Huang Zhong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added the following lines in the config file hints
...
now, the result is:
the customer's radius server successfully
authenticated the request from freeradius server, but
i lose the attributes added in the file hints.
I'll bet money it's because you
I've downloaded freeradius0.8.1 and installed it on a
FreeBSD 4.4 pc.
I added the following lines in the config file hints
DEFAULT Suffix = @test1.vpdn, Strip-User-Name = No
Hint = PPP,
Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
cisco-avpair =
Hello,
Is FreeRADIUS IPv6 compatible?
And, after the authentication of the user I want to send (proxy) the
authentication packets to another FreeRADIUS server, How can I do that? It
is like proxying the packets to 2 other RADIUS server but one of them is
its own.
Regards,
Tamer
-
List
are welcome.
And, after the authentication of the user I want to send (proxy) the
authentication packets to another FreeRADIUS server, How can I do
that?
Why?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
by using other small companies' NASes. And in order to solve the
accounting conflict between the small companies the big company wants all
the data about the authenticating users from all other small companies. Big
company just will act as a referee.
Is this somehow possible by using proxy option
in an IPv6 Testbed to authenticate the users.
And, after the authentication of the user I want to send (proxy) the
authentication packets to another FreeRADIUS server, How can I do
that?
Why?
I know it looks strange but, In an scenario like this: you are a big
company and you have a contract
possible by using proxy option in FreeRADIUS, if yes how?
Either all your radius servers are proxies to the big company's radius
server(s) or you use something like radrelay and just use the accounting
information (which contains the detail you need) you don't need the
actual packets that are sent
to solve the
accounting conflict between the small companies the big company wants all
the data about the authenticating users from all other small companies. Big
company just will act as a referee.
Is this somehow possible by using proxy option in FreeRADIUS, if yes how?
No. Use
companies.
Big
company just will act as a referee.
Is this somehow possible by using proxy option in FreeRADIUS, if yes how?
Either all your radius servers are proxies to the big company's radius
server(s) or you use something like radrelay and just use the accounting
information (which
At 05:42 PM 12/9/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Is is possible to setup proxy radius not based so much on realms but based
on Key/Value pairs in the authentication packets? For example, I have many
resellers and I need to be able to proxy requests based on DNIS
(CalledStationID) or even just the last 4
Is is possible to setup proxy radius not based so much on realms but based
on Key/Value pairs in the authentication packets? For example, I have many
resellers and I need to be able to proxy requests based on DNIS
(CalledStationID) or even just the last 4 digits of the DNIS.
-
List info
Hi, everybody.
I am trying to configure my radius server as proxy, but i have a dont
know if it is possible write tacacs+ value in type option from
proxy.conf file the, this beause we are in transition process and we
need to do authentication any number users with tacacs+ and others ones
maximo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to configure my radius server as proxy, but i have a dont
know if it is possible write tacacs+ value in type option from
proxy.conf file the, this beause we are in transition process and we
need to do authentication any number users with tacacs
I am new to cistron. How do i setup my sever to authenticate dial in users using
command line. I use a PuTTY interface.
Troy J. White
C.E.O.
D.A. JAZ Internet Technologies
727-321-8899
Powered by Verizon
_
Sign up for FREE email from
, instead of
the text files. The advantages are twofold: a unified repository for all
my user data (ISP, IP Pools, local usernames) and the other benefit is I
could add/remove realms w/o sending a SIGHUP to the radius proxy.
Before I go and change the core components within the freeradius
library
a SIGHUP to the radius proxy.
That sounds reasonable.
Before I go and change the core components within the freeradius
library, has anyone else implemented this type of system before, and
have a better solution? Can I get this kind of behaviour through
modules? (ie, do a DB lookup, and add
benefit is I
could add/remove realms w/o sending a SIGHUP to the radius proxy.
That sounds reasonable.
Before I go and change the core components within the freeradius
library, has anyone else implemented this type of system before, and
have a better solution? Can I get this kind
Mike Varley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Faster and more efficient aswell. How often is proxy information going
to change, really? And SIGHUPing FreeRADIUS is not a costly affair.
