What OS and compiler were used?
On 11/22/06, Erich Focht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to run gexec with ganglia-3.0.3. Built ganglia with
--enable-gexec,
built and installed gexec. gexec runs fine if executed standalone, but when
I try it together with ganglia, gexec segfaults.
On 12/15/05, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing I always wanted is a way to fix up the host name in
gmond reporting. I have one installation with machines having NICs in
a high-availability setup. They actually change their DNS names when a
switch occurs, screwing the
On 10/14/05, Mark Ferlatte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael chang said on Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:59:54PM -0400:
Not to mention the patch seems to abandon everyone else who still has
a /dev/xyz setup (includes some debian and ubuntu users).
Unless we really got the patch wrong, that's
On 9/16/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/05, David HM Spector [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know why the os_name when running the WIndows gmond is
always Cygwin?
On 9/16/05, David HM Spector [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of the machines I have tested has Cygwin
On 9/14/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because this is my first patch, I wasn't sure if the patch came out
funny or not. When I first made the patch with the instructions at
I hate making extra noise, but I believe I forgot to clean up the
backup files in my directory, so I ended
I believe this is the first time I've hit the filter... =.=
The patch is attached to another message with this subject, since my
anti-spam filter caught the first failure message and I didn't figure
that out until I sent a revised message/patch.
Like I said in BZ 61, this is mostly a cosmetic
On 9/14/05, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike,
the patch looks fine and applies to current CVS in a dry-run.
That'd be because I just created it from current CVS. :)
Do we want it in 3.0.2?
Doesn't matter to me - if it doesn't break anything (e.g. applying
other patches),
On 9/13/05, Stu Teasdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 05:49:33PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
Ganglia 2.x.x something is in Debian -- maybe collaborate with people
there and see how many users use it (or don't use it).
Hi there, I'm the ganglia maintainer in debian. I
On 9/13/05, Stu Teasdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:37:58PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
I don't suppose we'd know what most of the existing code is licenced
under as a whole, would we? (Ideally, that would seem to be the best
choice as a licence that we use...)
I
On 9/13/05, Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer to keep it BSD licensed, but I'm a BSD user. :) Note that
the FreeBSD code is currently under a four line BSD license and thus
can't be GPL'd. The third clause can probably be removed since it's all
UCB code and they rescinded
On 9/12/05, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing may be the new AIX metrics code. As far as I know it
has
not been committed to CVS. I also remeber it needed some minor
changes
in the framework. Which means testing ...
Do we want to have a release candidate
On 9/11/05, Jeong Bae Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like a simple enough change to take the Apache basic authentication
password from PHP built-in global array, _SERVER.
On 9/11/05, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, I am definitely in favour of doing 3.0.2 soon. Current
CVS has the 64-bit disk accounting fix and the correct reporting of
wio. both pretty critical bugs.
As for what should go in my opinion is that we just should do it
On 9/10/05, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comments on the patch? My php is not good enough to evaluate the
change, but I am inclined to commit it if I get one or more ACKs.
Does it break PHP3? If not, then I'd presume it looks safe. If it
does, then we'd have to go as far as a
On 9/10/05, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we try to aim for an official 3.0.2 release with at least the
various PHP fixes checked in?
Matt is quite busy with work and all, and I don't mind doing a bit of
co-ordination with releases (and personally would like to see a bugfix
15 matches
Mail list logo
