On 3/2/07, Arnaud FARINE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/07, Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:55:33 +0100 Arnaud FARINE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yesterday I worked late!! And it has worked!
Hurray!
Otherwise, what tools are you using to
Hello.
I have xorg 7.2.0, KDE 3.5.6 and 2.6.19-gentoo-r4 kernel. My processor is
athlon 1700, video card is radeon 9200se. I cannot use proprietary ati
drivers, because my video card is no longer supported. So the problem is that
xorg loads processor too much(about 20-30%).
Also when I drag
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Greets, gentoo-users.
I have a lilo-related problem and can't find a solution on the net, so I
ask you for ideas.
This box should boot from SW-RAID-1, and it has also already done that.
After editing a label inside lilo.conf I issued lilo and got this:
#
Dale wrote:
Here is my question. What are the permissions supposed to be? I have
it set to root:users right now. It was set to root:uucp which was not
working. If someone has a modem and uses dial-up, can you reply with
the output of ls -al /dev/ttyS* if you would. If anybody else knows
Am Sat, 3 Mar 2007 04:27:09 +0300 schrieb Roman Makurin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All!
Is there any way to create a VirtualBox`s disk image of my current
system ? I can`t find any obvious solution in user manual of
VirtualBox.
Thanks.
create a dd image of your system and convert it with
#
Mark Kirkwood schrieb:
I think you might need a root=/dev/md3 inside the specification for
'Gentoo':
image=/boot/kernel-genkernel-x86-2.6.19-gentoo-r5
label=Gentoo
vga=0x314
initrd=/boot/initramfs-genkernel-x86-2.6.19-gentoo-r5
root=/dev/md3
Thanks for that, but it didn't work.
Thanks everyone. I'll report back on the outcome on D-day (March 11).
Roger
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi, all,
I have 5 up-to-date gentoo machines, all of them running gcc-4.1.1-r3.
On 4 of them, emerging libstdc++ proceeds as one might expect, just
installing
the current version of libstdc++ for gcc-4.1.1. But the 5th machine does
something quite different. Why?
On the 5th machine emerge
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Dale wrote:
Here is my question. What are the permissions supposed to be? I have
it set to root:users right now. It was set to root:uucp which was not
working. If someone has a modem and uses dial-up, can you reply with
the output of ls -al /dev/ttyS* if you would.
On Saturday 03 March 2007 16:16:50 John Blinka wrote:
I have 5 up-to-date gentoo machines, all of them running gcc-4.1.1-r3.
On 4 of them, emerging libstdc++ proceeds as one might expect, just
installing
the current version of libstdc++ for gcc-4.1.1. But the 5th machine does
something quite
Hello,
I feel a need to override the default FEATURES configuration for one
package (some kernel modules do not build with userpriv). However, I can
not find anything like that in any gentoo manual. It would probably be
something like package.features file, but that one does not work (quite
Alex Fansky ha scritto:
Hello.
I have xorg 7.2.0, KDE 3.5.6 and 2.6.19-gentoo-r4 kernel. My processor is
athlon 1700, video card is radeon 9200se. I cannot use proprietary ati
drivers, because my video card is no longer supported. So the problem is that
xorg loads processor too much(about
When I upgrade to clamav-0.90.1 from 0.88.7, which klamav-0.38 tells me to do,
I can't update the database. I just get an error message conf file error
which doesn't help me much. I've looked at the clamav conf file, but I can't
tell if it has a problem or not. The same thing happens with
On Saturday 03 March 2007 17:46:30 Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
I feel a need to override the default FEATURES configuration for one
package (some kernel modules do not build with userpriv). However, I can
not find anything like that in any gentoo manual. It would probably be
something like
This isn't strictly a Gentoo question, but I'm setting up Gentoo box to be
used as a secondary DNS server, plus some other duties, and I'm hoping there
is a DNS wizard reading who can authoritatively answer my question.