If everything is going well, proxy information won't change that
often.
If you want to have multiple fail-over
hi guys,
i have the following setup:
cistron radius - forwarding server (proxy)
freeradius - remote server for certain realms + mysql accounting
i have thousands of users on the freeradius server which is proxied by
cistron radius. prior to upgrading to the current 0.8 release from the aug.
29
to proxy a tacacs request to a radius server in the
free/open source software world ? There are commercial products that do
this, but they're out the question.
regards,
Carlos
Ing. Carlos M. Martinez
Network Administrator
ADINET - ANTEL
Uruguay
Ing. Carlos M. Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have a fairly large all-Cisco equipment and we use freeRadius for
accounting and user authentication (we used to have cistron, we migrated
to FR 0.3 a while ago)
Upgrade, PLEASE upgrade.
Is there any way to proxy a tacacs request
I didn't get any responses...so I'm trying again... See message below.
- Mike
- Original Message -
From: Mike Dain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:12 PM
Subject: MySQL-Proxy-Exec-Program-Wait
I'm using my server for both local
Mike Dain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm trying to add in an Exec-Program-Wait script. I don't care
if it only runs for proxy users or if it runs for everyone, I just
need to add in that attribute/value (Exec-Program-Wait/scriptname)
to everyone that logs in. Can someone tell me how to add
, November 11, 2002 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: MySQL-Proxy-Exec-Program-Wait
Mike Dain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm trying to add in an Exec-Program-Wait script. I don't care
if it only runs for proxy users or if it runs for everyone, I just
need to add in that attribute/value (Exec-Program
Mike Dain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried adding:
DEFAULT Exec-Program-Wait = /shell/example
to the users file.
sigh What's the point of writing documentation (what little there
is), if it's not going to be read? What's the point of adding
debugging, warning, and error
I'm using my server for both local authentication and proxy to another
server. I'm using MySQL for authentication/accounting. I have all of the
realms/secrets/etc. setup in the proxy.conf file, and everything seems to
work ok. Accounting shows up in the radacct table for all of it.
Now I'm
I'm trying to setup my server to only allow proxying if a resellers account
balance is good.
Example:
User connects to NAS
NAS sends user/pass to my radius server
My radius server checks the account balance of reseller
if reseller account balance 0
send request to reseller radius
Has anyone attempted this before? I'm using MySQL Freeradius. After
looking at lots of config files, etc. I think that a preprocess addition
might work. Does anyone know if the Realms/NAS tables work now? I could
also write a script to check account balances and remove the Realms entry
Thanks! It looks like that should work. I'm going to write some scripts up
and see how it goes. I'll let everyone know the results.
- Mike
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bonner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: proxy
Hey All,
This may be a stupid question, but still, one to which I don't know the
answer. :) If so, please forgive my ingnorance.
I am trying to find a way to strip attributes sent from the NAS in the
proxy authentication request in freeradius. I am able to modify the
attributes that are sent
doesn't
exist in FreeRadius, I want the user to be redirected to Previous nasty NT
accounting server.
Freeradius proxy always redirects the requests to NT accounting server
before searching itself for this username!
I want FreeRadius First search itself and if the username doesn't exist
accounting server.
MR Freeradius proxy always redirects the requests to NT accounting server
MR before searching itself for this username!
MR I want FreeRadius First search itself and if the username doesn't exist , It
MR redirect it to Next accounting Server.
MR Additional Info:
MR there is no seprator
in FreeRadius, I want the user to be redirected to Previous nasty
NT
MR accounting server.
MR Freeradius proxy always redirects the requests to NT accounting server
MR before searching itself for this username!
MR I want FreeRadius First search itself and if the username doesn't exist
, It
MR redirect
and if the accounts
doesn't
MR exist in FreeRadius, I want the user to be redirected to Previous nasty
NT
MR accounting server.
MR Freeradius proxy always redirects the requests to NT accounting server
MR before searching itself for this username!
