Hi All!
Exciting news for anyone in the Pasadena/Los Angeles area: GNOME has a
few extra tickets to SCaLE 16x
(https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale/16x) - currently a $90 value.
The first person to reply to this email will be given one of them, and
the rest will be raffled on social media (twitter
Why not run a specific contest to find a couple interns specifically to
work on privacy issues? No need to involve OPW specifically.
On Feb 20, 2015 5:10 PM, "Ekaterina Gerasimova"
wrote:
> On 20/02/2015, Magdalen Berns wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:28:58PM +, Magdalen Berns w
For what its worth, I believe that if we truly want to promote free
software, we need to begin reaching out to people outside of the
typical tech-sphere. A great place to begin would be with educators
and kids. There are many conferences not specifically related to tech
and free software where we c
use as we recognize that no one project is
'right' for everyone, but that free software is.
Emily Gonyer
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitu
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 01:39 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> To cooperate formally with a Linux Foundation event would run into a
>> problem -- they would probably want to call the GNU/Linux system
>> "Linux", and we should not accept that.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Stormy Peters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Emily Gonyer wrote:
>>
>> Of course people should be able to be paid to work on free software.
>> That's great. But when one or two large companies pay the majority o
at 7:18 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 07:15 -0400, Emily Gonyer wrote:
>> Of course people should be able to be paid to work on free software.
>> That's great. But when one or two large companies pay the majority of
>> developers, it becomes hard to
Of course people should be able to be paid to work on free software.
That's great. But when one or two large companies pay the majority of
developers, it becomes hard to argue that it is still a 'community
led' project, let alone one which is independent. And that's where
GNOME is right now.
On We
couraged to submit talks, and become foundation members. As a member of
the board, I will do my best to engage with them and encourage them to do
so, while also doing my best to ensure that their voices, thoughts,
concerns, etc are heard, understood and thought of in any and all changes
going fo
I agree whole heartidly that this is a valuable and good use of GNOME
time and resources. As a free software project ostensibly committed to
freedom, privacy and security, it behooves us to participate.
Emily Gonyer
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Oliver Propst wrote:
> Hi, its great to
ests? Shouldn't the needs of the project come first,
and not the needs of any individual corporation?
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova
wrote:
> "On 20 May 2014 12:10, Emily Gonyer wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova
>>
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Emily Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask below questions to future board:
>
> 1. For GNOME big event, call for sponsor is really important, what is your
> plan to call for more sponsors for conference like GUADEC and GNOME.Asia ?
>
I think it is of utmost
corporate money.
Emily Gonyer
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:28 AM, oliverp wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 10:48 +0200, oliverp wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 22:02 -0400, Marina Zhurakhinskaya wrote:
>> I think we can do more with organization sponsorship and individual
>> donat
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova
wrote:
> Hi Emily,
>
> On 17 May 2014 19:42, Emily Gonyer wrote:
>> Name: Emily Gonyer
>> Email: emilyyr...@gmail.com
>> Affiliation: None
>>
>> Dear Foundation,
>>
>> I'm intereste
I have re-sent my application to the aforementioned lists
(foundation-announce & elections), and it is 'awaiting moderator
approval'.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> 2014-05-17 17:55 GMT+02:00 Andre Klapper :
>
>> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 21:48 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
>> > CA
Name: Emily Gonyer
Email: emilyyr...@gmail.com
Affiliation: None
Dear Foundation,
I'm interested in serving on GNOME's board of directors for the first
time, in order to help steer GNOME in a more open and community led
direction. It is my opinion that GNOME has strode too far
Erm... is this today (Tuesday November 26th) or on Thursday November 28th??
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Franke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you should know by now, next GUADEC will happen in summer 2014 in
> Strasbourg, France.
>
> The first online meeting for the organization will happen o
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:03:34AM -0500, Emily Gonyer wrote:
>> And, once again, I have to ask, how much different does it have/need
>> to be?
> I don't think any designer would want my advice as to h
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> Dave Neary wrote:
>>> My stance is that I am happy for them (or anyone) to include GNOME in their
>>> product. They have permission (IIRC) to name it "something GNOME". So it's a
>>> different product, i.e. not "GNOME". I am happy if they use ou
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Alexandre Franke
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> Why would we want it to communicate "Distinguish this from GNOME"? I
>> won't say there can't be any such reason, but I don't see that there
>> is one. I haven't seen any discu
On Nov 22, 2013 7:33 AM, "Allan Day" wrote:
>
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> ...
