Hello,
The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
good. Should we wait a couple of days for testing the recent changes
to the module code? Is there any other issue that may prevent the
release?
Cheers,
Renato
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
> good.
Yes.
> Should we wait a couple of days for testing the recent changes
> to the module code? Is there any other issue that may prevent the
> release?
The
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:58:01PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
> > good.
>
> Yes.
>
> > Should we wait a couple of days for testing the recent changes
> > to t
Hi Dominik et al,
Just got back from holidays - this list has been busy in my absence!
> > > Should we wait a couple of days for testing the recent changes
> > > to the module code?
IMO, yes.
> Is there any other issue that may prevent the release?
1 month has elapsed since DV expressed a desi
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Scott Smedley wrote:
The documentation:
* There are several FIXME comments in the generated
documentation. Try this:
$ cd doc
$ find . -type f | xargs grep -I FIXME
All the FIXME stuff in the docbook-xsl/ subdirectory can be safely ignored.
A better check:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:49:18AM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> 1 month has elapsed since DV expressed a desire to relicence FVWM with
> GPLv3. I think we can go ahead with this now.
Let's do that later. It's a lot of work and many many files have
to be touched. The documentation issue is big e
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:49:18AM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> > > * GNU make is needed to build it.
>
> I'm so glad someone is helping on this - I find the build system
> complicated.
It *is* complicated. As a rule of thumb, always run
$ make distcheck
when you work on the installation p
Hi Dominik,
> > GPLv3. I think we can go ahead with this now.
>
> Let's do that later.
Ok.
> It's a lot of work and many many files have
> to be touched.
Really?
> I'm not going to release fvwm with a big fat "FIXME"
I didn't realise Viktor had already made a change to install the new
man pa
On 07/08/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >write fvwm in lower case
>
> Why?
Agreed. FVWM is an acronym; it should be written as such, which means
in upper case.
-- Thomas Adam
On 8/7/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It is run manually (usually be me) anytime a new command is documented.
> > > So, no need to worry about Perl dependencies.
> >
> > 1) I think this is not acceptable. It's too difficult to add new
> >commands right now.
>
> Difficult to
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:17:02PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On 07/08/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >write fvwm in lower case
> >
> > Why?
>
> Agreed. FVWM is an acronym; it should be written as such, which means
> in upper case.
And why should acronyms be written in
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:59:10PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> > > GPLv3. I think we can go ahead with this now.
[snip]
>
> > It's a lot of work and many many files have
> > to be touched.
>
> Really?
Every file that has a copyright statement needs to be touched.
> > I'm not going to release
On 8/7/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not going to release fvwm with a big fat "FIXME"
>
> I didn't realise Viktor had already made a change to install the new
> man page. The "old" man page is still around.
>
> VG: any reason for installing the new man page & still building t
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:21:20PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:17:02PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On 07/08/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >write fvwm in lower case
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > Agreed. FVWM is an acronym; it should be written
On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
> > good.
>
> Yes.
Ok, so where do we stand now?
* The new module code should be safe [done]
* Is everythi
On 8/13/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
> > > good.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Ok, so where do we
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
good.
Yes.
Ok, so where do we stand now?
* The new module co
On 8/13/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
>
> > On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> >>> The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
> > > good.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Ok, so
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
go
On 8/13/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> >> On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> >>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> >>On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:3
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, se
yOn Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
I'll look into it if you can give me some hint on how to fix automake for
the doc directory on my macbook.
What's the problem?
doc/fvwm/Makefi
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> yOn Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I'll look into it if you can give me some hint on how to fix auto
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
yOn Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
I'll look into it if you can give me some
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Most important: the generated man page is still broken. For
example:
allbox tab(:); lB lB lB. T{ T}:T{ depth 8 (256 colors) T}:T{
depth 4 (16 colors) T} l l l l l l l l l. T{ PseudoColor T}:T{ 68
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >>Most important: the generated man page is still broken. For
> >>example:
> >>
> >>
> >> allbox tab(:); lB lB lB. T{ T}:T{ depth 8 (256 col
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Most important: the generated man page is still broken. For
example:
allbox tab(:); lB lB lB. T{ T
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 12:42:50AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Most important: the generated
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
perl and tbl for building the docs.
