+1
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 5:04 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> I’m not quite sure what to do. If I don’t hear by tomorrow I’ll close this
> vote as passing.
>
>> On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:34 AM Justin Mclean
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
This speech policing is starting to get quite on my nerves. Especially when it
ignores the intent behind such things... 99% of the time the smiley is there to
say "Yeah, I know that sounds harsh, but it's a little joke". It is an attempt
to replicate in text what is natural in "real life"...
Antoine -
Thank you for your work getting the initial release done and patience here.
As Dave said, we have our 3 +1's.
thanks,
--larry
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 6:15 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:29 PM Craig Russell
> wrote:
> >...
>
> > No. Smiley face doesn't count.
> >
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:29 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>...
> No. Smiley face doesn't count.
>
Apparently you missed the point when Justin did that to me. Hmm?
Of course it doesn't count. Why don't you go police th VP Incubator, okay?
-g
Hi Greg,
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 1:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> Maybe I should say you're being an ass about the whole process. :-)
No. Smiley face doesn't count.
Stop.
Craig
>
> -g
Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org
You have your 3 +1 Votes!
We can discuss messaging on dev@tuweni
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 2:04 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> I’m not quite sure what to do. If I don’t hear by tomorrow I’ll close this
> vote as passing.
>
>> On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 27,
I’m not quite sure what to do. If I don’t hear by tomorrow I’ll close this vote
as passing.
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:34 AM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I see a lot of "oh no. a bad file". What is the takeaway from that? "The
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:34 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I see a lot of "oh no. a bad file". What is the takeaway from that? "The
> > IPMC thinks we should not release.”
>
> Has anyone voted -1? Nope. And even if they did a -1 vote is not a veto.
>
Great. Semantics. "But I didn't
Hi,
> I see a lot of "oh no. a bad file". What is the takeaway from that? "The
> IPMC thinks we should not release.”
Has anyone voted -1? Nope. And even if they did a -1 vote is not a veto.
> How about "make the release, and fix that next time” ?
The podlings previous release put up for IPMC
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:03 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Hi all,
> The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> Tuweni 0.8.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy and we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator
> PMC
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:35 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
>...
> This sort of language is not helpful. Nor do I think it is accurate. Can
> you please take more care with your words.
>
I feel it is accurate. And it is not directed at anybody. Only at this
process. It is descriptive, and my carefully
Hi,
> Insanity.
This sort of language is not helpful. Nor do I think it is accurate. Can you
please take more care with your words.
> Just let Tuweni make a release, already. Stuff like this will get fixed
> eventually.
No-one is stopping them from making a release.
Thanks,
Justin
Insanity.
Just let Tuweni make a release, already. Stuff like this will get fixed
eventually.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:46 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It may not be clear to you, but it was discussed in the earlier vote
> thread. See
>
Hi,
> It may not be clear to you, but it was discussed in the earlier vote thread.
> See
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b5fed22493e954937405cfd2553d06c00e5bee3b76be06b18b74862@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> for my noticing the jar still being present.
Noting its present and clearly
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 6:17 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Going only by past experiences in the incubator, my understanding is that a
>> graduation blocking issue is not something that necessarily blocks a
>> podling release.
>
> And I was not stating that, nor
It wasn't clear to me whether you were waiting for infra before issuing a
-1 - sorry to have read too much into that.
AFAIK - this is indeed still a first Apache release for Tuweni - not the
first attempt but I don't believe that 0.7.0 was successfully voted to
release.
The change of the release
Hi,
> Going only by past experiences in the incubator, my understanding is that a
> graduation blocking issue is not something that necessarily blocks a
> podling release.
And I was not stating that, nor has anyone voted -1 on this release. I was just
pointing out that this doesn’t seem to have
Going only by past experiences in the incubator, my understanding is that a
graduation blocking issue is not something that necessarily blocks a
podling release.
It would be something that should be noted and fixed in follow up releases
for sure.
Perhaps the letter of the law change or the level
Hi,
I also find int a little odd that in the discussion on this release it was not
clearly pointed out that having compiled code in the source release is a
graduation blocking issue and that as a TLP this would not be allowed in a
release, especially given that the exact same issue occurred in
HI,
> If you want to ask Infra a question, then ask on users@infra or
> private@infra.
Will do, thanks.
> And [1] is 13 years old.
And I said it was old, there are more recent emails along the same lines, but
I'm not able to find them right now. Not surprisingly searching for things
released
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:01 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I apologize for missing that question in the May report.
>
> I've ask esthe question several times over serval months (in slightly
> different forms) and not got a clear answer.
>
> The most recent conversations have been on
Hi,
> I apologize for missing that question in the May report.
I've ask esthe question several times over serval months (in slightly different
forms) and not got a clear answer.
The most recent conversations have been on Slack. See for instance [2] or [3]
(where is seems that sometimes infra
>
> Have you checked with infra that they will allow this? Previous they have
> said they will remove any release with an issue like this. I’ve tried to get
> clarity on this (see board report before last) but with no luck.
>
Justin,
I apologize for missing that question in the May report. Can
Hi,
I’m also curious to know how that jar is licensed. This doesn’t help [1] and
this [2] while claiming to be ALV2 includes category X LGPL license.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://github.com/gradle/gradle/tree/master/subprojects/wrapper
2. https://github.com/gradle/gradle/blob/master/LICENSE
Hi,
> We have been working on improving the situation. The gradle wrapper is no
> longer checked in sources, and the README has been updated to make sure folks
> can build from source and download the wrapper as needed.
>
> Unfortunately I missed something and the jar found its way into the
>
We have been working on improving the situation. The gradle wrapper is no
longer checked in sources, and the README has been updated to make sure folks
can build from source and download the wrapper as needed.
Unfortunately I missed something and the jar found its way into the
distributions.
+1 (binding) carried over from dev@tuweni Vote.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 6:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) - carried over from PPMC vote
>
>> On Jun 24, 2019, at 6:03 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> The Tuweni community voted on and
Hi,
Sorry, it’s late, I made a mistake. I meant to say VP infra not VP incubator,
as Apache Infrastructure are responsible for distribution policy [1] not us.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html
Hi,
JFYI - this is uncharted waters and VP incubator was previous said they will
not allow distribution of incubator source releases with jars in them. They may
of changed their minds and may allow this, but you might want to check with
them first.
Thanks,
Justin
+1 (binding) - carried over from PPMC vote
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 6:03 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> Tuweni 0.8.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy and we would now like to request the
Hi,
I see that the gradle jar is still in the source release. This was discussed
last release [1] and as discussed previously [2] this is currently not allowed.
It was mentioned in the last release vote that the gradle jar was removed, but
it seems it hasn’t been?
Thanks,
Justin
1.
Hi all,
The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
Tuweni 0.8.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy and we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
publish the
tarball on the Tuweni Download page.
Note we have collected 4 +1
32 matches
Mail list logo
