On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 06:33:55PM -0700, coderman wrote:
> Over time, lets say a few days, and 500 of these 10M files later, it would appear to
>me
> that a well written and connected client of this type could force a large amount of
> content out of Freenet and replace it with this bogus data.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Rick Rohles wrote:
> How about a Freenet based wireless network that utilizes the propagation
> rules of Freenet for voice and data services. Carriers need not apply!
Oh really? So your cell phone would route requests... hah.
--
Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!
Mark
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Brandon wrote:
>
> > Ah, I see. The web archives are optional, BTW, and list subscribers will
> > run the daemon to put the latest messages right in their mailbox.
>
> That sounds cool. I'd rather have a POP server so that I don't have to
> download them. I'd rather not stor
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Travis Bemann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:00:15PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Travis Bemann wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:31:27PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Br
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Travis Bemann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:31:27PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Brandon wrote:
> >
> > > > It gets worse. Date: is not always the first header. Ian's mail client
> > > > puts Date: A
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Brandon wrote:
> > 1) Should this be in EOF? If yes, I need CVS access.
>
> EOF is about making existing Internet protocols work over Freenet. This
> seems more like a web application.
Ah, I see. The web archives are optional, BTW, and list subscribers will
run the daemon to
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Brandon wrote:
> > It gets worse. Date: is not always the first header. Ian's mail client
> > puts Date: AFTER the Subject: header. I guess that means I can't assume
> > any order at all. Ah well, it just means I'll have to check if every line
> > starts with every header. Yuc
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Travis Bemann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:00:07PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> >
> > > Ekkk! My evil parser just used the wrong From: header on all Ian's
> > > messages! Arrr
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
>
> > Ekkk! My evil parser just used the wrong From: header on all Ian's
> > messages! Arrrgh
>
> Actually, that was just coincidence. But did you know that some
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> Ekkk! My evil parser just used the wrong From: header on all Ian's
> messages! Arrrgh
Actually, that was just coincidence. But did you know that some mail
clients put the Reply-To: header right after the Date: header?
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Brandon wrote:
>
> > freenet:wubba-wubba//
>
> That's pretty cool. Not the way I prefer to read mailing lists, but still
> very cool.
If you haven't been there already, freenet:wubba-wubba//raw contains the
unformatted messages stripped of extra headers.
I'm almost there.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> I tried making my own little test MSK but I can't get it to work.
Are you running the latest CVS? I changed the caching a bit.
> Can you point me to a URI in freenet that references files through an MSK so
> that I can take a look at how it works
On 2 Jan 2001, Steven Hazel wrote:
> "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > >From blah blah blah
> > >
> > > confuses the fucking braindead parser. Arrrgghh.
> >
> > The list server even munges it with a
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> >
> > > Why not have a datstructure that just doesnt grow to big, a lot like the
> > > Freenet datastore,
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:22:01AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Wouldn't fixed interval updating be better in this case? Throw up an entry
> > every hour with the last hours posts (or a "void" document if there were
> > none).
>
> Yes, but anyone needs
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Travis Bemann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:12:31AM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > insert.forum1.spool=/var/spool/mail/root //mail spool to watch
> > insert.forum1.name=My Forum's Name Here //human name of forum
> > insert.foru
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 06:52:17PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > I do! I do! I think we should all eat our own shit^H^H^H^Hdogfood and
> > distribute the mailing list with Freenet! (HTML archives, too.)
> >
> > If I don&
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> > Ok, I have (just about) got mailman working on one of Uprizer's servers.
> >
> > I am planning to set up the following mailing-lists:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Ok, I have (just about) got mailman working on one of Uprizer's servers.
>
> I am planning to set up the following mailing-lists:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Anyone got any comments/sugges
vals. Might introduce a one second
delay if a site's images are half requested when the cache clears. Oh
well, can't really help it while remaining efficient.
What are you, some kind of saboteur? Giving me malicious advice and all. :-)
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
>
>
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> Mark:
> > Yes, and MSKs make it trivial to regularly insert your site. Without MSKs
> > this was a valid point, because it was not feasible to insert 10,000
> > redirects every hour. But with MSKs, inserting the updated version is so
> > trivial you could do
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> I'm halfway there. The same daemon handles inserts and requests. It reads
> a config file with fieldsets like
>
> insert.forum1.spool=/var/spool/mail/root //mail spool to watch
> insert.forum1.name=My Forum's
On 31 Dec 2000, Steven Hazel wrote:
> Speaking of problems with 0.3.6, is anyone else finding that inserts
> with HTL=1 don't work? Everything seems to go fine from the client's
> point of view, but the node gives a null pointer exception, and the
> key doesn't end up in the data store.
