> If I remember correctly yhese should be some sort of binary
> file, correct. Where/how do I get the correct files?
I'm not familiar with it, but AFAIK you're right, it should be
binary files.
The last I had such a mess was on mandrake, but on Gentoo it
worked just right out of the box.
Be
Give mozilla mail a try. But the thing I most like in it is the junky
mail controls (that is built in, and works great).
[]'s
Mauro
Mike Williams wrote:
On Thursday 26 February 2004 20:10, Nick Dutton wrote:
Hello
I've just about made the switch to Gentoo, but I'm suffering a bit on
the m
On Thursday 26 February 2004 20:10, Nick Dutton wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've just about made the switch to Gentoo, but I'm suffering a bit on
> the mail front.
>
> As a long-time TheBat! user I'm having trouble giving up some of its
> features. One in particular is the ablilty to delete messages from
>
-- quoting Mike Williams --
> Aren't the 'POP3 Filters' there to do that? On the Tools menu.
> Never used them myself.
... yes, you can do with these POP3 filters exactly what the OP asked for.
Greetings, Matthias
--
Michael:
Hi. I'm Michael Jackson, from The Jacksons.
Hello
I've just about made the switch to Gentoo, but I'm suffering a bit on
the mail front.
As a long-time TheBat! user I'm having trouble giving up some of its
features. One in particular is the ablilty to delete messages from
the POP3 server from within a filter.
Specifically, I want to be abl
After searching for days I found the solution yesterday short after I
sent my request.
Here's the solution: for some reason KMail marks some mailboxes as "not
compactable"
After changing that in
.kde/share/config/kmailrc
I can delete my mails.
Acc. to some guys this effect is not limited to mb
Christian Bartl wrote:
Hello Gentoo Users,
When I delete a Mail from a mbox with KMail (1.6, KDE 3.2.0) the mail is
not really deleted from the mbox but only from the index-files
generated by KMail (.inbox*). Also compacting the mailbox doesn't help.
try "Compact All Folders"
(I use maildirs, a
On Monday 09 February 2004 06:08 pm, Christian Bartl wrote:
> I'm not sure if that's the right place for my question, but I could not
> find the desired information on KDE website.
You should try the KMail development list, I'm sure there's one out there.
> When I delete a Mail from a mbox with KM
Hello Gentoo Users,
I'm not sure if that's the right place for my question, but I could not
find the desired information on KDE website.
When I delete a Mail from a mbox with KMail (1.6, KDE 3.2.0) the mail is
not really deleted from the mbox but only from the index-files
generated by KMail (.
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 16:29, Paul Stear wrote:
> hi all,
> I use kmail and have installed clamav. I updated clamav db using freshclam
> and then run clamscan on my mail dir, it found 4 infected files:-
>
> /home/paul/Mail/trash/cur/1075475535.2312.nh0h: Worm.Gibe.F FOUND
> /home/paul/Mail/trash/
Paul Stear wrote:
hi all,
I use kmail and have installed clamav. I updated clamav db using freshclam
and then run clamscan on my mail dir, it found 4 infected files:-
/home/paul/Mail/trash/cur/1075475535.2312.nh0h: Worm.Gibe.F FOUND
/home/paul/Mail/trash/cur/1075475726.2312.qiyM: Exploit.IFra
hi all,
I use kmail and have installed clamav. I updated clamav db using freshclam
and then run clamscan on my mail dir, it found 4 infected files:-
/home/paul/Mail/trash/cur/1075475535.2312.nh0h: Worm.Gibe.F FOUND
/home/paul/Mail/trash/cur/1075475726.2312.qiyM: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND
/home/pa
nice one! that worked! Thanks!
Lotas
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 01:10, Michael Andreen wrote:
> On Sunday 18 January 2004 01.53, Lotas T Smartman wrote:
> > hello. i was having a problem with gnome and evolution (problem solved
> > now) and was not able to check my mail using evolution. i have all my
>
On Sunday 18 January 2004 01.53, Lotas T Smartman wrote:
> hello. i was having a problem with gnome and evolution (problem solved
> now) and was not able to check my mail using evolution. i have all my
> mail stored in a .maildir in my home dir, and after using kmail for
> about a day and a half, a
hello. i was having a problem with gnome and evolution (problem solved
now) and was not able to check my mail using evolution. i have all my
mail stored in a .maildir in my home dir, and after using kmail for
about a day and a half, all my old mail in my inbox is gone. all other
dirs are fine since
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Kmail SMTP secure authentication problem
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you. So I should wait with patience. I'll try again when I get back home. :-)
Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 00:47, Daniel Jiseok Song wrote:
> Thank you very much.
