[gentoo-user] Unknown keyword arguments "Description" during babl/meson build

2022-05-15 Thread Kevin Chadwick
Hi, New to Gentoo to get away from systemd CVEs and I enabled vaapi and IN10N use flags and after changed-use it suggested rebuild-rdeps rebuilding many packages. During babl and so meson build. I get 'Unknown keyword arguments "Description"' in the meson log. A similar message to here. "https:

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage: emerge(1) ebuild(1) ebuild.sh

2021-01-07 Thread Kevin Shell
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 08:51:40AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 16:43:00 +0800, Kevin Shell wrote: > > > What's the relationship between > > ebuild(1) & emerge(1), ebuild(1) & ebuild.sh? > > emerge is the high level command normally used by

[gentoo-user] Portage: emerge(1) ebuild(1) ebuild.sh

2021-01-07 Thread Kevin Shell
Hello gentoo list. What's the relationship between ebuild(1) & emerge(1), ebuild(1) & ebuild.sh? Why the ebuild(1)(python script) command exists, is it for debugging ebuild scripts? -- kevin

[gentoo-user] Re: Well, I went about updating my system again. (day 6)

2016-12-09 Thread Kevin Monceaux
e music playing via moc in another screen session. Thanks to screen I could bounce my window manager without missing a beat. :-) -- Kevin http://www.RawFedDogs.net http://www.Lassie.xyz http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org Bruceville, TX What's the definition of a legacy system? One that works! Errare humanum est, ignoscere caninum.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Well, I went about updating my system again. (day 6)

2016-12-08 Thread Kevin Monceaux
own X11, my uptime still keeps accumulating. I'm way overdue for a reboot to switch to a newer kernel. It's been 83 days since my last reboot. I've built a couple of new kernels that I haven't tested yet. -- Kevin http://www.RawFedDogs.net http://www.Lassie.xyz http://w

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] What's up with Firefox?

2013-07-04 Thread Kevin Thompson
On Jul 4, 2013, at 10:29, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Sorry to be a nuisance but I can't think of where else to ask. > > On the website I run I have a link to our Twitter profile (or whatever it's > called). This is the link: > >https://twitter.com/TideswellMVC > > If I examine the page usin

[gentoo-user] conky crashes with JSON output.

2013-05-05 Thread Kevin Thompson
Hello, everyone. I'm experiencing some problems with conky that seems to be Gentoo-specific. All of my friends running other distributions are able to run my configuration file just fine. Here's the output from conky: 7f2af50f5000-7f2af52f4000 ---p 0012 08:02 1469347 /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.

Re: [gentoo-user] problem trying to play sound when pulse audio is enabled

2013-04-29 Thread Kevin Thompson
the console, but to start gnome when I need it. > > >> > > >> Then do that. When you start GNOME, it will start PA automatically: > > >> you don't need to do anything. Don't try to start PA yourself; it's > > >> DBus activated. > > >> > > >> > > >> > I am running pa as a user and things are still not working, except for > > >> > the root user who can play sounds. > > >> > > >> I repeat: you don't need to run PA. GNOME will start it for you. > > > > > > But will that workif I have spawn=no in my /etc/pulse/client.conf which > > > I have to have for regular apps to work from theconsole? Or is there > > > some other way to make this happen? > > > > I don't understand the question. If you don't run PA by yourself, then > > it will be started only when using GNOME. And if you are using GNOME, > > you can use the nice sound settings dialog to get your sound. > > > > If you don't start GNOME, then PA will not be started. If you don't > > have sound in your console even without PA running, then is for some > > issue completely unrelated to PA. > > > > PA should not be started if you only log in through the console. > > Unless you are still running it system-wide, which is basically > > unsupported. > > OK, we will see what happens, so I have set spawn=no which should work > to prevent pa except in gnome, so hopefully that should work. > > Thanks for clarifying this for me. > > > -- > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: > How do > you spend it? > > John Covici > cov...@ccs.covici.com > I had the same issue here when installing pulseaudio. I don't use GNOME, so that does take part of the equation away. The problem was solved by changing permissions to /dev/snd and it's containing files. After chmodding /dev/snd/* to 666, I was able to play sounds as a normal user. In the Gentoo guide, it mentions this, and it also mentions taking your user out of the audio group if you're currently in it. Please see http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/PulseAudio#Root_can_play_sound.2C_other_users_cannot for more detailed information. Very Respectfully, Kevin Thompson

