On Tue August 5 2003 08:32, SIMICRO ML wrote:
> Peter Nixon wrote:
> > On Tue August 5 2003 06:37, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> >
> > Its like saying that example B is faster than example A in the following
> > scenario:
> >
> > A) You need to call your girlfriend. You know her number, so you dial it
>
Peter Nixon wrote:
On Tue August 5 2003 06:37, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
Its like saying that example B is faster than example A in the following
scenario:
A) You need to call your girlfriend. You know her number, so you dial it and
talk to her.
B) You need to call your girlfriend, You don't know
FreeRADIUS will also work with Linksys, D-Link, and Belkin lower price-point
AP/wireless routers. (Belkin only supports RADIUS in it's WPA-enabled wl router.)
Quoting Puneet B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Will free radius work with any standard wireless
> > access point that has a built in radius
> Will free radius work with any standard wireless
> access point that has a built in radius client such
> as Aironet, Orinoco, colubris etc? i.e can it be used
> as a server to authenticate users coming through any
> of the standard radius-supported access point? Any
> help will be appreciated
Hello all,
Will free radius work with any standard wireless access
point that has a built in radius client such as
Aironet, Orinoco, colubris etc? i.e can it be used as a
server to authenticate users coming through any of the
standard radius-supported access point? Any help will
be appreciated!
M
I am having the same problem installing --with-experimental-modules for
version 0.9.0. Has this been fixed, or is there a workaround?
Ed
This means the 'experimental module' cannot be configured without
the user specifically going to that directory and changing the execution
permission bit, rig
That did not work either; same error.
From: "Roger Sherwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Upgrade Problems - WAS: dictionary not being installed
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 23:57:04 +0200
Try: "--with-experimental-modules=yes"
Rog.
-Original
Try: "--with-experimental-modules=yes"
Rog.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed H
Sent: 04 August 2003 23:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgrade Problems - WAS: dictionary not being installed
Well I've been trying to debug and found
Well I've been trying to debug and found something interesting.
When I run ./configure as with the "--with-experimental-modules" it won't
configure and gives an error: /bin/sh: -c: line 1: `for mod in ; do
what=all; [ "$what" = "all"
Here is the configure statement with the error:
./configur
I hit the wrong button - please see the remainder of
message below.
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:55:46 -0500
"Tim McCracken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My numbers (atleast) were a joke. The reality of it is
(IMHO) that benchmarks are only useful to marketing
departments because they are rarely done
My numbers (atleast) were a joke. The reality of it is
(IMHO) that benchmarks are only useful to marketing
departments because they are rarely done in an equitable
manner. There are way too many differences to benchmark
accross hardware platforms, and rarely does anyone tune OS
parameters to m
My numbers (atleast) were a joke. The reality of it is
(IMHO) that benchmarks are only useful to marketing
departments because they are rarely done in an equitable
manner. There are way too many differences to benchmark
accross hardware platforms, and rarely does anyone tune OS
parameters to m
How do you test this? or joke? :)
I would like to keep record of my server performances relative to each
other too, it sounds like a cool idea
Evren
Tim McCracken wrote:
My testing confirms Alan's numbers, however he neglected to mention:
Solaris: 2.5
VMS on Alpha: 8.0 :)
On Mon, 04 Aug 200
Hi
I'm running FreeRADIUS 0.81 with MySQL for auth and acct, all works dandy.
I'm looking for some guidance on how to limit a user's session time (i.e. to
1 hour) within a 24 hour period and not reset the counter afterwards.
My sqlcounter.conf looks like this (the "daily" counter provided in the
My testing confirms Alan's numbers, however he neglected
to mention:
Solaris: 2.5
VMS on Alpha: 8.0 :)
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:07:58 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Everybody argue about something and usually its so
difficult to come to
Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everybody argue about something and usually its so difficult to come to
> a conclusion. Microsoft says windows is good, linux people say linux is
> better, I say FreeBSD is best :)
NetBSD...
> Microsoft always says the newer version of windows works
Sometimes this comes down to what you need it to do. I need a
centralized user database platform wide so LDAP was the obvious choice
so I ran that with detail accounting for a while but then I needed to do
some bit counting and I also needed to calculate usage for the users.
