On 1 December 2011 06:16, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I notice that the NOTICE has this incomplete statement:
This product includes the scala runtime and compiler
(www.scala-lang.org) developed by EPFL, which includes
the following license:
There is not any
On 1 December 2011 02:29, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Kafka community is hoping to get some feedback on the updated NOTICE
and LICENSE files for Kafka, before we post a new vote for it.
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/NOTICE
There are spurious === lines at
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hey Robert, its not clear to me why a suitable name search should be dropped
- is that because the brand team will do this search on a projects behalf?
This seems likely to me
But this is a POLL. Each option has
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 December 2011, 10:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling
The tashi-dev mailing list just got the following message from an
unreplyable Marvin. The Tashi project reports in January, April, July
and October.
Can this be ignored, or is our reporting schedule changing?
Thanks,
Michael.
Marvin wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated
The tashi-dev mailing list just got the following message from an
unreplyable Marvin. The Tashi project reports in January, April, July
and October.
Can this be ignored, or is our reporting schedule changing?
Thanks,
Michael.
Marvin wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 December 2011, 10:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling
Same thing on empire-db-dev@ I suppose Marvin (bot) somehow mailed the
wrong projects.
Cheers,
F
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Michael Stroucken
stroucki+apa...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
The tashi-dev mailing list just got the following message from an
unreplyable Marvin. The Tashi project
That would explain why he claimed to have mailed BeanValidation-dev,
and our yet having failed AFAIK to receive the notification.
Matt
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Francis De Brabandere
franci...@gmail.com wrote:
Same thing on empire-db-dev@ I suppose Marvin (bot) somehow mailed the
wrong
My advice is to go by the published reporting
period schedule, not by Marvin. Recently work
was done to consolidate some of Marvin's features
into a single script, and that seemingly has an
off-by-one error wrt the incubator schedule.
We'll try to get it fixed before the next batch
of reminders
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
That would explain why he claimed to have mailed BeanValidation-dev,
and our yet having failed AFAIK to receive the notification.
Er, strike that--we got it after all.
Matt
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Francis De
I agree. Kafka has left the three month monthly reporting window.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
I think we should ignore this since Kafka is now on the Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct
schedule according to the following wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
+1 (binding)
Gurkan
Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Kime: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Gönderildiği Tarih: 30 Kasım 2011 1:40 Çarşamba
Konu: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeltaSpike - CDI-Extensions project
Hi!
JBoss, The Apache
Completely agree , if there is a rule list I dont think this needs to be on it,
this is more a best practice imo
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Robert Burrell Donkin
Sent: 12/1/2011 4:20 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [POLL] Suitable Name
As it stands, either the NOTICE file is wrong, or the LICENSE file is
wrong, because the NOTICE file should not mention 3rd party products
that are not in the LICENSE file.
Thanks for the feedback! As I have already mentioned, we are tracking a bug
to fix all non-blocker changes to the NOTICE
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
Completely agree , if there is a rule list I dont think this needs to be on
it, this is more a best practice imo
Best practices tend to become the rule
Robert
To our mentors,
The September 2011 report was not signed off. Could one of you review
the current December report and sign off on it? Thanks!
Karl
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the
On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
As it stands, either the NOTICE file is wrong, or the LICENSE file is
wrong, because the NOTICE file should not mention 3rd party products
that are not in the LICENSE file.
Thanks for the feedback! As I have already mentioned, we are
This is perhaps an area where the incubator needs more caution before best
practice turns into a rule. You can call it guidance rather than best
practices, but I think you'll just say that's the same thing.
I do agree with your statements though
Sent from my Windows Phone
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a quick look at some of these artifacts. I definitely see licenses
missing from the LICENSE file. For example:
paranamer-2.2.jar -- http://paranamer.codehaus.org/info/license.html
The link you reference puts
Does Apache has tools (like rat) to extract all the needed license? Digging
out the license manually is both labour intensive and error prone.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
As it
Joe Schaefer wrote:
My advice is to go by the published reporting
period schedule, not by Marvin. Recently work
was done to consolidate some of Marvin's features
into a single script, and that seemingly has an
off-by-one error wrt the incubator schedule.
Yes good advice. Reminders are just
On 1 December 2011 21:58, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a quick look at some of these artifacts. I definitely see licenses
missing from the LICENSE file. For example:
paranamer-2.2.jar --
Kevan-
You appear to have generated your list of jars from looking at
kafka-0.7.0-incubating.tar.gz, the binary distribution that has been
built as a customary courtesy as part of the release attempt. This
includes quite a few jars that are not included in the source tree
since binary
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Eric Newton wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00939.html
RESULT:
25 matches
Mail list logo