Re: [gentoo-user] Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > the > > solution (in the GNOME developers view) is not to "remove PA", since > > the goal of the project is to cover *ALL* use cases. > > I don't know the details of the pulseaudio implementation but I have a > hunch the problem boils down to blind arrogance and ignorance on the > part of th

Re: [gentoo-user] Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> the > solution (in the GNOME developers view) is not to "remove PA", since > the goal of the project is to cover *ALL* use cases. I don't know the details of the pulseaudio implementation but I have a hunch the problem boils down to blind arrogance and ignorance on the part of the roots of the p

Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: [Bulk] Re: Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-25 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > > > So are you saying plugs are no longer required or that they are only > > needed for certain apps that take over the audio device. > > I don't even know exactly what ALSA plugs are, and ALSA has worked > perfectly for all these years, so yeah, whatever an ALSA plug is, either > it is not

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-25 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Am 23.04.2013 22:59, schrieb William Hubbs: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:49:19AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >>> Feel free to remove PA if you don't need it. I really don't see any > >>> scope for Lennart to make all of alsa redundant anytime soon

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] How reliable is ext3?

2013-04-25 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Therefore Ext2 is a perfect match: > * it is so old, that I guess by now most bugs have been found and > squashed; > * it is so old, that virtually any Linux (or Windows, FreeBSD, or > most other knows OS's) are able to at least read it; > * it is so old, that by now I bet there

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [Bulk] Re: Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-21 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > > > Just throwing out there that users can or atleast could use alsa > > plugs to have multiple applications. I did that before pulseaudio > > came along to play nfs carbon under cedega and listen to music. > > It should be noted that ALSA users can have multiple applications by > doing abso

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-19 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > I suggested he use Gentoo but I think he saw it as too much work. > > (comment for me?) > All I use is gentoo or embedded (state machines) on embeddded hardware. My > target is jack on embedded gentoo, but, I've run into resource limitations, > so I'm waiting on my new Arm15 dev board in May

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-19 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Another question. Can the installation of PulseAudio and Jack > coexist? Doable or a constant nightmare? There seems to be a a package to allow pulse to utilise jack. However if you are using jack for the high quality audio benefit then apparently you have to kill pulseaudio even if it means mak

Re: [gentoo-user] Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-19 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Feel free to remove PA if you don't need it. I really don't see any > scope for Lennart to make all of alsa redundant anytime soon (unlike > udev...) Of course from many threads from a pro audio user called Ralf, Gentoo users and so a fraction of Linux users are the only ones lucky enough to be

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> >> I don't use wine. For a lot of good reasons. > >> > > Name one. > > > fat, slow and buggy. Do you need more? If I really had an application > that I must use and is windows only - I would install windows. That > is a lot quicker and less painful than that wine crapfest shitting > all over

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Removing pulseaudio

2013-04-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > ... > > (i) It's a "sound server", a description I don't understand. What > > does it _do_? Why do I want it? It seems to be an unnecessary > > layer of fat between sound applications and the kernel. > > If you don't understand the term "sound server" you probably > shouldn't be using Gen

Re: [gentoo-user] [way OT but interesting] Massive recent DDOS attack

2013-04-03 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 03:33:17 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > But somebody had to blow it up. And even more people jumped on it. > Boohoo. > So the next time you start insulting people, base your findings on > more than a blog written by those guys who have an economical > interest to blow t

Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes

2013-04-01 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:12:17 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > I still don't understand what's so bad with MAC-based > > identification? I mean, uniqueness defined through MAC Address > > identity, the system name is just a label... > > MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you c

Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes

2013-03-31 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:55:00 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: > What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they > plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device > name changes. Fair point but wouldn't that be only if you plug in two of the same type that the name

Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes

2013-03-31 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 11:48:19 + (UTC) "Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)" wrote: > instead of pushing a completely > different (and possibly less reliable) naming scheme by default. Whilst I wouldn't want them changing on me (though if your physically changing the pci slot then you should be able to h

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] How to prevent a dns amplification attack

2013-03-30 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:53:29 +0100 Rene Rasmussen wrote: > There is also the possibility to use opendns.com > I've been using them for years, and have not had any trouble. I > started using them when my ISP decided to block some sites. And their > standard service is free :) They also support dn

