Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-3.4.0 has lost "New session"

On Sunday 03 April 2005 03:49, Peter Ruskin wrote: > After upgrading to 3.4.0 I miss the "Start New Session" from the K That's because it's in a different place. look in K->Switch User->Start New Session. It's enabled by default now. pgpBCXJ7NSoah.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-3.4.0 has lost "New session"

Never used this particular feature, but I did try to start my xserver with "-br", and it seems the Xservers file went away in KDE 3.4. Take a look in /usr/kde/3.4/share/config/kdm/kdmrc, particularly the setting for "ReserveServers", this seems to be what you are after. -Richard Peter Ruskin wro

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

On Saturday 02 April 2005 08:08 pm, Mike Williams wrote: > On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:37, Jerry McBride wrote: > > > > Keep in mind that it probably still has some bugs that  have not been > > > > fixed, hence the "unstable" label. > > > > > > Well, is there an expectation on when it will 'stablize

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:37, Jerry McBride wrote: > > > Keep in mind that it probably still has some bugs that  have not been > > > fixed, hence the "unstable" label. > > > > Well, is there an expectation on when it will 'stablize'? > > As far as KDE.org goes, it is stable. I've been using it sin

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

On Saturday 02 April 2005 07:32 pm, David Corbin wrote: > On Saturday 02 April 2005 02:26 pm, Taylor Morrow wrote: > > This means it's in the "unstable" branch. > > > > Although it is recommended that you wait until it enters stable, you > > can override this with: > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

On Saturday 02 April 2005 02:26 pm, Taylor Morrow wrote: > This means it's in the "unstable" branch. > > Although it is recommended that you wait until it enters stable, you > can override this with: > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge kde-meta > > Keep in mind that it probably still has some bugs that

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

This means it's in the "unstable" branch. Although it is recommended that you wait until it enters stable, you can override this with: ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge kde-meta Keep in mind that it probably still has some bugs that have not been fixed, hence the "unstable" label. On Apr 2, 2005 11

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

On Saturday 02 April 2005 10:32 am, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Sunday 03 April 2005 00:22, David Corbin wrote: > > Any idea when kde 3.4 will be unmasked? > > It's been unmasked since shortly after it was released. Unless you are > referring to moving to stable? I tried "emerge kde-meta". It says i

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

On Sunday 03 April 2005 00:22, David Corbin wrote: > Any idea when kde 3.4 will be unmasked? It's been unmasked since shortly after it was released. Unless you are referring to moving to stable? Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

Any idea when kde 3.4 will be unmasked? David -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE Emerge problem [solved]

Ian K wrote: Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: Ian K wrote: I know that it was the first ebuild of the emerge process. Upon doing an emege -p kde i get: [ebuild U ] dev-libs/openssl-0.9.7e [0.9.7c-r1] (thats the first ebuild.) Just to be sure, try this: # emerge --oneshot "=dev-libs/opens

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE Emerge problem

Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: Ian K wrote: I know that it was the first ebuild of the emerge process. Upon doing an emege -p kde i get: [ebuild U ] dev-libs/openssl-0.9.7e [0.9.7c-r1] (thats the first ebuild.) Just to be sure, try this: # emerge --oneshot "=dev-libs/openssl-0.9.7e"

Re: [gentoo-user] kde splitted ebuilds question

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:37:37 +0100, Botykai Zsolt wrote: > So, I just emerged KDE 3.4 via kde-meta. Now I want to remove unneded > stuff (single apps like amarok, juk, kaboodle, kpilot - I don't plan to > use them ever), so how to do that? > Just unmerge the meta packages, and the unneeded ones?

[gentoo-user] kde splitted ebuilds question

Hi for everyone. So, I just emerged KDE 3.4 via kde-meta. Now I want to remove unneded stuff (single apps like amarok, juk, kaboodle, kpilot - I don't plan to use them ever), so how to do that? Just unmerge the meta packages, and the unneeded ones? Thx for any advice, Zsoltik@ -

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 - where is plastik?

> Is kdeartwork emerged? (sorry, I have missed other this thread messages) > > Andrew > > Yes: qpkg -I -v kdeartwork kde-base/kdeartwork-sounds-3.4.0 * kde-base/kdeartwork-styles-3.4.0 * kde-base/kdeartwork-3.3.2 * kde-base/kdeartwork-kwin-styles-3.4.0 * Is there anything missing? -- gentoo-user

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 - where is plastik?

