Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-12 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | Ferris McCormick wrote: | | is a timesaver. I don't know if this works generally, but I have never | | had any trouble making libGL in parallel when building it by hand. | | Alright, I've switched to emake and we'll see how i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-12 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: | is a timesaver. I don't know if this works generally, but I have never | had any trouble making libGL in parallel when building it by hand. Alright, I've switched to emake and we'll see how it goes. Donnie -BEGIN PGP S

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-12 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 23:29 +, Ferris McCormick wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > --[PinePGP]--[begin]-- > > Ferris McCormick wrote: > > > I'm happy with libGL; I just reverted the ebuild to be as it started, > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 11/08/2005-21:06:34(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > | As you can see, it's the "static" in the end of the line. Maybe you > | should grep for "-static" instead. > > | - To avoid eventual problems with similarly named libraries (libpam and > | libpam_misc for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: | As you can see, it's the "static" in the end of the line. Maybe you | should grep for "-static" instead. | - To avoid eventual problems with similarly named libraries (libpam and | libpam_misc for example; grepping for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 11/08/2005-16:05:02(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Attached an update to incorporate this and your other grep comments. > > Here's a new one. It prints some useful information while it's > searching, like OK or Not found!. Also fixes a little more ugly output >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Attached an update to incorporate this and your other grep comments. Here's a new one. It prints some useful information while it's searching, like OK or Not found!. Also fixes a little more ugly output (double/single quotes a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Ferris McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote: --[PinePGP]--[begin]-- Ferris McCormick wrote: I'm happy with libGL; I just reverted the ebuild to be as it started, but to define a sparc-specific set of d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: > I'm happy with libGL; I just reverted the ebuild to be as it started, > but to define a sparc-specific set of dri drivers. All my problems came > from my mistaken belief that mesa would still build cleanly using the > sparc as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: > Why not pull these greps out of the loop? No need to do the *same* thing > for every library. Or did you forget to mention $libname in there? My rationale was that over the course of a compilation, both shared and static libs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 11/08/2005-11:58:31(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Here's a slightly better version: > > And here's the enhanced, scripted version. It traces libs back to their > packages to really make things easy. > > Seems to work quite well. > > Thanks, > Donnie > echo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 12:25 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ferris McCormick wrote: > > Notice, however, that the mesa ebuild does not seem to install the dri > > drivers anyplace. I suppose they should go > > into /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 11/08/2005-21:11:35(+0200): Jan Spitalnik types > Dne čt 11. srpna 2005 20:58 Donnie Berkholz napsal(a): > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > Here's a slightly better version: > > > > And here's the enhanced, scripted version. It traces libs back to their > > packages to really make things eas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jan Spitalnik wrote: > as it should be equivalent. You'd think so, but consider this case: Package A provides foo.so Package B provides foo.a Package C links against both Thanks, Donnie -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: > Notice, however, that the mesa ebuild does not seem to install the dri > drivers anyplace. I suppose they should go > into /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers, but the don't. It seems that the > ebuild uses mesa's 'installmesa' sc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Jan Spitalnik
Dne čt 11. srpna 2005 20:58 Donnie Berkholz napsal(a): > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Here's a slightly better version: > > And here's the enhanced, scripted version. It traces libs back to their > packages to really make things easy. you can replace (starting line 37) if $(grep ' \-l[a-zA-Z

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:02 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > And why is this a good thing? I'm adamantly against building the non-glx > > libGL here for standard use, and I will continue to oppose it. Be normal > > peopl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Here's a slightly better version: And here's the enhanced, scripted version. It traces libs back to their packages to really make things easy. Seems to work quite well. Thanks, Donnie -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: G

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > And why is this a good thing? I'm adamantly against building the non-glx > libGL here for standard use, and I will continue to oppose it. Be normal > people and do the same thing as everybody else in the world who's ever > used

