On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 05:49:33PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
Ganglia 2.x.x something is in Debian -- maybe collaborate with people
there and see how many users use it (or don't use it).
Hi there, I'm the ganglia maintainer in debian. I have a 3.0.1 package
ready to go, but some fairly major
On 9/13/05, Stu Teasdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 05:49:33PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
Ganglia 2.x.x something is in Debian -- maybe collaborate with people
there and see how many users use it (or don't use it).
Hi there, I'm the ganglia maintainer in debian. I
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:37:58PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
I don't suppose we'd know what most of the existing code is licenced
under as a whole, would we? (Ideally, that would seem to be the best
choice as a licence that we use...)
The main codebase is BSD, however some of the code was
On 9/13/05, Stu Teasdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:37:58PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
I don't suppose we'd know what most of the existing code is licenced
under as a whole, would we? (Ideally, that would seem to be the best
choice as a licence that we use...)
I
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:47:50PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
On 9/13/05, Stu Teasdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:37:58PM -0400, michael chang wrote:
I don't suppose we'd know what most of the existing code is licenced
under as a whole, would we? (Ideally, that
--- Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think patches should be made against CVS, since Martin has released
what was previously available in CVS as an unofficial 3.0.2.
Cheers,
Bernard
Patches against CVS would definitely help. Patches against
3.0.1-released should be OK, though.
Another thing may be the new AIX metrics code. As far as I know it
has
not been committed to CVS. I also remeber it needed some minor
changes
in the framework. Which means testing ...
Do we want to have a release candidate when this is put in? (e.g.
3.0.3-rc1, 3.0.3-rc2, etc.)
On 9/12/05, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing may be the new AIX metrics code. As far as I know it
has
not been committed to CVS. I also remeber it needed some minor
changes
in the framework. Which means testing ...
Do we want to have a release candidate
To: Bernard Li
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ramon Bastiaans; Ganglia Developers
Subject: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.2 release (was: [patch] private
cluster authenticate fix)
On 9/10/05, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we try to aim for an official 3.0.2 release with at least
On 9/11/05, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, I am definitely in favour of doing 3.0.2 soon. Current
CVS has the 64-bit disk accounting fix and the correct reporting of
wio. both pretty critical bugs.
As for what should go in my opinion is that we just should do it
On 9/10/05, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we try to aim for an official 3.0.2 release with at least the
various PHP fixes checked in?
Matt is quite busy with work and all, and I don't mind doing a bit of
co-ordination with releases (and personally would like to see a bugfix
11 matches
Mail list logo