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] How to prevent a dns amplification attack

2013-03-30 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:06:16 +0100 Norman Rieß wrote: > As we all know everything works better and cheaper when things are > privatized Actually No it's not so simple at all. You get incompetence in private and public and you may be more likely to get away with it for longer in a public servic

Re: [gentoo-user] How to prevent a dns amplification attack

2013-03-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:04:25 -0400 Michael Mol wrote: > > > >> listened to the dangers and even now simply redesigned DNSSEC. > > > > Or they could fudge it by making every request requiring padding > > larger than the response. Bandwidth would increase astronomically > > but amp attacks wo

Re: [gentoo-user] How to prevent a dns amplification attack

2013-03-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> listened to the dangers and even now simply redesigned DNSSEC. Or they could fudge it by making every request requiring padding larger than the response. Bandwidth would increase astronomically but amp attacks would have to find other avenues.

Re: [gentoo-user] How to prevent a dns amplification attack

2013-03-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:12:04 +0100 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > i am using pdns recursor to provide a dns server which should be > > usable for everybody.The problem is, that the server seems to be > > used in dns amplification attacks. > > I googled around on how to prevent thi

Re: [gentoo-user] Best whois client?

2013-03-27 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
from eix, it says that jwhois can do "recursive queries" whatever that means. -Kevin On 03/27/2013 06:37 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/27/2013 06:08 AM, Mick wrote: > > > Like Stroller I've been using net-misc/whois for ever and it does > > what I wa

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev blocks systemd etc

2013-03-27 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> On 27/03/13 at 11:27am, »Q« wrote: > > Eventually, as I understand it, GNOME and KDE will require systemd > > because they want full control of they system. For people not using > > GNOME or KDE, other init systems will still be possible, with either > > udev or a udev alternative. I have no id

Re: [gentoo-user] udev blocks systemd etc

2013-03-27 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> From a technical point of view (the quality of the code and the time > it takes to fix bugs), I believe everyone (even Lennart's most fervent > detractors) will agree that systemd is a superb piece of software. The > problem is the philosophy behind it; if you agree with said > philosophy, system

Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: [Bulk] Re: Back to openrc from systemd

2013-03-23 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:54:23 +0200 (Nuno Silva) wrote: > > A good overview though I don't agree with "If you don't 'need'" > > > > Did your desktop really fail to run at all? > > I don't need any of this u* or other things for my desktop computer to > work. Maybe this is related to the fact th

Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Back to openrc from systemd

2013-03-22 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > If you don't need user session monitoring for anything (which is what > > ConsoleKit and logind provides), nor interactive privilege granting > > (which is what polkit provides), then I believe you will have no > > Thanks. Now *that* is what I call explaining something in a nutshell :-) > >

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Time-lock USB stick

2013-03-21 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> We discussed using a simple RC timer to cut power to the device after a > certain amount of uptime, but if I pointed out that if we were spend the > time going to that trouble, we may as well go whole-hog and add built-in > encryption and make money off the thing. > > I think the grab-data-and-e

Re: [Bulk] Re: Email encodings (was Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros )

2013-03-19 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Either you ignored what I said about being able to disable loading > remote content and being able to disable showing inline rich content, or > you're seriously concerned about HTML parser vulnerabilities. You can't disable incoming rich content (which is the important one) like jpg logos on And

Re: [Bulk] Re: Email encodings (was Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros )

2013-03-19 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> If you're going to call me out for ignoring things, missing things or > simply not knowing things, please highlight what it is. "the quote" > isn't very enlightening in this context. You have a nasty habit of > referencing things without inlining them or referencing them directly, > and this has

Re: [Bulk] Re: Email encodings (was Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros )

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:38:11 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > K9 Mail can do both plain text and bottom posting. > > > Both set in Account settings/Sending mail. > > > > It can write but forces html onto users, which potentially includes > > jpg exploits, png exploits, html exploits, script

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo speed comparison to other distros

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:28:04 -0400 Michael Mol wrote: > > > > Even though it is from a DVD it can be updated just like standard > > linux. The problem is, if you run out of ram then things get killed. > > > > > >> (Frankly, this sounds quite nice for kiosk environments.) > > > > Could be

Re: [Bulk] Re: Email encodings (was Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros )

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:16:52 -0400 Michael Mol wrote: > > > > On 03/18/2013 04:38 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >>> It can write but forces html onto users, > > > > You seem to miss some of the details. > > About that. See the attachment. It&#x

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo speed comparison to other distros

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > > > It's one of Blueness projects based on Hardened Gentoo. It loads into > > ram at boot (you need something like 4 gig of ram) which takes ages > > from dvd but could be from an ssd/hdd (defeating half the point > > without a ro switch though). It can update from the net once booted too. > >

Re: [Bulk] Re: Email encodings (was Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros )

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
ou're ranting about users being "forced" to send email with > HTML, intimating that this means they'll send exploit-laden messages to > their recipients. I am not. On 03/18/2013 04:38 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: >> It can write but forces html onto users, You seem to mi

Re: [Bulk] Re: Email encodings (was Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros )

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > Wait, K9 Mail doesn't have a plain text option? > > > > Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised, as I am also unable to comprehend why K9 > > might enforce top-posting on replies. > > K9 Mail can do both plain text and bottom posting. > Both set in Account settings/Sending mail. It can write but

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo speed comparison to other distros

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> On 15 March 2013, at 17:32, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > > > If you use the Gentoo hardened Tinfoil Linux you will need lots of ram > > and wait ages to boot but firefox will just pop up. > > I'm sorry, I don't understand this statement. Could you poss

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HTML editor WYSIWYG

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> sublimetext is nice, not OSS though Netbeans is quite useful for html5. Also chrome and firefox have good developer options so you can try changes and see them without a refresh. When I load my pages in a browser they are fine but in every WYSIWYG editor I have tried they are desimated to unread

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Can I chroot to a folder?

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > Is that partition mounted with "noexec" option? or "user" option > > without explicit "exec" option? > > > > problem solved :) You know you can bind mount just the directories you want with exec but as interpreters don't check this mount option, it's not as effective as it could be ;-( --

Re: [Bulk] Re: Email encodings (was Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros )

2013-03-15 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > > > From the headers of his email: > > > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros > > References: <51418728.7020...@gmail.com> > > In-Reply-To: <51418728.7020...@gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > I

Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo speed comparison to other distros

2013-03-15 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > I didn't miss anything. I get what some are saying. The reason for my > > question is this. Gentoo allows a person to customize the OS to the > > specific hardware it is being run on. Redhat and other binary distros > > don't allow this, unless you compile your own packages which is no > >

Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-12 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:29:38 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> We should be pounding away on the fact that we're running out of > >> IP > >> > addresses... period... end of story. If people ask about NAT, > >> > then mention that the undersupply will be so bad that even NAT > >> > won't help.

Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-11 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> >> NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary > >> because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique > >> one. > > > > The best real reason for moving to IPV6 is address space (or lack > > thereof, in the case of IPV4). The people who are trul

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-11 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> No, there was simply no useful result that came up. Incidentally, both > links you provide *did* come up...but I dismissed them because I > couldn't imagine anyone using them as a reference except in trying to > deride Henning Brauer. > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=129666298029771

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-11 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> On 03/09/2013 07:53 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >> "There is no reason to believe that IPv6 will result in an > >> increased use of IPsec." > >> > >> Bull. The biggest barrier to IPsec use has been NAT! If an > >> intermediate rou

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-11 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Don't waste time and effort on it. Put your > effort into pounding away on a simple issue that people do understand... > we're running out of IP addresses. We have run out of unallocated ones, there are still loads of unused ones and even more due to global NAT, and even some being released. I

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-09 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > > > Lookup ipvshit > > > > I'll give you a hint. > > > > The guy who wrote most of the pf firewall that MAC OSX now uses as well > > as QNX, the latest version originating from OpenBSD and being far better > > than iptables has bought up lots of ipv4 just to stay away from ipvshit. > > >

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-09 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> "There is no reason to believe that IPv6 will result in an increased use > of IPsec." > > Bull. The biggest barrier to IPsec use has been NAT! If an intermediate > router has to rewrite the packet to change the apparent source and/or > destination addresses, then the cryptographic signature will

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-08 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Unfortunately, your logic is flawed. > > Where would you put the additional bits of address? > > That would involve rewriting the IP Header. > Your assumption that I do not know that is flawed. I did a review of ipv6 before it was released and determined ipv4 to be superior then. That was bef

