Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:01 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > 1. Change all MXNet to Apache MXNet (incubating) from documentation > where it necessary > > 2. Change maven package description ” MXNet Engine Adapter for DJL” > to "Deep Java Library (DJL) Engine Adapter for Apache MXNet"

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:55 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > > >>> (2) The community is being called AgensGraph Extension and it is very > >>> likely that the VP, Brand will not approve. > >> > >> Regarding the name: One of the 1st efforts will be a renaming of the > >> project. > > > >

Re: "Fork Me" on GitHub (was Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP)

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 8:57 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I also wonder if opinions might have changed in the 5 years since that > discussion. In that time, GitHub has only become more ubiquitous and more > adopted by many Apache projects. > > Probably more a discussion for the board or

Re: [RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Maven Wrapper

e granted permission to use > another license. > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:59 PM David Nalley wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean > > wrote: > > > > > > HI, > > > > > > I agree with what John wrote, part o

Re: [RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Maven Wrapper

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > > I agree with what John wrote, part of the code is EPL which is not compatible > with the ALv2, you need the owner permission to change the license on that.. > > My understanding of "Let me try to get in contact with Walmart Labs to

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept TubeMQ into the Apache Incubator

Hi folks, I am happy to report that this vote is now closed and has passed unanimously. 25 +1 (14 of which were binding) votes were cast. I am excited to welcome the TubeMQ community into the Apache Incubator. --David On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:48 PM David Nalley wrote: > > Hi

[VOTE] Accept TubeMQ into the Apache Incubator

: David Nalley ke4...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC) Mentors: Junping Du junpin...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC) Justin Mclain jmcl...@apache.org (ASF Member, VP of Incubator) Sijie Guo si...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC) Zhijie

Re: [DISCUSS] TubeMQ Proposal

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi David, > > Very interesting proposal. > > How do you compare with Apache Kafka or Pulsar ? > It sounds to address the same use cases, right ? > > I would be interested to be mentor on the proposal if you are looking > for an

[DISCUSS] TubeMQ Proposal

: David Nalley ke4...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC) Mentors: Junping Du junpin...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC) Justin Mclain jmcl...@apache.org (ASF Member, VP of Incubator) Sijie Guo si...@apache.org (ASF Member, Incubator PMC) Zhijie Shen

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

> > I'd like to see the IPMC get out of the way of the podlings' releases. I > see no reason for us to be a gate, and many more reasons to back off and > let podlings get their work done. > I strongly agree with your sentiment, even if I differ with your tactics a bit. I think that they are

Re: Publising Wrong Distribution

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:52 AM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > > Hi All, > > One of the projects that I am mentoring has a situation needs to be > resolved. I've copied the case below. What do you think about it: > > "I want to resolve this soon. > > Again the issue is this: > > I pushed a bad

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:59 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > On Jul 3, 2019, at 2:37 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > > > This is correct. Provided we *do* explicitly acknowledge that special > > status of the Incubator. > > > > This acknowledgement will basically put podling source code

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:38 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:27 PM Greg Stein wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:10 AM Justin Mclean > > wrote: > > >... > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Although not a "real" PMC, we do need to provide legal protection for > > > each

Infrastructure removing releases Was: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

> > Have you checked with infra that they will allow this? Previous they have > said they will remove any release with an issue like this. I’ve tried to get > clarity on this (see board report before last) but with no luck. > Justin, I apologize for missing that question in the May report. Can

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:26 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > A couple of thoughts: > > And a couple of thoughts on top of that. > > > Podlings are not permitted to call themselves "Apache Foo" because they are > > not yet full Apache

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 6:31 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > > A couple of thoughts: > > Podlings are not permitted to call themselves "Apache Foo" because they are > not yet full Apache projects. > Actually we compel them to call themselves Apache Foo (incubating)

Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

There's been a lot of discussion in various threads about bureaucracy, whether podlings are part of the ASF, etc. As a result of that I've spent a good deal of time reading resolutions and older discussions and organizing those thoughts from a legal and community perspective. I've also read a

Re: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin

+1 (binding) I agree with Greg, this feels superfluous. Let’s get out of the way of people doing the work. —David On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 01:37 Greg Stein wrote: > +1 (binding) > > (and IMO this vote should never have been needed/called; let's help them, > rather than hinder) > > On Mon, Jun

Re: Move the Zipkin repos back, as the community has voted to leave.

