Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20131014
IETF LC End Date: 20131027
IESG Telechat date: 20131024
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments: (BTW only editorial comments)
- Title page 1: Ruting - Routing
- Abstract page 1: e.g. - e.g.,
- ToC page 2 and 5
: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20131028
IETF LC End Date: 20131106
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 1 pages 2 and 3: I have a concern with the order of definitions.
IMHO there are 3 solutions:
* keep the document order
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20131120
IETF LC End Date: 20131126
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 3 and 9 page 30: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments
- 1.1 page 5 (ECMP): Pathing - Path
- 2.1 page 6
: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20130104
IETF LC End Date: 20130110
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: (not really technical)
PKCS#12 was subject to concerns from teh cryptography community,
in particular from Peter Gutmann, based on:
- its (too) high
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140122
IETF LC End Date: 20140211
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- typo 3 page 2:
... The actual
polices used for production certificates has a significant impact
^
BTW
-signaling-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140211
IETF LC End Date: 20140212
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- the number of authors is greater than the (soft) limit
- 1 page 5: too many 'o' in 'co-oordination
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140222
IETF LC End Date: 20140225
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None (but some basic concerns were raised during the last call)
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and 5 page 3: Acknowledgements
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140401
IETF LC End Date: 20130403
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Not Ready
Major issues: there is a typo in the IANA considerations, i.e., the
heart of the document. It seems to be a trivial typo but there is no
proof of this...
Minor issues: None
In your previous mail you wrote:
Yes, this duplicate paragraph in IANA considerations is a typo introduced
= fine (the problem with a typo is authors' intent is not clear / hard
to infer).
I'm also willing to change to Acknowledgments (no e after g) which I think
is the suggestion being
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140428
IETF LC End Date: 20140503
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- in Toc page 2 and 6 (title) page 8: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments
- 5 page 8: compability - compatibility
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140620
IETF LC End Date: 20140620
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
(a metacomment anyway: with the arrival of IPv6 we should not spend
too much time/effort on NAT traversal...)
Nits/editorial comments:
- Abstract
but in this particular use case it doesn't matter.
To finish the Orchid v1 (RFC4843) uses an Encode_100 with the middle
100 bits.
Regards
Francis Dupont fdup...@isc.org
PS (*): RFC5201bis misses the 128 bit Context ID in the hash input
so there is already a conflict.
PPS for Julien: at line 289
OLD
In your previous mail you wrote:
Dear Francis,
I've done the changes, but I need some more information:
4.2 page 9 (connection-address): (ambiguous wording)
... An IP address
SHOULD be used, but an FQDN MAY be used in place of an IP address.
[JIG] I'm not getting
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140703
IETF LC End Date: 20140703
IESG Telechat date: 20140710
Summary: Ready for nits
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- Abstract page 1 and 1 page 2: only BGP is a well known abbrev,
AS or RPKI are not, now it is only a formal
In your previous mail you wrote:
- 3 3.7 (twice), 3.11 page 4 and 4 4.3 page 6: need - needs
i believe that x need not do y is correct, so will leave it to the
rfced if you will indulge
= you are the native English writer (:-). Anyway the RFC Editor
could fix it if needed...
- 3
.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140717
IETF LC End Date: 20140721
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
first a meta-question: should this kind of documents refer to its
parent, RFC 6237 (same subject but RFC 6237
In your previous mail you wrote:
Thanks, Francis, for the review.
first a meta-question: should this kind of documents refer to its
parent, RFC 6237 (same subject but RFC 6237 is Experimental, the
I-D is for Standards Track)? IMHO it should not (so the I-D is
right) because
-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140930
IETF LC End Date: 20140929
IESG Telechat date: 20141002
Summary: Ready with nits
Major issues: none
Minor issues: none
Nits/editorial comments:
- Abstract page 1: the FE abbrev should be introduced (in particular
one can believe it means
: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20141009
IETF LC End Date: 20141010
IESG Telechat date: 20141016
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
First please note I participated to Softwire WG work so it is possible
the document is not understantable by someone who has
I reviewed the draft-ietf-softwire-map-10.txt document but I was too
involved in Softwire stuff to be able to judge whether the text is
understable without prior knowledge. Can someone from the team look
at it and summary in the list?
