Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

ybe we should start building with a 1.6 snapshot. > Its my perception that the people working on JUnit 4 have decided to > take a "bite the bullet" (or the "sour apple") approach to this > migration, and I think this is wrong, They've decided to require JDK 1.

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

"Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:37:37AM +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > This is to "solve" the junit stuff right? >> >> JUnit is the most prominent project to r

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

Could have sworn I double checked :) Thanks, Brett On 2/20/06, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The enum is just generating warnings.. (I missed that at first too btw).. > Just the unicode stuff is generating compile errors.. > > Mvgr, > Martin > > Brett Porter wrote: > > On 2/19/

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

The enum is just generating warnings.. (I missed that at first too btw).. Just the unicode stuff is generating compile errors.. Mvgr, Martin Brett Porter wrote: On 2/19/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It seem

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

On 2/19/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It seems we traded junit for commons-lang.. > > It is trivial to fix in commons-lang. I thought about doing it, but it seems that the package of the classes is ".enum".

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:37:37AM +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is to "solve" the junit stuff right? > > JUnit is the most prominent project to require Java 5 ATM, but hardly > the only one. We've had other projects breaking

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

On 19.02.2006 11:08:22 Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Maybe adding a jdk compatibility mode could be interesting to use / > > add (didn't look if this is working though) ? > > Well, derby would benefit from something like that as well (it needs a > mixed JDK 1.3/1.4 environment). Batik/FOP could als

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems we traded junit for commons-lang.. It is trivial to fix in commons-lang. > Maybe adding a jdk compatibility mode could be interesting to use / > add (didn't look if this is working though) ? Well, derby would benefit

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

It seems we traded junit for commons-lang.. Maybe adding a jdk compatibility mode could be interesting to use / add (didn't look if this is working though) ? Mvgr, Martin Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is to "solve" the junit stuff rig

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is to "solve" the junit stuff right? JUnit is the most prominent project to require Java 5 ATM, but hardly the only one. We've had other projects breaking for months now because we didn't provide a Java 5 environment. > I'm perso

RE: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

> -Original Message- > From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, 19 February 2006 2:46 AM > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5 > > This is to "solve" the junit stuff right? > > Will be interestin

Re: Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

This is to "solve" the junit stuff right? Will be interesting...I'm personally not happy with how effectively there's this one project run by a bunch of people who don't particulary understand enough about backwards compatibility and the like (just like Sun really) which force this kind of thing.

Upgraded vmgump to JDK 1.5

Hi all, I went ahead and installed JDK 1.5 and made Gump use it. If it should turn out to create worse results than we have right now, it is just a matter of changing a single file to turn it back. While I was at it (actually waiting for my upload of 47 MB of JDK to finish) I also upgraded Mono

Re: Move public onto JDK 1.5?

On Mon, 23 May 2005, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I find this time quite interesting since we see projects embrace >> JAXP 1.3 and in particular DOM3 at very different paces. > > Yeah, in fact, I think it is one of the biggest deals in my memory > of Gump. You haven't been aroun

Re: Move public onto JDK 1.5?

> On Sun, 22 May 2005, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does it make sense to move public (with nagging) to JDK 1.5? > > Not yet, IMHO. > Ok. I just didn't want us to give up on all the Gump flavours w/o having asked the question. >

Re: Move public onto JDK 1.5? (was Re: Brutus going down)

t; Does it make sense to move public (with nagging) to JDK 1.5? -1, macosx still doesn't have 1.5 stable. -- Stefano. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Move public onto JDK 1.5?

On Sun, 22 May 2005, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it make sense to move public (with nagging) to JDK 1.5? Not yet, IMHO. > Given that we can't support all configurations, and given the level > of turmoil the JAXP 1.3 seems to be causing, ought we not ju

Re: Move public onto JDK 1.5? (was Re: Brutus going down)

On 23-05-2005 04:43, "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it make sense to move public (with nagging) to JDK 1.5? +0. I haven't been paying much attention to java5. - Leo - To uns

Move public onto JDK 1.5? (was Re: Brutus going down)

Leo wrote: > It is likely that there won't be any e-mail sent out by gump for a few days. > > It is likely that the non-standard workspaces (kaffe, testing and jdk15) > will be offline for quite a while. Does it make sense to move public (with nagging) to JDK 1.5? Given that we

JDK 1.5 Gump hasn't been running since last Friday

I've just removed gump.log from ~gump/workspaces/jdk15/workspace/, I think it should start to work again tomorrow. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Kaffe] bootstrap-ant seems to think Kaffe is JDK 1.5

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig apache.org> writes: > >> >> ... since optional/condition/IsPingable.java shouldn't be compiled >> otherwise. >> >> Ant checks for the class java.lang.Readable to

Re: [Kaffe] bootstrap-ant seems to think Kaffe is JDK 1.5

Stefan Bodewig apache.org> writes: > > ... since optional/condition/IsPingable.java shouldn't be compiled > otherwise. > > Ant checks for the class java.lang.Readable to detect JDK 1.5, has > this recently been added to Kaffe? Yeah, just yesterday. Merge of a few

[Kaffe] bootstrap-ant seems to think Kaffe is JDK 1.5

... since optional/condition/IsPingable.java shouldn't be compiled otherwise. Ant checks for the class java.lang.Readable to detect JDK 1.5, has this recently been added to Kaffe? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [

Re: enabling lenya jdk 1.5 builds?