MR I want FreeRadius First search itself
27, 2002 2:57 PMSubject: Hints Proxy
Hello all,I haven't used hints much in the past but I am wondering if it might bepossible to use them for proxying certain requests to a secondary radius.Or if there is possibly another way (besides hints) that this could beaccomplished.For example. We ha
: Hints Proxy
Hello all,
I haven't used hints much in the past but I am wondering if it might be
possible to use them for proxying certain requests to a secondary radius.
Or if there is possibly another way (besides hints) that this could be
accomplished.
For example. We have a realm hosted
|
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Darren Nay wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:59:28 -0600
From: Darren Nay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fw: Hints Proxy
Can anyone tell me if this is a possibility?? Using hints, or otherwise.
(refer to the forwarded
Franklin,
Thanks for the suggestion. This just might work. :) I'll give it a try.
Darren
- Original Message -
From: Franklin Trumpy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Hints Proxy
Darren,
I'm not exactly certain
, and would like to proxy
some of the requests for that realm to another radius, but have some still
authenticating on the primary radius.. say for example, all of the users
with a prxy- prefix (ie. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would be sent to the secondary
radius for authentication. A username without
Hi List,
We are currently trying to get FreeRadius 0.7.1 to work with our
VopRadius server. This is how it flows.
Our users dial into the Qwest Network. The Qwest NAS sends a request
to Qwest's radius proxy servers - Qwest proxy servers send a request to one
of our proxy servers
At 09:51 AM 9/20/2002 -0400, Brandon Lehmann wrote:
Hi List,
We are currently trying to get FreeRadius 0.7.1 to work with our
VopRadius server. This is how it flows.
Our users dial into the Qwest Network. The Qwest NAS sends a request
to Qwest's radius proxy servers - Qwest
to be in the 'clients' file are the machines which send
packets to the server.
The only reason that this would happen is because our proxy server
is NOT sending back a Proxy-State [33] attribute. How can I make
sure that FreeRadius sends this attr back?
Look at the output of debugging mode?
Also, try
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Brandon Lehmann wrote:
The only reason that this would happen is because our proxy server is
NOT sending back a Proxy-State [33] attribute. How can I make sure that
FreeRadius sends this attr back? If I can't get it to do this, can
someone please advise a software
At 01:31 PM 9/20/2002 -0500, Franklin Trumpy wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Brandon Lehmann wrote:
The only reason that this would happen is because our proxy server is
NOT sending back a Proxy-State [33] attribute. How can I make sure that
FreeRadius sends this attr back? If I can't get
rlm_realm: Proxying request from user test to realm DEFAULT
rlm_realm: Adding Realm = DEFAULT
rlm_realm: Preparing to proxy accounting request to realm DEFAULT
modcall[preacct]: module suffix returns ok
modcall: group preacct returns ok
modcall: entering group accounting
radius_xlat: '/usr/local
-Ascend-Disconnect-Cause = 43
X-Ascend-Connect-Progress = 101
X-Ascend-Data-Rate = 26400
X-Ascend-PreSession-Time = 27
X-Ascend-Xmit-Rate = 38000
Qwest isn't sending you a Proxy-State attribute. Kindly ask them how
you are supposed to return one if they aren't
43420
800-644-6638
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.nwonline.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris
Parker
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question regarding Proxy-State [33] Attribute
At 03
; Stephen Goff
Subject: RE: Worldteq - Status of Realm Activation: IP Change
Brandon,
Please try again. Your realm was pointing (test server only) to another
company that previously owned this realm...
Proxy-state will not be sent in your dialtests. Proxy-state will be
implemented with our
Hi,
I'm trying to configure the freeradius (Version 0.5) to proxy requests
to a remote server.
I'm getting a message 'No request found for proxy reply from server XXX'
Has anybody got the same problem?
Here is some debug output:
Server#/usr/local/sbin/radiusd -x
Starting - reading
Wolfgang Bremer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to configure the freeradius (Version 0.5) to proxy requests
to a remote server.
