A vote was just completed in the ManifoldCF community on the following
resolution:
==
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests
of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
establish a Project Management Committee charged
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
This looks like a mind expanding activity. I added my name for a maximum of 2
per month.
Great, thanks!
Would you mind taking a look at for example Nuvem and Wink this month?
Or pick some other yet unclaimed
Hi,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Jim Donofrio donofrio...@gmail.com wrote:
We havent heard anything +1 or -1 from any IPMC members besides our mentors.
Any thoughts on this vote?
+1 to graduate
Note that when you reply to a message and only change the [...]
prefix, at least GMail thinks
The 72 hour voting period is passed and the vote is now closed. Thanks to
everyone who took time to review the release.
With the three IPMC member votes (2 of them mentors) and 5 PPMC votes the vote
succeeds.
IPMC member voting record:
* Ate Douma: +1
* Chris Mattmann : +1
Srinath Perera :
It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
guidelines. It's very clear from
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html that what has been proposed
is acceptable under existing Apache rules. Bigtop is building
+1 to graduate MRUnit.
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Jim Donofrio donofrio...@gmail.com wrote:
We havent heard anything +1 or -1 from any IPMC members besides our mentors.
Any thoughts on this vote?
We released 0.9.0-incubating on Tuesday so we have completed 4 releases and
Hi Jukka...
I also added myself, but as being a Mentor of CloudStack I would rather
take (shepherdZ: DeltaSpike, Nuvem, Wink) while Dave Fisher takes (shepherdY:
CloudStack, NPanday, VCL)
Dave would you please ACK that ?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Jukka Zitting
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
guidelines.
We aren't making new rules. We are trying to help the Bigtop project
understand the
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
guidelines.
We aren't
In the Board agenda, we have a line where each Director can state they have
reviewed the report (before the meeting). They can also append queries and
comments. Little mini-discussions kinda happen in those comments.
Point here is: provide a similar location for IPMC members (including
shepherds)
On May 3, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
OK, so let's see how this works out in practice. We have 19 podling
reports to review by next Wednesday (Ambari is still empty).
To keep the required effort down to a reasonable level, I divided
these to six slots of three reports
On May 4, 2012 2:03 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
...
EOD existing Apache rules/license make no such distinction. Works
under the following licenses may be included within Apache products
(includes ASL).
Can people please stop using ASL or APL? No such thing. It is the
Apache
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 3, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
...
The resulting TODOs are (see also the May2012 wiki page):
- jukka: Airavata, Droids, SIS, Wookie, Zeta Components
- rgardler: Amber, PhotArk
- mfranklin:
On May 4, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi Jukka...
I also added myself, but as being a Mentor of CloudStack I would rather
take (shepherdZ: DeltaSpike, Nuvem, Wink) while Dave Fisher takes (shepherdY:
CloudStack, NPanday, VCL)
Dave would you please ACK that ?
Sorry
Hi,
I don't understand the BigTop use cases and release model in too much
detail to have very specific or hard opinions on this, but here's a
few high-level observations that hopefully are useful for this
discussion:
* AFAICT there's no immediate release that's being blocked by this
discussion,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Board agenda, we have a line where each Director can state they have
reviewed the report (before the meeting). They can also append queries and
comments. Little mini-discussions kinda happen in those comments.
Point
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 4, 2012 2:03 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
...
EOD existing Apache rules/license make no such distinction. Works
under the following licenses may be included within Apache products
(includes ASL).
Can
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Benjamin Hindman
benjamin.hind...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you elaborate on this? Do you mean recruit active participants from the
Mesos community into the IPMC? Or do you mean recruit people from the IPMC
to be more active in Mesos?
Ideally each podling
Hi Jukka!
Thanks a million for chiming in.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand the BigTop use cases
Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf
* If the former, then each
Hi,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
Giraph has been been in incubator for the last year and I think it
is ready to graduate.
That's my understanding as well: http://markmail.org/message/rxroucqrf4wowox7
Is Giraph ready to graduate?
+1, yes
BR,
Jukka,
Thanks for your response, this is very helpful. I have a couple of
questions/clarifications inlined.
On May 4, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
* As far as I can tell from the discussion, the BigTop repos directory
[1] doesn't neatly fit into either of the above
21 matches
Mail list logo