Is kdeartwork emerged? (sorry, I have missed other this thread messages) Andrew === On Friday 25 March 2005 15:37, Robert S wrote: === > > emerge kwin > I've done that - no improvement. /usr/kde/3.4/share/apps/kwin/plastik.desktop is definitely there, but plastik (and the other .desktop

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 - where is plastik?

> > emerge kwin > I've done that - no improvement. /usr/kde/3.4/share/apps/kwin/plastik.desktop is definitely there, but plastik (and the other .desktop files in the same directory) aren't there. Permissions are -rw-r--r-- 1 root root, which I think is correct. I've created a new user account,

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 - where is plastik?

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:09:59 +1100 (EST), Robert S wrote: > I have just installed kde3.4 using split ebuilds. I installed the > kdebase-meta package and the kdebase-startkde and kdegraphics-meta > ebuilds, but I only get a choice of about 5 grotty styles CDE default). > My favorite plastik is go

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 - where is plastik?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I have just installed kde3.4 using split ebuilds. I installed the > kdebase-meta package and the kdebase-startkde and kdegraphics-meta > ebuilds, but I only get a choice of about 5 grotty styles CDE default). > My favorite plastik is gone! The plas

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 - where is plastik?

I have just installed kde3.4 using split ebuilds. I installed the kdebase-meta package and the kdebase-startkde and kdegraphics-meta ebuilds, but I only get a choice of about 5 grotty styles CDE default). My favorite plastik is gone! Can anybody help me remedy this? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mai

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 compiling freezes machine

Hi, I've been trying to compile KDE 3.4 using [1]. It worked for kde-libs but everytime kdepim starts to compile, my machine freezes completely during the run (I mean really dead). I couldn't find anything in a log file or give you more info what exactly causes this. Is this something known or

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-split ebuilds advice

On Monday 07 March 2005 05:58 pm, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: > On Monday 07 March 2005 21:37, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > > Anyway, what about the meta kde-meta? same way? > > Well...since kde-3.3.x is already a meta package (with the various > kde{base,network,libs,etc.} as its dependencies), I guess t

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-split ebuilds advice

On Monday 07 March 2005 21:37, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > Anyway, what about the meta kde-meta? same way? Well...since kde-3.3.x is already a meta package (with the various kde{base,network,libs,etc.} as its dependencies), I guess that kde-meta is going to be a meta-meta package! The ebuild s

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-split ebuilds advice

On Monday 07 March 2005 01:26 pm, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: > On Monday 07 March 2005 18:45, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > > My ? is, do I have to emerge or in order > > to be able to emerge individual apps at a later time for updates etc... > > If I understand your question correctly: the kdemeta pack

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-split ebuilds advice

On Monday 07 March 2005 18:45, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > My ? is, do I have to emerge or in order to > be able to emerge individual apps at a later time for updates etc... If I understand your question correctly: the kdemeta packages are simply containers that have the various individual ap

RE: [gentoo-user] kde-split ebuilds advice

> My ? is, do I have to emerge or in order > to be > able to emerge individual apps at a later time for updates etc... I installed my KDE via the "emerge kde" command. I don't typically see updates for individual applications but do see updates for the core KDE component groups (i.e. kdelibs, k

[gentoo-user] kde-split ebuilds advice

OK, I installed beta1 using emerge kdemeta-. and got everything. It worked well. Same with beta2, although when I had to emerge an individual app it seems like I remember problems with blockers. Then I reinstalled my entire machine (gawk bug and my attempts to repair it!!). Upon setting up

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4.0-rc1?

So far none of those problems on my Dell 8600 laptop. The only problem I have so far is with a bug in kmilo. And a problem trying to istall syncekonnector with some dependencie requirements missing. Other than that I LOVE 3.4. Mike On Wednesday 02 March 2005 12:08 am, Jerry McBride wrote: > An

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.4.0-rc1?