> I cannot check Kmail now because I'm in work now. My Gentoo box is in my
> home. But I tried to telnet to the SMTP server and got this message.
> ==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you. So I should wait with patience. I'll try again when I get back home. :-)
Regards,
Daniel Jiseok Song
>Yeah, the UI is a bit unintuitive in this particular case. Eventually, all >the
>combo boxes that are found to be not supported will be
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 09:37, Daniel Jiseok Song wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thank you for the reply. I've already tried that. But it didn't seem to
> work at all to me. It responds nothing. When I click the button "Check what
> server supports" it is disable
6-8560
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home : http://www.wooriTG.com
- -Original Message-
From: Mike Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 6:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Kmail SMTP secure authentication problem
- -BEGIN PGP SIGN
but I got no message.
Daniel Jiseok Song
- -Original Message-
From: Jason Stubbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Kmail SMTP secure authentication problem
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 11:26, Daniel Jiseok Son
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 09:03, Daniel Jiseok Song wrote:
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=45627&highlight=kmail+authenticati
>on
>
> I think there is a bug in Kmail about authentication. And I’m afraid it’s
> not fixed yet and more.
I ha
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 11:26, Daniel Jiseok Song wrote:
> Whe using mozilla mail, I can send e-mail via SMTP with secure
> authentication server. I just check âUse secure authenticationâ checkbox,
> itâs done.
>
> But using Kmail, I always fail to send. It just saying my IP is rejected
> relay
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] Kmail SMTP secure authentication problem
Whe using mozilla mail, I can send e-mail via SMTP with secure authentication server.
I just check “Use secure authentication” checkbox, it’s done.
help to find out?
Thanks in advance...
Daniel Jiseok Song
- -Original Message-
From: Daniel Jiseok Song [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] Kmail SMTP secure authentication problem
Whe using mozilla mail, I can send
Whe using mozilla mail, I can send e-mail via SMTP with secure
authentication server. I just check “Use secure authentication” checkbox, it’s done.
But using Kmail, I always fail to send. It just saying my IP is
rejected relaying by the mail server.
There are some menus for selecting auth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 04 December 2003 04:55 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Apologies (again) for the other e-mail...
>
> On Friday 05 December 2003 01:13, Mike Williams wrote:
> > Important changes (compared to KMail 1.5):
> >
> > Operations on the parent of a close
Apologies (again) for the other e-mail...
On Friday 05 December 2003 01:13, Mike Williams wrote:
> Important changes (compared to KMail 1.5):
>
> Operations on the parent of a closed thread are now performed on all
> messages of that thread. That means it is now possible for example to
> delete a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 04 December 2003 12:27, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2003 02:12 am, Christian Herzyk wrote:
> > >With kmail you can either have threading on or threading off. With
> > > threading on, it goes by the headers _and_ the time
On Thursday 04 December 2003 22:25, Christian Herzyk wrote:
> Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 December 2003 02:12 am, Christian Herzyk wrote:
> > >With kmail you can either have threading on or threading off. With
> > >threading on, it goes by the headers _and_ the time of receipt. If you
>
Jeff Smelser wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 02:12 am, Christian Herzyk wrote:
>With kmail you can either have threading on or threading off. With
>threading on, it goes by the headers _and_ the time of receipt. If you
>delete messages as you read them, it might be easier to not thread the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 02:12 am, Christian Herzyk wrote:
> >With kmail you can either have threading on or threading off. With
> > threading on, it goes by the headers _and_ the time of receipt. If you
> > delete messages as you read them, it mi
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 29 November 2003 21:52, Jeff Smelser wrote:
Trying to use kmail in thread mode, as I read the thread, on this list
actually, I have an annoying thing where when I delete a message in the
thread it wants to move the thread around because the time of the message I
> Hi,
>
> You used that aegypten or just created gpg.conf at home
> directory with those
> two lines (keyserver and keyserver-options)?