Please don't post problems or bug reports with old versions of the
server. There are MANY bugs fixed in newer releases, see:
http
are not trying to proxy the requests from your systems to
anywhere else.
If you want to proxy from your systems, the situation becomes more complex
as you need to keep some sort of state so that proxy replies are returned
to the system that originally sent them. Or you need to start playing with
different
It's LVS (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org)
What do you recommand to load-balance RADIUS traffic? Any suggestion?
Xavier
--
http://www.rootshell.be
echo '16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sb20293A2058554E494Csnlbxq'|dc
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Alan DeKok wrote:
Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's LVS (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org)
What do you recommand to load-balance RADIUS traffic? Any suggestion?
No, sorry. I would probably recommend using a custom version of
FreeRADIUS, as it knows about the RADIUS protocol.
The LVS
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 12:09:10PM +0200,
Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] is thought to have said:
It's LVS (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org)
What do you recommand to load-balance RADIUS traffic? Any suggestion?
I've used Alteon products (now owned by Nortel) to load balance my RADIUS
Hi,
I just installed a FreeRadius, works fine! Seems to be a very strong
implementation of the RADIUS protocol.
But, I already have a question. :)
My radiusd is used as a proxy and send request to a load-balancer (LVS).
But all packets are forwarded with the same source port (8002) and the LVS
Title: Freeradius proxy server configuration
I set up two freeradius servers to test the proxy feature.
In one machine (A), I installed radius server and a radius client testing program.
In another machine (B), I installed radius server only.
I configured server A and B by editing
= RADIUS
User-Name = x
Proxy-State = 120
Freeradius gets the following back from MS IAS:
rad_recv: Accouting-Response packet from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:, id=22,
length=25
Proxy-State = 0x313230
And sends it on to the NAS:
Sending Accouting-Response of id 120
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works fine for authentication request/accept and accounting-stop, but my
NAS complains about the accounting-start messages:
Then it's most likely a problem with the attributes in the
accounting start packet.
WARNING: Identifier does not match - ignoring
Hi,
I want to know how to configure a proxy server. My requests come from one
host to a radius server which I want to forward to
another server. I added the entry for the host in proxy.conf specifying the
realm as xx.yy.com and gave the address of the remote server
as auth-host.
However my
Igor Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to configure proxying accounting requests to another radius
server (NAS --A--B), but it just doesn't send anything. Autorization and
authetification works perfectly.
Debugging mode says... ?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Hi,
Does anyone know what is wrong when you receive the following message?
Proxy: No request found for proxy reply from server - ID X
10x,
--
Ionut Muntean
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I've read docs mailing lists, and played with a test server, but I still
cannot figure this out. How can I tell FR to not proxy an accounting packet
if it came from a specific IP?
I have added an entry into proxy.conf where the accthost is LOCAL, and setup
an entry in acct_users to proxy
I'm trying to get freeradius 0.6 to bypass the proxy settings and handle the
packet locally if an accounting packet comes from a certain IP. Here's what
I've got so far, but it still tries to proxy to the NULL realm accthost when
I send an accounting packet. Any help would be appreciated
be bugs in tunnelling code, which was fixed in 0.6. If
you're running an earlier version, you should upgrade.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Unfortunately I made proxy request but only PAP authentication succeed. When using
CHAP
Dimitar Peikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately I made proxy request but only PAP authentication
succeed. When using CHAP complain is about bad password!
Read the FAQ on CHAP versus PAP. The same issues apply to IAS.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
Hi,
Did someone tryed to proxy to MS IAS on 2K Server? I've got bad success
about that and need some help, or example on this. If I point directly
from NAS to either FreeRADIUS ot MS IAS authentication goes alright but
when try to proxy MS IAS via FreeRADIUS I get errors on MS Event viewer
Dimitar Peikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I point directly from NAS to either FreeRADIUS ot MS IAS
authentication goes alright but when try to proxy MS IAS via
FreeRADIUS I get errors on MS Event viewer.