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:58 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > > But if you are releasing Maven artifacts, I would assume that you change the > group-ids to not start with "org.apache" > and the packages should probably be changed too. But not 100% sure if this is > just a nice-to-have or a hard

Re: IP clearance issues of 3rd party projects transferring to Apache

Regardless of the project's TLP status, all significant code contributions from outside the project have to go through the IP Clearance process. Here's the page that applies to TLPs (as opposed to new incubating projects). https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:37

Re: Podling releases and release policy

On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 2:23 PM Hen wrote: > > Wrote a long thing... decided it wasn't useful :) > > The tldr; > > * Incubating releases are Apache releases. No user cares if they are > endorsed or official (for whatever they may mean). Perhaps if we said GA we > might be clearer. Agreed. We

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:32 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > I think Jim and Greg were describing theory, not practice. We can shout > from the rooftops that We Do Not Release Binaries, but then you have > download pages like [1] that present binary artifacts on equal footing > with source

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:39 PM Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:25 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > Jim, you’re re-iterating the premise of my question. In the context of my > > question, it doesn’t matter what these things are called. But we need to > > know how reviewers are to

Re: Jenkins access

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > Hi, > > My apologies if this is the wrong forum to ask..Can someone please > add permission for the users dangogh and neuman to

Re: Git release candidate tagging policy? [was: Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >> Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days >> of playing with GIT. >> It is used e.g. in the following TLPs: >> TomEE >> DeltaSpike >>

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > We're actively discussing with various organizations about the future home > of plugins.netbeans.org. We'd certainly not want to go into the future > without our Plugin Portal and plugins, there's no

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:57 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >> ...My guess is, based on Daniels estimate, that >> first year is 13-30k - each year thereafter

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Excellent cliff notes, and I'm really glad to see us surfacing the > issues - and costs - of incubating such a large podling. > > Question: do you have a rough forecast of how long this expense/extra > infra burden

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further details > specifically, before going into a vote for acceptance of the proposal? My > concern is that each question we answer is

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > On 16.09.2016 00:36, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > [...] >> >> Public servers: >> - www.netbeans.org: ... >> - hg.netbeans.org: ... >> - deadlock.netbeans.org: ... >> - bits.netbeans.org: ... >> - updates.netbeans.org: ...

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Notes on the NetBeans infrastructure from the NetBeans build engineer. Who > from Apache infra is going to do 1:1 discovery? Daniel Gruno will - feel free to reach out directly to him at

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Incubator PMC, > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: >> ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ... > > At this point I ask anyone

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: >> ...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate >> any code from anywhere on

Re: ASF Android release policy

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Ian Dunlop wrote: > Hello, > > In the Taverna Incubator project we have been developing an Android mobile > app which is almost ready for a first release. Are there any ASF procedures > and policies for doing an Android release? Can an ASF

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> What is the expected impact on infrastructure here?... > > I'll let Geertjan or someone else who's familiar with the

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] JMeter Dashboard / Report

+1 - thanks for going into detail on CCLAs, and the schedules for each. Made it much easier to review. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Milamber wrote: > Hi, > > Apache JMeter is receiving a code for a new Dashbord / Report module. > > See

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

5 releases of software, and 4 of them before an SGA appeared is troubling. The code being imported and writable at all at the ASF prior to a valid SGA being filed appears to be a violation of Incubator policy[1] This, plus John's comments are troubling and give me pause --David [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >> Hi Sterling, this looks fascinating. >> I have a few questions for you: >> >> How many arches are you

