Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 3 Jun 2011, at 23:01, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
If
TDF decides at a later point to change to a compatible license, then this
would open up additional ways in which we could collaborate, and we would
welcome that as well.
It's not
I popped into the LO IRC channel a few times
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 4 Jun 2011, at 00:39, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 19:23, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/06/2011 10:30, eric b wrote:
Hi,
For the record, I added the Education Project idea on the wiki page
(http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal).
The idea we defend since several years, is to work with High Schools and
Universities, train students, detect potential good ideas,
On 02/06/2011 11:39, Florian Effenberger wrote:
I hope you don't mind if I jump in to the discussion.
Thank you for doing so. Speaking as someone outside all the involved
communities I'm pleased to hear your voice. I'm not equipped to answer
your questions, I'll leave that to people who know
On 02/06/2011 14:12, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 2 June 2011 14:04, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we add ourselfs as commiters?
If you would like to contribute here (possibly instead of, or in
addition, to your work at TDF), then yes! Please add yourself into the
proposal on the wiki.
On 02/06/2011 14:21, Simon Brouwer wrote:
Op 2-6-2011 15:04, Greg Stein schreef:
On Jun 2, 2011 4:32 AM, Alexandro Coloradoj...@openoffice.org wrote:
...
There is currently a bit rearagement movement toward figuring things
out in
TDF OOo previously to the OOo annoucement, which happened last
On 02/06/2011 13:40, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Ross,
On 2011-06-02 at 12:09 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Instead I would like to
understand if this technical objective of breaking OOo code into
reusable libraries that the various forks can collaborate on, is part of
the TDF mission.
I am one
On 02/06/2011 16:22, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
...
I do have a question though. To me it's unclear whether the Openoffice
project has any real development ressources. I see so far one developer and
Rob, who I know to be a distinguished
On 02/06/2011 21:16, dsh wrote:
Of course I now some more magic than just re-indent a codebase... that
would be to easy to spot wouldn't it ;)
Indeed, I inadvertently found what I believe to be the best approach.
Commit an svn:props change to a template that is an svn:external in 30+
of ASF
On 02/06/2011 21:26, Christian Lippka wrote:
Hello,
The Open Office Proposal Wiki currently lists a subversion repository as
a required resource.
We already had subversion for some time as the repository for the main
code and it didn't
work well for a project this size. I do not like to start
Thanks for this exciting proposal. I have a few questions.
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why
only two for such a large codebase?
It's going to be very hard for two committers to manage and maintain
this code.
The proposal states Both Oracle and ASF agree
On 01/06/2011 17:28, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a statement that Oracle will assist in the transition and migration from
OpenOffice.org., I am probably reading too much into it, but why is there not a
statement that Oracle intend
On 01/06/2011 17:29, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:21, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for this exciting proposal. I have a few questions.
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why only
two for such a large codebase?
Hopefully more
On 01/06/2011 17:33, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 12:13:09 PM:
Community
OpenOffice.org. seeks to further encourage developer and user
communities
during incubation, beyond the existing developers currently working on
the
On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
...
And is it generally held to be a criterion
for a podling to graduate or even initiate, that it first persuade all
Linux distros to include it
We don't care where it is
On 01/06/2011 19:24, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote on 06/01/2011 12:21:23 PM:
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why
only two for such a large codebase?
We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list,
On 01/06/2011 22:26, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 17:20, Benson Marguliesbimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.comwrote on
[cc'ing Italo and Louis hopefully they have joined the incubator list
already, but just in case]
On 02/06/2011 01:01, Jim Jagielski wrote:
More info re TDF and LOo
- Forwarded message from Italo
Vignoliitalo.vign...@documentfoundation.org -
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:16:53 +0200
On 24/05/2011 10:04, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Nigel!!!
1) due my experience, I'd reply NO. The existing OGNL[1] project
(ASL2.0 released with a long history) just joined the Incubator and
the only rename it had was to Apache Commons OGNL[2]
Although one needs to ensure that the name is not an
With my +1 we have a count of:
20 +1's (at least 8 of which are binding, I've not actually cross
checked all the names)
Thanks for your support and comments. I'll get on with bringing Airavata
into the incubator.
