Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
Maybe the users who want to see a progressbar just want Gentoo for the speed
and they don't want to get intimidated with all those messages they do not
understand. Then a progressbar is much better: they have an indication of
when it will be finished even if the
Neil Bothwick wrote:
Like this? http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=42346highlight=emergeprogresssid=3c66f1e0ff64d1c988e565486c467cae
I used it for a while and it provided useful feedback of the progress of
lengthy compiles, but it also caused problems with a number of packages
so
gabriel wrote:
On February 4, 2004 09:28 am, Tommi Pirinen wrote:
Any chance for some devs consider adding this kind of functionality to
the main tree?
there's no need to add this to the main tree. one of the really great things
about gentoo is the fact that it just
Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The problem is largely technical. There is no "set period of time" that
it takes to compile something... In fact, it varies widely based upon
USE flags. On top of that, it also varies with every version (and every
re-version). To acurately gauge a percentange,
Norbert Kamenicky wrote:
IMHO, it is really VIA + nvidia problem, I met it on VIA chipset
boards too
(see my previous [EMAIL PROTECTED] ML)
What chipsets u have on mainboard/VGA ?
I have 2 bugdet computers, the older one is using VIA KT333 and newer
has KT400, both have a GeForce 2MX400. In
Troy Dack wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 13:36, Tommi Pirinen wrote:
So how did you install Gentoo?
How does installation process have to do with anything? I suppose I
booted it from the disc and made the settings and emerged the packages
I want.
It is obvious
Sean Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 18:42, Jakub Krajcovic wrote:
I can't really say what causes this, because when i launch X, everuthing
is ok, it only happens after some time, probably has something to dio
with the apps i run under X - not sure, haven't been poking into
gabriel wrote:
2-HIDE THE GARBAGE... Do we really need to have ALL the compiler and emerge
updated logged to the screen? See PROGRESS BARS above.
it's not garbage. it's output.
Yeah, except it's not even output, it's mostly input. The command lines
of the compilers
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 31 January 2004 20:30, Jerry McBride wrote:
2-HIDE THE GARBAGE... Do we really need to have ALL the compiler and emerge
updated logged to the screen? See PROGRESS BARS above.
Well, I had some severe problems the last days
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
If you think 2.6.x kernels are stable, try using an unpatched 2.6.1
kernel with a GB or Japanese (or possibly German) keyboard.
Actually, almost any non-english keyboard is affected somehow.
Such as non-US keyboards being totally broken, you mean? :) (If anyone
cares,
Sensei wrote:
Redeeman wrote:
I gave it a try... but nothing happens... always ~5 fps.
Moreover... those packages are just the same package from the nvidia
official site, with a patch for via chipsets --- maybe the 4x patch ;)
Nothing... :( With this lousy gpu I should reach 30~50 fps when
Kurt Guenther wrote:
My inittab is set to just come up as level 3, so I don't incure the
overhead of an X session that I don't use. However, after the latest
sync, the system boots into a beautiful Gentoo Login screen. How do
I switch levels on this?
--Kurt
Gentoo doesn't use numbered
Andrew Farmer wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:46:55 -0800, Aaron Walker muttered:
Andrej Kacian wrote:
Hi, what do I need installed in order for gucharmap to display exotic
characters properly instead of displaying their code in a rectangle?
I assume there will be
Andrej Kacian wrote:
Hi, what do I need installed in order for gucharmap to display exotic
characters properly instead of displaying their code in a rectangle?
I assume there will be separate package for each unicode character class
(latin-a, latin-b, hebrew, ...).
emerge --search font
Then
Andrej Kacian wrote:
I tried that in the first place. Nor unicode neither efont-unicode helped. I
also tried some others, but to no avail. (That's why I'm asking here)
Humm... I don't think I've emerged anything special and my gucharmap
shows most of the characters just fine (except
I have this persisting problem with incorrect glyphs being rendered in
stead of the most of the IPA character block of unicode. According to
gucharmap utility these wrong glyphs are contained in font called Nimbus
Sans L, which doesn't even seem to exist in any of the common
font-directories.
Exactly the same problem. I wasn't sure where it came from, because I
had mass update recently, but main point is that many of config files
seemed to have trivial font-style increases by one pt. I thought it was
related to some change in fonthandling, but it seems it was to actuallu
increase font
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:03:58 +0100
Henk Abma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 06:19:42PM +0200, Tommi Pirinen wrote:
What config files do you mean? where did you change something? If I
change the point size in gnome from 14 to 12 where possible, things
get slightly better
18 matches
Mail list logo
