the archive were fgdata/content-of-the-aircraft-folder
instead of the expected
fgdata/Aircraft/f-14b/content-of-the-aircraft-folder.
I don't know if it's a bug or
Hi all,
The purpose of this little cosmetic patch is to ease the use of
proptest's output in a ploter.
Thanks to review,
Alexis
diff --git a/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp b/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp
index 9bdadef..cc4ffc4 100644
--- a/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp
+++ b/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp
Le 07/11/2012 10:55, Renk Thorsten a écrit :
> Sorry, I don't want to talk down on the great job you guys are doing
> in presenting all this, I'm just trying to understand what it is you
> consider an eye-catcher. I'm just a bit mystified that somehow a
> feature which dominated our screenshot
Le 07/10/2012 00:13, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Alexis Bory wrote:
>> The idea is NOT to change anything to this standard. Instead, I've
>> just added a tiny option in the Display Options dialog
>
> On balance, I think this new option
HI,
I just posted on the forum about YASim and I thought it was a good idea
to post here as well:
"Talking about us (FG's aircraft modelers and developers) and YASim:
YASim is a very cool tool, I like it very much, but it comes with its
crwod of frustrations you have to live with. And the m
Le 03/10/2012 22:05, Alexis Bory a écrit :
>
> Patch attached, Tests and comments welcome.
Self comment: this patch includes a change to the Hawkeye, grrr
use this one attached instead
Sorry for that
diff --git a/Nasal/view.nas b/Nasal/view.nas
index 6af58fa..09244dd 100644
--- a
Hi all
The default Field of View has been choosen a long time ago and discussed
several times on the devel list.
AFAIK this 55 deg FOV had been settled for two main reasons:
1) There is a need to have a standard FOV across different aircrafts so
the user keeps its space and distance percepti
Le 22/07/2012 14:58, Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
> The mentioned commit breaks scenegraph picking. For reference take
> the c172 door handle that opens the dor but never closes it anymore.
> Well, except you click at the position where the untransformed door
> handle would be.
Quite annoying wh
Le 10/07/2012 21:41, Olivier a écrit :
> I'm happy to announce the production status of the massive shared
> objects positions import script.
Pretty cool news :-)
> Finally, and because I receive many questions about it, the import
> script for 3D models is on its way, finished to approximate
Le 04/07/2012 14:27, Erik Hofman a écrit :
> On 07/04/2012 01:12 PM, Michael wrote:
>> No, I mean authors could leave as is or use any licence they want.
>>
>>-- But it doesn't need to be GPL. --
>>
>> Sorry, GPL is ok for code but feels like a lead-foot for everything else.The
> The only optio
Le 03/07/2012 22:25, Alexis Bory a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I just filed a nasty little bug here:
> http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=797
>
> I'm not sure if it's directly related to Rembrandt or it is a long
> standing bug with effect/inherits-f
Hi all,
I just filed a nasty little bug here:
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=797
I'm not sure if it's directly related to Rembrandt or it is a long
standing bug with effect/inherits-from > Effects/model-transparent,
but it brakes the A-6E ADI (Attitude Indicator) and in
Le 19/06/2012 11:49, Vic Marriott a écrit :
> Hi All,
> I received this today. It is a commercial venture, so I don't feel
> inclined to contribute directly. Has anyone else been contacted by them?
Yes, I think so. I've been contacted privately around October 2010 by
Steve (Swanbast ?) who was v
Le 08/06/2012 20:39, Torsten Dreyer a écrit :
> Thanks for all the replies,
>
> summing all up, I end up with the following:
>
> The summer release will become v2.8.0. Rembrandt is included but
> disabled by default and announced as an experimental but cool new feature.
>
> We keep the current sele
Le 07/06/2012 18:04, Gijs de Rooy a écrit :
> There's a lot possible with Rembrandt, but 99% of our aircraft don't
> use it. And lots of aircraft look ugly with Rembrandt
> (non-translucent windows and fake shadows mostly). I just checked the
> few aircraft that I remember being included in the b
Le 06/03/2012 00:05, Ron Jensen a écrit :
> Personally, I hate the glass shaders covering instruments and windows.
> I want
> to actually fly these aircraft and not drool over how 'real' they look.