So, is everything ready for release?
/Viktor
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
> >perl and tbl for building the docs.
>
> So, is everything ready for release?
This is still an issue:
A prefix of ŽcŽ i
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
> >perl and tbl for building the docs.
>
> So, is everything ready for release?
And is it really helpful to have tables in t
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
perl and tbl for building the docs.
So, is everything ready for release?
And is i
On 8/17/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Single quotes are written ' not \'
> * A line must not begin with a single quote
Both these fixed.
> Has this been doen?
>
> > * The boolean arguments section is still missing from the new
> > manpage.
>
Yes, booleanArgs.xml is put
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 12:42:50AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Most important: the generated
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:13:49PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >>>Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
> >>>perl a
On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:13:49PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > >>On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >>>Yes. I'm now
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think we just have a
> > couple of them.
>
> The only remaining table it the one in the description of the
> color-limit option. That
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think we just have a
> > > couple of them.
Allright, with your la
On 8/19/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > > On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:52:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On 8/19/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > > > On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> By the way, there's another issue with the build process:
>
> * The documentation has a build error when building on a multi
>core machine with "-j 2".
>
> I think there are some dependencies missing.
Fixed. Multiple targets w
On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > By the way, there's another issue with the build process:
> >
> > * The documentation has a build error when building on a multi
> >core machine with "-j 2".
> >
> > I think
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > By the way, there's another issue with the build process:
> > >
> > > * The documentation has a build erro
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
By the way, there's another issue with the build process:
* The docume
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:44:23PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> Another issue: modules written in perl don't work with the current
> configure. They get perl as interpreter (as opposed to /somewhere/perl).
Should be fixed.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
sign
On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:44:23PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > Another issue: modules written in perl don't work with the current
> > configure. They get perl as interpreter (as opposed to /somewhere/perl).
>
> Should be fixed.
>
Ok, everyth
On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, everything is done except putting the tarballs in the ftp dir (I
> seem to have forgotten my password.. already emailed Jason about
> this).
there is no password for the incoming folder.
/Viktor
On 8/29/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, everything is done except putting the tarballs in the ftp dir (I
> > seem to have forgotten my password.. already emailed Jason about
> > this).
>
> there is no password for the inc
On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/29/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok, everything is done except putting the tarballs in the ftp dir (I
> > > seem to have forgotten my password.. already ema
On 8/29/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/29/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ok, everything is done except putting the tarballs in the ftp d
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:10:21AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:53:08AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > Currently the 2.5.22 release is tagged version-2_6_22 in cvs. This
> > requires fixing.
>
> I'll do that in a minute.
Done.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt,
On 8/30/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:10:21AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:53:08AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > > Currently the 2.5.22 release is tagged version-2_6_22 in cvs. This
> > > requires fixing.
> >
> > I'll do that
On 8/30/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/30/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > On 8/30/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> On 8/29/07, seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> On 8/29
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:39:41AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/30/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you notify Jason of the upload?
>
> I did. But he still hasn't replied to my password change request..
User: anonymous (or ftp)
Password: ftp
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
-
On 8/30/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:39:41AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > On 8/30/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Did you notify Jason of the upload?
> >
> > I did. But he still hasn't replied to my password change request..
>
> Us
"seventh guardian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And the download link is still dead.. bummer... Maybe he's on holiday..
Very likely, it's pretty hot in Houston this time of year.
> Is he the only person who can do it?
Jason is at the University of Houston and has donated his time to
Fvwm since
On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > By the way, there's another issue with the buil
On 8/28/07, Viktor Griph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wr
62 matches
Mail list logo