When it comes to t
I'm still confused why you're arguing over this...It's implemented both ways for a
reason I assume. So if the flat file is so great, why even bother with SQL
code? AH! Choice! Kudos to the dev team.
You wrote:
> On Mon August 4 2003 20:34, Steven Fries wrote:
> > Maybe you're bot
Ok lets make peace :)
Everybody argue about something and usually its so difficult to come to
a conclusion. Microsoft says windows is good, linux people say linux is
better, I say FreeBSD is best :)
Anyhow the hardware is so fast and cheap nowadays that we dont need to
be so efficient :) It is
On Mon August 4 2003 20:34, Steven Fries wrote:
> Maybe you're both right? But who really wants to win a "Who's the bigger
> nerd contest"? If I have a small set of users, I'm using the flat file. But
> if my user list growsno doubt use SQL. The best thing for me is I don't
> have to write fanc
Killer analogy :)
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Nixon
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Advantages of Using SQL ?
On Tue August 5 2003 06:37, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> Well, if that is suc
Hello
Do not forget fastuser
The fastusers works fats... And can fit a lot of users into the memory...
And if I remember correctly, uses hash.
And do not forget the radius task is almost a read-only task -= in a
normal environment you can not compare an amount of auth requests with an
amount of req
On Tue August 5 2003 06:37, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> Well, if that is such a big problem then you can do a memory disk and
> store your db files in memory disk. That would then definetely work
> better than freeradius itself. How much are the memory prices now anyhow.
You could. This again uses mor
And dont forget that the SQL solution will use hashed
indexes, usually even if you don't define them. So yes,
small database will be faster as a flat file loaded in
memory, but big databases will normally be faster from SQL
due to cacheing of the hash and the user data.
But then, maybe free
Maybe you're both right? But who really wants to win a "Who's the bigger nerd
contest"? If I have a small set of users, I'm using the flat file. But if my user list
growsno doubt use SQL. The best thing for me is I don't have to write fancy text
handlers to parse through the users file, I ju
Hi,
Have been trying to work my way around an annoying little issue I'd been
having in regards to (shadow) password expiries not being seen when using
the rlm_unix module. (Freeradius 0.9.0 installed on a test Redhat 9 server)
First off let me say that I am not an experienced C programmer so my
Well, if that is such a big problem then you can do a memory disk and
store your db files in memory disk. That would then definetely work
better than freeradius itself. How much are the memory prices now anyhow.
About the operating system stuff, the load of exchanging few messages in
memory can
If anyone has a clue, it would be most helpful. I am ugrading from
freeradius-0.8.1 to freeradius-0.9..0 on Redhat Linux 7.2, using MySQL for a
backend dbase.
For "configure" i used:
./configure --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-ltdl-install
--with-rlm-mysql-lib-dir=/usr/local/
On Tue August 5 2003 05:34, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> Thats totally wrong, so you say same cpu works on both db lookups and
> freeradius, now when freeradius is making a lookup inside users file
> which is in ram, the same cpu doesnt work on db lookups in memory or
> what? so thats out of question.
Thats totally wrong, so you say same cpu works on both db lookups and
freeradius, now when freeradius is making a lookup inside users file
which is in ram, the same cpu doesnt work on db lookups in memory or
what? so thats out of question.
but mysql is optimized for that kind of lookups, there
On Mon August 4 2003 19:01, Andrea Coppini wrote:
> > DB backends are good, and save alot of admin, but don't expect them to
>
> be
>
> > faster than a memory scan :-)
>
> I haven't done any tests, but I would presume an SQL backend would be
> more 'robust' than freeradius.
>
> The way I see it, ha
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:01:07 +0200
"Andrea Coppini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > DB backends are good, and save alot of admin, but don't expect them to
> be
> > faster than a memory scan :-)
>
>
> I haven't done any tests, but I would presume an SQL backend would be
> more 'robust' than freera
> DB backends are good, and save alot of admin, but don't expect them to
be
> faster than a memory scan :-)
I haven't done any tests, but I would presume an SQL backend would be
more 'robust' than freeradius.
The way I see it, having 1 request a minute is definitely faster with a
users file in
On Mon August 4 2003 21:53, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> think about it yourself,
>
> -easy data manipulation,
> -reload of freeradius is not needed
> -nice web interface dialup_admin
> -you can make your own web interface with php easily with sql connectivity.
