Hi Dr. Greve,
Thank you very much for getting back to me so promptly. If memory serves me
right, I am pretty sure that the orientations were incorrect in tkmedit but
will double check soon. Based on what you are saying and based on what I
read in the wiki about mri_convert it seems that I will be
Thanks! I will take your advice and start to learn it. I appreciate your
help so much!!
Elissa
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> something like:
>
>
> set SUBJECTS = (subject1 subject2 ... subject60)
> foreach s ($SUBJECTS)
>foreach hemi (lh
something like:
set SUBJECTS = (subject1 subject2 ... subject60)
foreach s ($SUBJECTS)
foreach hemi (lh rh)
mris_anatomical_stats -l $hemi.BA45.label $s $hemi
end
end
definitely worth taking the time to learn! It will save you endless amounts
of time in the longrun and it's
Thanks! I am a newbie so I think it would take me longer to learn how to
write the script then to just do it one at a time! :)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> oh, no, but write a script to do it! That's what unix is for.
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar
>
oh, no, but write a script to do it! That's what unix is for.
On Tue, 22 Mar
2016, Elissa Ash wrote:
> Thanks Bruce
> I am calculating the thickness for a given ROI (rh.BA45.label) and comparing
> it
> across subjects and it is tedious to have to type in the command separately
> each time
>
Thanks Bruce
I am calculating the thickness for a given ROI (rh.BA45.label) and
comparing it across subjects and it is tedious to have to type in the
command separately each time (~60 subjects). I was hoping that there was a
way to input multiple subjects at once. That's it.
Thanks,
Elissa
On
Hi Elissa
not really. What would you want it to do? There are tools for tabulating
the output of mris_anatomical_stats across subjects, if that's what you
are trying to do
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Elissa Ash wrote:
>
> Dear experts,
>
> Is there any way to run the
Dear experts,
Is there any way to run the mris_anatomical_stats command on more than one
subject at a time?
Thanks,
Elissa
--
Elissa Ash, MD, PhD
Director, Center for Memory and Attention Disorders
Department of Neurology
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
6 Weizmann St.
Tel Aviv 64239, Israel
Dear. All.
I tried tksurfer and it works.. It's still very strange why tksurfer-sess
does not work.
The command line that worked successfully is:
tksurfer replay06 lh inflated -curv -gray
Then I overlayed the contrast result sig.nii.gz and the registration file.
Then I cut the plane and then
That looks ok, but if you want to do a group analysis, you can add
--trgsubject fsaverage and the output surface will be in fsaverage
space. You can then concatenate the data together (mri_concat) into one
stack and then run mri_glmfit etc for your group analysis. You may or
may not want to
The problem is not the command, it is the size of the data it generates.
You can try reducing the size of the anatomical to a bounding box around
the brain. This is a bit tricky as you also have to compute a new
registration. I can help step you through the process if you want to go
in that
I don't know of a reference where someone has done this (though I would
be surprised if it is not out there), so just be aware of this if you
try to publish. The commands look correct, however, you may or may not
want to sample in the middle of the cortical ribbon (--projfrac 0.5).
Since this
answers below
On 03/22/2016 11:03 AM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
>
> Dear FS experts,
>
> I ran cortical thickness analysis as previously explained in Wiki :
>
> Wiki https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/GroupAnalysis
>
> My data is previously cached so I ran the command :
Thank you so much Lilla !
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Lilla Zollei
wrote:
>
> Hi Mahmoud,
>
> At the below link you will find some suggestions / settings that we use
> with our Cintiq tablet:
>
>
>
Oh, I see.
I showed the contrast results on a surface using the command:
tksurfer-sess -s $SUBJECT -df sessdirfile -hemi lh -analysis retino
-contrast UpperLower
Then I select 3 points along a boundary between upper and lower visual
fields (near calcarine sulcus) and press "Cut line". Then,
Hello Bruce,
Thanks again for your prompt response. We have an official holiday here.
Will send the info on Thursday.
Thanks and regards,
Sampada
Predoctoral student
KGMU, Lko
India
On haveay, March 2016, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> I see
>
> if you have defects that
then you must not have cut the patch from those surfaces. The error is
about a vertex # in the patch (147220), which is larger than the total
number of vertices in those surfaces (144977), so it's out of bounds. How
did you do the cutting?