First off the machine has three network cards, one with a (DHCP) private IP
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:13:42PM +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007 17:46:30 Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
I feel a need to override the default FEATURES configuration for one
package (some kernel modules do not build with userpriv). However, I can
not find
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:08:59PM -0600, Dale wrote
Here is my question. What are the permissions supposed to be?
I have it set to root:users right now. It was set to root:uucp
which was not working.
Did you try making your user a member of the uucp and dip groups?
--
Walter Dnes
Matthew R. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've downgraded back to 0.88.7 for the moment
Anyone know what's going on?
Clamav-0.90 changed the format of the config files such that every
option has to have a value. This particular applies to boolean options
which prior to 0.90 were set using just
On Saturday 03 March 2007 20:39:01 Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
But there may be situations where this possibility could be used in some
other ways. You may want nostrip for few packages only (need of debug
symbols, and you do not want to have them for the whole system), or the
make check
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:07:23PM +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007 20:39:01 Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
But there may be situations where this possibility could be used in some
other ways. You may want nostrip for few packages only (need of debug
symbols,
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:17:52 -0800
Bob Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't strictly a Gentoo question, but I'm setting up Gentoo box
to be used as a secondary DNS server, plus some other duties, and I'm
hoping there is a DNS wizard reading who can authoritatively answer
my question.
Hi,
I want to switch from suspent2-sources to xen-sources. The suspend2-sources are
2.6.18-r1 and xen-sources are 2.6.16.28-r1 (btw I cannot find XEN section in
2.6.16.28-r2). Suspend2 kernel works fine to me, so I've installed xen-sources
and did this to built it:
1) zcat /proc/config.gz
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:17:52AM -0800, Bob Young wrote:
Obviously on a given system each NIC is usually connected to a different
domain, my question is, whether or not it is /legal/possible/okay to use
different *hostnames* on different NICs?
AFAIK, you can have multiple names for
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:04:59 +0100
Michal 'vorner' Vaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:17:52AM -0800, Bob Young wrote:
Obviously on a given system each NIC is usually connected to a
different domain, my question is, whether or not it
is /legal/possible/okay
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Bob Young wrote:
This isn't strictly a Gentoo question, but I'm setting up Gentoo box
to be used as a secondary DNS server, plus some other duties, and I'm
hoping there is a DNS wizard reading who can authoritatively answer my
question.
First off the machine has three
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:04:51 +0100
pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to switch from suspent2-sources to xen-sources. The
suspend2-sources are 2.6.18-r1 and xen-sources are 2.6.16.28-r1 (btw
I cannot find XEN section in 2.6.16.28-r2). Suspend2 kernel works
fine to me, so I've
pat ha scritto:
Can someone point me to a solution?
what do the xorg logs and kernel logs say?
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
В сообщении от Saturday 03 March 2007 20:36:08 b.n. написал(а):
I have almost your hardware configuration (ati radeon9200se, amd duron
1800), however I'm running stable (xorg 7.1, kde 3.5.5), and I have no
problems whatsoever (I'm even smoothly running aiglx+Beryl).
Have you checked the xorg
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 03:21:52PM -0600, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:04:59 +0100
Michal 'vorner' Vaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:17:52AM -0800, Bob Young wrote:
Obviously on a given system each NIC is usually connected to a
different
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:17:52 -0800
Bob Young wrote:
This isn't strictly a Gentoo question, but I'm setting up Gentoo box
to be used as a secondary DNS server, plus some other duties, and I'm
hoping there is a DNS wizard reading who can authoritatively answer
my question.
First off the
b.n. wrote:
pat ha scritto:
Can someone point me to a solution?
what do the xorg logs and kernel logs say?
m.
Problem is that when the GDM freezes, I havent change to get dmesg and where can
I get X.org log. Is there a way how to save them before next boot (excluding
boot from CD)?