Anyone want to compare notes on KDE 3.4.0-rc1? I've got it installed on a laptop and a desktop running on Gentoo. So far, only a couple of problems that I've experienced. 1- Unable to compile kdeedu on my laptop. Early on in the build, the compiler falls into an endless loop in the KIG directo

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 Beta 2

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:29:08 +, Jason Edson wrote: > Hi, I'm kind of new to gentoo, well using advanced portage features, and > I was just wondering how i get emerge kde to install 3.4 beta 2 instead > of 3.3.2. KDE 3.4 is masked by its inclusion in the package.mask file, changing keywords w

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 Beta 2

Jason Edson wrote: Hi, I'm kind of new to gentoo, well using advanced portage features, and I was just wondering how i get emerge kde to install 3.4 beta 2 instead of 3.3.2. And if I can get it to work can I have both 3.3.2 and 3.4 beta 2 installed? Thank you for your time! Jason Edson [EMAIL P

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 Beta 2

Hi, I'm kind of new to gentoo, well using advanced portage features, and I was just wondering how i get emerge kde to install 3.4 beta 2 instead of 3.3.2. And if I can get it to work can I have both 3.3.2 and 3.4 beta 2 installed? Thank you for your time! Jason Edson -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org m

Re: [gentoo-user] kde 3.4 split ebuilds; emerge -pvDu world damaged

Catalin Trifu ha scritto: Hi, I've just passed to kde-3.4 split ebuilds and after that i tried to make un update to the system and this is what emerge says. How can i solve it ? Thanks, Catalin it'has worked fine for me, maybe because it was a system without previous versions of kde? if y

Re: [gentoo-user] kde 3.4 split ebuilds; emerge -pvDu world damaged

I'm in the same boat. I build kde-meta after adding them to my /etc/portage/package.kewords file. What I did was remove them from teh file, and now I can update the system. I assume I'll have it figured out correctly by the time 3.4 goes ~x86 Mike On Thursday 27 January 2005 10:04 am, Catalin

[gentoo-user] kde 3.4 split ebuilds; emerge -pvDu world damaged

Hi, I've just passed to kde-3.4 split ebuilds and after that i tried to make un update to the system and this is what emerge says. How can i solve it ? Thanks, Catalin [blocks B ] =kde-base/kappfinder-3.4* (from pkg kde-base/kdebase-3.4.0_beta1) [blocks B ] =kde-base/kcheckpass-

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE sound problems

I have always tried new releases of kde when they are out. and somehow I always land up going back to gnome. Try gnome-light its refreshing On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:06:17 +1100, Robert S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running kde 3.3.2 on an amd64. All packages are the latest "stable" > am

[gentoo-user] KDE sound problems

I am running kde 3.3.2 on an amd64. All packages are the latest "stable" amd64 ones except for the alsa ones which are ~amd64. I'm having a few sound problems: 1. When I enable the sound system, there are no system notification sounds. I am able to get them working if I do Control center -> Sou

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-3.4, no sound and pesky volume box

I apologise if my curt reply yesterday was offensive. I wasnt even irritated. It wasnt meant to be offensive. But logical because of the product being Beta. Perhaps theres a Beta Bug track for kde that you might want to look at and see if the bug is listed there? Your question sounded like you w

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-3.4, no sound and pesky volume box

Michael W. Holdeman ha scritto: On Monday 24 January 2005 03:47 am, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:01:54 -0500, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: I thought beta was when most bugs were worked out, with the input of users? Yes, so: 1) You should expect bugs. check 2) You

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-3.4, no sound and pesky volume box

On Monday 24 January 2005 03:47 am, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:01:54 -0500, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > > I thought beta was when most bugs were worked out, with the input of > > users? > > Yes, so: > > 1) You should expect bugs. check > 2) You should report bugs. check > > Othe

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-3.4, no sound and pesky volume box

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:01:54 -0500, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > I thought beta was when most bugs were worked out, with the input of > users? Yes, so: 1) You should expect bugs. 2) You should report bugs. Otherwise, there's no point in running a beta, and the bugs could remain in the release v

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-3.4, no sound and pesky volume box

I thought beta was when most bugs were worked out, with the input of users? I appologize if this is not the place to ask, But I am a long time Gentoo user and have found this list to be the most valuable resource most times for most issues.. Mike 23 January 2005 03:10 pm, PK wrote: > maybe th

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-3.4, no sound and pesky volume box

maybe thats why its still beta ? Michael W. Holdeman wrote: After emerging kde 3.4 beta, using emerge kde-meta, I have no sound in kde and a pesky volume level box at zero in teh middle of the screen that wont go away. I can set the volume up in kmix etc... but it just goes back down. If I log

[gentoo-user] kde-3.4, no sound and pesky volume box

After emerging kde 3.4 beta, using emerge kde-meta, I have no sound in kde and a pesky volume level box at zero in teh middle of the screen that wont go away. I can set the volume up in kmix etc... but it just goes back down. If I log back into 3.3.2 sound works as expected, except for knotify c

