On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi...
The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
and documented on the incubator site for future
Hi Sam...
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Mohammad Nour
sebb wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It is the case that Initial Committers are eligible to serve on the PPMC,
though not all choose to do so.
Also, it is apparently a recommendation that invited committers be invited
to the PPMC, but it doesn't seem to be a
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the Apache
Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12 in
total now) from diverse organizations and did a release in May this year to
demonstrate we follow the
+1
Regards
JB
On 11/17/2011 11:42 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the Apache
Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12 in
total now) from diverse organizations
Great news, succes with this!
+1
2011/11/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net
+1
Regards
JB
On 11/17/2011 11:42 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Meanwhile, I will personally focus on JSPWiki. If others wish to join
me, here is a a current list of projects that have been incubating
more than a year:
I've been meaning to try to help out with JSPWiki for a while, but I've
not yet had the time. If
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Unless
On 17 November 2011 10:42, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12
in total now) from
I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only need to
be one release. The source for each artifact is there, it is just per
artifact in the -source.jar.
There might be different set-up then a lot of other
As much as I don't like this layout, this is not the first projet to use
it, and I don't really see how / why the IPMC should decide the svn layout
for the project. You won't be the one to manage it daily afaik, so that's
not up to you to decide imho.
Sling and Felix already use such a layout
On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only need to
be one release. The source for each artifact is there, it is just per
artifact in the
On 17 November 2011 12:51, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
As much as I don't like this layout, this is not the first projet to use
it, and I don't really see how / why the IPMC should decide the svn layout
for the project. You won't be the one to manage it daily afaik, so that's
not
Again, we had this discussion before namely, when the actual release
vote happened. I'm still confused why we have to go through this
again. You should be able to build all of the components by using the
-source.jar's that are provided. They contain what is necessary i.e.,
the full source.
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, we had this discussion before namely, when the actual release
vote happened. I'm still confused why we have to go through this
again. You should be able to build all of the components by using the
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:34 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 12:51, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
As much as I don't like this layout, this is not the first projet to use
it, and I don't really see how / why the IPMC should decide the svn layout
for the project.
To try that I just went to the ACE downloads page which has a bunch of
jars and source jars to download, i downloaded the source of the first
one, org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-sources.jar, and
looking inside there is the source to some Java classes but no build
scripts or
$ mkdir org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator
$ cd org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator/
$ wget
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ace/org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-source.jar
$ jar -xf org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-sources.jar
$ wget
+1 to the JIRA project and the notifications coming here. Thanks for
driving this one!
- Shane
On 2011-11-17 6:55 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Burrell
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
$ mkdir org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator
$ cd org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator/
$ wget
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ace/org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-source.jar
$
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...I agree with others that having an svn tag for that release would be
much more convenient...
oops sorry, wrong list - moving this thread to ace-...@incubator.apache.org
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:30, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only need to
be one release. The
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:30, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
as such has been
On 17 November 2011 14:07, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
$ mkdir org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator
$ cd org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator/
$ wget
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ace/org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-source.jar
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
(and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still
confused what all of this has to do with the graduation proposal vote
and why this has to be on
Hi Karl,
we can simply need to revert the changes just before the 0.8.0-incubator
release.
When upgrading the ACE build to use Maven, firstly, we used the tags scm
with Maven sub-modules.
So I'm quite sure that reverting just before the 0.8.0-incubator, I can
prepare that for the next ACE
JB,
please, lets move this to the ace-dev list.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Karl,
we can simply need to revert the changes just before the 0.8.0-incubator
release.
When upgrading the ACE build to use Maven, firstly, we
Sorry my mistake.
Regards
JB
On 11/17/2011 04:27 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
JB,
please, lets move this to the ace-dev list.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofréj...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Karl,
we can simply need to revert the changes just before the
Big +1
Carsten
2011/11/17 Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12
in total now) from diverse
2011/11/17 Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com:
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
(and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still
confused what all of this has to do with the
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
(and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still
confused what all of
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
(and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
configured like
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
(and the reason
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:56 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm
Sebb,
Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
code and jars. For example,
http://mirror.metrocast.net/apache//zookeeper/zookeeper-3.3.3/ . So, is
source distribution strictly required?
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
+1 to the JIRA project and the notifications coming here. Thanks for
driving this one!
I've done some customisation on PODLINGNAMESEARCH[1] (Hopefully Noel
will forgive me for assigning him as project lead without
Establish whether Apache Rat is a suitable name
-
Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1
Project: Podling Suitable Names Search
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
ul
liSearched for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for Rat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for Rat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for Rat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13152195#comment-13152195
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
---
Hello Ant,
On Nov 17, 2011, at 16:56 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm not against
On 17 November 2011 16:30, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebb,
Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
code and jars. For example,
+1 (binding) congrats!
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12
in total
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be the first incubator release for
Accumulo.
This candidate has received 4 binding +1 votes (1 IPMC, 3 PPMC) and 1
non-binding +1 vote, with no -1 votes. We need 2 additional IPMC votes
On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
On 17 November 2011 16:30, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebb,
Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
code and jars. For example,
Welcome. I have done the first steps as explained here [1]
adding to the ReportingSchedule and a default entry to podlings.xml
The latter still needs the project description and list of mentors.
This is just to get things started, and also enables Clutch
to help guide your project. No rush.
[1]
sebb wrote:
Jun Rao wrote:
Sebb,
Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
code and jars. For example,
http://mirror.metrocast.net/apache//zookeeper/zookeeper-3.3.3/ . So, is
I
I took a look at the svn source and the binary artifact and have some
additional comments.
1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects the license/notice requirements of these
jar files.
2) Why are these jars being stored in your
Thanks Sebb and Kevan. This is helpful.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects the license/notice requirements of
these jar files.
2) Why are these
On 18 November 2011 02:17, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Sebb and Kevan. This is helpful.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
2009-02-09 kato
I'm
You should define 'very small' for Joao and work with legal-discuss
and the Incubator PMC to decide if the item can be signed off or not.
[me=bean counter who points to a field not being signed off :) ]
Hen
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
can
55 matches
Mail list logo