Which are...?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:00:18 -0400
Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dimitar Peikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I point directly from NAS to either FreeRADIUS ot MS IAS
authentication goes alright but when try to proxy MS IAS via
FreeRADIUS I get errors on MS Event viewer.
Which
Dimitar Peikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this case NAS is MS RAS on 2k Server.
This is explanation of error event 'A malformed request was received from=
client . The data is the packet.'
OK, it may be bugs in tunnelling code, which was fixed in 0.6. If
you're running an earlier
Hi,
Is it possible to ocnfigure a Freeradius proxy to log details of accounting
packets that it is proxying?
thanks, josh.
Josh Howlett, Networking and Digital Communications Group,
Information Systems Computing, University of Bristol.
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | phone: +44 (0)117 928 7850
At 10:59 AM 7/2/2002 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to ocnfigure a Freeradius proxy to log details of
accounting packets that it is proxying?
Yes. Simply add the appropriate module to the 'accounting' block of
the server's config.
-Chris
Hi list,
I'm wondering how sql authorization pass to be ignored when my proxy
access-request is accepted.
Now after successfull proxy accept my sql authorization module tries to
authorize the user once more:
rad_recv: Access-Accept packet from host xx.xx.xx.xx:1812, id=12, length=63
We have a proxied customer that uses DNIS as part of their authentication
sequence; however Qwest and UUNET do not supply DNIS as part of their tests.
Is there a way to create a user [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have him locally
authenticate against a users file while allowing everything else to
proxy
or anyone have any idea how I can set a realm for an accounting packet by the
Called-Station-Id?
Thanks,
James.
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:53, Chris Parker wrote:
At 01:31 PM 6/19/2002 +0800, James Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
I wish to set up freeradius to act as a radius proxy but instead of using
James Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However now I have a problem with accounting packets.
They seem to always be proxied off to the default realm no matter what.
I guess this is because the users file is not processed for accounting packets.
Do you or anyone have any idea how I can set
is not processed for accounting
packets.
Do you or anyone have any idea how I can set a realm for an accounting
packet by the Called-Station-Id?
There is an equivalent to the 'users' file used for accounting that is
called 'acct_users'. If you add the same Proxy-To-Realm configs to that
you should get
that is
called 'acct_users'. If you add the same Proxy-To-Realm configs to that
you should get the behaviour you are looking for.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless!\ Director, Engineering
Can freeradius proxy search multiple radius servers?
I'd like to be able to have the NAS access the proxy and have the proxy
access more than one radius server to authenticate the user without the use
of realms or other identifiers supplied by the end user for identification.
It's not clear
Kenneth Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh, I have seen from the proxy radius with debug mode, sending a MTU=576
to RAS, however, I have not set any value for MTU in my configuration, why
would this happen?
I don't know.
is it the source of my problem? thanks very much!
Probably, yes
Hi all,
I wish to set up freeradius to act as a radius proxy but instead of using the
user@domain style username for different realms I wish to use the dialled number
(Called-Station-Id) to determine which radius server the request is sent to.
So two people on two different systems can use
Title: RE: Proxy Client Source IP and Realm
Hello people,
Just found this message on the archive, and I think I need something similar:
You want to do:
DEFAULT Called-Station-Id == 1234, Proxy-To-Realm := company.com
Fall-Through = Yes
DEFAULT Called-Station-Id == 2345, Proxy
Gelson Dias Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I do the above, will the realm information be changed somehow? I
mean, if a dial-up client connects to station 1234 and logs in as
[EMAIL PROTECTED], will freeradius proxy it to the servers defined for
company.com, but without changing
, the preacct{} block
is called, followed by the accounting{} block. accounting{} is skipped if
preacct{} sets Proxy-To-Realm.
Unless I'm mistaken, rlm_realm will add a Proxy-To-Realm attribute during
preacct{}, which, if doc/module_interfaces is correct, should prevent
accounting{} from handling
the problem:
dballew@radtest02:/export/home/dballew echo
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Password=abc, NAS-Port=10,
NAS-Identifier=RadTest, Proxy-State=0xab00ef | /etc/radclient/bin/radclient
-r 1 -t 5 -d /etc/radclient/etc/raddb 64.218.97.97:1645 01 cosi71sunfl
radclient: no response from server
The request comes
This is a timedout authentication...not an issue with attribute 33.