> Flying means I need to be able to actually read the instrument, so I often
> prefer larger fonts a
Le 23/02/2012 23:21, Martin Spott a écrit :
> when I
> can spend all the time on so many other enjoyable activities.
>
> Have fun,
> Martin.
Martin, I quote only this one, as I do know what can be felt in such
circumstances, and you're right, the most important: save time to enjoy
life.
Le 12/02/2012 11:00, Erik Hofman a écrit :
> That said, it's sad to see the situation end up like this. I always
> found it quite pleasing to work with others that updated my model byt
> frankly I would get mad when at one point they would claim ownership
> like you do.
I second Erik on that one. I
Le 26/11/2011 22:27, Alasdair Campbell a écrit :
> I recommend the cheaper, but wonderful blend of malts
> known as "The Famous Grouse"
>
+1 :-)
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a
Le 12/11/2011 11:05, Frederic Bouvier a écrit :
>> See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png
> And what about this one ?
> http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png
>
> -Fred
>
Hi Fred,
Stars are funnier, but from my point of view, the size of the rating
Le 30/10/2011 20:50, ThorstenB a écrit :
> Am 30.10.2011 20:42, schrieb Citronnier - Alexis Bory:
>> Mmh not sure if its related or if I did something silly but flightgear
>> didn't make it...
>> with this output:
> Ah, my stupid mistake. Pull again (flightgear).
Cool,
Le 30/10/2011 11:38, ThorstenB a écrit :
> On 30.10.2011 11:02, Durk Talsma wrote:
>> I managed to narrow the problem down to a commit that occurred
>> between October 12 and October 16. More specifically,
>>
>> FlightGear next: 3d544fb SimGear next: e4e31be
>>
>> still works, while
>>
>> FlightGea
Hi all and Curt,
mpserver10 is moving, the old server is still running but it's going to
be removed from the racks on Thursday (maybe). fgms is already running
on a brand new and powerful VM.
The new IP is: 31.24.249.125
Thanks a lot for updating the DNS record,
Alexis
---
Le 25/09/2011 01:07, Geoff McLane a écrit :
> Evolved from [Any alpha testers with a bit of extra time on their
> hands?]
>
> Re: Start up
>
> When I first loaded the f-14b the engines were NOT
> running, so I searched for a 'Start-up procedure', but
> mostly in vane... it turned out all I needed t
s flying around there ! Model view
ought to be interesting in case of one other tester just encounter problems.
Greetings,
Alexis
> Maybe see a few of you out there?
>
> Curt.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Citronnier - Alexis Bory wrote:
>
> Le 23/09/2011 16:
Le 22/09/2011 05:03, Curtis Olson a écrit :
> I have something here that I think is kind of fun.
Yup, I confirm this is plenty fun :-)
It worked like a charm here. However with local weather, cold front,
rough day condition, the challenge is there. Due to heavy turbs the
system entered huge pitc
Le 23/09/2011 16:47, Curtis Olson a écrit :
> Hi Geoff,
>
> I'm starting to run low on ideas here. I assume you don't have any
> crazy/severe turbulence turned on or your plots would be all over the
> place. Are you running out of fuel and your engines dying? If you
> open the autopilot dialo
Le 22/09/2011 22:04, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:00:49 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
> :
>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Geoff McLane wrote:
>>> You seem to be deliberately holding its speed down
>>> around 150 - I see air-brakes come up when greater
>>> than this, and th
Le 17/09/2011 20:26, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> Cedric wrote
>
>> I hope this is the last time we will have to discuss this topic, since
>> over the last months it seemed that everyone agreed with that FGDATA
>>
>> - has to be split sometime
>> - should be split a.s.a.p.
>>
>> We agreed that after t
Le 12/09/2011 21:31, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
> 2011/9/12 Mathias Fröhlich :
>> On Sunday, September 11, 2011 21:29:28 Durk Talsma wrote:
>>> My error was in SimGear, and your fix was for FlightGear, it I'm correct.
>>> So, I'm not sure if that would fix it.
>> Hmm, then probably not...
