On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
How is that
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
In fact, in my opinion it leads to the very unfortunate side effect of IPMC
feeling in need to justify why it exists by micromanaging podlings.
I've been through incubation as a mentor on Phoenix, Nifi, and
I want to create a wiki page for a proposal to incubate Apex with ASF. Can
someone give me edit access for the following page?
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApexProposal
For those unfamiliar with Apex; it is an unified batch and stream
processing compute platform native to Yarn that was open
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote:
I want to create a wiki page for a proposal to incubate Apex with ASF. Can
someone give me edit access for the following page?
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApexProposal
For those unfamiliar with Apex; it is an
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:36AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
PPMCs and making
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I've been waiting for a bout a week for other to chime in, but
it seems that nobody has so I'll repeat my question as of
a week ago: what would be the effective way to change the
status quo around IPMC an make it more board like?
On 2015-08-03 09:37, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
How is that different from the status quo where a
Hi all,
some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point
with regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary
distribution of a source code release has to be handled like a release
itself, and that there should be no download source of it outside of
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Atri Sharma atri.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Requesting adding of username AtriSharma to Incubator wiki ContributorGroup.
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Atri Sharma atri.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Requesting adding of username AtriSharma to Incubator wiki
ContributorGroup.
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
Thanks.
Hi,
Requesting adding of username AtriSharma to Incubator wiki ContributorGroup.
--
Regards,
Atri
*l'apprenant*
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
How is that different from the status quo where a podling with active
mentors can have their releases
OK, I’ll bite. Do you have links to where you got this information?
-Alex
On 8/3/15, 2:55 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Hi all,
some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point
with regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:18 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
I wonder how much of the silence is a notion of I don't want to be
accountable if something goes wrong in this podling.
Right, but that same concern could be applied to every single TLP
and yet the board seems to do the
This is that proverbial political overhead that a lot of folks are accusing
ASF of and cite as a reason of not going into the foundation. Which is grossly
unfair at the board level, but unfortunately seems to be very true at IPMC
level today.
+1000
-Original Message-
From:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I've been waiting for a bout a week for other to chime in, but
it seems that nobody has so I'll repeat my question as of
a week ago: what would be the effective way
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
How is that
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
+1
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 09:37
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reform of Incubator {was; [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the
Apache Incubator)
[ ... ]
It's not the central Incubator folks
Congratulations on achieving this milestone and good luck for many more to
achieve in near future!
Best,
Dhaval
Sent from my iPhone, plaese excuse any typos :)
On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:29 AM, Rajat Gupta rajat.iit...@gmail.com wrote:
congrats guys
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Luke
Good job!!
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Nihal Bhagchandani
nihal_bhagchand...@yahoo.com wrote:
that is a great news guys
thumbs up to the whole team...
Nihal
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 11:42 AM, IT CTO goi@gmail.com wrote:
Well done! Great team effort and great leadership
Well done! Great team effort and great leadership by Moon.
0.6 here we come!
Eran
בתאריך שבת, 1 באוג׳ 2015, 09:08 מאת moon soo Lee m...@apache.org:
Hi,
The Apache Zeppelin team is proud to annouce the first release of Zeppelin
inside the Apache incubator: 0.5.0-incubating.
Apache Zeppelin
that is a great news guys
thumbs up to the whole team...
Nihal
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 11:42 AM, IT CTO goi@gmail.com wrote:
Well done! Great team effort and great leadership by Moon.
0.6 here we come!
Eran
בתאריך שבת, 1 באוג׳ 2015, 09:08 מאת moon soo Lee m...@apache.org:
congrats guys
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Luke Han luke...@apache.org wrote:
Congratulations!
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:43 AM, 김영우 warwit...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations!
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:08 PM, moon soo Lee m...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Zeppelin team is
Congratulation!!
+1
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:38 AM, moon soo Lee m...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Zeppelin team is proud to annouce the first release of Zeppelin
inside the Apache incubator: 0.5.0-incubating.
Apache Zeppelin is a web-based notebook that enables interactive data
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 August 2015, 10:30 am PST. The
report
for your podling will
On 2015-08-03 21:13, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Yup. I believe this to be an unfortunate (at least from my standpoint)
but and extremely fair observation.
As far as I'm concerned the issue of RRs of IPMC is in a state of a
stalemate right now. We clearly have a everything's fine lets just
add
In fact, in my opinion it leads to the very unfortunate side effect of IPMC
feeling in need to justify why it exists by micromanaging podlings.
I've been through incubation as a mentor on Phoenix, Nifi, and now getting
up to speed on Trafodion, I have not seen micromanagement of podlings.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Hi all,
some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point with
regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary
distribution of a source code release has to be handled like a
On 03.08.2015 18:36, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
It's not the central Incubator folks like our regular release
reviewers and report contributors who invent these extra criteria
Sorry but this has to be said: I see folks on this list inventing policy
(or rather, confusing opinion and policy) all the
In my experience incubating Calcite, the “overhead” was mostly the
infrastructure and process, not politics. (If you think the incubator is
political, you haven’t seen politics…) The process is necessary (mostly) to
ensure clean IP. The infrastructure, less so. So, if we’re talking about how to
On 03.08.2015 21:51, Julian Hyde wrote:
In my experience incubating Calcite, the “overhead” was mostly the
infrastructure and process, not politics. (If you think the incubator is
political, you haven’t seen politics…) The process is necessary (mostly) to
ensure clean IP. The
32 matches
Mail list logo