Re: [gentoo-user] kde is installed but wont start

On Tuesday 18 January 2005 17:28, Positive Negative wrote: > I emerged kde and gnome... > > I can get gnome to work, but kde cant connect to X server??? I emerged KDE and never gnome, and KDE is perfectly working. My crystal-ball says, you f* up /etc/hostname, but my crystal-ball was wrong before

[gentoo-user] kde is installed but wont start

I emerged kde and gnome... I can get gnome to work, but kde cant connect to X server??? -- AIM: FucPsSht -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] kde meta ebuild

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:19:53 +0900, Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not to be condescending or anything but... Apparently the split-up ebuilds are > ready and the only issues left are related to the upgrade process rather than > installation, which is why the split-up ebuilds aren't in t

Re: [gentoo-user] kde meta ebuild

On Friday 14 January 2005 16:36, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: (B> Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2005 08:19 schrieb ext Martoni: (B> > On the site (http://kde-metaebuilds.berlios.de/) it states that: (B> > "However, it is being merged slowly into portage and should be the (B> > main/only set of official kde e

Re: [gentoo-user] kde meta ebuild

Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2005 08:19 schrieb ext Martoni: > On the site (http://kde-metaebuilds.berlios.de/) it states that: > "However, it is being merged slowly into portage and should be the > main/only set of official kde ebuilds for 3.4.0." It will be nice to have those KDE meta ebuilds, but I th

[gentoo-user] kde meta ebuild

On the site (http://kde-metaebuilds.berlios.de/) it states that: "However, it is being merged slowly into portage and should be the main/only set of official kde ebuilds for 3.4.0." But checking on the unstable new ebuilds, KDE 3.4.0_beta1 is being distributed through the usual monolithic KDE pack

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.2 freezing

On 3 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Norbert Kamenicky wrote: > >> Hello everybody :-) >> >> After upgrading to KDE 3.2 if I left click on any button which >> opens a list (i.e. KDE icon button, task list etc.) I have 30% >> chance that mouse and keyboard become frozen until the time >> I pre

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.2 freezing (more bugs)

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:52:18AM +0100, Norbert Kamenicky wrote: > Hello everybody :-) > > After upgrading to KDE 3.2 if I left click on any button which > opens a list (i.e. KDE icon button, task list etc.) I have 30% > chance that mouse and keyboard become frozen until the time > I press left-

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.2 freezing

Norbert Kamenicky wrote: Hello everybody :-) After upgrading to KDE 3.2 if I left click on any button which opens a list (i.e. KDE icon button, task list etc.) I have 30% chance that mouse and keyboard become frozen until the time I press left-ALT keyboard button. It's really very annoying. Anybo

[gentoo-user] kde compile can not find qt library

Any help with this problem would be much appreciated: /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -DNDEBUG -DNO_D

Re: [gentoo-user] kde compile can not find qt library

Check out the forums and use the search box. http://forums.gentoo.org Frans Kevin Gordon wrote: Any help with this problem would be much appreciated: /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -ans

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-3.2 compile failed

Karl Huysmans kirjoitti (sunnuntai, 15. helmikuuta 2004 17:35): > Hi, > > I am trying to get kde-libs compiled, but no luck. Compile dies every > time complaining it can't find /var/tmp/portage/qt3.3.0/libqt-mt.la. There's a bug in the qt-3.3.0 ebuild. Doing an emerge sync && emerge qt && emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-3.2 compile failed

On Sunday 15 February 2004 16.35, Karl Huysmans wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get kde-libs compiled, but no luck. Compile dies every > time complaining it can't find /var/tmp/portage/qt3.3.0/libqt-mt.la. emerge sync emerge qt arts kdelibs tony -- Contract ASIC and FPGA design. Telephone +46 702

[gentoo-user] kde-3.2 compile failed

Hi, I am trying to get kde-libs compiled, but no luck. Compile dies every time complaining it can't find /var/tmp/portage/qt3.3.0/libqt-mt.la. Anyone a clue? THX -- Karl Huysmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-base/kdelibs-3.2.0 cannot emerge

On Sunday 15 February 2004 15.48, Neal Lippman wrote: > I haven't seen a post on this or sometihing in bugzilla, unless of course I > missed it. you missed it. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41569 solution emerge sync emerge qt arts kdelibs tony -- Contract ASIC and FPGA design. Telephon

