On 23 February 2012 15:50, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
this release.
== Major changes since RC-2
+ Distribution has it's own content for
On 23 February 2012 18:58, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Feb 23, 2012, at 11:32 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23 February 2012 15:50, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now
On 23 February 2012 20:11, Damian Steer pl...@mac.com wrote:
On 23 Feb 2012, at 18:32, sebb wrote:
== Proposed dist/ area:
The following will be added to the existing distribution area:
http://people.apache.org/~andy/dist-jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating-RC-4/
Where is the source
On 23 February 2012 19:42, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Sebb,
On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:13 PM, sebb wrote:
On the contrary, they are plenty useful to Maven. They are used by its
assembly plugin to allow for transitive dependencies and the ability
On 23 February 2012 20:44, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/02/12 18:32, sebb wrote:
Hi sebb,
Thanks for the review,
== Staging repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-001/
This contains zip and tar.gz binary and source archives, which
On 23 February 2012 21:21, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Sebb,
On Feb 23, 2012, at 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
Yep, I'm not an expert, but we push tar.gz and .zip distributions in OODT,
and
then we have specialized assembly.xml descriptors in downstream OODT
On 21 February 2012 09:31, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
yesterday I tried to update the incubator web site to reflect the renaming
of the deft project to AWF. To some extent, it was successful :
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ points to AWF
However, the main
I think the site source files and build.xml are now in good shape.
The Ant build file can recreate the full output directory tree in any
required directory:
ant [-Ddocs.dest=target-dir]
[default is site-publish]
The source tree can also be overridden by using a command of the form:
ant
On 21 February 2012 03:15, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 February 2012 10:12, franci...@apache.org wrote:
Author: francisdb
Date: Thu Feb 16 10:12:31 2012
New Revision: 1244915
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1244915view=rev
Log:
added redirect for empire-db
Modified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13212303#comment-13212303
]
Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-120:
altrmi files dropped as per INCUBATOR-118
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb resolved INCUBATOR-118.
Resolution: Fixed
Removed altrmi files
Are the altrmi files still needed? If so
On 15 February 2012 15:44, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The first thing to do is to decide if the following directory tree can
be junked:
site-publish/projects/altrmi/
I suspect it can, as altrmi has moved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb resolved INCUBATOR-120.
Resolution: Fixed
Are the following files still needed in site-publish
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13212311#comment-13212311
]
Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-120:
site-publish\projects\geronimo-proposal.html does have
On 20 February 2012 13:54, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes
the license header issue and adds rat-plugin.
Signing KEYS:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb resolved INCUBATOR-119.
Resolution: Fixed
Caused by the fixEOL step; fixed by adding encoding=UTF-8
site
On 15 February 2012 13:15, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:59 AM
Subject: Re: svn
On 16 February 2012 10:12, franci...@apache.org wrote:
Author: francisdb
Date: Thu Feb 16 10:12:31 2012
New Revision: 1244915
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1244915view=rev
Log:
added redirect for empire-db
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/.htaccess
That won't
On 21 February 2012 02:31, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 February 2012 15:44, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The first thing to do is to decide if the following directory tree can
be junked:
site-publish
On 20 February 2012 16:52, danhayw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danhaywood
Date: Mon Feb 20 16:52:18 2012
New Revision: 1291363
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291363view=rev
Log:
Updating Isis project summary after 0.2.0-incubating release
Modified:
On 20 February 2012 13:07, elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: elecharny
Date: Mon Feb 20 13:07:13 2012
New Revision: 1291238
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291238view=rev
Log:
Updated the site to reflect the deft-awf renaming
Added:
: Incubator
Issue Type: Bug
Components: site
Environment: WinXP/SP3
Apache Ant(TM) version 1.8.2 compiled on December 20 2010
Reporter: Sebb
Priority: Minor
If I delete the file site-publish/ip-clearance/lucene-kuromoji.html and rebuild
the site
On 15 February 2012 02:18, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: svn
: site
Reporter: Sebb
Priority: Blocker
[This is listed as a blocker because it's not possible to move to svnpubsub/CMS
until resolved.]
The following files in site-publish have no sources in site-author:
The entire tree under:
site-publish/projects/altrmi/
Looks like
On 15 February 2012 07:42, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Roman,
we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you
point me to some written docs?
AFAIK, it would be
On 14 February 2012 16:21, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
So I realize that I don't have enough time myself
to convert the incubator site's content to markdown
even tho there are scripts to automate that process.
Instead let me offer a different idea- to keep the
existing build
to the CMS- a simple approach
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple approach
On 14 February 2012 16:21, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
On 14 February 2012 18:09, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: migrating the main site to the CMS
On 14 February 2012 22:47, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: sebb seb...@gmail.com; general@incubator.apache.org
general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:47 PM
Subject: Re
On 14 February 2012 22:19, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: joes
Date: Tue Feb 14 22:19:04 2012
New Revision: 1244240
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1244240view=rev
Log:
support CMS builds. All that's left to do is to rename
site-author/ content/ and to ensure all the content in
On 15 February 2012 01:30, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The documentation is in the caller script sebb.