> >> Yeah, so the thing that I think we really miss is some examples of
> >> what is cool to do. Like examples of t-shirts and stickers, and
> >> original designs based on the logo. My understanding is that this
> >> would
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le jeudi 21 novembre 2013, à 12:17 +, Allan Day a écrit :
>> Vincent Untz wrote:
>> >> Do we have examples of the guidelines "hurting us"?
>> >
>> > I can think of groups simply choosing to not use the GNOME logo anymore
>> > beca
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 10:59 AM, Allan Day wrote:
>> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>>> I see the brand book I put together with Jeff Waugh way back when (where
>>> that vertical version of the logo came from, and the existing logotype)
>>> has been unceremonio
So, what would Ubuntu GNOME need to do to differentiate their logo
from the 'normal' GNOME logo? Can they not use the GNOME foot at all?
Could they simply add a line 'not sanctioned by the GNOME Foundation'
to the website? What needs to be done?
Emily
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Bastien Noce
Hi Jim - I totally understand. Most of what I've done has simply been
updating names/dates/etc (mostly related to the current vs former
board of directors) and minor grammatical/ease of reading edits. I
hope/assume that's OK. :)
Emily Gonyer
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Jim Nel
I've made a few preliminary edits and will try to get some more done
tomorrow. But I/we will certainly keep such things in mind :) Are
there other wikipedia pages we should should be keeping an eye or two
out for?
Emily
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31,
Yes its vanilla forums. I've been busy and haven't checked in in week
or two and it appears most of the spam didn't start till ~the end of
sept/beginning of oct. There's (unfortuantly) no easy, quick way to
delete multiple posts at once :( Having forums that were actively
maintained by gnome would
I'd be happy to help run the booth again. I'd need funding, as always, but
would be happy to come and help out. I can assist with booth details as
needed, though someone else would have to bring the box(es).
Emily
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> hi.
>
> On 15.08.2013 1
Portland would be awesome in my book! :)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:15 PM, meg ford wrote:
> +1 for Portland.
>
> Meg Ford
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think I can take care of logistics if people are interested. If
>> people want to take my sugge
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it's clear from the recent thread that most people had
> no idea we had a Jabber server, or that they could get accounts
> on it, or how to go about doing so.
>
> What's more, over the last week, I tried to help two peopl
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 12:45 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>> On 12/15/2012 04:47 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 20:40 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> >> As feedback is often slow (needs several times of nagging) I'd like to
>>
Theres the forthcoming "PengPod" (www.pengpod.com). I'm not 100% sure
that its entirely free, but it sounds as though it may be.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > This is especially true given that there is NO tablet that can run a
> > completely free operating
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> > Lets be intellectually honest - a command line client editor is *NOT*
>> > user-friendly.
>>
>> I don't agree at all with this assessment: it depends entirely on the
>> audience it is targeting.
>
> If the goal is freedom then presumably the g
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi Dave;
>
> On 28 November 2012 13:57, Dave Neary wrote:
And if GNOME continues to bury all the configuration in secret corners
without a UI, and even the basic stuff only by an add on (tweak tool)
you'll continue to fail t
eeded.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 13:38 -0500, Emily Gonyer wrote:
>> Why not just include an "About GNOME" section in System Settings
>
> It would be a start, but some down sides might be -
> . administrators locking a
Why not just include an "About GNOME" section in System Settings where
we can talk about these sorts of things - about software freedom and
what it means. About DRM and why we don't include tools to allow its
use, and why free formats like OGG are preferable. We could have
multiple tabs: One about
I agree completely. However, that doesn't mean we should make it
purposefully *hard* to get those things. Should we warn people?
Absolutely. They should know what they are doing and be informed. But
that doesn't mean we need to make it hard, and certainly not on
purpose.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 a
First up, I know my post is likely out of order, but I'm not sure how
to correct that... I'm reading and replying to the first post by Seif
in the archive... Anyhow..
So Seif's three questions were/are:
[1] Where’s the product going?
[2] What problem are we trying to solve?
[3] How are we going t
und using a multi-faceted approach to the annual report, with a
downloadable PDF file as well as online videos & other content -
thoughts?). Juanjo Marin, Karen Sandler & I are currently working on the
report but we cannot do this alone! Please help us get the annual report
out in a timel
39 matches
Mail list logo