>
> On Tuesday 02 December 2003 21:07, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> > I saw that in my searches. That's for aegypten and I didn't
> want to use it.
> > I have it
Hi,
You used that aegypten or just created gpg.conf at home directory with those
two lines (keyserver and keyserver-options)?
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 21:07, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> I saw that in my searches. That's for aegypten and I didn't want to use it.
> I have it working great now as I
> > On Sunday 30 November 2003 5:50 pm, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > > > The mail will show yellow if you don't have the public key to
> > > > validate the signature against, or the key is untrusted.
> >
> > also check your gpg.conf and set these:
> > keyserver x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
> > keyserver-options
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 17:35 schrieb Simon Prosser:
> On Sunday 30 November 2003 5:50 pm, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > > The mail will show yellow if you don't have the public key to
> > > validate the signature against, or the key is untrusted.
>
> al
Cool, I will set that up when I get home today.. Thanks..
> On Sunday 30 November 2003 5:50 pm, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > > The mail will show yellow if you don't have the public
> key to validate
> > > the signature against, or the key is untrusted.
> also check your gpg.conf and set these:
> keys
On Sunday 30 November 2003 5:50 pm, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > The mail will show yellow if you don't have the public key to validate
> > the signature against, or the key is untrusted.
also check your gpg.conf and set these:
keyserver x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
now whene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 November 2003 11:40 am, Mike Williams wrote:
> The mail will show yellow if you don't have the public key to validate the
> signature against, or the key is untrusted.
>
> i.e. I have your public key, but I have established no trust so I s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 November 2003 17:27, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> I seem to have sending mail with openpgp working ok.. But, when I receive
> other peoples emails with pgp, its always yellow, saying it can not
> validate the key. Did I miss a step somewhere?
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I seem to have sending mail with openpgp working ok.. But, when I receive
other peoples emails with pgp, its always yellow, saying it can not validate
the key. Did I miss a step somewhere?
Thanks,
Jeff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
On Saturday 29 November 2003 21:52, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> Trying to use kmail in thread mode, as I read the thread, on this list
> actually, I have an annoying thing where when I delete a message in the
> thread it wants to move the thread around because the time of the message I
> am on now, isnt
Trying to use kmail in thread mode, as I read the thread, on this list
actually, I have an annoying thing where when I delete a message in the
thread it wants to move the thread around because the time of the message I
am on now, isnt as old as the other message... How can I stop that, I just
w
Thanks for offering to try and help.
I did that, and have it set that way now. I even restarted Kmail
afterwards...
No success...
Thank you so very much though. Really appreciate the effort.
Best regards,
Steven
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 04:55, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
> Try to set the dictio
Hi!
On Monday 25 August 2003 03:55, Steven wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I can't seem to get Aspell to work with either Kmail or Kword. Can anyone
> help? I've searched (and posted without response) the forums, but everyone
> appears to suggest procedures that I have already taken... :-\
>
> The error I get
Seeing as I have yet to have any response from either this
mailing list or the forums, I've gone ahead and submitted it
as a bug for future reference.
Thanks in advance to all who took a moment to even read
any of my posts.
Steven
On Sunday 24 August 2003 18:55, Steven wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I can'
Hello:
I can't seem to get Aspell to work with either Kmail or Kword. Can anyone
help? I've searched (and posted without response) the forums, but everyone
appears to suggest procedures that I have already taken... :-\
The error I get when attempting to initiate the spellchecker in Kmail is:
"IS
> On July 4, 2003 01:08 pm, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote:
> > If Kmail stores mail in mbox format you can "import" these into
> > Evolution from: File -> Import menu.
> >
> > On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 01:07, Reg HUGHSON wrote:
> > > Does anyone know how I can transfer my email already received by Kmail
> >
On July 4, 2003 01:08 pm, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote:
> If Kmail stores mail in mbox format you can "import" these into
> Evolution from: File -> Import menu.
>
> On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 01:07, Reg HUGHSON wrote:
> > Does anyone know how I can transfer my email already received by Kmail
> > to Evolutio
If Kmail stores mail in mbox format you can "import" these into
Evolution from: File -> Import menu.
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 01:07, Reg HUGHSON wrote:
> Does anyone know how I can transfer my email already received by Kmail
> to Evolution?