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Ji Won Bang wrote:
Oh, I see.
Oh, I see.
When I run all of these surfaces, it gave me the exactly same numbers...
[jbang@cpu156 surf]$ mris_euler_number lh.inflated
euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 144977 - 434925 + 289950 = 2 --> 0 holes
F =2V-4: 289950 = 289954-4 (0)
2E=3F:869850 = 869850 (0)
total
Hi Freesurfer Community,
I am trying to run a vertex-wise analyses of PET data.
I have already performed bbregister. Next, I did mri_vol2surf for each
subject, left and right hemispheres.
for i in `cat subjects`; do mri_vol2surf --src
FS6_${i}_MPRAGE_Neuro.nii/pet/pet2free_fsl.mgz --out
I see
if you have defects that large you should look at the inflated.nofix
surface to see what they are.
What is your voxel resolution?
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Dr Sampada Sinha wrote:
Thanks Bruce for your reply. I did run it thru' recon-all. It went for more
than 2
days and
Thanks Bruce for your reply. I did run it thru' recon-all. It went for more
than 2 days and then exited with XL defect error (convex hull was more than
14000 and vertex size about 54000). So today I started by running the
recon-all in parts. I did not find anything wrong with brainmask files
after
no, for all surfaces for the same hemi (lh and rh). lh.inflated.K is not
a surface - it's a scalar field over the surface. The ones that should be
the same are:
lh.inflated
lh.white
lh.pial
lh.orig
lh.sphere
lh.sphere.reg
and same for the rh (but different from the lh ones)
cheers
Bruce
Dear. Bruce.
Thanks for your help.
When I tried:
mris_euler_number rh.inflated.K
It gave me:
nquads=15728644, nvertices=574
ERROR: MRISread: file 'rh.inflated.K' has many more faces than vertices!
Probably trying to use a scalar data file as a surface!
When I tried:
mris_euler_number
Hi Mahmoud,
At the below link you will find some suggestions / settings that we use
with our Cintiq tablet:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FreeviewGuide/FreeviewWorkingWithData/FreeviewSegmentations
"Segmenting using a Cintiq tablet or display"
Best, Lilla
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016,
you can try recon-all -make all for that subject and and see if it doesn
anything. But run mris_euler_number on those surfaces and see if they
match. They should all have the same number of faces/edges/vertices (for
one hemisphere in the same subject)
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016,
Ji Won Bang wrote:
Dear. Bruce.
Thank you for your advice.
I think I misunderstood what you meant.
What I did is this.
I showed the contrast result on a surface by using the command:
tksurfer-sess -s $SUBJECT -df sessdirfile -hemi lh -analysis retino
-contrast HorVer
Then I cut line, and then plane (occipital
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your response. What I'm trying to do is to get each voxel's
times course in structural space and I was under the impression that
mri_vol2vol --mov func.nii would be the right way to go. Would you please
let me know what the best way would be to do this?
best,
Ehsan,.
On
what surface did you recut it from? Can you run mris_euler_number on that
surface (presumably the inflated) and also on the white/orig/pial
surfaces? They should all have the same number of vertices, but I suspect
some of them won't, meaning that they need to be regenerated.
cheers
Bruce
Dear. Freesurfer experts.
Hi. How are you?
I'm trying to flatten the visual cortex using the command mris_flatten
(freesurfer version 5.3.0).
The command line is:
mris_flatten -w 0 -distances 12 7
$SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJECT/surf/lh.oc.patch.3d
$SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJECT/surf/lh.oc.patch.flat
The error
Hi Bruce,
Again, thank you for the quick response!
I will be looking forward to the upgrade then.
Kind regards
Morten
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] På vegne af Bruce Fischl
Sendt: 22. marts 2016
Hi Morten
not yet. The STN is on our list of things to segment (as is the SN),
although both will likely require good T2* (or maybe T2) weighted images.
cheers
Bruce
On
Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Morten Sejer Hansen wrote:
Dear Bruce,
Thank you for your quick and precise answer.