Yes, but how can one find the calling script from the build script?
BTW, if the script is run at the moment, it will cause problems.
Will fix
the ant invocation
On 15 February 2012 01:49, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator
On 15 February 2012 01:55, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Incubator PMC members,
We'd like to ask your approval to release the Hama RC4 as Apache Hama
0.4.0-incubating. This RC4 has passed the Hama PMC vote as follows (*,
** marks an PMC, IPMC vote) :
+1 Thomas Jungblut *
On 10 February 2012 19:27, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
1.4.1-incubating.
We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for
additional two.
*** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 ***
On 8 February 2012 13:03, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
this release.
== Overview
This will be the second incubator release for by Jena;
On 9 February 2012 16:32, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 17:10 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Ross,
Sorry, I didn't see a mail from Noel, but he's already the chair.
If this VOTE isn't
On 9 February 2012 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On 8 February 2012 10:41, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
AFAIK
On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
RAT report on the source distro looks good.
None of the artifacts (zip or jar files) seem to have the incubator
disclaimer notice.
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
AFAIK, this is a
As I read it, http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
only applies to files with no creative content.
AFAICT this is not the case here.
On 6 February 2012 15:03, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Perfect - thanks Ate
On 6 February 2012 14:54, Ate Douma
On 6 February 2012 15:29, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 6 February 2012 15:20, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
As I read it, http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
only applies to files with no creative content.
AFAICT this is not the case here.
Can you
On 6 February 2012 16:30, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
On 02/06/2012 03:30 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Doumaa...@douma.nu wrote:
On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6,
On 6 February 2012 19:38, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 13:18, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 6, 2012 5:26 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012 11:41 AM, sebb seb
On 4 February 2012 11:55, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
I've quickly collected a page of things to check before casting your vote for
a staged release.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Reviewing+a+Release
This was done from the back of my head,
On 1 February 2012 15:54, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:54:18PM +, Ross Gardler wrote:
My point is that when we help guide individuals who demonstrate a
willingness to contribute those individuals often grow in capacity.
There was a memorable
On 31 January 2012 11:07, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
Great, thanks. Using this method, I get a file layout similar to:
giraph-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
NOTICE (without appended text for dep1 and
AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 January 2012 11:07, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
Great, thanks. Using this method, I get a file layout similar to:
giraph-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
NOTICE
On 27 January 2012 18:37, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Guys,
So, the board passed the Gora TLP resolution and now I'm in the process of
helping
migrate the Gora project to its TLP status. I've created an issue here:
On 28 January 2012 20:53, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
This vote passes with the required 3 +1's from Sebb, Ant, and Stefan. Thank
you guys for taking the time to review and approve this release, ~Prescott
Date:
I did not vote +1.
I did not vote at all.
Fri, 27 Jan 2012
On 23 January 2012 06:20, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is ready for release.
This is very similar to our release at the end of November, however we have
used
generics where appropriate to give it a better feel for .Net developers.
SVN Tag:
On 23 January 2012 15:17, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being
versioned as 0.7-incubating.
We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 3
binding IPMC +1 votes during the
Entries in podling bloodhound not in incubator group: gmj,hwright
Entries in podling giraph not in incubator group: ssc
Entries in podling gora not in incubator group: ferdy
Command to update incubator group:
modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=ferdy,gmj,hwright,ssc
Please ensure when adding
On 17 January 2012 01:06, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
snip/
We may also have semantic gaps. Leo's [RT] may be presuming that a
podling's board report[sic] is merely a bureaucratic requirement.
snip/
Hmm :-)
On 12 January 2012 06:09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
A number of substantive issues came up during the past month.
First, and although it was raised on the private list and therefore details
won't be part of the public report, we advise the Board that there is
substantial
On 11 January 2012 18:44, Patrick Hunt phu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph
On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
better/easier?
I checkout the SVN tag
On 12 January 2012 12:35, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26:49PM +, sebb wrote:
On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
How is this most easily accomplished
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
(one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
other projects. Typically you
On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
It's a bit odd to me that there are two source
On 10 January 2012 10:13, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related matter, how is the rename being handled for the various
incubator data files, web-pages, mailing lists etc.?
We're still working
On 10 January 2012 06:09, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
Documents are available at:
On 9 January 2012 23:52, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359
*** Please download, test and
On 9 January 2012 04:41, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
This has been the subject of prior conversations, but I'm opening a
thread in some hope of reaching a definitive resolution.
Some of our
-
From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:06 AM
On 9 January 2012 19:40, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Documents are available at:
On 10 January 2012 02:29, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
[to: general@, cc: callback-dev@]
As discussed during the Callback proposal phase [1], the podling
community wasn't too certain about the Callback name and thus after
some discussion they recently voted [2] on
On 8 January 2012 21:04, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Dear IPMC, dear Community!