>> ... but
Le 28/08/2011 16:43, Paul Guhl a écrit :
> Lets clarify the issues: the modellers asked me to provide secured file
> format to prevent model theft and resell for benefit. They are willing
> to contribute to FG and don't plan to sell add-ons. Instead they would
> like to see their copyright enforced
Le 27/07/2011 12:48, Slavutinsky Victor a écrit :
>> I'm afraid that you wrongly interpret 'being busy doing other things'
>> with 'unwilling to help'. So far everybody who has made valuable
>> contributions has been welcomed by everybody. And depending on the time
>> someone has/is willing to rese
Le 26/07/2011 22:45, Durk Talsma a écrit :
> Hi Torsten,
> On 26 Jul 2011, at 22:34, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
>
>> Am 26.07.2011 22:26, schrieb Durk Talsma:
>>> Hi Torsten,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report. I can confirm the crash, which means that I'm
>>> optimistic that I find a solution tomorrow. I'v
Le 25/07/2011 18:06, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> Martin,
>
> > -Original Message- From: Martin Spott
> > [mailto:martin.sp...@mgras.net] Sent: 25 July 2011 16:14 To:
> > FlightGear developers discussions Subject: [Flightgear-devel]
> > Martin is responding slowly
> >
> > Hi, if anyone i
Le 03/07/2011 11:20, Bruce Hellstrom a écrit :
> I have FlightGear 2.0.0 installed and working. However, I need the
> latest code to integrate some changes to be submitted later once
> everything is tested.
>
> When I build the latest pull from Git (SimGear/FlightGear and using
> the latest fg
Le 12/06/2011 19:39, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> Can we please have the old airport textures back: the new ones wreck
> some very fine airports. Here's a small sample of Gatwick/EGKK. It's
> like this all over and it's spoiling someone's very good work:
>
> ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk:2121/flightg
Le 25/05/2011 22:28, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
> This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article completely with
> the rating system described in December.
>
> Now I'm off to rate all the aircraft I maintain!
>
> -Stuart
Hehe, nice to see that a rating system may have a chance to be establis
Le 13/05/2011 23:42, Martin Spott a écrit :
> While I'm at it, I'd like to express a warm "thank you" to those
> private and commercial sponsors who actually made this particular
> booth setup possible ...
Hi Martin,
Wow this booth is really outstanding! It couldn't look more professional.
N
Le 07/05/2011 08:45, Jack Mermod a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've made a med-poly SA-2 Surface to Air missile 3d model. It's
> mapped, textured, in .ac format, and animated. I've been using it for
> myself so I can pretend I'm flying a gunship in Vietnam, but it may be
> of use for the git repo.
Ve
Heiko Schulz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I could imagine more something like a portal, (like avsim.com,
> x-plane.org) where you have all Downloads available, sorted in
> licencs, types, ratings. This would allow to search and find easily
> all aircraft, no need to search through the whole web.
It wo
Gene Buckle a écrit :
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
>
Just a thought , but maybe asking nicely rather than demands and
threats might work better ;)
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jack Mermod
>>> wrote:
>>>
> I'm planning on contact
syd adams a écrit :
> Just a thought , but maybe asking nicely rather than demands and
> threats might work better ;)
>
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jack Mermod wrote:
>
>> I'm planning on contacting Red Bull today. If I get the green light, I
>> better see my livery in the database lick
Hi all,
I just hover above a bunch of discussions about how to complete a not so
complex L/G animation.
Well, I have done some nice landing gear, see A-10, A-6E, f14b. I didn't
use any maths for that. No nasal, no perl, no python... No maths
function from the FDM either. The XML interpolation
f-14b updated and in git, so it uses symbolic name rather than labels.
Alexis
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database envir
James Turner a écrit :
> On 2 Jan 2011, at 14:56, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>
> > gui.menuEnable("fuel-and-payload", false);
> >
> > We can add new names for any other menus that we might want to
> > disable on a per-aircraft basis, but from a quick skim through the
> > menus I couldn't see any other
James Turner a écrit :
> On 30 Dec 2010, at 18:18, ThorstenB wrote:
>
>
>> So, what do we do? Adapt all the aircraft above - or revert the menu
>> item ordering?
>>
>
> Adapt the ordering in the short term, and then come up with a non-brittle
> solution for the future.
>
> The new menu arr
Peter Brown a écrit :
> Based on what I saw when following the link, I might suggest that
> it's not a good way to promote FlightGear, since it's not "for sale".
> There are an Amazon and Ebay link on the site main stage as someplace
> to "buy" FlightGear, which purely takes the potential user
Hi all
I did (mid october) a flightgear page on Productwiki site.