Thanks
francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20141025
IETF LC End Date: 20141027
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and 5 page 18: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments
- 3.2.6 page 8: singaling - signaling
- 3.3.1 page 9
.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20141104
IETF LC End Date: 20141106
IESG Telechat date: 20141125
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and 7 page 5: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments
(BTW what is the favorite spelling in Canada: UK
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20141224
IETF LC End Date: 20141224
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
5 page 4: in its lower layer should provide this
the term should is ambiguous, i.e., either it is a keyword
-encode-16.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150107
IETF LC End Date: 20150117
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- you use a strange indentation for sub sections... Perhaps it is from
the tempate?? Anyway
: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150212
IETF LC End Date: 20150206
IESG Telechat date: 20150219
Summary: Almost Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: the authentication in DHCPv6 (RFC 3315 section 21)
is considered in the document as a strong authentication.
I have to disagree
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150213
IETF LC End Date: 20150218
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready with nits
Major issues: none
Minor issues: none
Nits/editorial comments:
There are a heavy use of abbrevs. Note abbrevs are registered under
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style
-10.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150213
IETF LC End Date: 20150206
IESG Telechat date: 20150219
Summary: Ready with issues
Please look at my preceeding message about draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-arch-09.txt
for the minor issue and editorial comments.
Regards
francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
-acceptown-community-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150206
IETF LC End Date: 20141208
IESG Telechat date: 20150205
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- Abstract page 1: VRF and PE are not well known abbrevs
(cf http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc
-signaling-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150313
IETF LC End Date: 20150318
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
I read the 09 version but was too busy to prepare the IETF meeting
to send these few comments. Note I
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150226
IETF LC End Date: 20150302
IESG Telechat date: 20150305
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and Appendix A page 11: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments
- 1 page 2: even its meaning is obvious
: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150418
IETF LC End Date: 20150420
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready with nits
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments: many!
- Abstract page 1: a standardized services:
either 'a standardized service' or 'standardized services
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150402
IETF LC End Date: 20150402
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
I reviewed the 15 version but I can see the 16 one is already available
so I'll try to update my comments.
- first I
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150515
IETF LC End Date: 20150513
IESG Telechat date: 20150514??
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
I reviewed the 06 version.
- 1 page 3: signalling - signaling
- 4.1 page 5: after the terminology section
-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150701
IETF LC End Date: 20150629
IESG Telechat date: 20150709
Summary: Almost Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: the TLS part is a bit underspecified (nothing critical
as the missing text should get a quick and easy consensus)
Nits/editorial
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20151026
IETF LC End Date: 20151023
IESG Telechat date: 20151119
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 3 and D p
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20151002
IETF LC End Date: 20151013
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- In 1 page 2: th
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-34.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150828
IETF LC End Date: 20150824
IESG Telechat date: 20150903
Summary: Almost Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues:
This document uses and even redefines RF
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-11.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150911
IETF LC End Date: 20150923
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20150925
IETF LC End Date: 20150924
IESG Telechat date: 20151001
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- Abstract page 1: my
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20151218
IETF LC End Date: 20151228
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 2 page 3: (comme
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-dtls-srtp-08.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20151112
IETF LC End Date: 20151117
IESG Telechat date: 20151203
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
(very
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-trill-irb-13.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160618
IETF LC End Date: 20160624
IESG Telechat date: 20150630
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- you have 6 (with a soft
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2016-01-25
IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-04
IESG Telechat date: 2016-02-04
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- I was first su
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160226
IETF LC End Date: 20160224
IESG Telechat date: 20160303
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC 3 and B p
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160331
IETF LC End Date: 20160405
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- in ToC page 2 a
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-avtext-sdes-hdr-ext-05.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160319
IETF LC End Date: 20160318
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
Spelling:
- ToC
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160429
IETF LC End Date: 20160429
IESG Telechat date: 20160505
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- Abstract
In your previous mail you wrote:
> > The authors are in California. You will not see their response until
> > after the IESG meeting.
=> they are editorial comments: in the worst case they'll be handled
by the RFC Editor...