Yes. I
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 31 December 2000 08:43, Mark Roberts wrote:
> > You can now configure a list of allowed hosts for FProxy (or any other
> > servlet). Simply add (for example)
> >
> > services.fproxy.allowedhosts=127.0.0.1, 192.168.1.2
> >
> > to your .f
You can now configure a list of allowed hosts for FProxy (or any other
servlet). Simply add (for example)
services.fproxy.allowedhosts=127.0.0.1, 192.168.1.2
to your .freenetrc. If you don't, it will assume
services.fproxy.allowedhosts=all
and you don't want that.
Also! Reques
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 12:17:40AM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote:
> > Latex IMHO is better. I personally like to manually write stuff like
> > Latex and HTML. Maybe this is due to my experience with fundamentally
> > broken HTML editors which generated real
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I assumed you insert them like
> >
> > InsertClient -createUpdate yes KSK@asdf
> >
> >which inserts a redirect like
> >
> >
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >The date-based redirects are already in InsertClient, so it shouldn't be
> >very hard to copy them. Quite a few options, but they all make sense. I
> >
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 04:17:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Allright, I volunteer my help on this. I'd especially like to see the
> > Protocol Specification completed but I will work on the other documents
> > also.
> >
> > Who wants to do the
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Adam Langley wrote:
> Some basic MM info:
>
> When a process fork()'s (vfork()'s or whatever)
> it's page tables are copied and the pages of the new process are
> marked as COW (Copy On Write). If the new process writes to any
> of it's pages the kernel handles a page fault,
On 30 Dec 2000, Mr.Bad wrote:
> > "BC" == Benjamin Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BC> Mr. Bad: Can you support date-based redirects in
> BC> freenetmirror? That would make for a farily straightforward
> BC> package to create a freenet-website...
>
> Not yet, no. Remembe
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> So I have noticed that Freenet's memory usage gets to about 97MB within
> about 4 seconds of starting up in IBM JDK 1.3 running on Linux with
> default parameters - this is clearly rediculous. This suggests that it
> isn't a question of threads being left
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> Mark:
> > Assuming irregular updating. You would also iterate backwards. But MSKs
> > make inserting a new version so trivial that regular updating is not a
> > problem.
>
> Not a problem if you have always-on Internet access, which not everyone
> does. I co
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> Mark:
> > Yes, and MSKs make it trivial to regularly insert your site. Without MSKs
> > this was a valid point, because it was not feasible to insert 10,000
> > redirects every hour. But with MSKs, inserting the updated version is so
> > trivial you could do
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > > > Like so often with security, inexperienced users will be likely to slack
> > > > on this if given the option, but in fact they DO want to be sure that what
> > > > they are linking or returning to is actua
[The first time I tried to send this, Sourceforge's MTA segfaulted!]
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Aaron P Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> > Immediately, we must randomize the FProxy port. Otherwise, Freenet
> > nodes
> > are sitting ducks too. I will work on this tonight if nobody else
> > volunteers.
>
> YAY!!
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> >
> >Well, that's all working great for me now. The only problem is that FProxy
> >leaks memory so terri
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> How is he calling the client?
Through FProxy.
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> > Upgrading to Dev...
> >
> > - Forwarded message from Joey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > From: "Joey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PRO
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
>
> Brandon:
> > >Real updating will be quite a bit faster. A lot faster, actually. Because
> > >it requires one request instead of an indefinite number which tends to get
> > >bigger.
> > >
>
> BC:
> > Properly set up MSKs will only require one request per d
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > The clients will just have to be smarter (capable of carrying the
> > > mapping name over a redirect if necessary), and links must, like
> > > bookmarks, be to a secure key all the same.
> >
> > There is a much greater probability of recieving a s
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> Brandon:
> > > Real updating will be quite a bit faster. A lot faster, actually. Because
> > > it requires one request instead of an indefinite number which tends to get
> > > bigger.
>
> Ian:
> > Huh?
>
> I'm just saying that requesting an actually updated
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From Travis Bemann
> >There has been lots of discussion on using stuff like mapfiles/MSKs to
> >handle pseudoupdating. However, pseudoupdating is just a temporary
> >measure that will be obsoleted by real updating. So why don't we not
> >waste our
yOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
>
> > > No, fillBuckets is way too low level. It's a generic piece of code for all
> > > keys. You're adding key-specific code and it should go in a key-specific
> > > place.