Product wiki is an intersting site where you can describe and rewiew any
product on a wiki basis. So feel free to improve the page and add review.
Since the creation, additional links appeared on the Product manuals
(click "see a
Jack Mermod a écrit :
> Screenshot: http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/5017/cobra5.png
Hi Jack,
At first glance I see a problem (very common) with the colors of the 3D
model. Dark parts (that is not on the sun side) a really too dark.
The reason is that ambient values are not equals to rgb va
2010/12/11 Martin Spott
> If people
> are serious about their stuff, then they'll have to learn to commit
> their stuff early _without_ being faced with some release deadline.
> If they don't, their problem - next time, after the release passed
> without their contribution included, they probabl
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> Torsten wrote
>
>
> >> It looks like there are only 2 or 3 different ads, but it took
> >> clicking
> > on
> >> at least 14-16 of them before they stopped appearing on my fb
> >> page -
> > nice,
> >> those behind FSP are uploading the same ads over and over, and
> >> cal
Csaba Halász a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Robin van Steenbergen
> wrote:
> > I am not sure whether the content *generated* by a GPL-licensed
> > program (such as FlightGear generating screenshots) would have to
> > be licensed under the GPL as well.
> >
> > To be honest, I doubt
Ron Jensen a écrit :
> On Thursday 11 November 2010 03:36:02 Mally wrote:
> > ?Arnt
> >
> >> ..url to your facebook page? Would be the useful one url I
> >> meant. ;o)
> > Effectively, once I'm logged in, the URL to my personal facebook
> > page is still just http://www.facebook.com/ . Unless you
Jack Mermod a écrit :
> Hi, I've been trying to get the F-18 model off of the Vinson, but
> this has proved difficult in Blender. Can anybody with AC3D pull the
> FA-18 model off of the vinson.ac, and post it here? That would really
> help. When I pull it off in blender, it doesn't keep the tex
Citronnier - Alexis Bory a écrit :
> In http://www.maison-capestang.com/fg/ there are also some other free
> models, all by flyingtoaster, and all released under GPL.
well, actually flyingtoaster's models are precisely in
http://www.maison-capestang.com/fg/flyingtoaster/
Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, October 21, 2010 03:40:42 Jack Mermod wrote:
> > I've been doing some heavy work on Mathias Frohlich's F/A-18
> > lately, but I have been forced to postpone my release of the
> > improved version due to the fact that I cannot find any indication
>
Csaba Halász a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Curtis Olson
> wrote:
> > Hi Csaba (or anyone else), I'm just bumping this back up to the top
> > of everyone's inbox in hopes that someone will respond and let me
> > know what specific dns changes should be made. This is where I
> > le
syd adams a écrit :
> Hi folks, I recompiled flightgear (git) , and noticed that the 2d
> cloud layers are racing along nearly double my flight speed , and
> usually in the general heading I fly .Its gives the illusion I'm
> flying backwards , unless a mountain peak happens to be poking
> thro
Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
> In an effort to help with this I've been looking at two fixes: 1) A
> control to disable sub-model loading for AI aircraft. This
> effectively stops the model loader from recursing into tags,
> and therefore stops it from loading any sub-models such as cockpits,
>
Curtis Olson a écrit :
I just updated the aircraft download page with all the latest
aircraft updates to match FlightGear v2.0
http://www.flightgear.org/Downloads/aircraft-2.0.0/
I notice that many of the new aircraft are missing thumbnails, and
perhaps a few of the older aircraft could us
Hi,
I noticed that FG's particles contrails never reflect the coloured light
of the sun. At sunset time, they should have the same redish color as
the clouds, instead they looks like black smoke or enlightened white smoke.
a) This above is with this setting:
false
true
b) With:
false
Martin Spott a e'crit :
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
> KLSV 012X is one of these. Last updates forgot this one we added to
> our nav.dat long time ago. Robin should have it in his papers but,
> well it's gone.
>
> a) Please bring it back !!!
Have a patch handy ?
C
Hi all and Martin,
Some freqs are not handled by X-Plane but are supported in FG. AFAIK
this is because we use a workaround to make VORs compatible with TACAN
on certain weird frequencies.