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: > 3. With USE=-dri, for testing purposes (and in the end, perhaps for > performance reasons as well), it seems better to change the make target > to HOSTCONF=linux-sparc, and let user's CFLAGS define the architecture. > When yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 17:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ferris McCormick wrote: > | It always makes sense to enable glx (Mesa) whether there is DRI support > | or not; some applications can run adequately well using the > | Mesa-indirect appr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 17:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ferris McCormick wrote: > | It always makes sense to enable glx (Mesa) whether there is DRI support > | or not; some applications can run adequately well using the > | Mesa-indirect appr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | A few updates: | | I'm working on a Mesa ebuild to add; this will provide the gl.h | everyone's been complaining about missing. My dev box is really screwy | because of orphaned files, things lying around from CVS, etc, so I |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | Per-Erik Westerberg wrote: | | Ubuntu "Breezy" has also problems with the "fixed" font when I updated | | it, the "fonts.alias" file is missing from the "/usr/share/fonts/misc" | | directory, maybe it is the same problem that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: | maillog: 10/08/2005-23:01:30(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types |>Needing to set ModulePath at all in a standard installation is broken. |>This shouldn't need to be in a configuration file; none of the tools I'm |>aware of generate

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-11 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 10/08/2005-23:01:30(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > | Hm, why not just forget the transition, stick a warning telling people > | to add > | > | ModulesPath "/usr/lib/modules" > | ModulesPath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules" > > Needing to set ModulePath at all in a standar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Jason Wever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Ferris McCormick wrote: | With mach64, the problem on sparc has been the hardware itself, if I | remember correctly. That is, kernel, xorg are fine, but the mach64 | card | used on U5/U10 is memory-deficient. Someone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: | Hm, why not just forget the transition, stick a warning telling people | to add | | ModulesPath "/usr/lib/modules" | ModulesPath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules" Needing to set ModulePath at all in a standard installation is broken. T

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 10/08/2005-22:08:36(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > | What about new revisions of the monolithic xorg that will install in > | /usr/lib/xorg/modules followed by new revisions of all packages like > | opengl-update, nvidia, ati-whatever, that will depend on the newe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: | What about new revisions of the monolithic xorg that will install in | /usr/lib/xorg/modules followed by new revisions of all packages like | opengl-update, nvidia, ati-whatever, that will depend on the newer xorg | release?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 10/08/2005-21:45:58(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > > >>>It seems that the current xorg-server installs all modules in > >>>/usr/lib/xorg/modules. Any idea why? It used to be /usr/lib/modules > >>>until recently, and that's still where

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > >>>It seems that the current xorg-server installs all modules in >>>/usr/lib/xorg/modules. Any idea why? It used to be /usr/lib/modules >>>until recently, and that's still where opengl-update symlinks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: > It seems that the current xorg-server installs all modules in > /usr/lib/xorg/modules. Any idea why? It used to be /usr/lib/modules > until recently, and that's still where opengl-update symlinks stuff to, > and also where vnc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 09/08/2005-11:16:52(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > | If you find bugs that aren't purely ebuild problems, do not file them at > | bugs.gentoo.org -- go to bugs.freedesktop.org, in the xorg product. > | > | Two USE flags you will care about are "dri" and "glx" -- b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: | It always makes sense to enable glx (Mesa) whether there is DRI support | or not; some applications can run adequately well using the | Mesa-indirect approach, and some graphics cards --- e.g., Elite == afb | --- don't allow

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Ferris McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote: --[PinePGP]--[begin]-- Ferris McCormick wrote: | I wrote the note very fast, and it was not too clear. With sunffb, the | kernel code for current 2.6.x (x

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: | I wrote the note very fast, and it was not too clear. With sunffb, the | kernel code for current 2.6.x (x > 6) is broken, and davem has taken dri | support out of the xorg sunffb driver (to paraphrase him, you can't do | bot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Ferris McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote: --[PinePGP]--[begin]-- Ferris McCormick wrote: | > Done. It's not quite right, yet, but it can now be worked with. For | > sparc, we do not want a lot of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | Ferris McCormick wrote: | |> Done. It's not quite right, yet, but it can now be worked with. For | |> sparc, we do not want a lot of ..._dri.so modules (even though that is | |> the target being used) because the kernel does

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: |> Done. It's not quite right, yet, but it can now be worked with. For |> sparc, we do not want a lot of ..._dri.so modules (even though that is |> the target being used) because the kernel does not support them. So, |> curr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 10:53 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ferris McCormick wrote: > | 2. But to get sparc assembler built correctly, the following patch > | seems correct: > > Looks good to me. > > | > > Just go ahead and commit it. Done.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Per-Erik Westerberg wrote: | Ubuntu "Breezy" has also problems with the "fixed" font when I updated | it, the "fonts.alias" file is missing from the "/usr/share/fonts/misc" | directory, maybe it is the same problem that people are experiencing? I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: | 2. But to get sparc assembler built correctly, the following patch | seems correct: Looks good to me. | (Alternative is to create a complete linux-dri-sparc config file; I can | do that if you like.) No need if you don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Per-Erik Westerberg
Ubuntu "Breezy" has also problems with the "fixed" font when I updated it, the "fonts.alias" file is missing from the "/usr/share/fonts/misc" directory, maybe it is the same problem that people are experiencing? / Per-Erik tis 2005-08-09 klockan 11:16 -0700 skrev Donnie Berkholz: > Donnie Berkh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 12:46 +, Ferris McCormick wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 19:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > Good catch. I was going to get to the rest of the GL headers after > > getting Mesa working. > > Another comment