>
>
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>
--
L
On Friday 04 July 2003 07:41, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2003 11:16 pm, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> > Yep, that *was* the error with 0.6.7 (actually, it was "No
> > passphrase.) Perhaps a regression? Here's the patch (from portage)
>
> Yea, that was it. Odd that I have the same pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 03 July 2003 11:16 pm, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> Yep, that *was* the error with 0.6.7 (actually, it was "No
> passphrase.) Perhaps a regression? Here's the patch (from portage)
>
Yea, that was it. Odd that I have the same problem with 0.6.8
Does anyone know how I can transfer my email already received by Kmail
to Evolution?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ date ; echo ${Kurt V. Hindenburg}
Friday 04 July 2003 12:50 am
> Also, when trying to sign/encrypt stuff in kmail, a popup says "invalid
> passphrase" even though it did not ask me to input the passphrase. I
> found on goggle this is the common error.
Yep, that *was* the e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 03 July 2003 06:11 pm, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ date ; echo ${Kurt V. Hindenburg}
> Thursday 03 July 2003 08:02 pm
>
> > On Thursday 03 July 2003 04:41 am, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> > > They are using 0.6.7. That version
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ date ; echo ${Kurt V. Hindenburg}
Thursday 03 July 2003 08:02 pm
> On Thursday 03 July 2003 04:41 am, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> > They are using 0.6.7. That version has a bug (something about
> > -display IIRC.)
>
> I tried 0.6.8 and 0.6.9, both versions -qt didn't work. I'm n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 03 July 2003 04:41 am, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> They are using 0.6.7. That version has a bug (something about
> -display IIRC.)
I tried 0.6.8 and 0.6.9, both versions -qt didn't work. I'm now using
0.6.9 with pinentry-gtk working.
- --
^
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ date ; echo ${Kurt V. Hindenburg}
Thursday 03 July 2003 05:10 am
> On Wednesday 02 July 2003 10:33 pm, Zack Gilburd wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 July 2003 04:57 pm, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
> > > Rather odd that for kmail/gpg to work you need gtk...lol
> >
> > That's interesti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 10:33 pm, Zack Gilburd wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2003 04:57 pm, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
> > Rather odd that for kmail/gpg to work you need gtk...lol
>
> That's interesting considering I use pinentry-qt with KMail.
Lucky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ date ; echo ${Kurt V. Hindenburg}
Wednesday 02 July 2003 08:57 pm
> This is for the records, I was having problem getting kmail/gpg to work.
> It appears that pinentry-qt does NOT work with kmail. Instead you have
> to use pinentry-gtk.
>
> Rather odd that for kmail/gpg to w
On Thursday 03 July 2003 01:57, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
> This is for the records, I was having problem getting kmail/gpg to work.
> It appears that pinentry-qt does NOT work with kmail. Instead you have
> to use pinentry-gtk.
Thats not entirely true. I am using KMail and pinentry-qt.
Perhaps
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 04:57 pm, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
> This is for the records, I was having problem getting kmail/gpg to work.
> It appears that pinentry-qt does NOT work with kmail. Instead you have
> to use pinentry-gtk.
>
> Rather odd that for kmail/gpg to work you need gtk...lol
Tha
This is for the records, I was having problem getting kmail/gpg to work.
It appears that pinentry-qt does NOT work with kmail. Instead you have
to use pinentry-gtk.
Rather odd that for kmail/gpg to work you need gtk...lol
--
^^^ Kurt
There is no good nor evil; there is only power.
--
[EMAI
On Sunday 30 Mar 2003 15:22, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> OK here's a wierd question: I now have links in kmail opening in
> Phoenix but, instead of the URL in the phoenix window being that of the
> current page, it shows the local location of the temp file created in
> .kde. As an example, I'll use Tim
On Sunday 30 March 2003 06:22 am, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> an example, I'll use Timothy Grant's web page which he ioncludes in his
> signature in posts to this list. www.craigelachie.org I would expect to
Ya trying to get me Gentoodotted there Ernie!
--
Stand Fast,
tjg.
Timothy Grant
www.cra
On Friday 28 March 2003 11:51 am, Kurt Bechstein wrote:
> Not a problem. Glad to hear it worked.