> >
> > MSKs aren't really keys. They're much higher level than keys.
>
> It shoul
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >It's not mandatory, it just won't automatically load if it's not named
> >index.html. But again, the default string to load doesn't matter. An
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:14:04PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> >
> > > > to typing "freenet:MSK@pigdog//" and having everything happen behind the
> > > >
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> But KSKs are inherently insecure and should be avoided when not absolutely
> necessary. If you do have a "map" file like you suggested, then it should
> never be located directly under a KSK but rather under a secure key type
> (to which KSKs can be re
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> Why not have a datstructure that just doesnt grow to big, a lot like the
> Freenet datastore, rather than worrying about clearing.
Yeah, I can do that.
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> > From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >The root entry could be named "zarkney" for all we care. Using nothing
> >makes parsing the file difficult and has no advantage over using
> &g
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> >
> > > I'd actually prefer forcing a mapfile to exist in an SVK subspace in order
> > &
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >
> >> >From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> >2) When
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> > MapHandler starts a thread to delete the cache every 10 minutes. This
> > confuses the clients and they sit around forever waiting for the thread to
> > terminate, which it never does.
> >
> > Bleah. At least FProxy works, even though it allow
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >2) When the filename is omitted, it is assumed to be "index.html",
> >like a Web server does. We can thus represent the vast majority of MSKs as
&
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > It does the following:
> >
> > - Detects links outside of Freenet and links with embedded question mark
> > - Detects JavaScript
> > - Detects embedded objects/code
> >
> > if any of the above are detected, a warning page is displayed. The user
> > can g
s often not what
programmers prefer. And users want simple guessable keys with no catches.
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:00:36PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > &
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > > To add support for MSKs to RequestClient, the obvious place to add it is
> > > ClientUtil.getKey, but I would have to overload it with another version
> > > that takes a MapHandler as an argument, and that's ugl
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
>
> > > to typing "freenet:MSK@pigdog//" and having everything happen behind the
> > > scenes where it belongs. That makes me favor your proposal. [2]
> >
> > This s
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > to typing "freenet:MSK@pigdog//" and having everything happen behind the
> > scenes where it belongs. That makes me favor your proposal. [2]
>
> This syntax looks very nice, but assumes the site to not be in a
> subspace. Most sites will probably look like
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> I consider it a meta-key that is in a layer on top of other keys.
Yeah.
> > To add support for MSKs to RequestClient, the obvious place to add it is
> > ClientUtil.getKey, but I would have to overload it with another version
> > that takes a MapHandler as a
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:00:36PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> >
> > > > I need to pass it a Params object because the MapHandler needs to request
> > > > the mapfile.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > I need to pass it a Params object because the MapHandler needs to request
> > the mapfile. Otherwise I can leave getKey alone and do it right in
> > fillBuckets. Either way is OK IMHO. It's only two lines of code.
>
> No, fillBuckets is way too low level.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> >
> > > > To add support for MSKs to RequestClient, the obvious place to add it is
> > > > ClientUt
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
>
> > >
> > > To add support for MSKs to RequestClient, the obvious place to add it is
> > > ClientUtil.getKey, but I would have to overload it with another version
> > > that takes a MapHandler
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> > To add support for MSKs to RequestClient, the obvious place to add it is
> > ClientUtil.getKey, but I would have to overload it with another version
> > that takes a MapHandler as an argument, and that's ugly and inefficient,
> > because the ke
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I don't think my (derivative of Brandon's) MSK proposal can be implemented
> >like the other keytypes, because it is very different. It's not an
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Dev Random wrote:
> It does the following:
>
> - Detects links outside of Freenet and links with embedded question mark
> - Detects JavaScript
> - Detects embedded objects/code
>
> if any of the above are detected, a warning page is displayed. The user
> can go ahead and r
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > > would refer to index.html. So, as a practical matter, we can type two
> > > extra characters, or we can click through an entry page. Hrmmm...
> > >
> > > I'm ambivalent about this now. Must think... must sleep...
> >
> > So just add Fproxy support for M
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > They're identical. To get to the latest version of either, you've got to
> > insert a Javascript redirect page.
>
> Well you can use the built-in date-based redirects when I code them (I was
> going to do this yesterday but got distracted by the mailing li
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > I've been annoyed by FProxy's promiscuous behavior for a while now, and
> > nothing's been done about it, even though it's really easy to restrict the
> > connection to localhost, and only a little harder to read a configuration
> > file.