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Gregor J. Rothfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'd like to start working on making lenya gump with jdk 1.5. what do > i need to do to make this happen? Nothing. We run Gump on JDK 1.5, Kaffe and JDK 1.4 on a regular basis, see the brutus.apache.org

Re: enabling lenya jdk 1.5 builds?

As far as I can see it is already running : http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/lenya/lenya/index.html It fails on prereq xpp so it seams. Mvgr, Martin Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: hi, i'd like to start working on making lenya gump with jdk 1.5. what do i need to do to make this happen? t

enabling lenya jdk 1.5 builds?

hi, i'd like to start working on making lenya gump with jdk 1.5. what do i need to do to make this happen? thanks, -gregor -- Gregor J. Rothfuss COO, Wyona Content Management Solutionshttp://wyona.com Apache Lenya http://lenya.apache.org [EMAIL PROT

Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...

Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thursday 14 October 2004 01:12, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: I'm giving 3 hours now since I had the impression that builds were starting to overlap. Perhaps not enough :o( Last log says ; 3 hours 7 minutes. Start Date/Time (UTC) Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:02:00 (UTC) End Date/Time (

Re: Kaffe? [was Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...]

> sorry about that (but I guess, only those who don't do anything don't > break anything ;-) Precisely. No problem, no apology needed.. regards Adam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [E

Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...

On Thursday 14 October 2004 01:12, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > I'm giving 3 hours now since I had the impression that builds were > starting to overlap. Perhaps not enough :o( Last log says ; 3 hours 7 minutes. Start Date/Time (UTC) Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:02:00 (UTC) End Date/Time (UTC) Tue, 12 Oc

Re: Kaffe? [was Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...]

Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Ok, I've made the gump/cron/local-env-brutus.sh put the chosen JDK at the front of the path (it was at the end.) export JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk1.4 export PATH=$JAVA_HOME/bin:$PATH This seems to cure things, for now: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/test/buildLog.html regards, ahh

Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has someone made JDK 1.5 the default JVM for Gump?? We have a JDK 1.5 Gump. http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/ I think Niclas meant: Is the public Gump running JDK 1.5 (by accident) right now? No, it

Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...

> > Java.version 1.4.2_05 > > This is from the LAST "reasonably successful" build - 76%. > THEN something happened, and xerces and crimson doesn't build since they are > "somehow" compiling against DOM v3, and not DOM v2. Good point, it is a run out of date. I'm waiting for cron to kick in t

Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, the only other explaination is that the xml-apis or something > have brought DOM v3 into CVS/SVN, Doesn't look that way: last change is more

Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...

> I think Niclas meant: Is the public Gump running JDK 1.5 (by accident) > right now? Opps, ok. http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/index.html shows: Java.version 1.4.2_05 and this ought'nt have change since Stefano updated it a week-ish ago. Also, I see this in

Re: JDK 1.5 now running Gump...

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Has someone made JDK 1.5 the default JVM for Gump?? > > We have a JDK 1.5 Gump. > > http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/ I think Niclas meant: Is the public Gump running JDK 1.5 (by accident) right

JDK 1.5 now running Gump...

Has someone made JDK 1.5 the default JVM for Gump?? Sun has introduced a incompatible change (do they ever follow their own compatibility advice?) org.w3c.dom.Node interface have additional methods in it, which breaks crimson and xerces. I assume that Xerces is also referencing impl classes

Re: encoding weirdness on JDK 1.5 [WAS Re: For those interested in building ASF/OSS code upon JDK 1.5...]

ot;Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:56 PM Subject: encoding weirdness on JDK 1.5 [WAS Re: For those interested in building ASF/OSS code upon JDK 1.5...] > looks cool :) > > what's a bit weird is that beanutils fails on an encodin

encoding weirdness on JDK 1.5 [WAS Re: For those interested in building ASF/OSS code upon JDK 1.5...]

know where else to post this, but I could imagine there could be general interest, so I'll try here. We have a JDK 1.5 Gump running at: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/ http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/buildLog.html ... basically this attempts to build ASF and OSS projects usi

Re: Xerces on JDK 1.5 (on Gump) (fwd)

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Michael Glavassevich wrote: I modified Xerces' Javac task in CVS such that it should now detect JDK 1.4 and above. I strongly suspect that this was the source of the problem. Hopefully that will fix the Gump failures. Despite not understanding how (and that is ok) I would have

Re: Xerces on JDK 1.5 (on Gump) (fwd)

> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Michael Glavassevich wrote: > > > I'm going to guess this has in part to do with the version of Ant that > > Gump is using to compile Xerces. Xerces uses its own Javac task [1] so > > that it compiles smoothly on JDK 1.4. This code isn't awa

Re: Xerces on JDK 1.5 (on Gump) (fwd)