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

Hi Sterling, this looks fascinating. I have a few questions for you: How many arches are you targeting initially? I saw ARM and MIPS commented below, but not sure if that's the initial list, or just a few notable. What's the CI/Build/Testing environment that you currently have? How many nodes,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate from > the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below. > > See also discuss thread [1]. Mentors were invited to join the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Brooklyn graduation as TLP

+1(binding) the Brooklyn folks have done a good job in building a community and adapting processes. --David On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > The Brooklyn community and project made significant advances in the past > months and believes it is ready to

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hi, > >> Thanks for making a clear statement because it lets me focus on the >> question that may be central to this discussion: can you tell us why >> did you guys decided to join ASF in the first place? This is not

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi Marko, > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: >>> I think that Marvin's question to you was pretty cogent. Would you be >>> willing to spend an hour or so each on 5

Re: apache binary distributions

/me notes the mixed public and private lists I.e. assume you're a developer or sysadmin who is *not* an Apache committer. You know you need to get a software project management tool for the linux machines you maintain, and you've heard of something called Maven. - What is the actual

Re: apache binary distributions

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: The Hadoop PMC is utterly free to produce a Hadoop RPM with

Re: apache binary distributions

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Seems like for the past two weeks I only have weekends to respond :-( Apologies for the delay on this thread. On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: 1) The concept of a brand

Re: apache binary distributions

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: ...is Apache Brand meant to protect *any* possible

Re: apache binary distributions

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote: Hi all, some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point with regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary distribution of a source code release has to be handled like a

Re: Reform of Incubator {was; [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the Apache Incubator)

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: The proposed need to announce release votes on the IPMC list is how things were when the incubator was created. The need for IPMC to control the process is another case of the IPMC over-reaching itself and in so

Re: Reform of Incubator {was; [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the Apache Incubator)

Empower the Mentors to run the podlings, teach the newcomers and bring it to TLP. As a mentor of podlings, I dislike the above idea. Mentors get busy, they miss things, sometimes big things. Sometimes things that are obvious to an outsider are missed by mentors who don't catch it. I've

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: The question of diversity in this case is not are we enough men/women/whatever, the question here is is there a single corporate entity with a

Re: [NOTICE] Yetus TLP proposal

Please consider using commits@ - that's a well known design pattern that is used pervasively. If you need notifications@ in addition, that's okay too, but there are lots of things that assume commits@ --David On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote: On Thu, Jul

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: As long as there's a human being in the loop reviewing what's

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

Crucible [1] as another tool for code reviews. Is that a viable option? Has anyone on the list had any experience using it? -C [1] https://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible/overview/ On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:56 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Till Westmann

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:56 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: We've explored gerrit 2-3 times in the past 24 months. We have seen several projects request it over the years. As I've mentioned elsewhere

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

(discussed in dev@asterixdb.i.a.o and agreed upon by the PPMC within 24-48 hours) 2. Work with ASF infra (David Nalley is the VP of infra, so you have his attention here) to see if they are willing to run a Gerrit instance. It’s my understanding David, that the AsterixDB folks have a few

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Folks, Can someone clarify in simple terms what the issue is here? There's a few issues Chris: 1. Contributions are being submitted, discussed, and accepted externally. No record of the

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon ima...@uci.edu wrote: This is pretty far from what the norm is, and is being proposed by a podling, so I'd expect some skepticism. Other podlings, have proposed similar workflows (albeit with extra problems.) and were not allowed to retain that

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Till Westmann ti...@apache.org wrote: On 14 Jul 2015, at 15:31, David Nalley wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon ima...@uci.edu wrote: We use Gerrit as a tool to do code reviews and to organize the commits, as well as to facilitate easy