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 19:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Good catch. I was going to get to the rest of the GL headers after > getting Mesa working. Another comment about Mesa. Mesa, as distributed, has "built in" architectures it can build

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | A few updates: | | I'm working on a Mesa ebuild to add; this will provide the gl.h | everyone's been complaining about missing. My dev box is really screwy | because of orphaned files, things lying around from CVS, etc, so I |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | | Hrm. Is this going to be sanely doable by your average dev? How long | | a dep string would we be having in typical cases? How about in bad | | cases? | | It shouldn't be difficult in most cases,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: | Furthermore, make sure you don't install the headers in /usr/include/GL, | but in a location that opengl-update would know how to handle. Good catch. I was going to get to the rest of the GL headers after getting Mesa working

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 09/08/2005-11:16:52(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > > Also there have been errors of the freetype/type1/trap modules not found > on startx. They aren't yet built in xorg-server, so you may need to copy > them over from an older install. Add to that the "bitmap" and "pcidata" modules -- th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 09/08/2005-11:16:52(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > | If you find bugs that aren't purely ebuild problems, do not file them at > | bugs.gentoo.org -- go to bugs.freedesktop.org, in the xorg product. > | > | Two USE flags you will care about are "dri" and "glx" -- b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | If you find bugs that aren't purely ebuild problems, do not file them at | bugs.gentoo.org -- go to bugs.freedesktop.org, in the xorg product. | | Two USE flags you will care about are "dri" and "glx" -- both are | necessary t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Caleb Tennis wrote: | On Monday 08 August 2005 08:14 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: | |>If you could bring up some specific examples, we could discuss them. | | | Sure. Qt has optional support for xkb, tablet, fontconfig, xrender, xrandr, | xcursor, xine

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: | emerging libXfont with font-server made xorg-server link just fine. | | Still, I believe that it is xorg-server that has to be fixed. It needs | to get "NOFONTSERVERACCESS" defined, which will avoid the call to | fs_register_f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 15:03, Caleb Tennis wrote: > Let me follow up with that I'm all for adding the use flags IF other > packages would make use of them as well. I just really hate adding 8 local > use flags for this pretty heavily used package that won't add much utility > to anything else a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Caleb Tennis
> Yep, you're a heretic. :) > How would you propose that DEPEND information make it's way up the > portage stack, and ultimately affects the depgraph? > > What you're suggesting is effectively "suggested" deps, which are a > bit backwards considering we have "optional" deps, the 8 flags you > disli

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:36:31AM -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: > On Monday 08 August 2005 08:14 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > If you could bring up some specific examples, we could discuss them. > > Sure. Qt has optional support for xkb, tablet, fontconfig, xrender, xrandr, > xcursor, xinerama (

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Caleb Tennis
On Monday 08 August 2005 08:14 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > If you could bring up some specific examples, we could discuss them. Sure. Qt has optional support for xkb, tablet, fontconfig, xrender, xrandr, xcursor, xinerama (already a use flag), xshape, and xsm. I'd really hate to add 8 more use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-09 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 08/08/2005-01:08:03(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types >> snip > The font-server flag may be necessary in libXfont, but I haven't fully > explored this yet. If it turns out to be the case, it'll be removed as > an optional flag and forced on. Unfortunately, it seems it does. I did it with "-fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Caleb Tennis wrote: | What is the plan for packages (I'm thinking other x11-libs/ packages and | window managers) which can optionally depend on various X11 libraries? Do we | need use flags for "xcursor", "xrender","xsm" and the like to pull in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-08 Thread Caleb Tennis
On Monday 01 August 2005 03:54 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I eagerly await your questions and concerns. Donnie, What is the plan for packages (I'm thinking other x11-libs/ packages and window managers) which can optionally depend on various X11 libraries? Do we need use flags for "xcursor", "