KLSV 012X is one of these. Last updates forgot this one we added to our
nav.dat long time ago. Robin shou
Yes he dares !
http://flightprosim.com/screenshots/SNAG-0281.jpg
Alexis
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlin
Pete Morgan a écrit :
> Do a search for "professional flight simulator", and an ad for Flight
> Pro Sim appears with the title.
>
> "Plight Pro Sim A Scam ?"
>
> Sound suspect to me
>
> http://m2.daffodil.uk.com/flight_pro_sim_scam.png
>
> Pete
Flightprosim.net domain, the "Independant revie
Hi all,
Reproductible while using --atlas argument, you need to try hard to
crash the c172p. After a few (serious) crash maneuvers it triggers a
buffer overflow.
Alexis
--
NAN's found in SampleGroup velocity
PT_vs_hpt: ran out of layers
Warning: invalid line segment passed to IntersectVisitor:
Torsten Dreyer a écrit :
> "No transponder" correct, an IFR certified aircraft without a
> transponder is unrealistic. It's low priority on my todo list and I
> consider it a missing feature, not a bug. My goal is to model a
> GTX330 which is what I have in the RL Seneca. As a side note: I
> c
Hi all,
There is a new mpserver, mpserver10.flightgear.org.
This one is located in France - Montpellier 34.
Thanks to all mpserver-maintainers for replaying to it.
Alexis
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Deve
leee a écrit :
> [...]
> If individuals want to spend their time bounty-hunting (although
> there's no ca$h bounty, of course) then they're welcome to do so, but
> this should not be a concern of the FG project. The only time that
> this issue should concern the FG project is when someone tr
Hi all,
I think all of these discussions drive us in the wrong way. Even if we
would have a different license, there would be a lot of people trying to
profit from our work by trying to copy it. That's only because our work
is good. And this work is good also because it has been done under GPL.
Pete Morgan a écrit :
> Glad you picked the 787, this is broken in CVS with all sorts of
> errors.. thats why We need an aircraft fault list...
Hi Pete, there is also the wiki for that, look here:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Category:Aircraft_TODO
and here you can start a list of erro
mp...
FlightProSim.com a écrit :
>
> Hi All,
>
> To further enhance the Flight Gear project we would like to begin a
> monthly developer’s competition.
>
> We are asking you to give ideas for what could get developed over the
> next month….
>
> This must be attainable, measurable and worth g
Hi Stuart,
I spotted one typo that I couldn't edit by myself:
KNUQ Moffatt Field should beKNUQ Moffett Field
Thanks and bravo,
Alexis
Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> The September edition of The FlightGear Newsletter is now available:
>
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/i
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
> Hi, When trying to get the terrain elevation under a solid AI (like a
> tanker) we only get the elevation of the AI, maybe that's because it
> is solid... But it can be useful to get the real terrain elevation,
> for instance if we want to k
Hi,
When trying to get the terrain elevation under a solid AI (like a
tanker) we only get the elevation of the AI, maybe that's because it is
solid...
But it can be useful to get the real terrain elevation, for instance if
we want to know the AI AGL.
A workaround consist in computing a point sli
Manuel Bynum wrote:
> Well, I can remove the bombs. that's what's requiring the davepack.
> and also requiring it are the vortices. I'll ask DCulp and see if
> he'd let me include his pack with my F-14.
Manuel, what about subscribing to the devel list (and CVS-logs) ? Maybe
with a dedicated em
Martin Spott wrote:
> Hi Alexis, Manuel,
>
> Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
>
> > Also please, would you mind choose and formalize a specific name to
> > the JSBsim Tomcat? I already proposed to you
> > $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/f-14b-jsbsim/f-14b-jsbsim-set.xml, but now, it
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> As Martin just shortly said, you shouldn't add dependencies on stuff
> that is not certainly part of the base package. This means depending
> only on *basic and generic stuff*. Even an existing aircraft from
> the base packa
Hi Manuel,
As Martin just shortly said, you shouldn't add dependencies on stuff
that is not certainly part of the base package. This means depending
only on *basic and generic stuff*. Even an existing aircraft from the
base package may be pushed out of the short list at the next release
(that
Alexis Bory wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Nasal In directory
> baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9196
>
> Modified Files: pushback.nas Log Message: - Now the pushback "door"
> will be created only if /sim/model/pushback has already been created
Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
>
> May I ask something here? Why there is something comitted, which
> isn't tested yet?
But commiting to the CVS is the faster way to get usefull feed back and
gather differents opinions on a proposal.