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Ian Maxon ima...@uci.edu wrote: This is a severe problem and needs to be rectified promptly. How are commits migrating from the external repository to the ASF repository? We typically end up missing provenance information that is important in blind mirroring of

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: +1 (to this and Jochen's response) Roman was explicit in his question about clearly identifiable non-release artifacts available to the general public. We can debate words on a page forever, or

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Le 24/06/15 09:19, Rob Vesse a écrit : Personally I think the policy should be clarified such that nightly builds MUST only live on ASF infrastructure Non sense. Nightly built can stay wherever is suitable. It's not

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote: Am 23.06.2015 07:16, schrieb Marvin Humphrey: [...] How am I supposed to invite all the downstream developers of the world to start integrating with my awesome feature FOO before it gets formally released when our

Re: Robot vs. personal KEYS for signing releases

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Cédric Champeau cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote: We are not using the Apache CI servers for that but our own CI server. IMHO you should make a difference between building and checking. Building should be automated as much as possible. Checking the release is a

Re: June report prep

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Ted can you give some concrete examples, because I see some good feedback along with folks attempting to address the feedback. Processes updated or re-iterated, etc... I haven't seen any comments like stop the presses till...

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Daniel Dekany ddek...@freemail.hu wrote: Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 5:29:40 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: As soon as it can be done. The question is, why would you want to wait? I thought, maybe, after being voted in, but before actual incubation starts, the legal

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a blog at blogs.a.o --David On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Hi! can someone please remind me what's the policy for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a blogging platform?

Re: JavaX

The one thing I require is that I retain the right to do the same thing - publish and talk about the language by myself, call my products JavaX and so on. Generally speaking, we wouldn't permit this. There have been exceptions in the past, but generally if JavaX becomes a project at the

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] gstack donation to Apache CloudStack

Looks sane to me, +1 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:03 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Apache CloudStack is receiving code for a Google GCE interface to the CloudStack API. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-gstack.html Please vote to approve this contribution. Lazy

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] ec2stack donated to Apache CloudStack

Looks sane to me, +1 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:03 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Apache CloudStack is receiving code for an EC2 interface to the CloudStack API. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.html Please vote to approve this contribution. Lazy consensus

Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel: The other person is Dan Norris. Dan is a paid contractor, but talked with me before

Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel: * Acquia: Jake Farrell Someone also correct me in that I don’t think Jake is a paid infra

Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: Initial sketch placed on the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhimsyProposal Anyone who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly. No urgency or timeframe in mind (other than preferably starting

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Atlas for Data Governance on Hadoop

I really hope we aren't setting the precedent that we can't look at source code prior to bringing in a project to the incubator. Is there a reason the repo remains private on Github? In particular, you have what appears to be a relatively diverse set of initial committers, but we can't look at who

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Have any of the podling mentors help to verify the RC? I could not tell from the result VOTE link No - with ApacheCon coming up, and almost all of the mentors traveling, I don't think there's been any vote from any

Re: ASFIncubator now managed via TweetDeck

The above makes a really nice, security-conscious scheme that I would love to champion among various PMCs and suggest that we document it as part of our social media guidelines. The only open question in my mind is who (and by extension what email address) should the master ASFxxx account

Re: ICLA/CCLA/SGA guidelines for GitHub or multi-entity projects was: [Groovy] Next steps...

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: In contrast, from a legal standpoint, a signed Software Grant doesn't change much when the codebase is already under the ALv2. (Quite

Re: [Groovy] Next steps...

it's not like we are limited to having just a few moderators. Nothing wrong with mentors and initial committers both being on the list of mods. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: I usually start with mentor moderation and try to transition quickly to

Re: CCLA's and SGA's

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:04 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: All, Just wanted to confirm with others. If a company is donating a new project to the ASF, a CCLA (or multiple ICLAs) are required to allow contributors from that project to continue on in Apache, as well as an SGA

Re: What is The Apache Way?