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-08 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > What would have been best, could have been done years ago and not cost > > lots of money and even more in security breaches and what I meant by > > ipv5 and would still be better to switch to even today with everyone > > being happy to switch to it is simply ipv4 with more bits for address > >

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-08 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> >> 1. The craziness of trying to conserve IPv4 space > >> 2. NAT. Finally, a good solid techical reason to make NAT just go away > >> and stay away. Permanently. Forever. > > > > It's a great shame that isn't all it fixed (ipv5), then your job > > wouldn't have been so hard and there wouldn't

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} RAM & apache MaxClients (rock & a hard place)

2013-03-08 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> I can probably dump a lot of apache config. I still need SSL on both > servers even though only nginx faces the user? Perhaps you need Apache for certain pages otherwise this is simply a quick fix which is fair enough, we always like those at times but it sounds to me like you could have gained

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/hosts include file?

2013-03-08 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> 1. The craziness of trying to conserve IPv4 space > 2. NAT. Finally, a good solid techical reason to make NAT just go away > and stay away. Permanently. Forever. It's a great shame that isn't all it fixed (ipv5), then your job wouldn't have been so hard and there wouldn't be any reason for many

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing static IP remotely...

2013-02-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Probably the safest thing you can do I use install scripts and so can have two system copies in tandem easily (aided by OpenBSD being simply brilliant with 0 kernel updates) and test out any procedure for a remote server locally with a VM before doing anything. -- _

Re: [gentoo-user] Amazon-Instant video

2013-02-13 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
No thats not it, i am using the adobe plugin not pepperflash. This is the message that I get http://imgur.com/LoNB9RV -Kevin On 02/12/2013 09:14 AM, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:32:10AM -0600, Kevin Brandstatter wrote: >> I just got amazon prime for the instant vide

Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd-197-r1 starts gdm-3.6.2 [now gnome3]

2013-02-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> If you can't find the power off button in a modern GNOME installation > you have to be quite blind... of course, I don't even use it when I > have it, powering off from the console and all. I guess you haven't seen the mountains of users who didn't consider holding ALT to change the suspend opti

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd-197-r1 starts gdm-3.6.2 [now gnome3]

2013-02-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Do Gnome devs know how to spell "fork"? I think not they have an accent and keep saying 'pass me the fork an knife' Puzzled why they only got a knife they just get their heads down and start cutting away due to the funny look from the passer. -- __

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd-197-r1 starts gdm-3.6.2 [now gnome3]

2013-02-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> I'd still really like someone who groks what Gnome3 is all about to fill > in these blanks in my understanding with truthiness ;-) Apparently the main drive is to have a brand, so a constant and so simple look is recognised as a Gnome/? machine. A bit pointless if no-one uses it or changes to so

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd-197-r1 starts gdm-3.6.2 [now gnome3]

2013-02-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> I'm happy to be shown to be wrong and to be shown where Gnome3 has merit > for being itself, where it can proudly stand on it's own. But I'm just > not seeing it yet I thought the following brilliant feature was obvious? So your Gran has absolutely no chance of finding the "power off" button so

[gentoo-user] Amazon-Instant video

2013-02-11 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
same trouble or if someone has a solution. -Kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} LWP::UserAgent slows website

2013-02-07 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of requests, etc -Kevin On 02/06/2013 07:13 PM, Grant wrote: > I have a script that makes 6 successive HTTP requests via > LWP::UserAgent. It runs fine and takes only about 3 seconds, but > whenever it is run I start

Re: [gentoo-user] ebtables on Gentoo?

2013-01-29 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> So anyway, my memory of this is all very wishy-washy, but ebtables > turned out to be the best way to implement those inter-VM restrictions. > It could probably have been done in iptables, but ebtables made it easy > to say "don't let these two talk." I don;t know the details but I expect that w

Re: [gentoo-user] *draft* for setting up network bridge with systemd (for qemu/kvm)

2013-01-29 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> And, BTW, I didn't mean "behind" in the sense that Gentoo doesn't > support systemd; I meant "behind" in the sense that us systemd users > get a lot flak just by mention it in the list. And that's exactly why I see Gentoo as being ahead and actually your talking about a few of the IMO more moro

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel Questions

2013-01-23 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Anything newer is a vast improvement, especially Core2 and newer. As long as you ignore the unfixable security issues even by microcode of core2 duos ;-). -- ___ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write program