[gentoo-user] kde-base/kdelibs-3.2.0 cannot emerge

I haven't seen a post on this or sometihing in bugzilla, unless of course I missed it. Yesterday, after emerge sync, emerge -pu world reported a whole bunch of new ebuilds to merge, including kde 3.2, so I figured why not? However, emerge of kdelibs-3.2.0 repeatedly fails. The error I am gettin

[gentoo-user] KDE-Apps under KDE3.2

Hi folks! After upgrading to kde-3.2 and qt-3.3 I cannot emerge any kde-specific program anymore. The configure script fails and complains about missing kdelibs, although kde-libs 3.2.0 and 3.1.5 are installed. Whats wrong? Thanks in advance Alex Puchmayr PS: Output: zeus # emerge -

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.2 : simple question

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 08:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > this is rather elementary, but i need to learn. > > when i ask 'emerge -p kde' (to get the new 3.2.0 ), it tells me : > > [blocks B ] > but when i ask 'emerge -p kdelibs' or 'emerge -p qt', i get the same. > 'man emerge' says su

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE failed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti (tiistai, 10. helmikuuta 2004 22:19): > I unmerged all instances of KDE I had, as well as qt. Then I emerged > kde-3.1.5, which pulled down qt 3.2.3-r1. After 13 hours of compiling, > KDE still doesn't work. The kdm.log doesn't show any errors. I don't > know if it's

[gentoo-user] kde digest problem?

Hi all, When I do an emerge -udvp world I am getting an error message, as shown below. I have sync'ed a number of times with no change. I am assuming that this error will stop me updating to the new kde 2.0. How can I cure this? Exiting... ebuild / kde-base/kde-i18n-3.2.0 merge \ Parent:ebui

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.2 : qt 3.3.0 compile error

i just tried to compile KDE 3.2 following an 'emerge sync' & got an error during the compile of Qt 3.3.0 : ... /z/tmp/portage/qt-3.3.0/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.0/bin/uic -L /z/tmp/portage/qt-3.3.0/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.0/plugins listboxeditor.ui -i listboxeditor.h -o listboxeditor.cpp /z/tmp/p

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.2 - what else to rebuild?

I just upgraded to KDE 3.2, but when I run kword it still says it's built with KDE 3.1.5. If I emerge koffice again, will it rebuild with 3.2? How would I know what other packages need to be remerged? If I follow the instructions on removing 3.1.5, with revdep-rebuild do the trick? (I tried it now,

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde 3.2 - how to remove 3.1?

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:23:40PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Alan said, > > > This removes the kde dependancy package, but leaves all the other kde > > packages (kdelibs, kdeutils, etc). I guess portage doesn't do reverse > > dependancy removals yet huh? > > emerge kde -P > emerge depclean

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde 3.2 - how to remove 3.1?

Alan said, > This removes the kde dependancy package, but leaves all the other kde > packages (kdelibs, kdeutils, etc). I guess portage doesn't do reverse > dependancy removals yet huh? emerge kde -P emerge depclean -p emerge depclean >> This was mentioned some time ago... >> I had exactly the

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde 3.2 - how to remove 3.1?

On Wednesday 11 Feb 2004 20:27, Peter Ruskin wrote: > On Wednesday 11 Feb 2004 20:24, Peter Ruskin wrote: > > I'm hanging on to 3.1.5 - 3.2.0 is pretty buggy.  I've filed one > > bug at kde on knotify and commented on an existing bug with > > ksysguard.

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde 3.2 - how to remove 3.1?

On Wednesday 11 Feb 2004 20:24, Peter Ruskin wrote: > I'm hanging on to 3.1.5 - 3.2.0 is pretty buggy.  I've filed one bug > at kde on knotify and commented on an existing bug with ksysguard. > Sorry, the one above should read:

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde 3.2 - how to remove 3.1?

On Wednesday 11 Feb 2004 19:07, Persson wrote: > I succesfully emerged kde 3.2, but seems to me that the 3.1.x stuff > is still there (eg, the /usr/kde/3.1 directory). > > Is it safe to do an > > emerge umnerge kde-3.1.5 > > or could that command accidentally delete something that may cause > 3.2 t

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde 3.2 - how to remove 3.1?