Ross
On 02/05/2011 22:32, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to call a vote
to actively explore this.
As a side note - the W3C is looking for implementations of the WS-RA specs,
which include Eventing... Airavata might be interested in participating in
that. [1]
Ditto
Ross
--Glen
[1] http://www.w3.org/News/Public/pnews-20110502
On 5/2/11 5:32 PM, Ross
I would like to call a vote to accept Airavata for entry into the Apache
Incubator. The proposal thread can be found at [1] and the proposal text
is at [2]
[ ] +1 Accept Airavata into the incubator
[ ] -1 Do NOT accept Airavata into the incubator because...
Thanks,
Ross
[1]
On 29/04/2011 05:02, Milinda Pathirage wrote:
+1 for the proposal. I would like to contribute to this project.
Yay! That's what we like to hear. We look forward to working with you.
Ross
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator.
The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this
mail. For those in a hurry here's a quick summary:
Airavata is a software toolkit currently used to build science
gateways
.
Sent from my mobile device.
Good stuff!
Cheers,
Chris
On Apr 23, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator.
The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this
mail. For those in a hurry here's
On 28 Apr 2011, at 20:45, Sagara Gunathunga sag...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Ross,
+1 and I would like to contribute for this project.
Excellent. We look forward to working with you.
Ross
Thanks !
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I would like
are in the incubator.
Sent from my mobile device.
Good stuff!
Cheers,
Chris
On Apr 23, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator.
The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this
mail. For those in a hurry here's
(at the risk of package-naming
challenges).
Cool stuff - I remember Eran talking about this a couple of years back.
Thanks,
--Glen
On 4/23/11 5:53 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator.
The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end
and organizations that
are familiar with the development of open source. We expect that the
amount of volunteer work will increase, and more developers will come
on board.
== Champion ==
Ross Gardler, Apache Software Foundation
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Ross Gardler, Member, Apache Software
On 25/02/2011 00:08, Ate Douma wrote:
[+1] +1 Accept Rave into the incubator
+1 Binding
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 24/02/2011 23:11, Troy Howard wrote:
In my opinion, a reasonable compromise would be to set it as a project
goal to reduce corporate dependency on the committers list.
I'm really confused where this is coming from. The goal of incubation is
to generate sufficient diversity in contributions
On 23/02/2011 19:49, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
Corporation, the
Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the SURFnet SURFConext
Portal project,
OSS Watch, and several
Have our rules about branding podlings changed?
More specifically, is the announcement below in keeping with those rules?
Ross
Original Message
Subject: Apache Libcloud 0.4.2 Released!
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:54:10 -0600
From: Jerry Chen je...@apache.org
To:
On 19/01/2011 01:10, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
Have our rules about branding podlings changed?
More specifically, is the announcement below in keeping with those rules?
Ross
Original Message
Subject:
I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side.
Thanks for the help on the ASF side.
Sent from my mobile device.
On 3 Dec 2010, at 10:15, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
...I hope
On 3 Dec 2010, at 13:38, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side.
Thanks for the help on the ASF side.
Where are we on ICLAs and user ID preferences?
I
+1 from me, of course
On 17/11/2010 13:10, Ross Gardler wrote:
Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal
can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is
copied below.
[ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject
The result of this vote is:
10 binding +1
7 non-binding +1
Full summary of the votes are below.
I'll start getting things set up - thanks for you support folks.
Votes cast:
Binding +1s
===
Alan Cabrera
Isabel Drost
Ant Elder
Ross Gardler
Daniel Kulp
Benson Margulies
Marcel
On 24/11/2010 00:45, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
FYI Ross, I also +1'ed this.
Appologies. I must have missed that. Thanks for your vote and support,
it's now recorded in the result thread.
Ross
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 23, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
The result of this vote
: Dave Reynolds, Ian Dickinson, Chris Dollin, Andy
Seaborne
* Talis Systems Ltd: Paolo Castagna
* University of Bristol: Damian Steer
* TopQuadrant Inc: Jeremy Carroll
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Ross Gardler (rgardler .at. apache.org
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz
Re wookie
I've notified the community and will report myself if necessary
Sent from my mobile device.