Thanks
francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-08.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160707
IETF LC End Date: 20160708
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 4.4 page 5
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14 already reviewed for Last Call
and the few nits were addressed in newer versions.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170116
IETF LC End Date: 20170123
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready with nits
Major issues: none
Minor issues: the title (and the Abstract) is a bit misl
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170121
IETF LC End Date: 20170214
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Not Ready
Major issues: this document is not understable at all without a
previous reading of R
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170210
IETF LC End Date: 20170214
IESG Telechat date: 20170224
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 1 and 3 page 3
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170217
IETF LC End Date: 20170224
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-13.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160829
IETF LC End Date: 20160822
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- Abstract page 1:
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-murchison-nntp-compress-05.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160922
IETF LC End Date: 20161010
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and A p
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-realm-08.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20161103
IETF LC End Date: 20161123
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Almost Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: the wording should be improved by a
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20161025
IETF LC End Date: 20161019
IESG Telechat date: 20161027
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 1 page 3: w
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-trill-directory-assist-mechanisms-10.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170105
IETF LC End Date: 2017019
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 1.1
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170106
IETF LC End Date: 2017012
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready with Nits
Major issues: None
Minor issues: please consider to publish this as a B
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-08.txt
Reviewer: F
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170710
IETF LC End Date: 20170718
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 2 page 3 (twice) and 2.1
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170706
IETF LC End Date: 20170707
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170626
IETF LC End Date: 20170719
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2: Acknowledg
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules-05.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170516
IETF LC End Date: 20170515
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready with Nits
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 1
see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170509
IETF LC End Date: 20170302
IESG Telechat date: 20170511
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/edi
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-name-addr-guidance-01.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170601
IETF LC End Date: 20170601
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 2 and 3
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170607
IETF LC End Date: 20170605
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Almost Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: ambiguous uses of lowercase keywords:
RFC 2119 i
see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-udp-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2017-09-14
IETF LC End Date: done
IESG Telechat date: 2017-09-14
Summary: In the Right Track
Major issues: None
Minor
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: On the Right Track
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-curdle-pkix-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20171002
IETF LC End Date: 20171009
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and 11 p
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-rollover-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20171007
IETF LC End Date: 20171017
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
IMHO the language itself
RFC 8174 (Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words)
published in May solved the lower case 2119 keyword issue but
should we recommend draft authors to use the RFC 8174 updated
standard section about the use of 2119 keywords?
IMHO yes at it is the simplest. Note the RFC Editor
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-dawkins-iesg-nomcom-advisor-iaoc-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170929
IETF LC End Date: 20171016
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and 7
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-as-instanceid-05.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20171124
IETF LC End Date: 20171208
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication-10.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20171209
IETF LC End Date: 20171212
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready with Issues
Major issues: None
Minor issues: C-nickname is used before being defined
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20171024
IETF LC End Date: 20171024
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 1.1 page 3: please upgrade th
of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-secevent-token-08.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180419
IETF LC End Date: 201805xx
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-16.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180512
IETF LC End Date: 20180521
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready with nits
Major issues: None
Minor issues: Missing keyword section (aka RFC 2119 section).
BTW
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-11.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180616
IETF LC End Date: 20180619
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready with Nits
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 6 a
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180123
IETF LC End Date: 20180115
IESG Telechat date: 20180125
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial co
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2018/02/07
IETF LC End Date: 20180209
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- Abstract page 1: please exp
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-housley-id-sig-update-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20171221
IETF LC End Date: 20180102
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and 10
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-hip-dex-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180224
IETF LC End Date: 20180226
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 3: you use the US sp
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180315
IESG Telechat date: 20180320
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- 5 page 6 (w
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180217
IETF LC End Date: 20180221
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- ToC page 2 and 6 page 14
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-21.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180225
IETF LC End Date: 20180228
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
(I took my notes on vers
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-17.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20181017
IETF LC End Date: 20181017
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
I have a problem with the CLUE
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang-09.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180926
IETF LC End Date: 20181002
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
The yang model mixes config,
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20181005
IETF LC End Date: 20181010
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
I reviewed the vers
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-08
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2019-01-08
IETF LC End Date: 2019-01-08
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
- sec
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting
of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-17.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180911
IESG Telechat date: 20180927
Summary: Ready with Nits
Major issues: None
Minor issues
201 - 300 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