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:37 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: My assumption was that 'setting binding policy on projects' was something specifically excluded from my level of authority, as an officer derived

Re: What is The Apache Way?

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: Well, David, I'm afraid you are the authoritative source on the policy you use as an example. :) Well - I suppose I did open myself up for that. If it's not documented and that's a problem then

Re: What is The Apache Way?

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: I think a better analogy would be US Culture. Yes it is as nebulous as it gets, but the fact that US Constitution exists as a written document

Re: What is The Apache Way?

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: The temperature of this might be reduced by replacing, 'no one knows what the Apache Way is' with 'a lot of us have trouble translate it into practical decisions in a repeatable fashion.' Or not. As reported here,

Re: What is The Apache Way?

Members should look to the board to enforce policy, not define it (Though Directors are members and will be involved with the definition) This disagrees with much that the Foundation has published. In example: The membership of the ASF elects the 9 member board to run the foundation and to

Re: Git write access for podlings

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes st...@apache.org wrote: Git allows you to commit as whoever you want - e.g. like in SMTP email, the headers are decided by the sender. SVN on the other hand will show the authenticated user in the commit log. So - speaking as a former

Re: Git write access for podlings

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: On 02/01/15 16:40, David Nalley wrote: On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes st...@apache.org wrote: Git allows you to commit as whoever you want - e.g. like in SMTP email, the headers are decided

Re: Git write access for podlings

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Hi, So something Jan and I ran into on the infra list, does anyone know definitively what the access rights given to a podling's git repo are, if they request one (instead of a svn directory)? If nothing else we

Re: Git write access for podlings

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:40 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: On Wed Dec 31 2014 at 2:24:36 PM David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:59 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Hi, So something Jan and I ran into on the infra list, does anyone

Re: Votes for git repos - commit id vs tag

I recently found this confusing with the first parquet-format release. I thought that both commit id and tag were optional, given that the actual release candidate is a signed tarball (actually, the necessary source code to build the project [1]). Commit id is not optional. Tag is. The

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote: On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: Hello Jake, When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving all of our infrastructure over to The Apache

Re: dashboarding incubator

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote: Hi, one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1], and I think could be useful. See for instance the

Re: IP clearance clarification: copyright notices

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, In the vote thread about [1] a question came up about the following clause, from our IP clearance form: Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been updated to reflect the new ASF

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] Sling Sightly and XSS modules

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi Incubator PMC members, Apache Sling has received the donation of a new Sightly templating module and accompanying XSS module. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-sightly-xss.html for

Re: Committer Voting and Vetos

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person can block the adding of a candidate. Do any projects use some form of majority

Re: [PROPOSAL] Grill as new Incubator project

currently employed by SoftwareAG. Raghavendra Singh from InMobi has built the QA automation for Grill. What kind of QA environment does Drill/Lens have currently? How much do you expect to need going forward? --David - To

Re: [PROPOSAL] Silk as new Incubator project

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: I would like to propose Silk as an Apache Incubator project. The new proposal is added to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SilkProposal and is duplicated below. Hi Cos: Are there any other resources that Ignite will

Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

* Do you have any third party dependencies in the Taverna core that have incompatible licenses (like GPL)? Unfortunately we do have a few of those, yes - the fact that we have to move away from those was one of the things that we discussed a lot in the Taverna community. Can you make sure

Re: Jenkins Account

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe someone with the right karma [1] can run modify_appgroups.pl hudson-jobadmin --add=salyh so that i am able to admin jenkins for johnzon (was fleece) [1]

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:31 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Ted, Andrew, and sebb, FOAF files were one of first thing I checked, but I don't have a FOAF file, yet I (ptgoetz) am still listed as a member of Storm on p.a.o. I can confirm that some of the new members have

Re: Uploading a release

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Julian Hyde julianh...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 4, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote: Publishing the contents at [1] can be done by following the steps detailed out at

  1   2   >