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel Questions

2013-01-23 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > Overheating problem? Considering it's about a Pentium 4, that seems a likely > > cause. > > Which P4 i has not so probs. The probs come with Atom. Older systems used to reset on overheat so it was obviously hardware. Newer cpus actually halt and then continue operation. Most of the time you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: System won't boot if CMOS clock is slow

2013-01-17 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> So it is Linux' fault, that your mate used crap Hardware? That is great! > let us blame it for the weather too. And stubbed toes. Well the point was that if OpenBSD had an auto update function I could have installed that and he would still be using OpenBSD happily. If Linux did what OpenBSD does

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: System won't boot if CMOS clock is slow

2013-01-16 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> I have had systems in the past who refused to boot because the > motherboard time was off, and at first it looked like that was the > problem again. OpenBSD takes the time from the filesystem in that case and boots. I wish linux did. I had a mate who used to ring me up everytime his mother in la

Re: [gentoo-user] java vs icedtea6

2013-01-15 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
er, I know very little on this matter and seeing as i think both are open sourced i have no idea how much or if there is any code overlap. -Kevin On 01/15/2013 06:32 PM, William Kenworthy wrote: > Looking for comments: > > A while back I removed java during an upgrade on my main deskto

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gigabyte wont boot

2013-01-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> If all else fails, maybe it is dead. Yeah no beep equals cpu | ram | mb Check if pin 1 on the cpu is in the right place and cpu power cables right and no bent pins. The cpu and ram are compatible with the mb. Hoover the ram slot and reseat If your second mb works you could try the cpu and ra

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about systemd logging

2013-01-10 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:46:29 +0700 Robin Atwood wrote: > Thanks for the tips, now I can get more output to tty1 if I want. I > still can't get any systemd messages to syslog-ng, however. A bit of > a mystery. This may be way off as I expect systemd to never shape up to a point that I will use i

Re: [gentoo-user] Processes hang - system dies

2013-01-08 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > > ** > > > > > > I have a very severe problem after a recent disk replacement. After a few > > > > > > > > days running, all new processes just hang. The kernel reports: > > My guess is disk failing or kernel bug. Install smartmontools and see if > > smartctl -H returns anything inter

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2013-01-04 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
Sure, ive attached one to this email. -Kevin On 01/03/2013 03:08 PM, Robert David wrote: > This is wired, can you post screenshot? > > There does not seem to be some condition in code. > > Robert. > > On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0600 > Kevin Brandstatter wrote

Re: [Bulk] RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?

2013-01-04 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:22:37 -0500 "Mike Edenfield" wrote: > I have never personally run into any case > where I had a single /+/usr and regretted it, but I *have* encountered > situations where I could not get /usr mounted and ended up merging it > with /. FWIW, YMMV, etc. And why was that, not

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade

2013-01-04 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:52:29 -0600 "Dustin C. Hatch" wrote: > You'll probably want to do this in single user mode (i.e. > `rc single`), so running programs don't crash suddenly. A reboot > afterward is probably a good idea as well. I'm interested in what may crash, do you mean after logging ou

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox and ssl

2013-01-04 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 12:18:45 -0500 Michael Mol wrote: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Mick > wrote: > > > > On Friday 04 Jan 2013 12:45:01 Robert David wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> anyone have problem with firefox and selfsigned ssl? I tryed > >> firefox and firefox-bin. > >> > >> Firefox: >

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2?

2013-01-03 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:24:13 + I wrote: > it's very > few tabs If tabs are the irritation to scroll open mail, try three column view to reduce the likelihood or small screen view which only needs arrows enter and escape.

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2013-01-03 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
i cleared out the configs when i installed the release. Suspend works, it even locks now, but i still cant change the settings. no dbus problems that i can see -Kevin On 01/03/2013 04:26 AM, Robert David wrote: > Did you try e with new config with e-17 release? Or you had some > pr

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2?