>
> On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 11:45, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> > On Friday 28 March 2003 11:32 am, Kurt Bechstein wrote:
> > > From the kmail help manual:
> > >
> > > 6.6. How can I use a different browser
Am Freitag, 28. März 2003 17:11 schrieb Ernie Schroder:
> kmail opens URL's in konqueror by default. How can I change it to open
> them in Phoenix? I can't find a setting in kmailrc.
read the kmail-handbook chapter 6 Frequently asked questions 6.8 (at least in
the german handbook at this position
Try going to the control center/associations and set it up
there.
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:11:08 -0500
Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kmail opens URL's in konqueror by default. How can I
change it to open
them in Phoenix? I can't find a setting in kmailrc.
--
Regards, Ernie
100% Micro
Not a problem. Glad to hear it worked.
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 11:45, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> On Friday 28 March 2003 11:32 am, Kurt Bechstein wrote:
> > From the kmail help manual:
> >
> > 6.6. How can I use a different browser than Konqueror to open links
> > in messages?
> >
> > Change the Fil
On Friday 28 March 2003 11:32 am, Kurt Bechstein wrote:
> From the kmail help manual:
>
> 6.6. How can I use a different browser than Konqueror to open links
> in messages?
>
> Change the File Associations for HTML files using KControl.
>
> So you will need to edit the program associated with open
>From the kmail help manual:
6.6. How can I use a different browser than Konqueror to open links in
messages?
Change the File Associations for HTML files using KControl.
So you will need to edit the program associated with opening html files
in kde. Doesn't look like there is a way to do it
kmail opens URL's in konqueror by default. How can I change it to open
them in Phoenix? I can't find a setting in kmailrc.
--
Regards, Ernie
100% Microsoft and Intel free
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Monday 17 March 2003 12:54 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2003 21:24, Steven wrote:
> > ...
> > Can someone please offer some advice?
> >
> > I started by walking through the Gentoo GnuPG users guide. I then
> > proceeded to read the KDE help center docs on this subject. They onl
On Monday 17 March 2003 21:24, Steven wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I've been looking into configuring Kmail for use with a 'crypto plugin',
> but thus far have not been able to find a plugin to install.
>
> Can someone please offer some advice?
>
> I started by walking through the Gentoo GnuPG users guide.
Hello:
I've been looking into configuring Kmail for use with a 'crypto plugin', but
thus far have not been able to find a plugin to install.
Can someone please offer some advice?
I started by walking through the Gentoo GnuPG users guide. I then proceeded to
read the KDE help center docs on thi
Though I no longer use Red Hat, I still receive the Enigma list in
digest form in kmail. With KDE 2.2 and 3.0.5, the individual posts were
numbered on the page. This made it easy to fins the messages I was
interested in reading by looking for their #'s from the index. Since
upgrading on
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 04:40, Voicu Liviu wrote:
> I use Kmail with pop3.
> Why doesn Kmail delete emails from server when I empty the Trash?
It's been a long time since I used KMail with a POP3 account (I use
fetchmail for that now), but generally mail is downloaded from the POP3
ser
> OHH PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DO ME A FAVOR!
>
> Not another mail client, no. Just build a better imap/filtering code into
> kmail and be done with it. You can even use kde's plugggable architecture
> and have imap/pop3/exchange stuff in separate plugins or whatever. Just
> lets make better programs i
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 11:41, Stanislav Karchebny wrote:
> > I'm trying to convince myself of starting a project to make an imap mail
> > client. Probably it would borrow many parts from kmail. But certainly not
> > the imap and filtering code. And it probably would not have a trash
> > folder,
>
> I'm trying to convince myself of starting a project to make an imap mail
> client. Probably it would borrow many parts from kmail. But certainly not
> the imap and filtering code. And it probably would not have a trash folder,
OHH PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DO ME A FAVOR!
Not another mail client, no.
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:29, gabor wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm using imap to get my mails .
>
> when i delete a mail, mutt or evolution simply marks the mail as
> deleted, and then i press 'empty trash'/'cleanup'/whatever,
> and it deletes the mails.