> A generic pushback sounds nice, but so much as I
> understood, the
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Alexis Bory -- Monday 04 May 2009:
> > Added Files: pushback.nas
>
> This is not only verbose and ugly code, it will cause error messages
> and not work on some machines. Just saying ...
>
> m. :-}
Hi Melchior,
I did not had such a strong fee
Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 11:57 -0700, jalapenopeppe...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Hello. I have been working on the F-14 tomcat for months in an
> > effort to make an accurate JSB fdm for it. I have sent to DCulp a
> > snapshot release, and he says that he keeps getting nasal errors,
>
gerard robin wrote:
> Hello, Only a question , to avoid , to die idiot. When i am flying
> with MP with any Aircraft but a f-14 and when a f-14 is flown by an
> other pilot , i get within the internal property a folder /f-14/
> with several item which seem unuseful (since empty). /f-14/bu
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Sunday 22 March 2009:
> > FWIW, I just checked in a small change that allows the AI Air
> > Traffic controller to request the AI Aircraft to set a squawk code.
> >
>
> Yeah, I've read that, and we've immediately discussed on IRC how to
> use that. Unfortu
Detlef Faber wrote:
> Maybe there hasn't been a lot of praise for nasal, but I guess the
> broad use of nasal, even among JSBSim developers speaks for itself.
> As far as I know there hasn't been any comments of lacking nasal
> features (that weren't added within a short time).
>
> Finally: I
gerard robin wrote:
> I was STUPID since, i thought that the modelers were free to create
> the Aircraft in order to answer to these old criteria ( best FDM, eye
> candy). I noticed now that we are dependent of some constraints, we
> must accept anything coming from the mind of DEVELOPPER who
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> Ever since helicopter support was added to the YASim FDM there's an
> annoying bug: even when parked, with rotor off and braked,
> helicopters slide happily around on the ground.
>
> Andy knows about it and explained why it happens, but claims that
> there's nothing to
Vivian Meazza wrote:
> I'm seeing segfaults from time to time with Windows and CVS/Head
> trying to start when mp is running. Csaba Halász reports the same.
> It's most frustrating to try to track this one down, because it is
> not reliably repeatable. Assuming that we are not the only ones
>
Hi all,
I just thought that displaying Flightgear and the aircraft version
numbers on the splash screen could help a bit the supporting effort we
do on the forum and the users list.
Thinking out loud,
Alexis
--
Check
Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
> Okay -- I just finished updating with
> Fred's new binary and CVS update, and duplicated the flight, and it
> happened again. Weird thing is, I was JUST climbing through about
> 17,000 when I was thinking, "gee, this is going well so far. I
> wonder what the METAR
James Turner wrote:
> I'm planning to create some slightly advanced cockpit instruments in
> the near future, and to do this I need to support some more complex
> text displays. (This is for the character-based displays on the
> KLN89/94/etc GPSs, and FMS/MCDU units in the longer term).
>
> I
Curtis Olson wrote:
> These aircraft download packages as well as the download page is all
> autogenerated from scripts, and all the information about authors and
> versions is contained within your aircraft. If you have any
> questions, look at an example aircraft that does things the way you
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> var MPS_TO_KT = MPS2KT;
>
> What do other Nasal developers think? I'm willing to change it if
> others have problems with that, too. (And to change all occurrences
> in the repository.)
No problem here with shorter names for the constants. For me they are
easy to reco
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, This time I really think I should make my works commercial- or
> if you want to have all this give ma a lot of money.
>
> I'm aware that we want to make it right, like our overall concept on
> flightgear.org says. But this is also dependant of time and (!)
>
Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Alexis Bory - xiii
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a problem with how the f-14b liveries textures are applied
> > over MP:
>
> Seem to be the same issue as with the
Hi all,
I have a problem with how the f-14b liveries textures are applied over MP:
I can switch livery locally without problem, there is 4 PNGs for each
livery and every thing goes fine.
The livery change over MP is also visible, all properties under
ai/model/multiplayer/sim/model/livery (and su
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > c17p : Light Single GA; our default aircraft - overall
> > size can possibly be reduced by removing some liveries
>
> O.k.- and where to store the liveries which didn't get into the base
> package? There was a lot of work- it shoulden't be lost.
Hi all, I have the same q
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