Alex Fansky ha scritto:
Well, I used aiglx+Beryl and everything worked fine on xorg 7.2. But after
kernel upgrade I got this problem(I didn't forget to reemerge x11-drm).
Ok, so it's the new kernel fault (I'm running 2.6.18, in fact). It
wasn't so clear for me from the previous post, sorry.
Hi,
Before I file this as a bug I'd like to make sure it's not caused by
something wrong with my system. Please help me determine that.
In the past two days I was trying to upgrade my glibc from version 2.4
to 2.5. Each time I tried it the emerge process failed at the very
last point - I think
Hi all,
I did some upgrades and I guess I screwed something up cos I can't
compile kdelib anymore. I tried with kdelib-3.5.6 as well but seems like
the same problem. Dependencies showed I should have done qt-3.3.6-r4 and
to be on the safe side I unmerged qt-4.2.2 (which I emerged
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
[SNIP]
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161953
Thanks for the pointer. That helped me solve the problem. Not elegantly,
but adequately.
John Blinka
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:08:59PM -0600, Dale wrote
Here is my question. What are the permissions supposed to be?
I have it set to root:users right now. It was set to root:uucp
which was not working.
Did you try making your user a member of the uucp and dip
В сообщении от Sunday 04 March 2007 00:25:10 pat написал(а):
Problem is that when the GDM freezes, I havent change to get dmesg and
where can I get X.org log. Is there a way how to save them before next boot
(excluding boot from CD)?
Pat
try single option in the your boot loader
--
On 4/03/2007 8:43 AM, Paul Colquhoun wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Bob Young wrote:
This isn't strictly a Gentoo question, but I'm setting up Gentoo box
to be used as a secondary DNS server, plus some other duties, and I'm
hoping there is a DNS wizard reading who can authoritatively answer my
On Saturday 03 March 2007 23:37, Dale wrote:
I suspect something changed with the grouping and I just didn't know
it. It was likely one of those messages in a compile that went by and I
didn't see it. It may be for the better, mor secure or something, but I
just missed it.
Now that you
I appreciate all the replies, and yes Michael you're correct the original
question was in regards to a system having different base (host) names for
different NICs. IOW the Windows Domain Controller that eth0 is connected to
records eth0 in it's DNS table as gentoo.windowsdoman.local. In addition
Mick wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007 23:37, Dale wrote:
I suspect something changed with the grouping and I just didn't know
it. It was likely one of those messages in a compile that went by and I
didn't see it. It may be for the better, mor secure or something, but I
just missed it.
I am perturbed that beagle has grabbed 99% of CPU time. If I kill it,
within 5 seconds another process is spawned, again grabbing 99%. I
don't even USE beagle. Is it possible to unmerge it without affecting
other programs?
If I understand correctly, I have found the following to be quite good
Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
Hmm, this is what I am getting on a x86 build.
# ls -al /dev/ttyS*
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 64 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS0
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 65 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS1
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 66 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS2
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 67 Mar 3
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
Hmm, this is what I am getting on a x86 build.
# ls -al /dev/ttyS*
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 64 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS0
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 65 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS1
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 66 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS2
crw-rw 1
Dale wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
Hmm, this is what I am getting on a x86 build.
# ls -al /dev/ttyS*
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 64 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS0
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 65 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS1
crw-rw 1 root uucp 4, 66 Mar 3 22:09 /dev/ttyS2
I've just run into this after an emerge:
Using Eterm 0.9.4 from a remote host to my Gentoo box:
$ clear
'Eterm': unknown terminal type.
I can work around this by amending .bash_profile to set TERM to 'xterm'
if it is currently 'Eterm' - but I'm curious as to why or what has
removed 'Eterm'
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Dale wrote:
If you can, check to see if udev was upgraded and there was a notice
that there are group changes. I would think udev would be what was
changed. I'm curious to see your reply though.
Ok - here is the state after the emerge (recall group *was* tty):
$ ls
47 matches
Mail list logo