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Michael Glavassevich wrote: I'm going to guess this has in part to do with the version of Ant that Gump is using to compile Xerces. Xerces uses its own Javac task [1] so that it compiles smoothly on JDK 1.4. This code isn't aware of JDK 1.5 (yet) nor is the vers

Re: JDK 1.5

Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Yeah, there is something so rewarding about the 'thank you' one gets 99% of the time. Human feedback it is. Thanks. The other aspect I didn't mention is that you can proceed at whatever pace you want. Building with JDK 1.5 at the moment is a "nice to h

Re: JDK 1.5

dnesday, July 21, 2004 6:20 PM Subject: Re: JDK 1.5 > Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > > How do we get the word out about the JDK 1.5 Gump runs? > > > > http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/ > > > > Teams may not be shooting for JDK1.5 compliance right now, but if Gump

Re: JDK 1.5

Adam R. B. Jack wrote: How do we get the word out about the JDK 1.5 Gump runs? http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/ Teams may not be shooting for JDK1.5 compliance right now, but if Gump could do the leg work for them, maybe they'd do minor tweaks if needed. I could see this help user,

JDK 1.5

How do we get the word out about the JDK 1.5 Gump runs? http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/ Teams may not be shooting for JDK1.5 compliance right now, but if Gump could do the leg work for them, maybe they'd do minor tweaks if needed. I could see this help user, but I feel it has to

Re: Ant on JDK 1.5

> Questions; Will Gump use JDK1.5 by default later? Will it be possible > to tell Gump which version of the JDK to use for the build? > > > Things are getting increasingly complicated. > Avalon doesn't build with 1.5 (not yet anyway). > Avalon requires 1.3, and other projects 'promises' JDK 1.1, b

Re: Ant on JDK 1.5

Adam R. B. Jack wrote: There are some interesting errors given here: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/ant/bootstrap-ant/gump_work/buildscript_ant_bootstrap-ant.html Ought we be publishing these to the Ant dev community? Questions; Will Gump use JDK1.5 by default later? Will it be possible to t

Re: Ant on JDK 1.5

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are some interesting errors given here: Hmm, looks like an encoding issue on first glance, all the other things are just warnings (and should go away in the "normal" Ant run since we pass a proper -source argument here). The

Ant on JDK 1.5

There are some interesting errors given here: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/ant/bootstrap-ant/gump_work/buildscript_ant_bootstrap-ant.html Ought we be publishing these to the Ant dev community? regards, Adam -- Experience the Unwired Enterprise: http://www.sybase.com/unwiredenterprise Try

Re: JDK 1.5

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You feeling game to try a copy of Gumpy (again) to see if you can > investigate for us? Sure, I wouldn't have voted to retire "old Gump" otherwise. Problem is with finding time. My current Linux machine is up for a major OS upgrad

Re: JDK 1.5

> > I have no idea how you launch java from Python. This one obviously > > does not use the 1.5 JDK. > > It simple makes a system call to 'java', so it gets what is first on the > path. Ah yes, the PATH is visible here: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/gump_work/check_env.html and ht

Re: JDK 1.5

> boostrap-ant will probably pick up tools.jar from the CLASSPATH, but > this shouldn't be necessary as the script can find it on its own if > JAVA_HOME is set correctly. For some reason I didn't beleive that to be the case (back when I added the usage of the system CLASSPATH w/ tools in it.) I'v

Re: JDK 1.5

> > > > http://brutus.apache.org/gump/jdk15/xml-crimson/xml-crimson/gump_work/build_xml-crimson_xml-crimson.html#Output > > > > I get an internal server error when I try to access this. > > Yes, I foolishly tried to remove an xdocs related bug before I went away for > the long weekend, and trashed

Re: JDK 1.5

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed, now how do we work w/ Ant to ensure this does not happen? > Also, if you see then env page (when it comes back) just launching > Java seems to give JDK1.4. Hmm, while we wait for the env page to come back 8-) boostrap-ant

Re: JDK 1.5

remove an xdocs related bug before I went away for the long weekend, and trashed it. Working to restore, sorry... > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: > > org/apache/tools/ant/Main (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0) > > Most probabl

Re: JDK 1.5

thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: > org/apache/tools/ant/Main (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0) Most probably means that bootstrap-ant has been built by JDK 1.5, while the Java VM running Ant when building Crimson is JDK 1.4. Stefan ---

Re: JDK 1.5

Thanks, but our goal is to work completely in JDK1.5, so the task is to either tighten our environment (to make JDK 1.4 simply "not available" to the JDK 1.5 run) or to be more explicit/careful in Gump code (and bootstrap scripts). I suspect the latter has the better long-term mileage, b

Re: JDK 1.5

Hi Adam, a quick Google search concerning this problem brought me to this link : http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?thread=522017&forum=316&message=2500873 What I understand, is that the problem means that we are trying to run under JDK 1.4 some code compiled under JDK 1.5. These op

JDK 1.5

t this means that (1) the JDK 1.5 compiler was found/used by bootstrap-ant and and (2) the JDK 1.4 compiler was found/used by Ant and does not grok JDK 1.5 classes. Just a guess. Any thoughts on how we tighten things up in an environment where we have multiple compilers/JDKs installed? Can we get