If you are seeing the requests but they aren't seeing the responses then you
have a network problem...often attributed to a radius proxy having multiple
IP addresses. Does your server have more than one IP address? If so
to them, This is what they sent me to prove the problem:
dballew@radtest02:/export/home/dballew echo
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Password=abc, NAS-Port=10,
NAS-Identifier=RadTest, Proxy-State=0xab00ef | /etc/radclient/bin/radclient
-r 1 -t 5 -d /etc/radclient/etc/raddb 64.218.97.97:1645 01 cosi71sunfl
This is what I see when I have it in debug: Shouldn't I see that
Proxy-State in the Access-Request?
Waking up in 6 seconds...
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 63.150.70.42:55330, id=250,
length=151
User-Name = tbullock
CHAP-Password
Enesha Fairluck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I see when I have it in debug: Shouldn't I see that
Proxy-State in the Access-Request?
If the NAS sends one, yes. If the NAS doesn't send one, no.
The issue from your earlier emails seemed to be that the *reply*
didn't have a Proxy
: Re: Proxy Value 33
Enesha Fairluck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I see when I have it in debug: Shouldn't I see that
Proxy-State in the Access-Request?
If the NAS sends one, yes. If the NAS doesn't send one, no.
The issue from your earlier emails seemed to be that the *reply
At 10:42 AM 6/11/2002 -0400, Enesha Fairluck wrote:
Hey guys:)
I have another problem maybe some of you can help me with. I just got
off the phone with the people at our reseller...They say that when we send
the accept, reject or accounting packets, we are supposed to be sending
proxy
Thank you for all your help! :)
--E
- Original Message -
From: Chris Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Proxy Value 33
At 10:42 AM 6/11/2002 -0400, Enesha Fairluck wrote:
Hey guys:)
I have another problem maybe
Been there..run the latest CVS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Enesha
Fairluck
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Proxy Value 33
Hey guys:)
I have another problem maybe some of you can
At 01:32 PM 6/8/2002 -0400, Eric Dean wrote:
I got no bytes on this and I already google'd the hell out of the subject
matter...any ideas?
http://www.mail-archive.com/freeradius-users@lists.cistron.nl/msg05238.html
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
want to do:
DEFAULT Called-Station-Id == 1234, Proxy-To-Realm := company.com
Fall-Through = Yes
DEFAULT Called-Station-Id == 2345, Proxy-To-Realm := else.net
Fall-Through = Yes
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
I got
no bytes on this and I already google'd the hell out of the subject matter...any
ideas?
-Original Message-From: Eric Dean
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:40
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Proxy
Client Source IP and Realm
The features page
The features page says that
freeradius can "Proxy or replicate the request to another RADIUS server, based
on any criteria, not just
'@realm'."
http://www.freeradius.org/features.html
Can someone shoot me an example whereby I can proxy
using theClient IP address of an upst
Is there any detail doc about how to config Proxy-To-Realm ?
I think the doc proxy is not enough to understand everying relate to radius proxy
funtion in FreeRadius.
May I know How to config my FR 0.5 act as check users file before do proxy?
How to config suffix or prefix proxy
Why did this fix get removed from the June 4th CVS snapshot? auth.c is
version 1.103 in those snapshots.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Removal of Proxy-State
eric [EMAIL PROTECTED
Chris A. Kalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why did this fix get removed from the June 4th CVS snapshot? auth.c is
version 1.103 in those snapshots.
Uhh... weird. I guess it wasn't committed. I'll do so now.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Greetings:
I'm looking to be able to proxy RADIUS requests based on criteria OTHER than
a 'realm' in a username. Specifically, I'd like to proxy /some/ requests
based on the NAS-IP-Address. Is this possible to do with the latest version
of FreeRADIUS, or is it at least possible to write
201 - 300 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