>
> when i tried kmail, it moved the mails to a tras
On Monday 03 March 2003 03:18 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Monday 03 Mar 2003 22:10, Collins wrote:
> > On Monday 03 March 2003 11:07 am, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > > On Monday 03 Mar 2003 17:54, Collins wrote:
> > > > I noticed some time ago that under kmail 3,1 the trash folder is
> > > > not used 9
hi,
i'm using imap to get my mails .
when i delete a mail, mutt or evolution simply marks the mail as
deleted, and then i press 'empty trash'/'cleanup'/whatever,
and it deletes the mails.
when i tried kmail, it moved the mails to a trash folder.
it's very inconvenient, because it means contacti
On Monday 03 Mar 2003 22:10, Collins wrote:
> On Monday 03 March 2003 11:07 am, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > On Monday 03 Mar 2003 17:54, Collins wrote:
> > > I noticed some time ago that under kmail 3,1 the trash folder is
> > > not used 99% of the time - deleted mail goes directly to the bit
> > > buc
On Monday 03 March 2003 11:07 am, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Monday 03 Mar 2003 17:54, Collins wrote:
> > I noticed some time ago that under kmail 3,1 the trash folder is not
> > used 99% of the time - deleted mail goes directly to the bit bucket.
> > I've searched in vain for an option that controls
On Monday 03 Mar 2003 17:54, Collins wrote:
> I noticed some time ago that under kmail 3,1 the trash folder is not
> used 99% of the time - deleted mail goes directly to the bit bucket.
> I've searched in vain for an option that controls this behavior.
>
> Does anyone know more about this?
Hi Col
I noticed some time ago that under kmail 3,1 the trash folder is not used 99%
of the time - deleted mail goes directly to the bit bucket. I've searched in
vain for an option that controls this behavior.
Does anyone know more about this?
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
Athlon-XP gentoo 1.4_rc2
On Saturday 08 February 2003 10:19, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> There are two pgp modes in kmail. The plugin mode that can read all
> kinds of gpg and the builtin/legacy mode. The options you checked
> belong to the legacy mode. To configure the plugins go to the plugins
> page, select the plugin and
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:05 pm, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> I kinow that this is probably a KDE problem but I'm running KDE-3.0.5 still
> on this box, and if I use the search messages option under "edit" kmail
> will always crash on exiting. Though this is not a show stopper, it is
> irritating.
I kinow that this is probably a KDE problem but I'm running KDE-3.0.5 still on
this box, and if I use the search messages option under "edit" kmail will
always crash on exiting. Though this is not a show stopper, it is irritating.
Is there a fix for this, other than upgrading KDE?
Regards, Erni
On Saturday 08 February 2003 01:26, Carl Hudkins wrote:
>
> Even though I have "Show signed/encrypted text after composing" checked,
> it is not shown.
> Though I have *not* checked "Automatically encrypt messages whenever
> possible", the "Encrypt Message" button is activated whenever
On Saturday 01 February 2003 15:37, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I made a howto for aegypten+kmail:
> http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv/kmailgentoo.php
Very helpful page -- told me exactly what I needed to know! All of the
requirements are in portage, though most are masked; after going through
Ok, that fixed it. This really drove me up the wall. Thanks for the nice howto Paul.
Kent
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 21:37:17 +0100
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 07:57, Kent Jantz wrote:
> > First off let me say I already looked thru the forums and mail list
On Saturday 01 February 2003 22:26, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote:
> On Saturday 01 February 2003 01:37 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > I made a howto for aegypten+kmail:
> > http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv/kmailgentoo.php
>
> Your page is unreadable in konqueror. The text is obscured by a huge
> box.
I'm w
On Saturday 01 February 2003 01:37 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I made a howto for aegypten+kmail:
> http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv/kmailgentoo.php
Your page is unreadable in konqueror. The text is obscured by a huge
box.
--
Bruce J.A. Nourish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thursday 30 January 2003 07:57, Kent Jantz wrote:
> First off let me say I already looked thru the forums and mail list
> archives for an answer. When I come across some of the postings in the
> Gentoo Mailing list in KMail with OpenPGP signatures in them I get a dialog
> box saying" Quote:
>
>
On Thursday 30 January 2003 07:57, Kent Jantz wrote:
> First off let me say I already looked thru the forums and mail list
> archives for an answer. When I come across some of the postings in the
> Gentoo Mailing list in KMail with OpenPGP signatures in them I get a dialog
> box saying" Quote:
>
>
98 matches
Mail list logo