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: | Donnie, | Unless you a good reason for me not to do so, I am going to start | adding the ~sparc keyword to the Modular X ebuilds and then start | playing with them locally. (I'm not going to mess with your global | package

[gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-08 Thread Ferris McCormick
Donnie, Unless you a good reason for me not to do so, I am going to start adding the ~sparc keyword to the Modular X ebuilds and then start playing with them locally. (I'm not going to mess with your global package masks, of course, but I do want to work with a real ~sparc keyword rather than fa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | What I meant by "tomorrow" was "next week," of course. =) I just made | the first commits. Most things are committed, with the exception of the metabuilds. I'm still working on them. If you want to try it, you'll have to add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | As I said, very soon. It's out. I will begin adding new categories as | necessary and the beginnings of the modular tree tomorrow. What I meant by "tomorrow" was "next week," of course. =) I just made the first commits. Plea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-04 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
that's great :) Thanks for doing that. That's exactly what I done with XCB ebuilds. Maybe some of you don't know xcb, it a remplacement for Xlib. Currently it only available on cvs. I think it couldn't have to be ignore it. Some ebuilds for : http://guybrush.ath.cx/svn/public/portage/x11-libs/ W

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-03 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 07:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > If you want your patch back in, you will _need_ to file it upstream and > have it committed before we will re-add it. While I generally agree with this "the closer to upstream, the better", I hope that this can be a bit more easy for comp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As a further note on this: We will be dropping all patches that are not upstream and are not obviously Gentoo-specific configuration changes. If you want your patch back in, you will _need_ to file it upstream and have it committed before we will re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote: | If I understand correctly, all of the packages in x11-proto will only | install header files. Are these header files ever useful on their own | though? Would it make more sense to include the header files | in various

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-02 Thread Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
If I understand correctly, all of the packages in x11-proto will only install header files. Are these header files ever useful on their own though? Would it make more sense to include the header files in various library packages? -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-02 Thread Maurice van der Pot
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:23:06PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Your suggestion of adding a few new virtuals is a good idea, but I think > the metabuilds for libraries, drivers, etc. can substitute for it. It's > not clear to me that there are many common configurations that could be > dealt wit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-02 Thread Ian Leitch
Donnie Berkholz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | The new categories are x11-apps, x11-proto and x11-drivers. Of these, | the name for x11-proto (the protocol headers) is debatable. The upstream | module they're all in is called "proto," and their pkg-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | The new categories are x11-apps, x11-proto and x11-drivers. Of these, | the name for x11-proto (the protocol headers) is debatable. The upstream | module they're all in is called "proto," and their pkg-config (*.pc) | files ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:23:37 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > Hrm. Is this going to be sanely doable by your average dev? How > | > long a dep string would we be having in typical cases? How about in > |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:23:37 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Hrm. Is this going to be sanely doable by your average dev? How | > long a dep string would we be having in typical cases? How about in | > bad cases? | > | The more formal the depstring, the quicker the packages b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:54:04 -0700 Donnie Berkholz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | | Well... What I was mainly thinking (and assuming we don't have the > | | new virtuals system by whenever this beco

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:54:04 -0700 Donnie Berkholz | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | | But see, that's the thing; no packages should just generally say "Give | | me the X libraries" other than temporari

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:54:04 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | | Well... What I was mainly thinking (and assuming we don't have the | | new virtuals system by whenever this becomes relevant) is that a | | metapackage could represent, say, "the core x11 libr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | Well... What I was mainly thinking (and assuming we don't have the new | virtuals system by whenever this becomes relevant) is that a metapackage | could represent, say, "the core x11 libraries as provided by xorg". This | is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:23:06 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Your suggestion of adding a few new virtuals is a good idea, but I | think the metabuilds for libraries, drivers, etc. can substitute for | it. It's not clear to me that there are many common configurations | that could

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:54:27 -0700 Donnie Berkholz | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | Until such time as that becomes possible for everyone to do, the | | x11-libs metabuild will PROVIDE virtual/x11. But realize that not | | eve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:54:27 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Until such time as that becomes possible for everyone to do, the | x11-libs metabuild will PROVIDE virtual/x11. But realize that not | everybody will have or want all the X libraries installed, when they | only need a f

[gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (This is an expanded, updated version of a recent blog post, so some of you may have already seen parts of it.) Background: Upstream is splitting up the monolithic X.Org X11 release into a huge number of modular releases, the combination of which wil