>
> FProxy used t
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 11:21:44PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> >
> > > Last time we talked about this, my solution was to create a new
> > > psuedo-keytype. With a new key
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Timm Murray wrote:
> While date rewriting is a pretty good kludge (as kludges go), I think it
> will be harmful to routing over the long term. Take this simple example:
>
> A-B-C-D-E-F
>
> E inserts such a document with htl 2 and sends it to D and D sends it to C.
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> I've been annoyed by FProxy's promiscuous behavior for a while now, and
> nothing's been done about it, even though it's really easy to restrict the
> connection to localhost, and only a little harder to read a configurat
I've been annoyed by FProxy's promiscuous behavior for a while now, and
nothing's been done about it, even though it's really easy to restrict the
connection to localhost, and only a little harder to read a configuration
file.
So I was reading through all the code and I can put a chastity belt on
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
[snip]
> > freenet:CHK@rE9zY9IVJAqGZInGOF0d03L6ZeoOAwE,nmrAmhCGI3EBnKMALocq7A//index.html
> >
> > freenet:pigdogjournal//index.html
>
> That does look nice and you make a good point. But is a new psuedo-keytype
> all that bad? We might want to define some oth
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> No, this is different. Your proposal messes with KSKs. My proposal is to
> create a new psuedo-keytype such as MMK, so:
> freenet:MMK@mapfile/filename
>
> The distinction may seem subtle but it doesn't mess up KSK or SSK
> parsing. You could even have a mapf
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> Last time we talked about this, my solution was to create a new
> psuedo-keytype. With a new keytype you can disambiguate between mapped and
> non-mapped keys and you can store information about the mapfile in the key
> without limiting what normal keys can l
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > I still don't know how to implement it this way, with ambiguous URIs. Once
> > we read the metadata from "blah.html", and notice the
> > MapFile=SSK@blah/blah, how do we remember to use it (and not the normal
> > SSK) when the next request comes in from a l
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
>
> > > Yeah, as long as the link wasn't to the CHK of the map it would
> >
> > I still don't see what the problem you're pointing out is. Can you give a
> > clear
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > Yeah, as long as the link wasn't to the CHK of the map it would
>
> I still don't see what the problem you're pointing out is. Can you give a
> clear example of what wouldn't work?
This problem is a normal recursive paradox with two content hashed files,
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 03:10:42AM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> >
> > > Keep thinking about it. If you combine SSK and map files (not
> > > necessarily a hard an
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> Keep thinking about it. If you combine SSK and map files (not
> necessarily a hard and fast combination), you can keep the
> implementation very simple by caching a mapfile in fproxy as an
> association to the SSK parent key.
The implementation is s
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Benjamin Coates wrote:
> >From Benjamin Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I'm going to have to use M18 for now, today's snapshot has a bug (61452 in
> >bugzilla) that renders the browser totally nonfunctional, and at 90 minutes a
> >build, I don't have time for the compile-it-
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote:
> > freenet:SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAgE/pigdog+journal/splashtest.html
> > is very, very impressive, especially with the latest Mozilla and my
> > Freenet plugin. Everything except one or two images loaded within 10-15
>
> Arr! Share! Share the Mozilla
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > Minor comments. The delimiter should be = instead of " ". Also, no need
> > for the special use of ":".
> >
> > So you go to KSK@blah, which has the field MapFile=test.map in the
> > metadata. FProxy notices this and processes keys like
> > blah/images
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> Remember that these map files should be associated with an SVK, i.e
> defined for the entire subspace. If you keep that in mind, you should be
> able to simplify this proposal a bit.
Why should they be associated with a SVK? Combining map files and
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> Finally, a free day! In my cherished Free time, I spent some time *using*
> our product. Hats off to the FProxy folks, and pigdog journal. Both of
> you prove that publication on Freenet does work, and not to shabbily.
freenet:SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJ
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Bryan Derksen wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Travis Bemann wrote:
> > This is suboptimal to a subspace because files can be added later to a
> > subspace, while all the files have to already be specified for this
> > (but they don't have to *exist* yet).
>
> I proposed someth
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Travis Bemann wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 07:06:02PM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> > (I wrote up the following this morning, and I still don't see any obvious
> > flaws, so I'll subject it to your criticism.)
> >
> > A map file
(I wrote up the following this morning, and I still don't see any obvious
flaws, so I'll subject it to your criticism.)
A map file is a list containing two columns, an absolute filename and a
CHK. For example:
Mapfile
/images/duck.gif freenet:CHK@ABC
/chapter_01/index.htm
88 matches
Mail list logo