The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation
of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE
on graduating as a TLP.
The podling is in the
On 6 January 2012 19:21, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
Agrees with the SVN tag, which is
On 3 January 2012 18:41, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear IPMC members,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release.
The artifacts are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc0/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN
On 4 January 2012 19:45, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 14:33, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Someone created
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/site/trunk/?p=1227271
before the devicemap-commits@ list was created. I expect no list
On 28 December 2011 19:15, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
This is the fifth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being
versioned as 0.6-incubating.
We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we have
received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes
On 20 December 2011 18:51, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC 8 for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator.
Please try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating
release. This is the
; there are a lot of incorrect NL
files around and it may be one of them.
2011/12/16 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han devin...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5
On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han devin...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
ODF Toolkit in Apache.
This release candidate fixes the following issues
On 13 December 2011 15:27, sebawag...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebawagner
Date: Tue Dec 13 15:27:36 2011
New Revision: 1213736
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213736view=rev
Log:
Update OpenMeetings committers account names
Modified:
On 13 December 2011 17:47, lut...@apache.org wrote:
Author: lutter
Date: Tue Dec 13 17:47:07 2011
New Revision: 1213805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213805view=rev
Log:
Redirect Deltacloud to its new post-graduation site
I assume you are going remove the
On 13 December 2011 23:29, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:23 -0800, David Lutterkort wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 19:19 +, sebb wrote:
On 13 December 2011 17:47, lut...@apache.org wrote:
Author: lutter
Date: Tue Dec 13 17:47:07 2011
New
On 9 December 2011 05:45, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Have we made any actionable plans for dealing with
the podling reports this month, or are we content
letting the board reject yet another rollup of all
the raw reports?
You are now :-) Thanks.
I would
On 8 December 2011 10:14, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote on Release ace version 0.8.1-incubator subprojects has been
running for 72h and we didn't see any more votes from IPMC members
other than the 4 votes we already have from the vote on the ace dev
list. Given that this
On 8 December 2011 10:39, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 10:14, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote on Release ace version 0.8.1-incubator subprojects has been
running for 72h and we didn't see any more votes from IPMC members
other than the 4 votes we already have
On 8 December 2011 14:30, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 10:39, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 10:14, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote on Release ace version 0.8.1-incubator
On 8 December 2011 15:28, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 14:30, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 10:39, sebb seb
On 8 December 2011 16:54, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:17 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 15:28, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 14:30, Karl Pauls karlpa
On 4 December 2011 20:18, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be the first incubator release for
Accumulo.
This release candidate fixes the minor issues found in rc8:
* Added the
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00939.html
RESULT:
On 2 December 2011 09:33, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have generated your list of jars from looking at
kafka-0.7.0-incubating.tar.gz, the binary distribution that has been
built as a
On 2 December 2011 10:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev
On 2 December 2011 10:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev
On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th).
That's Incubator Marvin, who requires podlings to provide an extra week's notice
The December report[1] says... reports are due here by the
On 2 December 2011 13:38, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th).
That's
On 2 December 2011 14:12, Billie J Rinaldi billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2011 7:11:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Cannot find KEYS file to verify the sigs.
It's here: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/accumulo/KEYS
Thanks, please include the link in future
On 1 December 2011 23:24, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
OK?
Wow, thanks for that effort. Please do.
Now done.
Had to make minor tweaks for readability.
If there are any complaints with my changes, please raise ASAP so they
can be fixed
On 1 December 2011 06:16, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I notice that the NOTICE has this incomplete statement:
This product includes the scala runtime and compiler
(www.scala-lang.org) developed by EPFL, which includes
the following license:
There is not any
On 1 December 2011 02:29, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Kafka community is hoping to get some feedback on the updated NOTICE
and LICENSE files for Kafka, before we post a new vote for it.
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/NOTICE
There are spurious === lines at
On 1 December 2011 21:58, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a quick look at some of these artifacts. I definitely see licenses
missing from the LICENSE file. For example:
paranamer-2.2.jar --
I've done a short trawl of the pages that relate to release voting.
There are two pages that I think need updating - please read on.
The Httpd release description [1] says:
For the ASF to release the candidate tarball/archive, at least three
project members must vote affirmatively for release,
On 30 November 2011 14:11, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
illuminating for some.
cheerio,
- Leo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons
On 28 November 2011 19:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/28/2011 1:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it
. Since cutting RCs is a significant
time investment, we'd appreciate if you could list all the concerns you
have once.
I do not hold back my concerns hand them out in piecemeal fashion. I
overlooked the DLL in earlier release candidate reviews; I made a mistake. :)
2. Sebb, if you have
On 28 November 2011 19:22, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 28, 2011 7:01 PM, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth
901 - 1000 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