One last
Dear Bruce,
Thank you for your quick and precise answer.
One last question. Is it possible to segment the Nucl. Subthalamicus? It is a
subcortical anatomical structure, and is a part of the basal ganglia. It is not
included in the output following the command:
asegstats2table --subjects
Dear Experts,
I was wondering if someone could share with me and others the experience
using digital tablet pen and those sort of things instead of mouse to edit
and touch the images especially the masks.
I appreciate your help.
Thank you!
Mahmoud
___
Dear FS experts,
I would like to run surface based analysis using FA maps. I am not exactly sure
that what I am doing is totally right specially step 2 . I used the following
commands:
1. I registered the FA maps to T1 using the command: bbregister --s bert
--mov dtifit_FA.nii --bold
Dear FS experts,
I ran cortical thickness analysis as previously explained in Wiki :
Wiki https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/GroupAnalysis
My data is previously cached so I ran the command : mris_preproc --fsgd
gender_age.fsgd --cache-in thickness.fwhm10.fsaverage --target
To check whether the orientation is correct, you can view it in freeview
or tkmedit. When you click on the axial view it should show up axially,
etc. Though you cannot tell whether it is left-right reversed this way.
You cannot feed it a matrix, but you can specify the direction cosines
on the
There is not an easy way to do this. You'd have to make an annotation
from the AAL. Possible, but not easy.
On 3/21/16 3:54 PM, carolina.mr wrote:
Hi all,
I have some statistical results for AAL 90 coordinates (correlation
coefficients from network measurements x clinical data).
I would like
try now
On 3/21/16 10:24 PM, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Could you please upload epidewarp.fsl for FSL 5.x once again.
>
> Thanks!
> -Prad
>
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
That number is the mean vertex area, so to get the total area for each
subject multiply that number by the number of vertices in the cluster.
On 3/21/16 2:29 PM, Karl Liu wrote:
Dear FS team,
My question is how I should extract the measure of pial surface area
from a significant cluster
Hello Sampada,
Because of significant changes in the code, we halted development of the
beta release I sent you last year. We will be publishing a new beta
release soon (week-ish) but in the meantime, if you want the latest
"dev" version of the freesurfer you can downlownd it from our Download
sure. Have you tried running it through recon-all? It may work fine
On
Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Dr Sampada Sinha wrote:
> Thanks Bruce for your reply. The acquisition was oblique and the voxel size
> doesn't
> conform to the 1mm cube isotropic. I am trying to work on it and figure out a
>
Thanks Bruce. I was sent the link for dev version by Zeke last year. It's
working on Linux platform. But, I am not able to download or install it on
Mac.
Thanks and kind regards,
Sampada
On Tuesday, March 22, 2016, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Sampada
>
> V6 is not
Thanks Bruce for your reply. The acquisition was oblique and the voxel size
doesn't conform to the 1mm cube isotropic. I am trying to work on it and
figure out a solution. However, if I am not, hope its okay to send you the
nifti image.
Thanks and regards,
Sampada
Rnday, March 20, 2016, Bruce
Hi Morten
the insula you should be able to get out of the cortical labels in the
various *.annot files. The substantia nigra we don't segment at the
moment, and I suspect it would be hard to do so from only a T1-weighted
scan.
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Morten Sejer Hansen wrote:
Hi Sampada
V6 is not out yet, although we are actively (frantically?) working on it.
cheers
Bruce
On
Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Dr Sampada Sinha wrote:
> Dear freesurfer experts,
>
> I am trying to do hippocampal subfields segmentation on Mac. I will greatly
> appreciate if freesurfer 6.0 version link
Dear Experts,
I am interested in retrieving the volume of the insula and substantia nigra
from T1W structural scans converted to nii.gz files. All scans have undergone
the recon-all process without error.
I have seen volume estimations of Insula and substantia nigra performed in
several
Sorry, I forgot to mention
that I went back to the original line 51 of the Marie Schaer code in
"make_outer_surface".
No "fix" anymore.
Marco
2016-03-16 11:51 GMT+02:00 Marco Bucci :
> Dear all,
>
> I forward again my original post.
> I also attach the recon-all.log of
47 matches
Mail list logo