On 16 Nov 2010, at 02:17, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
That means we're still missing DeltaCloud (promised for tomorrow), Droids,
HISE, Stonehenge, VCL, and Wookie.
---
In the case of Wookie mentors did not communicate the need for a report until
yesterday and the lead developers are currently in the middle of a conference.
Of course they should have spotted announcements here, but their still learning
what to look for and what filters to have.
I'll do a
All,
Resolving IP issues are a part of the incubation process not the acceptance
process
It is not necessary to delay entry into the incubator because some o these
issues need to be satisfactorily resolved. The Jena developers are aware of
this and have undertaken to do what is required in
On 12/11/2010 09:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to accept
Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the proposal is
copied here for your convenience and can be found
==
=== Champion ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz (bdelacretaz AT apache DOT org)
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Ted Dunning (tdunning AT apache DOT org)
* Ross Gardler (rgardler AT apache DOT org)
* Upayavira (upayavira AT apache DOT org)
* Isabel Drost (isabel AT apache DOT org)
=== Sponsoring Entity
As champion for Jena I agree in principle. I can't speak for the Jena team if
course, but representatives are tracking this list and have started discussing
in their project list.
I will be making the formal Jena proposal here very soon (just as soon as I'm
not limited to the iPhone) - its in
For me this proposal means we should be aware of possibilities. There is no
intention of forcing collaboration on incubating projects. Each project should
continue to work on it's own graduation.
However there will probably be code that fan be shared. The sharif of
appropriate code can only
Nov 2010, at 18:15, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I sense an iPhone at work here.
Would that be Omar Sharif?
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
For me this proposal means we should be aware of possibilities. There is no
intention
* University of Bristol: Damian Steer
* Top``Quadrant Inc: Jeremy Carroll
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Ross Gardler (rgardler .at. apache.org
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacretaz .at. apache.org
* Leo Simons leosimons .at. apache.org
=== Sponsoring Entity
: Paolo Castagna
* University of Bristol: Damian Steer
* Top``Quadrant Inc: Jeremy Carroll
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Ross Gardler (rgardler .at. apache.org
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacretaz .at. apache.org
* Leo Simons leosimons .at. apache.org
* Top``Quadrant Inc: Jeremy Carroll
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Ross Gardler (rgardler .at. apache.org
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacretaz .at. apache.org
* Leo Simons leosimons .at. apache.org
=== Sponsoring Entity ===
Incubator PMC
It is correct that Jena will be submitting a proposal to the Incubator. I have
the proposal now and I'm just waiting for their go-ahead to submit it. I guess
it being on their public lists indicates that will come any day now.
Sent from my mobile device.
On 3 Nov 2010, at 06:31, Bertrand
On 28/10/2010 12:48, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FOOproposal - as you can imagine,
FOO is just a temp name ;-)
We're still looking for two additional mentors.
I'm in, although I'm likely to limit myself to release reviews and such
oversight, feel free
The problem with pretty much all widgets provided by third parties is they
track users and thus are not suitable for apache.org servers (not sure if that
is policy or my preference).
An alternative is to hack up our own widgets, perhaps using Wookie
(incubating).
There is a twitter widget in
On 23/08/2010 10:08, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Was there a particular reason why the three podlings were selected
(thrift, sis, and esme).
They all have Joe as a mentor and it is Joe who wants to drive this
experiment. He feels that this will benefit those particular projects.
Ross
D.
On
Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice about a legal
situation that I'm not 100% sure about, I'm pretty sure it's a simple
case so I'm asking the IPMC rather than legal-discuss@
In short:
- there is a few files that are part of an existing FOAF+SSL
certification project
On 18/08/2010 14:25, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 08/17/2010 07:48 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17/08/2010 17:35, Carl Trieloff wrote:
To this question, (what will make this model succeed or fail) I find
myself not coming
to defensible answers... I would love to see thoughts of others
On 17 Aug 2010, at 03:29, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I think that it is a very interesting proposal, that could work very
well in
specific circumstances, and I'd be willing to see it tried as an
experiment,
if the Board buys
On 17 Aug 2010, at 03:31, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 10:00:40 PM
Subject: RE: Radical revamp (was: an experiment)
Greg Stein wrote:
Using
On 17 Aug 2010, at 03:53, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It's optimized for success while making mentors potentially responsible for
failure (iow a project with crappy mentors will fail no matter how much they
grok apache). Still have doubts about escalating the graduation
I'm really worried about the growing meme that RAT is solving the IP management
problem.
It is not a solution, it is merely a tool that is useful for a very specific
use case.
All it does is do a pattern match for an Apache licence header in a bunch of
files. It's really useful for checking
Unlike the observer role. It's very close to the current signing off of board
reports by mentors but forces them to do a little more than put there name to a
piece of electronic paper.
Personally I imagined my binding vote, as a mentor, to indicate a) the project
debs want this tongi ahead
Sorry damned iPhone autocorrect. First word should be I like
Sent from my mobile device.
On 17 Aug 2010, at 09:38, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Unlike the observer role. It's very close to the current signing off of board
reports by mentors but forces them to do a little more than
On 17/08/2010 05:32, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
I've already decided that I'm going to have to recruit a number of key
mentors to help me protect the project during incubation.
Historically, I think there are two classes
On 17/08/2010 10:15, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Ross, while I understand the All it does part I don't get the
dangerous part.
There have been a number of people who have stated things like
(paraphrasing) IP management issues have largely gone away now we have
RAT. I'm sure the statements are not
On 17/08/2010 10:45, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-08-17, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Ross, while I understand the All it does part I don't get the
dangerous part.
It becomes dangerous if people start to believe it did more than scan
for licenses.
More specifically scan for *only* Apache
On 17/08/2010 13:21, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.orggeneral@incubator.apache.org
Cc: general@incubator.apache.orggeneral@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 4:14:02 AM
Subject: Re: Radical revamp
On 17/08/2010 17:35, Carl Trieloff wrote:
To this question, (what will make this model succeed or fail) I find
myself not coming
to defensible answers... I would love to see thoughts of others on this
question.
The thread implies it comes down to the 3+ members on the project.
It's not that
On 17/08/2010 17:45, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I do
question the idea that just having 3 Members on the project and leaving them
to their own devices will actually work well for the majority of our podlings.
I don't think anyone is claiming it is right for the *majority* of
podlings. Just *some*
Gavin,
Thank you for all your help on Wookie to date. The kinds of
contributions you have made (helping ensure that licence headers etc.
are clear) are exactly the kind of contributions that are needed.
You leave a legacy that will ensure that our release (when it comes
about) will be more
On 17/08/2010 02:05, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 16:47, Noel J. Bergmann...@devtech.com wrote:
...
Your head is in the sand. The Incubator is a broken process. Everybody
hates it. Everybody wants to get out of it. Subversion was fortunate
in that we had enough support to bully
On 17/08/2010 03:00, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I think that it is a very interesting proposal, that could work very well in
specific circumstances, and I'd be willing to see it tried as an experiment,
if the Board buys into it. Do we have any such projects pending or already
in the Incubator?
On 10/08/2010 12:48, ant elder wrote:
How about keeping it here at the Incubator? It could be a showcase
project that demonstrates how to do things like releases, as well as
an eat your own dog food type place to help avoid any unnecessarily
burdensome IPMC processes and procedures ;)
I
Thanks for the responses. I'm moving forwards with this now.
Ross
On 27/07/2010 11:11, Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm currently working with the community behind a large and established
codebase that wants to enter the ASF Incubator. It is likely to be a
while before we have the legal stuff sorted
I'm currently working with the community behind a large and established
codebase that wants to enter the ASF Incubator. It is likely to be a
while before we have the legal stuff sorted out but all indications are
that it will be sorted.
I do, however, have a few questions from the team that
On 29/05/2010 13:55, Tim Williams wrote:
I wonder why the proposal template doesn't explicitly ask the
proposers about their belief in the Apache Way?
When I'm reviewing proposals I am looking for this in the proposal as a
whole. There are plenty of places where this shows through, e.g:
On 18/01/2010 20:17, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
[X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator
Ross
-
To
Count me in as a mentor for this excellent proposal.
Ross
On 04/01/2010 19:46, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Hi general@,
On behalf of the OODT community, I'd like to bring the following
proposal for discussion within the Incubator. I've talked with Chris
and Dave about bringing this project to
or similar.
Ross
Thanks!
S
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands
* Niclas Hedhman
* Ross Gardler
* Karl Pauls
* Reinhard Pötz
Sponsor:
* Apache Incubator
--
Reto Bachmann-Gmür
trialox.org
Tel: +41445005015
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
2009/11/20 Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
reto.bachm...@trialox.org wrote:
...The full proposal can be found on the wiki at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal
...
And we are looking for mentors!
I've added
2009/11/18 Sebastian Wagner seba.wag...@gmail.com:
we would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator.
Full Proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
Calling a vote is premature. Therefore my vote is -1.
Your proposal does not yet have a confirmed
2009/11/10 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
3) Increase the amount of mentoring: The lack of mentor time and
better (not necessarily more) supporting documentation gives
unnecessary administrational and procedural headaches (failed release
votes, etc.) to many podlings.
Without more
examples/how-tos, noted this in comments). This wasn't a big
job; most of the code wasn't actually called by the current codebase
and could be safely removed without being replaced.
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
Sorry to waste your time...
I just went to remove this committer and realised they are not named
as an initial committer after all. So no changes needed to the
proposal.
Ross
2009/9/8 Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org:
During the due dilligence process for Wookie one of the named initial
Where is the process for voting a new podling committer documented?
More specifically what is the IPMC notification process?
Thanks
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
seek more contributors?
c) does the community know what it knows about the ASF (i.e. will it
ask in unusual circumstances)?
d) have the mentors been active in their mentoring and recommend graduation?
If yes to all these points then we should graduate the project.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch
on the graduation of a
podling on grounds of diversity of code commits needs to back it up
with documented evidence that either a) the committers are not
listening to the community or b) there is no active oversight from
those with voting rights.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open
here, I've not
personally looked into the health of the community. I trust the
mentors)
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
2009/8/3 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
[x] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because...
I'm not seeing sufficient diversity of active committers [1] and not
too many people seem to be contributing patches [2]. My suggestion
would be for Pivot to spend some more time
for the IPMC not the membership. I've
moved this part of the discussion there.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
search engines in the UK and US (please provide other links
too if you have them to hand).
I guess the minimum check would be the US, with suggested checks in
other territories.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
On Jul 20, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
In the wookie proposal I recommended that the consortium agreement for
the donating project be examined to ensure that none of the other
institutions can lay claim to any IP in the code.
I now have a copy of the consortium agreement and can
2009/7/22 William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
...
The one thing that might be concerning is that most people will use a
query such as;
http://www.google.com/search?q=wookie+download
and be lost in the approx 135k
2009/7/21 Andrew Savory s...@andrewsavory.com:
Hi,
2009/7/20 Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org:
In my opinion this is sufficient for the ASF to accept this
contribution (once (i)CLAs are in place). Speak up if you think
differently.
Looks good. You might want to cc the wookie-dev list, so
think
differently.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
2009/7/19 Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au:
-Original Message-
From: ross.gard...@googlemail.com [mailto:ross.gard...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Ross Gardler
Sent: Saturday, 18 July 2009 12:26 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Wookie - a W3C widget
2009/7/14 Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org:
I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache
Wookie, a W3C widget engine with Google Wave extension
The full proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal
I'm pleased to say that the IPMC has voted
activities. Or perhaps the
proposal should identify a lead mentor whose responsibility is to
ensure nothing slips through the cracks.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=7day=17year=2009hour=12min=0sec=0p1=136
Ross
--
Ross Gardler
OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
601 - 700 of 757 matches
Mail list logo