This removes the kde dependancy package, but leaves all the other kde packages (kdelibs, kdeutils, etc). I guess portage doesn't do reverse dependancy removals yet huh? alan On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:22:48PM +0100, Jakub Krajcovic wrote: > This was mentioned some time ago... > I had exactly the

Re: [gentoo-user] Kde 3.2 - how to remove 3.1?

This was mentioned some time ago... I had exactly the same issue about 2 days ago, and i did # emerge -P kde -P = prune -> it removes all but the latest version of the specified package On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:07:28 +0100 Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I succesfully emerged kde 3.2, but see

[gentoo-user] Kde 3.2 - how to remove 3.1?

I succesfully emerged kde 3.2, but seems to me that the 3.1.x stuff is still there (eg, the /usr/kde/3.1 directory). Is it safe to do an emerge umnerge kde-3.1.5 or could that command accidentally delete something that may cause 3.2 to stop working? Has anyone tried this? Thanks P -- [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE

On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 16:31, Timothy Grant wrote: > I got a similar though not identical error the first couple of times I > tried to build it. I did a sync and discovered a newer version of > autoconf, merged that, then merged KDE and all was good. What version of automake? I use KDE too. I've fou

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE

On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 06:01, Scharf Yuval wrote: > Hello, > > When building kde-3.2.0 I got the following message: > > configure.in: no proper invocation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE was found. > configure.in: You should verify that configure.in invokes AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, > configure.in: that aclocal.m4 is

[gentoo-user] KDE

Hello, When building kde-3.2.0 I got the following message: configure.in: no proper invocation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE was found. configure.in: You should verify that configure.in invokes AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, configure.in: that aclocal.m4 is present in the top-level directory, configure.in: and that acl

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.2 : simple question

this is rather elementary, but i need to learn. when i ask 'emerge -p kde' (to get the new 3.2.0 ), it tells me : [blocks B ]

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE failed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 10, 2004, at 2:12 AM, Jani-Matti Hätinen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti (lähetysaika maanantai, 9. helmikuuta 2004 21:30): I'm not sure I remember everything, but I'll try . . . I tried to update to KDE 3.2 using ~x86. kdelibs-3.1.4 blocked qt. So, unmerged

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE failed

On Feb 10, 2004, at 2:12 AM, Jani-Matti Hätinen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti (lähetysaika maanantai, 9. helmikuuta 2004 21:30): I'm not sure I remember everything, but I'll try . . . I tried to update to KDE 3.2 using ~x86. kdelibs-3.1.4 blocked qt. So, unmerged kdelibs-3.1.4 and emerged

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE failed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti (lähetysaika maanantai, 9. helmikuuta 2004 21:30): > I'm not sure I remember everything, but I'll try . . . > > I tried to update to KDE 3.2 using ~x86. kdelibs-3.1.4 blocked qt. > So, unmerged kdelibs-3.1.4 and emerged the new qt. The install of 3.2 > failed at some p

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE failed

On February 9, 2004 12:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm not sure I remember everything, but I'll try . . . > > I tried to update to KDE 3.2 using ~x86. kdelibs-3.1.4 blocked qt. > So, unmerged kdelibs-3.1.4 and emerged the new qt. The install of > 3.2 failed at some point, so I installed 3.1.5.

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE failed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 9, 2004, at 3:20 PM, Kevin Hanson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure I remember everything, but I'll try . . . I tried to update to KDE 3.2 using ~x86. kdelibs-3.1.4 blocked qt. So, unmerged kdelibs-3.1.4 and emerged the new qt. The install of 3.2

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE failed

On Feb 9, 2004, at 3:20 PM, Kevin Hanson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure I remember everything, but I'll try . . . I tried to update to KDE 3.2 using ~x86. kdelibs-3.1.4 blocked qt. So, unmerged kdelibs-3.1.4 and emerged the new qt. The install of 3.2 failed at some point, so I

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE failed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure I remember everything, but I'll try . . . I tried to update to KDE 3.2 using ~x86. kdelibs-3.1.4 blocked qt. So, unmerged kdelibs-3.1.4 and emerged the new qt. The install of 3.2 failed at some point, so I installed 3.1.5. Now, kde won't start. The Nv

[gentoo-user] KDE failed

I'm not sure I remember everything, but I'll try . . . I tried to update to KDE 3.2 using ~x86. kdelibs-3.1.4 blocked qt. So, unmerged kdelibs-3.1.4 and emerged the new qt. The install of 3.2 failed at some point, so I installed 3.1.5. Now, kde won't start. The Nvidia splash screen flashes

Re: [gentoo-user] kde upgrade - the missing config file

On Saturday 07 February 2004 09:12, Jani-Matti Hätinen wrote: > Sorry, scratch that. > Check your environment to see where the KDEDIR variable points to. If > it's 3.1, check what you have in /etc/env.d/. I have 48kdepaths-3.2.0 and > 57kdedir-3.2.0, which set the KDEDIR and PATH variables. If th

Re: [gentoo-user] kde upgrade - the missing config file

Jani-Matti Hätinen kirjoitti (lähetysaika lauantai, 7. helmikuuta 2004 10:36): > Ok, now your system's really screwed up. > First, log out of KDE and into a console with root. Then remove the > symlink from /usr/kde/3.2 to /usr/kde/3.1 and restore KDE-3.1 to it's > original directory. > Then mo

Re: [gentoo-user] kde upgrade - the missing config file

Ben Jones kirjoitti (lähetysaika lauantai, 7. helmikuuta 2004 05:32): > I just upgraded to kde 3.2.0, and I just know I've missed something > crucial. My kicker etc was still the 3.1 version, so I mv'd by ~/.kde to > ~/.kde-BAK. ~/.kde is just a symlink to ~/.kde3.* I don't exactly know what movin

[gentoo-user] kde upgrade - the missing config file

Hi, I just upgraded to kde 3.2.0, and I just know I've missed something crucial. My kicker etc was still the 3.1 version, so I mv'd by ~/.kde to ~/.kde-BAK. Then restarted X... and kicker didn't start. It was still looking for libs in /usr/kde/3.1/*. For now I just just "mv /usr/kde/3.1 /us

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [normal] [gentoo-user] KDE etc: Nvidia depends

040206 Marc Redmann wrote: >> -- it doesn't (yet) support the VIA KT400 chip -- , > are you sure, that nvidia drivers don't work with via kt400, > i am running this combination here without any problems so far. please tell me all your details ! if you look in the Nvidia README Appx F , it doesn't

[gentoo-user] Re: [normal] [gentoo-user] KDE etc: Nvidia depends

Hi, > -- it doesn't (yet) support the VIA KT400 chip -- , are you sure, that nvidia drivers don't work with via kt400, i am running this combination here without any problems so far. brgds, Marc -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] KDE etc: Nvidia depends

when i try 'emerge -p kde' & for several other packages, among the list of dependencies are : [ebuild N] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.4496-r3 [ebuild N] media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.4496 i can't get the Nvidia drivers to work w my mobo -- it doesn't (yet) support the VIA KT400 ch

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE lock screen

I get this a lot, too. Try killall kdesktop_lock and then try to lock the screen. For some reason I haven't been able to figure out, the kdesktop_lock program doesn't always die cleanly when you unlock the desktop. /Chris On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:41:38AM +0100, Marco Lazzeri wrote: > Ok. Do

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.2

040204 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:28:22 +0200 Leonid Podolny >> Yes, but it's at ~x86 > Yes, and it will follow the usual procedure for ~x86 -> x86. which is ... ? -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.2

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:28:22 +0200 Leonid Podolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Yes, but it's at ~x86 Yes, and it will follow the usual procedure for ~x86 -> x86. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail:ciaranm at gentoo.org Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.2

Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:11:12 +0200 (IST) Leonid Podolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Does anybody know when there will be a stable ebuild for KDE 3.2? I'm | very excited about it, but don't want to taint my system with such a | big non-ebuild component. There are already eb

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.2

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:11:12 +0200 (IST) Leonid Podolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Does anybody know when there will be a stable ebuild for KDE 3.2? I'm | very excited about it, but don't want to taint my system with such a | big non-ebuild component. There are already ebuilds for kde 3.2. They

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.2

Does anybody know when there will be a stable ebuild for KDE 3.2? I'm very excited about it, but don't want to taint my system with such a big non-ebuild component. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE lock screen

Ok. Do you know how to debug this problem? (I'm not using mplayer on my machine) Thanks, Marco Il sab, 2004-01-31 alle 18:22, Brendan Sullivan ha scritto: > sometimes that happens if xscreensaver dies for some reason. some > programs like mplayer can kill xscreensaver depending on the options > y

  1   2   3   4   >