Yes. These are all correct..
> These are
Why would it isntall the first time (v. 0.8.1) and not the upgrade (v.
0.9.0)? Any suggestions?
Ed
From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dictionary not being installed Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 12:12:20
-0400
"Ed H" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Zoup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where can i found some complex documents (!) about free radius ?
> its cool ! :) but i need help ;)
The server comes with documentation. The web site has a FAQ, some
how-to's, and a pointer to a book from O'Reilly.
There is no "secret treasure trove" of do
Eric Leblond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did not manage to find how to group users using only the users file.
You can't. It's impossible. Use 'rlm_passwd', instead.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> latest cvs versions of freeradius could not compile
It's a known problem. I'll commit a fix today or tomorrow.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:26:55PM +0200, labis siegfried wrote:
> It is not indicate in this file and i don'ti find where the explication of
> this attribute is.
Try to search for it in doc/README...
In the new style file, you can define multiple DEFAULT entries. All
entries are processed i
on witch debian?
Greetz :)
Bas
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former" -- Albert Einstein."
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Zoup
Sent: maandag 4 augustus 2003 15
It is not indicate in this file and i don'ti find where the explication of
this attribute is.
A 10:29 04/08/03 +0200, vous avez écrit :
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:15:51AM +0200, labis siegfried wrote:
> what is the attribute "fall-through" in users file? i don't understand the
> utility of this a
hi guys :)
where can i found some complex documents (!) about free radius ?
its cool ! :) but i need help ;)
mant thanks :)
--
Wish You Were Here ...
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
greater ability to manage and scale up.
vec
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 2:43 AM
Subject: Advantages of Using SQL ?
> hi,
>
> im a freeradius newbie but i was wondering if there are any major
advantages
>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:10:48PM +0530, Rudramuni PH wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have some problem in server testing.
Do you think that posting the same thing multiple time will get you a
faster answer?
The answer is: no. It only gets you faster into blacklists...
And: perhaps it would be helpfull to a
Hi
I have some problem in server testing.
1 I have installed the README-radius-1.2.0 on Linux 7.2.
2. I am testing server as for the the Radius faq document i.e 4.12
Debugging it yourself.
If you're REALLY interested in knowing how to debug the RADIUS server
yourself, then the following step
I am trying to make FreeRadius 0.8.1 work with EAP-TLS
and this error message is shown when running
"run-radiusd -X -A" as specified in
http://www.impossiblereflex.com/8021x/eap-tls-HOWTO.htm
/usr/local/sbin/radiusd: error while loading shared
libraries: /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so: cannot
ope
think about it yourself,
-easy data manipulation,
-reload of freeradius is not needed
-nice web interface dialup_admin
-you can make your own web interface with php easily with sql connectivity.
These are what I can think of at the moment. I also think it would be
faster than using users file and
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Patrick wrote:
> hi,
>
> im a freeradius newbie but i was wondering if there are any major advantages
> to running freeradius on an sql auth system or not ? other than of course
> the obvious stuff like being able to replicate the tables etc...
online cha
hi,
im a freeradius newbie but i was wondering if there are any major advantages
to running freeradius on an sql auth system or not ? other than of course
the obvious stuff like being able to replicate the tables etc...
Thanks
P
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 22:38, Navid Sheikhol Eslami wrote:
> I guess my approach was just wrong then :)
>
> Any suggestion to do the same thing, but with a different Check
> attribute? :)
Same question !
I did not manage to find how to group users using only the users file.
Thanks in advance,
--
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:15:51AM +0200, labis siegfried wrote:
> what is the attribute "fall-through" in users file? i don't understand the
> utility of this attribute
read doc/README
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
what is the attribute "fall-through" in users file? i don't understand the
utility of this attribute
thanks a lot
siegfried
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi
I have some problem in server testing.
1 I have installed the README-radius-1.2.0 on Linux 7.2.
2. I am testing server as for the the Radius faq document i.e 4.12
Debugging it yourself.
If you're REALLY interested in knowing how to debug the RADIUS server
yourself, then the following step
53 matches
Mail list logo