2013-01-03 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:09:27 +0100 "Peter Humphrey" wrote: > Thanks for your thoughts Alan. I didn't like Claws much last time I > tried it, but then that was some time ago. > > Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on > the mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2013-01-03 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
The problem is the option to lock screen on suspend is greyed out and uncheckable. Did try building with all modules -Kevin On 12/28/2012 04:16 AM, Robert David wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > what exactly you missing on screen lock in E17? I use E17 and screen > lock is ok when suspending.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] codec for video embedded in presentation

2013-01-01 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:16:25 -0200 Francisco Ares wrote: > I don't think so. Most of them are very basic level users, and they > just have to have the same software, and it's gotta be from M$ - > nothing out of main stream. > > But what is your point? Boot an OS with office that works and as lon

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] codec for video embedded in presentation

2012-12-31 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:35:52 -0200 Francisco Ares wrote: > If my colleagues would at least be kind enough to have OpenOffice > installed on their machines also... Will they let you boot a usb?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up if you start X with startx; xorg-server suid flag

2012-12-31 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 22:06:00 +0800 kwk...@hkbn.net wrote: > > That already has a de-facto answer; USE="suid" must be on by default > > as without it users cannot run a desktop (xorg-server does not yet > > run without root permissions) I use some hackery to run startx on some systems as a norma

Re: Should /usr be merged with /? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?)

2012-12-30 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:19:44 +0800 Mark David Dumlao wrote: > > I'd certainly be happy "fixing" FHS to say that tools for mounting > > and recovering "essential system partitions" be located in /, and > > that these "essential system partitions" contain the tools for > > mounting and recovering n

Re: Should /usr be merged with /? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?)

2012-12-29 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> The latest FHS dates from 2004, the same year as the *earliest* FUSE release > I > can see on the FUSE web site. I'd say a good working hypothesis is that FHS > was simply written *before* any user-space file systems were more than an > experimental oddity. > > > > IF the system's /home di

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? -> what was wron with SysVInit?

2012-12-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:14:46 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Kevin Chadwick > wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:38:15 -0600 > > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > > >> In SysV, I can *write* the daemon in the init script. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? -> what was wron with SysVInit?

2012-12-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:38:15 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > In SysV, I can *write* the daemon in the init script. > In *that* sense, the init system tells the daemon how to do things, Please explain, sure there is the environment that tells a daemon what to do. No shell can tell a c daemon l

Re: Should /usr be merged with /? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?)

2012-12-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:16:34 +0800 Mark David Dumlao wrote: > whatever filesystem type > it is. >Following this, for any distro to correctly FHS, there needs to be a >package manager switch to copy arbitrary packages (and dependent >libraries) from /usr to /. As of yet not implemented. > Not

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?

2012-12-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> > Should perl be in / or /usr? > > Now that is a good question, if only because Perl traditionally _loathes_ > being in /bin, for its own philosophical reasons. > > Now, as a practical matter? WTF are the scripts written in Perl? Or in > anything other than sh? If they're intended for emerg

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2012-12-27 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
On 12/27/2012 05:16 PM, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 22 Dec 2012 01:29:57 Kevin Brandstatter wrote: >> So e17 just came out and ive been using for a bit. The only problem >> ive had with it is that i cant check the option to lock the screen on >> suspend. I don't think th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? -> what was wron with SysVInit?

2012-12-27 Thread Kevin Chadwick
gt; OpenRC/SysV), everything can spiral out of control really easily. And > it usually does (again, look at sshd; and that one is actully nicely > written, there are all kind of monsters out there abusing the power > that shell gives you). > > Then Kevin started to suggest that I know nothi

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?

2012-12-27 Thread Kevin Chadwick
Again you don't break the spec unless you have to and you don't change the spec unless it is an improvement or you have no choice. Non of which is the case. Just like you do not mould a mail RFC to a widely used technically inferior hotmail implementation. > He's like DJB on crack. Except DJB ma

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? -> what was wron with SysVInit?

2012-12-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:01:17 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > And, what community is being divided? Fedora,OpenSuse, and Arch use > systemd by default. From debian and hurd to slackware which will not touch systemd ever and ubuntu and also embedded with the kernel working on more and more deep

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?

2012-12-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 00:01:58 +0800 Mark David Dumlao wrote: > Nobody's telling you _your_ system, as in the collection of programs > you use for your productivity, is broken. What we're saying is that > _the_ system, as in the general practice as compared to the > specification, is broken. Those

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? -> what was wron with SysVInit?

2012-12-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 08:56:38 -0500 Joshua Murphy wrote: > It would still be a (notable, at that) drop > in size if the shell script was redone to provide exactly the same set > of features, then compared, but that size difference wouldn't have the > same shock value as the comparison against 80+

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >